Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle2
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Meetup. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| September 2026 +/- | |
|---|---|
| Portland, Oregon Wiknic | September 5, 2026 |
| Christchurch 49 | September 13, 2026 |
| London 232 | September 13, 2026 |
| Seattle meetup | September 15, 2026 |
| Bay Area WikiSalon | September 15, 2026 |
| Fullerton 1 | September 17, 2026 |
| Nottingham 2 | September 19, 2026 |
| Riverside 4 (Temecula) | September 19, 2026 |
| WikiConference North America | September 24, 2026 |
| Auckland 51 | September 26, 2026 |
| Edinburgh 29 | September 26, 2026 |
| Brixton 18 | September 27, 2026 |
| San Diego 139 | September 27, 2026 |
| October 2026 +/- | |
| Minnesota | October 4, 2026 |
| Bay Area WikiSalon | October 13, 2026 |
| San Diego 140 | October 17, 2026 |
| Full Meetup Calendar • Events calendar on Meta For meetups in other languages, see the list on Meta | |
The 2nd Seattle meetup occurred Saturday, January 15, 2005 Seattle Central Library. It was not as large as the November meetup, but that was anticipated: we had trouble finding a day this month that was open for even this many, and we didn't really have an out-of-town contingent this time.
In attendance were:
- Jmabel
- Michael Snow
- Lion Kimbro
- DanKeshet
- Matiasp
- Trent
- and a few non-Wikipedian friends and relations
< I suspect that list isn't complete, please feel free to add yourself as appropriate; there were some comings & goings -- Jmabel | Talk 22:08, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC) >
Topics of conversation included:
- Wikipedia Signpost, Wikipedia's new internal newspaper, started by Michael Snow.
- SeattleWiki, started by Matiasp; check out http://www.seattlewiki.org.
- Possible contact with small, local history museums; Dan Keshet and Jmabel have followed up to the point of drafting Wikipedia:Museum projects, but as of mid-February 2005 there has been no active outreach.
- Whether some (maybe 1%?) of articles are either sufficiently controversial or sufficient "vandal magnets" that our normal, open way of free-for-all editing may just not work for these; suggestion of starting dialogue on alternatives. Jmabel will probably try to start discussion on this.
- Larry Sanger's recent criticisms of Wikipedia, and the issues of elitism/anti-elitism
- Michael Snow pointed out that there is very little in Wikipedia on performers of previous generations, unless their work was in a medium where it would be preserved. For example, our coverage of classical composers is at least semi-decent, but performers of classical music from before the present generation, and especially from before recording, are very under-covered. Even more so for dancers, stage actors, etc.
- ... and we pretty much all seemed to think Seattle, Washington is ready to be a featured article (which it soon was).