Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 6

< Wikipedia:Motto of the day | Nominations
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Tewy in topic In review
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8→Archive 10

In review

Latest comment: 17 years ago915 comments38 people in discussion

They suck, but we don't suck them

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 16:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Do not kill the Great! Ya still want to? There ya go!

Bit long, I suppose.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 08:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

ReopenedAaaaah, so close.......c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. What Kfc1864 said, only for the second time around. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

How do you describe an edit war over a fencing jacket? Lamé.

A very bad joke. Would like to somehow have the lame/lamé links together, but can't see how to do this without splitting the word in a silly way, like Lamé. Confusing Manifestation 02:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened,Tad more discussion may be good.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

→ In all your fantasies, you always knew
That man and mystery were both in you.

Same as the "Think of Me" motto. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, Not enough consensus.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Absit iniuria verbis.

From the latin "let injury by words be absent"; too simple maybe? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 19:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Our teachers help us shine!

I've left the Wikipedia link in as it might be a bit confusing otherwise ^-^. YuanchosaanSalutations! 08:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Not enough votes to reach consensus. -- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 12:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes second time around. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

To be or not to be - that is the question.

Apologies if this has been used before or is frequently used. G1ggy! 04:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Do write what is right but... know how to write right.

Self-explanatory.--KnowledgeHegemony 07:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

→ Ye cannae change the laws of physics, laws of physics, Jim!

A quote from the song. Confusing Manifestation 05:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Oppose as kind of a 'cult reference.' (But I get it!). —ScouterSig 16:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose Star Trek is not a cult. :-P I'm actually opposing this for a different reason, that being you can change policies and so forth if consensus about them changes. And Jimbo, as part of the Wikimedia Office, does have the authority to override consensus if need be. See WP:CON. I do like the motto (see my user page) but I just don't think it fits. Hersfold (talk/work) 20:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Sorry for another oppose, but one of the main ideas of Wikipedia is that policies may be changed. --Tewy 20:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus, but see edit 1 before archiving. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Who?

Inspired by #You have been rejected, below. --Tewy 18:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

No pretzel for you

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

→No soup for you!

Edit 1: Per comment above. More people are going to recognize this. Hersfold (talk/work) 14:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Here we observe the Wikipedian in its natural habitat, doing what it does best.

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Water, water everywhere and barely a drop to drink

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved (per consensus), with edit. Scoutersig has a valid argument. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

C://fatal error...not!

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

What goes around, cums around

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Eye For an eye leaves everyone blind

New one from Martin Leuther King. I think It's better than my last one. --St.daniel Talk 14:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

It's our problem-free
philosophy…
Hakuna Matata!

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Ice Age 2 : The Meltdown

Edit one: Another movie related motto from your friend ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 16:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

In an encyclopaedia near you

Variation on ending of movie ads. Simply south 22:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Coming soon to a theatre near you!

Edit one: A variation of Simply south's idea. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 00:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia

A combination of "Wiki" and "Encyclopedia" Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected,COnsensus favors it, but similar motto done less than 2 months ago.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


The popups that aren't ads

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 06:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Our flaming fists of fury will destroy you, fiends! Ha ha ha… oh man, who writes this stuff!?

Too corny? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 22:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

We're gonna get ya, vandal, and you're never coming back!

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't cut wikipedia with a pair of censors

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, per consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

This is my first motto. If it is to similar to the past mottos, please remove it.---PrestonH 04:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 2 What about this one (see the links)?

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 3 What about this one?--PrestonH(Review Me!) • (Sign Here!) 14:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up must come down.

Edit 4: Why not? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 16:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment, why not create four edits of one motto? Answer: because when the people that close mottoes come to a decision, it's impossible to decide because users support one version, and when new versions are made, nobody pays attention to them. Sorry if I sounded mad, I'm not. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down

Edit 5. Why relate to vandalism, or would this work better if reversed? Simply south 22:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 6. The Random Editor's idea. --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

What goes up, must come down.

Edit 7. Changed "comes" to "goes". Just for kicks. --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 8. Why not? --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

→Remember the Titans

In the film, it talks about the discrimination/conflicts between black and white players, and the plot reveals us that for working together despite those differences, they succeed in most of the matches. There are many different types of wikipedians, but since they work together despite their differences, Wikipedia succeeds! ♠Tom@sBat 23:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No support, enough votes (although Scoutersig's reason was so-so). --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There are no bad guys, only good guys who are in disguise.

Or would a better one be "there are no strangers, only friends we haven't met yet"? YuanchosaanSalutations! 10:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: A tad more discussion would be favorable. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There are no strangers, only friends we haven't met yet

Edit 1. Yuanchosaan's idea. --Tewy 18:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Just a tad more discussion would be favorable. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nominations. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's not about you, it's about us.

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Support: I like the motto, but I don't really get the 2nd link. ~ Magnus animuM  BRAIN FREEZE! 18:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, a little more discussion would do some good. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

→ For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Well there is, isn't there? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few actual !votes/no obvious consensus. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Still no consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

→ For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Edit one: Yuanchosaan's idea. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 15:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No discussion after reopening. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh, the irony. The links are a mix of ones relevant to the concept, and ones that roughly match the word they're linked from. Confusing Manifestation 23:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There's no "or" on Wikipedia.

I was participatin in some AfDs, and one was made with WP:OR. So, this motto was born! *Cremepuff222* 21:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 2. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Please leave your or at the front door.

I know it is really lame, but it certainly will get people to click the link. --Random Say it here! 22:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 2. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Please leave your O.R. at the front door.

Edit two, sounded a bit better. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 22:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There is no 'or' in 'Wikipedia'.

Edit 3. Sorry for the extra edit, but this goes along with the "I" in "team" phrase. --Tewy 18:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 2. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

→ I'm going to make you an offer; it's an offer you can't refuse

From The Godfather. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 21:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

We have all got something to sing about

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 21:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 01:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Head On, apply directly to the forehead.

Redian asked for it - plus, I wanted to see if I could work with the most annoying commercial ever. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 00:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, a tad more discussion would do some good. *Cremepuff222* 01:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Welsh
Icelandic
Korean
Italian
Polish
Esperanto
Dutch
Ido
Arabic

I apologize for this leviathan of coding; the interwiki-links wouldn't display at all. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 20:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Shame about the length. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

No guts, no glory.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 15:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus (hasn't been done before). --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

They always said a picture was worth a thousand words.

I thought I'd try a hand and writing a motto of my own, playing on the "every picture's worth a thousand words" quote. Ṣ₡ЯՄՊՏɧѱᎦ ☎/ ∑ 01:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Up, up, and away!

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When the going gets tough, the tough get going

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Somewhat been done before, no consensus in support. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

To get the goal, first you need a ball.

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't dispose of your stubs, make them bigger.

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It takes a thief for you to lock the door

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Consider this my vote as well; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's the calm after the storm

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Suddenly, out of the darkness, a ghost appeared

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Again, consider this my support; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Three strikes, you're out!

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Three strikes, and you're out!

Edit 1, even though I disklike edits greatly, I thought these links would be better. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Invincible? Oh, really?

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, with my support; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rated PG-13 for language, violence, and sexual content.

Do I really need to explain this one? *Cremepuff222* 23:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I am the ice cream man, I drive over fat kids with my van

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 23:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Oppose - Sorry, a lot of people aren't going to like this at all, per Ryan. Hersfold (talk/work) 14:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Support x1000000000 Humorous and well linked. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 22:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment. Hi. Um, is it really appropriate to have a billion strong supports? I mean, if it were typed out that many times, it would take about 15 Gigabytes. So, does this make much difference from a strong support? I heard you're only supposed to vote once, so isn't this cheating? I mean, what if someone put "Extreme infinite support x 1x10∞"? Wouldn't that be cheating, if say, there were many opposes, then if it were infinite, that one vote would cause all other votes to be obsolete? So, would it be more appropriate if you put "very strong support"? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 17:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Actually,.... It's not really a serious vote. Same as a Strong Support or Support 22:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Offensive. --Tewy 20:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I am the ice cream man, but I don't give ice-cream to kids that are bad

Variation c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 15:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When Random Article hands you bad articles, make an FA

invented from the popular saying: "When life hands you lemons, make lemonade." Felix 18:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When Random Article hands you bad articles, make an FA

Edit 1, Revised to include another link from the above version. Felixboy 12:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When life gives you lemons, make lemonade

Edit 2, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 23:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I need somebody... Help! But not just anybody... Help!

From the popular song of The Beatles: Help!. ♠Tom@sBat 20:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment: I suggest something like:

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Help! I've fallen and I can't get up!

An alternative to the above; it's inspired by the LifeAlert commercial "I've fallen and I can't get up." ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 23:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment: You're both wrong; the most annoying commercial is "Head On, apply directly to the forehead; Head On, apply directly to the forehead; Head On, apply directly to the forehead." AARGH Nooooo, now it's stuck in my head! ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 00:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I need somebody...Help! But not just anybody...Help!

edit 2, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 23:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I need somebody...Help! But not just anybody...Help!

Or another alternative which is a slight variation on the above (links for the first half are different). Edit three. Simply south 16:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Push it, push it, to the limit, limit

From Corbin Bleu's song Push it to the limit. --Random Say it here! 00:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for one version. *Cremepuff222* 23:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Push it, push it, to the limit, limit

(Edit 1) great idea simply south. --Random Say it here! 21:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for one version. *Cremepuff222* 23:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Voters emphasized "this version" in votes, only one support vote for original nomination after this edit was introduced. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Elementary, my dear Watson

Simply south 20:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No support. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Elementary, my dear Watson

Without the Mypage link. See here on Wikitionary why i chose that link. Edit one. Simply south 09:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Kill 'em with love!

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 17:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Kill 'em with love!

Edit one. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 22:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus, which seems to favor this version. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

We build our towers up, not down.

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

We build our best towers up, not down to the ground

edit 1, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 23:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's priceless, but you get it for FREE! (plus shipping and handling).

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I hope it's insured

The article can be reverted if needed. Page history = insurance. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 10:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Once again, call this my support vote; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

All creatures, great and small

From the hymn. Or the RSPCA's motto. Or the novel series, film, and TV show. ^_^. YuanchosaanSalutations! 09:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Sapere aude

Sapere aude Latin for Dare to know or Dare to be wise. May not be funny, but it exemplifies what Wikipedia is

Booksworm -- Talk to me! 15:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, only one person (besides nominator) supports. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

→ Sapere aude

Edit 1. Added arrow and linked to Wikipedia. Special:Random, as Magnus animum said, would work as well, though. --Tewy 19:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I like the changes made above! Booksworm Talk to me! 20:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, only one person (besides nominator) supports. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Eat your vegetables!

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus says "YES!" *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


Back to the drawing board!

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, barely enough supports to judge on this one. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Always, for secure protection against leakage

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus in favor. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

The golden age is here right now

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, at this rate, the motto won't recieve much support in the future. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

A tornado warning has been issued for the town of Article

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 00:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus says "NO!" *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

→ Think of me
Think of me fondly
When we say "Good Bye".

From The Phantom, a musical of which I am a huge fan (I must be a dramaturge as I've made 3 nominations based on plays or books :-) ). ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus and WP:SNOW. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Home is where the heart is.

Seems like I have seen it before. --Random Say it here! 01:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Where the sun shines and the living laugh, there is always going to be happiness.

Aaaaahhhhh........c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 06:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus.. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

You can't handle the truth! Or can you?

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus seems to approve of this version... *Cremepuff222* 00:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

You can't handle the truth! Or can you?

Edit one per Magnus animum's suggestion. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 07:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus seems to not think much of this version... *Cremepuff222* 00:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


The stuff that dreams are made of.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, many supports, and no opposes, and no comments, and no weak supports, and... *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What we've got here is FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE!

Really now, if it gets this hot you'd think people were more interested in flaming, instead of writing an encyclopedia, don't you agree? (the capps are for grabbing the eye, also for making a point) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, obvious support! *Cremepuff222* 00:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

~'Tis as sweet as grapes.

Anything to say? :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 23:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus (barely :-) ) . ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 01:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, (again). Eh-hem, time to issue my speech of recognition. First of all, I thank T-borg for nominating this fine example of a motto. Plus, I thank Magnus for suggesting the link to my userpage–has this even been before? And I thank all the rest of you (even Yuanchosaan) for supporting this motto. :) Thanks to all! *Cremepuff222* 00:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I want to be alone.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per consensus. *Cremepuff222* 01:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

He'll be back.

From the Terminator. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus mostly in favor. *Cremepuff222* 01:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Head on, apply directly to the forehead

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 21:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, nobody seems to like it... *Cremepuff222* 01:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Do your business in the bathroom, not here.

-- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 21:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, lot's 'o support, and barely any opposition. *Cremepuff222* 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Club Penguin, where you can adopt a puffle

Check the links! ♠Tom@sBat 20:24, 8 May 2 007 (UTC)

A puffle is a fluffy little creature available in the popular mmorpg Club Penguin; in this game, you play as a penguin and you can adopt these little thingies just like you do with pets; somewhat similiar to how an advanced editor adopts a new user here on Wikipedia. For more information, see here. ♠Tom@sBat 01:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though I have noclue what a puffle is. :) *Cremepuff222* 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

May the Edit be with you, always.

From T-borgs phrase, the one he has got on his signature. ♠Tom@sBat 20:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, I'll just leave it at that. ;) *Cremepuff222* 01:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1+1=2

Make sure to check the links to see what I mean! ♠Tom@sBat 16:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, but... Haven´t you voted twice? ♠Tom@sBat 22:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though Booksworm voted twice... *Cremepuff222* 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

You're expelled from the Garden of Eden!

Got the idea when I was on the toilet.Kfc1864 05:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, for a record number of opposes (I think...). ;) *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever your doing, and go edit.

--Random Say it here! 16:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing, and go edit.

Edit 1: Grammar. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Magnus animum (talk • contribs).

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing, and go edit.

Edit 2: Creative Links

  • Support: Very good, however, see below.

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing and go edit

Edit three: Different creative links. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 00:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing and go edit

Edit four: Alternative to above, but with more suggestive links. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 00:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Make love not war.

I forgot where I got this... Tohru Honda13 19:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Umm, haven't we concluded that it's been used? *Cremepuff222* 17:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, already used. *Cremepuff222* 23:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

"The world will be happier if you just admit your insanity to imperfection Mr. Editor..."

Source Unavailable... Telling the world that those who are truly insane are usually happy... 17:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Insanityofjoy (talk • contribs)

Reopened: No obvious consensus. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism? What's that?

Dunno if it was done before. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 21:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism? What's that?

Edit one, sorry, guess when you're blind as a bat, you can't see what links you're typing. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 21:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

It is time to go to the mattresses.

It is from the Godfather --Random Say it here! 23:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, edit one approved. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Do it, and you'll be sleepin' with the fishes.

Edit one:An alternative to the above, also from the Godfather. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 00:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though no more discussion has occured, there's nobody that opposes this version. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

There's a reason I'm so apathetic, but I can't be bothered to tell you.

It's a personal saying of mine, and apathy could be construed as a neutral point of view (not caring one way or the other). HalfShadow 02:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

A word to the wise ain't necessary … it's the ignorant ones that need the advice.

Edit one. In case it was the offensive wording... Chrishyman 00:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Best of the best? Not yet, up to you, really.

And out of the blue, this came… —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 22:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Best of the best? Not yet, up to you, really.

Edit one, delinked you. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 22:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

We will remember them

Last line of the fourth stanza of theOde of Remembrance, often recited on ANZAC day. This is my first try so please help. Happy Editing! YuanchosaanSalutations! 00:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

We will go, and we welcome newcomers.

How is this, for instance? Kfc1864 03:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate more discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, discussion hasn't been generated. :) *Cremepuff222* 23:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure?

A bit simple maybe? YuanchosaanSalutations! 08:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No obvious consensus. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still no discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Over the river and through the woods, to Wikipedia I go!

Edit two. I didn't like the linking, and I went to the original phrasing. So that's support. Chrishyman 00:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still no discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Grapes are key.

I thought that by using an unordinary word like grapes, I could somehow lure a user into clicking on the links. *Cremepuff222* 00:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though I nominated it... *Cremepuff222* 23:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The enemy's gate is down.

It is from the book Ender's Game. --Random Say it here! 02:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still no discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The devil can cite scripture for his purpose.

From The Merchant of Venice. --Random Say it here! 02:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The devil can cite scripture for his purpose.

(Edit 1) Good point. --Random Say it here! 00:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

They won't see us changing from Such Great Heights.

A slight change to the lyrics from Such Great Heights by The Postal Service. Redian (Talk) 20:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

They won't see us waving from Such Great Heights.

  • I'll keep trying, do these links fit better or is the overall meaning just not good? (And apologies if I should have waited a little longer) Redian (Talk) 21:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Give them just one last chance

♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 22:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still, no discussion has been made! *Cremepuff222* 23:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Give them just one last chance

Edit one: Changed the link from CAT:RFU to WP:AGF. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 15:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still, no discussion has been made! *Cremepuff222* 23:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

One edit to change the world.

User:Scienza 15:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

One edit to change the world

Per comment above, new links to WP:UuU, WP:EDIT, and Encyclopedia, respectively. Hersfold (talk/work) 22:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia: You are always welcome

DarkAvenger 09:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You're Welcome

Edit one: Clearer phrasing. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 22:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Today you will despair,Tomorrow you will be calm.

Kfc1864 08:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Is that good enough?

Support Obviously!Kfc1864 08:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment-Huh? I don't understand it.

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Today you will despair, tomorrow you will be calm.

Edit 1. Links and grammar.

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

We need you!

most of the mottos are all about wikipedia. its time we invite others to donate their ideas †Bloodpack† 04:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though only one more support has been added. *Cremepuff222* 23:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

This motto may require...

  This motto may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
Please discuss this issue on the talk page or replace this motto with a better one.

I like the "template motto" look. It didn't work as a header, obviously, so I hope that's how I should do it. (The template is the only part of the motto.) ---Without Wax Chrishyman 00:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus, but may gain support in future. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, barely reached. *Cremepuff222* 23:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Let's do it!

Edit 2. Harrison-HB4026's idea, from my talk page, with the (judging by all the above support votes) popular links. This is a little different from the existing motto. --Tewy 06:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. (Note: when archiving this version, place it under the original motto at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 5 as edit 2.) *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, nobody in favor after even after first closure. *Cremepuff222* 23:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I know who I am, I know where I stand, I would never run away when articles get bad...

From Hannah Montana´s song I got nerve; note that I replaced "life" with "articles". ♠Tom@sBat 02:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 02:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, edit 1 approved. *Cremepuff222* 23:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I know who I am, I know where I stand, I would never run away when articles get bad...

Edit 1: An alternative to the above, with the 2nd link changed. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 15:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, barely, but consensus reached. *Cremepuff222* 23:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Why move to Orlando when the sea is calm?

– AstroHurricane001(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?) 16:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus in favor (barely). *Cremepuff222* 23:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

When the going gets hungry, feed it.

– AstroHurricane001(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?) 16:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no comments since last closure. *Cremepuff222* 23:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

π = 3.141592653...

Please check the links to see what I mean. ♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 02:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no comments have been made since I last closed this! *Cremepuff222* 23:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

π = 6,912,237

Edit one: Changed links and placed a variable ({{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}) that links to Irrational numbers. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 15:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no comments have been made since I last closed this! *Cremepuff222* 23:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikpedians, tonight we dine in hell!

alternative for below †Bloodpack† 03:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedians, tonight we dine in hell!

Edit 1 for spelling. bibliomaniac15 04:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandals, tonight you dine in hell!

Edit 2 from 300 movie †Bloodpack† 21:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Support Very clever, and it kind of shows vandals in a respectable (as in they are hard to stop, and do pose a threat) and I would like them to die and dine in hell. Redian (Talk) 05:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

how come these were approved? [1], [2], [3],

Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandals, tonight you dine in hell!

Edit 3 change the link of vandals, we're not condemning the person, but the act itself †Bloodpack† 23:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia, it's the network.

(Edit 1) How about this. --Random Say it here! 14:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, doesn't seem to have any chance of approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Simple, yet effective.

Like it sais. I thought the Wikipedia prefix would be redundant. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 09:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Approves, consensus in favor. *Cremepuff222* 23:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

All good things come to an end… NOT!

Is the Wikipedia link too obvious? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 09:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved Consensus n favor (Yay)c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

What he knows, we all benefit

From a linux ad. 201.143.38.67 22:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, Sloppy.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations/Archive_6&oldid=1190106316"