Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

In review

If it's this good free, imagine what a buck could do!

Not exactly sure where I got the idea, it just popped into my head. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

• Strong support A very good point. •97198 talk 03:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support. bibliomaniac15 04:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 14:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support, nice.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 03:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support--Vaishu2 04:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Wikipedia could always do with extra funding. Phgao 02:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 02:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Winner. ~Iceshark7 08:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Very Strong Support -Gets a good point across, and will get some fundraising money! Basketball110 (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I like the idea. MixItUp 01:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Approved MixItUp 23:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquistion!

Got this from watching the Monty Python sketch. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​^{talk•contribs} 16:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support Quite random (typical of MP) but then Wikipedia is quite a random place. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Support -- [falls of chair laughing] One of the best I have seen in a long time! --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Great! Phgao 02:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved Been relisted once and had over a month for people to voice objections. I figure this is consensus. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

That's 'cuz I'm special!

~AH1^(TCU) 17:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: what's the question? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 18:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose I would like to see a reference of some sort for a motto like this, otherwise it doesn't sound like it's something new. ~Iceshark7 13:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose To short, not really saying much. Phgao 02:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Doesn't say much. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 12:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Rejected per consensus. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Can I edit now? Now? How about now?

~AH1^(TCU) 17:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Funny; like the Verizon commercials. —ScouterSig 18:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, nore discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Support -- Very original. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Yes, sure. Phgao 02:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 00:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support I certainly hope so... Thereen 06:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved by consensus. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

We are Wikipedia. Prepare to be assimilated into the collective. Resistance is futile.

Derived from the infamous "Borg assimilation notice" heard in countless Star Trek episodes. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 03:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support, it sounds like wikipedia is an evil legion, trying to take over the world.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 04:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Aren't we trying to take over the world of encyclopedias? --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
    • But we arn't evil. Are we?--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 01:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose IP addresses can still edit Wikipedia, and are just as welcome as the other 48,334,073 of us :) Happy editing, ARkY // ¡HaBLaR! 21:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: well, after this I propose we add the idea to the FUI list, I could have sworn I've seen "Resistance is futile"/"You will be assimilated" somewhere in the archives. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 08:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support Um, resistence is futile, although it is funny, it could sound hostile to some... Phgao 02:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Rejected with no prejudice for/against a re-nom. It's been reopened once already and has been sitting at the top of the "Awaiting decision" section for over a month now without consensus to schedule. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

You are never too old to act like a kid and play around.

What do you think, rephrase perhaps? (WE NEED MORE MOTTOS ON STUFF OTHER THAN VANDALISM)--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 01:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

• Supportclever.-Kfc1864 talk _{my edits} 10:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, now that I think about it, it's ok. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support And I removed the comma, by the way. •97198 talk 14:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support A classic! Phgao 01:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

All your base are belong to us.

I tried again on the toilet.Kfc1864 talk _{my edits} 08:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: uuh, it's already on the FUI list. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 08:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, already on Frequently Used Ideas list. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the WPPD! We have you surrounded! Put your weapons down and surrender!

Police type motto. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 22:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support, but why "WPPD" (whats it mean), and why link to WP:SOCK (how is it a weapon?).--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 02:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Basically, the message is to surrender your sockpuppets. •97198 talk 06:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Good one. •97198 talk 06:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: WikiPedia Police Department, you know, PD, like in NYPD. Not saying that only they fight vandalism, of course. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 08:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Nice, some of these are brilliant! Phgao 01:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

There's some things money can't buy. For everything else, there's Master Card.

I think Betacommandbot deserves a little fame :) ARkY // ¡HaBLaR! 21:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support (even though that damned thing tagged some of my images :)). —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 22:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment whats the bot for anyway, never heard of it.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 02:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Betacommandbot is used for all sorts of tasks, though it is most well known for it's tagging of images, in this case images missing a fair use rationale. Happy editing, ARkY // ¡HaBLaR! 02:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support Tehe. •97198 talk 06:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support -- Very, very original. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I remember correctly, this is a(n) FUI. I'm sure I've seen similar mottos (ones that feature MasterCard), like "there are some things that knowledge can't buy. For everything else, there's Wikipedia.", or "There are some things that money can buy. For everything else, there's Wikipedia.". This is the only concern I have with this motto, as it may be similar to a few of the other ones. Other than that, if it isn't too much a of a problem, Support. ~AH1^(TCU) 12:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Nice play on the ad. Phgao 01:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Community of Wikipedia
Population: 6,917,220
Renowned by its liability and freedom to edit

 Smcafirst | Chat  at 21:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Modified from a community sign. Am I allow to add a green colour tone to it? And will it be better if I adjust the font sizes. Please do give feedbacks.

• I don't know about adding color tones and such, but I do Support the motto. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I think the color tone idea is allowed.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose in favor of edit 1.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 23:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Would it be better to use {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} rather than {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} for the population field? Cheers, ARkY // ¡HaBLaR! 02:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Except I don't think the colour thing would work, as most mottos appear formatted into userboxes - mind you, a number of template-inspired mottos have passed. •97198 talk 06:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Community of Wikipedia
Population: 48,334,073
Renowned by its liability and Freedom to edit.

Edit 1. Changed according to Arknascar44. Is this better than the original one? Please do give feedbacks for BOTH mottos.  Smcafirst | Chat  at 23:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support I like this one better--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 23:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment You've changed population from number of articles to number of users, except "population" still links to Wikipedia:Articles. Intentional? •97198 talk 03:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, in favor of original. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

The most terrible poverty is loneliness.

•97198 talk 10:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support, don't think we've got enough mottos on orphaned pages. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, per T-borg.  Smcafirst | Chat  at 01:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support per T-borg, don't see many of these mottos.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 01:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Would perhaps generate more interest in those pages. Phgao 01:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

An inputbox (exclude from page if approved)

It's what Wikipedia is all about. —[[Animum | talk]] 00:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Its a nice idea, but I think you should label the button somthing else (like "Contuibute today (Create Page)") or somthing like that.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 01:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support I think it's great. •97198 talk 07:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, original. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong support. Cool, creative, and original.  Smcafirst | Chat  at 21:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Love it... Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 02:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Great idea, after all the 'pedia is based foremost on articles and contributions. Phgao 01:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Paper will rot. Wikipedia articles won't.

~AH1^(TCU) 17:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support --Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 01:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Precisely. •97198 talk 07:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, kinda plain, but ok. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 08:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Short but effective. Phgao 01:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→Wikipedia is a process, not an answer

~AH1^(TCU) 00:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support, but why is it linked to WP:FA.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strenght alone} 03:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • The concept is that FAs don't just happen - they're made through the process of many single edits. •97198 talk 07:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Oh I see.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 02:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support, takes some time to understand, but still, pretty good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 13:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support per the resident Jedi. Good idea, though. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Yes it does take a bit to get it, um maybe it could be fleshed out a tad more. Phgao 01:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I think you're kneeling in dog poo!

~AH1^(TCU) 00:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, I almost laughed out when I saw this, but I'm going to oppose because it doesn't seem right for a motto.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strenght alone} 03:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, Sunny's got a point there. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 13:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose This seems feeding the vandals, and vandals probably wouldn't see it anyway. Phgao 01:38, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Editing Wikipedia is as easy as pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis!

edit 1, suggestion. ~AH1^(TCU) 00:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose makes wikipedia sound confusing.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strenght alone} 03:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Sarcasm, irony, whatever, I like it. •97198 talk 02:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose per point below. •97198 talk 04:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - if you click the word link, you'll notice that it means a lung disease from very fine dusts from a volcano. Some people could mistake the purpose, like "Wikipedia would be as easy as to get a lung disease" - That phrase wouldn't make any sense. ~Iceshark7 06:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Agree with Sunny, makes Wikipedia sound way too complicated.  Smcafirst | Chat  at 01:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Per above concerns. Phgao 01:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ 'Cause, a hero, is a hero, is a hero.

IP, user, or admin, we all make Wikipedia what it is. Equallity motto. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support Fair enough. Simply south 20:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like this one a lot, actually. Thereen 04:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Me too! •97198 talk 07:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support --Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 02:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia. Two million articles and counting. Or trying to.

Some self-deprecating humour derived from the uncertainty as to what was our two millionth article. Lurker (said · done) 10:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, not for any other reason, but that if approved, it'll be sertainly sheduled for halfpast next year, and who knows how may we'll have then. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 00:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per T-borg.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strenght alone} 00:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose A good idea but as T-borg mentioned, we ought to be past then by mid-2008! •97198 talk 07:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Good point! Lurker (said · done) 12:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ Neither will alone... nor strength alone.

Just remembered this quote on a show, seems fitting for a motto.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 16:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support, cool. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 17:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Just typographical errors to be fixed. Nor needs a space before the word, plus does not need a capital N. Simply south 22:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC) Done--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support Good one. •97198 talk 06:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support A very good one, a simple statement of the fundamental truth that both will and ability are needed to accomplish things. One of my favorite five "timeless" mottos. Hga 16:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness.

Nietzsche quote. •97198 talk 10:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support sounds nice.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 04:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very nice. Thereen 04:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 13:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→You get a star, you get a star, you get a star!

Inspired from that episode of Oprah where she gave everyone a car. Similar to the generosity she showed on that show, giving barnstars is a generous act of kindness and is always appreciated. Feel free to come up with a better variant if you are fond of this motto.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 04:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support Sounds good! --  PNiddy  Go!  04:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 18:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support - cool :-) --Agüeybaná 22:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, sounds ok to me. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 13:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support per above. —ScouterSig 18:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ Fie, fie, you counterfeit, you puppet, you!

Helena accuses Hermia of "sockpuppetry" in Act 3, Scene 2. :) •97198 talk 13:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

• Q' - And that's a motto for Wikipedia? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 13:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • That's why it's here. •97198 talk 13:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• Ah ha ha ha ha! FUNNY! I Support! --TheWikiLoner 14:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support-- *claps*K14 15:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• Question whats Fie mean? or is it some exclamation I should know?--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strenght alone} 00:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Answer: shame. Oh and a Weak Support from me, it sounds good, but play might be a bit obscure. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 00:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Oh, wait. My mistake. Apparently, it's "(archaic) Used to express distaste, disgust, or outrage." (Wiktionary) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 00:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, now that I get it.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 02:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Citations are not always required^{[Citation needed]}

~AH1^(TCU) 00:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• oppose as per WP:V and WP:RS †Bloodpack† 22:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per above.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 00:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Hi. The motto is supposed to use the false statement, the unlinked one, and put a {{fact}} tag beside it, to make it so that it looks like citations are so often required, even this statement requires a citation. I'm not saying that citations are actually not always required. Also, is it just me, or is the oppose ratio suddenly going up? Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose (for dirrerent reason) Now I see what your trying to say, but I'm still going to oppose in favour of edit 2.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, in favor of Edit two. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Citations are not always required. ^{[Citation needed]}

Edit two, what, you need a citation to prove water is liquid. ;) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 22:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support, 'tis nice. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 22:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support 'Tis nice, and true. I've withdrawn edit one. •97198 talk 06:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support I understand now what this motto implies. If someone says "citations are not always required," they need to prove WHY it's not required because IT IS required here in wikipedia. Its like saying, Wikipedia is bankrupt ^{[citation needed]} †Bloodpack† 07:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support now that I understand it, I like this version better.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support, only because it's going to confuse some people who just glance at the motto and move on. Good message, though, once you work it out. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

If you destroy a bus's windows, you'll be suspended.

Last night, in my city, some suspect vandalized (hence the term in WP) nearly 70 Thomas school buses that night. So I decided to create a motto for it! --  PNiddy  Go!  04:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, another stupid attempt at a motto derived from "vandalise and you'll be blocked", but changing the words and adding links. –sebi 05:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - but not becuase it is a "stupid" attempt to derive a "vandal-block" - more like that it's not common to see windows to be broken in buses. ~Iceshark7 08:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - per Iceshark.K14 14:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Doesn't sound that good.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 15:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ A lot is to be said for the word no.

Quote from Gumpisms: The Wit and Wisdom of Forrest Gump. •97198 talk 05:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, good one. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Support Sounds good.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 18:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

All new users to Wikipedia, just fake it till you make it!

This motto will encourage new users to slowly learn how to make graphics, pages, and other things on wikipedia bu simply looking at source code. A more aware of the wiki software community! Jimbo Herndan 23:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, not bad, not bad. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Oversaturated oppose I don't think it's good for me. Try another perfectly good motto and you'll get the hang on it. --  PNiddy  Go!  04:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Lock & Load, people! It's go time.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 18:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support - Very suitable for a day with a high level of vandalism. ~Iceshark7 19:37, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Support Sounds good.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 22:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Let's rock and roll!

†Bloodpack† 14:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, not bad. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 18:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Nothing wrong with enthusiasm! •97198 talk 06:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support Rock on! --Agüeybaná 22:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 02:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support -- Very original, I like it! --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

NPOV goodness in every spoonful!

~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Fixed spelling of spoonful. •97198 talk 15:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, sound nice. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support -- Original, very nice! --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

If they have no food, let me eat more!

• edit 1, suggestion. ~AH1^(TCU) 19:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose I think i get what you mean but otherwise it looks like it is trying to promote vandalism. Simply south 19:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Huh? How is it promoting vandalism? It's supposed to mean something like "if the vandals have no edits because I reported them to AIV, then let me get a barnstar for my good work!" or something like that. Does this make it any clearer? Also, when does summer vacation end (eg. back to school)? Late August or early September? Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 20:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→Eat to live, don't live to eat.

~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, pretty good! —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.

Translated: Happy is he who comes to know the causes of things. (Virgil) This seems highly appropriate for Wikipedia - I fiddled with links for a while then decided to keep it simple and linked the entire phrase to Wikipedia:About. EyeSerene^TALK 10:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: not sure everyone will understand. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• I love it That is a really cool motto! --  PNiddy  Go!  15:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I know it is nice having the translation below, but could a --> be added to show where it is from? Simply south 13:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Reply I'm not sure what '-->' means (sorry!), but the quote is from Georgics (book II, line 490) EyeSerene^TALK 18:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose A good idea, in theory, but the thing with all the non-English phrases is that - while their translation and respective links are usually very appropriate and clever - they lose all meaning when people simply don't know what they mean. My guess is that a very small number of people who come across this would actually know what it means in the original Latin. •97198 talk 01:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Everything got started in him and finds its purpose in him.

This is a biblical quote from Colossians 1:16b, which I found in The Message. Bushcarrot (Talk·Guestbook) 17:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support, kinda dull. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain Dull. Try again. --  PNiddy  Go!  15:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Play now or go to Jail!

This motto is like Monopoly.--  PNiddy  Go!  0 15:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support, not that bad, but not that good either. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment So if you don't do testes, you get blocked? I don't get your meaning.--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 07:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose Use the sandbox or you'll get blocked. Since when do you get blocked for making a mistake (without testing it in the sandbox)? •97198 talk 11:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - This sounds too much like "Edit wikipedia now, or you'll be blocked", GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 21:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't mock people or you'll go to jail!

Is it Very good?  PNiddy  Go!  0 00:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support either. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose You could say this about any policy. •97198 talk 10:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose I don't like the likening of bite to jail, although it is quite amusing. Phgao 01:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, no consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't mock people or you'll go to prison!

Edit 1 Changed word "jail" -> "prision"--  PNiddy  Go!  0 00:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support either. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Dull. •97198 talk 10:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Reopened - not enough votes. Simply south 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, no consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

The starboard is sinking! Oh no, vandals boarding he ship! Get up that rigging! Shoot SOS signs! Sysops, prepare for a fight! Stewards, activate VandalProof! Fiiiiiiiiiiiiight!

too long?K14 11:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose Seems too long for me, and it needs links.--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 13:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Lacks wikilinks to be purposeful to Wikipedia in anyway... ~Iceshark7 17:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, sorry, but it's like more of a panicked comment, when you know you should always stay cool. :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 19:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Oversaturated oppose The title motto is WAY too long! Try a shorter motto. --  PNiddy  Go!  04:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Imagination is more important than knowledge, for knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world

--Sunny910910 04:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support Sounds good. Is this a quote? If so, I'd recommend one of those arrow linky things. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 17:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, nice quote. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, no discussion after reopening. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Go to the Rest Area if you're tired.

People who are tired and really need to take a break.  PNiddy  Go!  0 00:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Corrected link.  PNiddy  Go!  0 00:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Dull. --Tewy 23:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose, true. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose I agree with Tewy.--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 13:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Somehow, it doesn't ring a bell in me. ~Iceshark7 17:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Not much to it. •97198 talk 12:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Vi Veri Vniversum Vicy

"By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe". This motto appears in Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus and I think it is a good motivational one. Pvd21 11:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, don't get it. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose - I can't see a relation to Wikipedia in this, especially when the link is just into a certain article. ~Iceshark7 17:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Put on the kettle to have a nice cup of tea

Relax. Simply south 21:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, 's not bad. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support - An excellent use for direct shortcuts and the essays even sync very well with each other. ~Iceshark7 19:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, a bit more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the club. No membership card required.

Motto about welcoming new users, and emphasising the inclusive nature of WP (also maybe encouraging anon IPs to register...)EyeSerene^TALK 00:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support, 'tis good, ne? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Just like a grocery store! --  PNiddy  Go!  0 05:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support-Good enough.K14 09:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Serves it's purpose.--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 12:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Excellent. A perfect phrase as a greeting! ~Iceshark7 17:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ It's easier to imagine taking one million steps in a single second, than to actually perform a single step.

I'm unsure about the reference, but that's where I found it from. ~Iceshark7 17:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support Another one of those mottos that puts things into perspective. •97198 talk 12:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

:Edit - Switched the reference from Donald Duck into Cornelius Coot, because he actually said this phrase in the series. ~Iceshark7 07:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support Sounds thought-provoking.--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 13:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, with my Support, now. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

To err is human.

In support of Good Faith. •97198 talk 08:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 08:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment wait a second, shouldnt it be "To err is to be human"?--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 08:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
    • I'm pretty sure the quote is "To err is human." •97198 talk 11:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
      • Oh, okay.--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 09:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support, although I'm surprised this hasn't been done before. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Yes......K14 06:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)s

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

To err is human. To really screw up requires a computer.

quote is by anonymous from everything I've ever seen. I'm not sure if a link to MeatballWiki is ok, I feel "Assume Stupidity, Not Malice" fits better with the theme of Assuming good faith, but a simple link to Hanlon's razor would work if that isn't alright. I really like this nom, but a little humour is always good, plus increasing awareness of automated editing tools can't be a bad thing --lucid 22:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected in favor of original. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Failure is an option, only when you let it be one.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support!! The best motto ever!  PNiddy  Go!  0 04:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Sounds good.--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 08:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support, thank you, Gandhi, for those wise words. (Doubt he actually said that, but it sounds like something he'd say, you know what I mean, oh never mind.) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

We learn not at school but in life.

--Sunny910910 07:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support, clever ;) But I recommend you use WP:TUTORIAL and WP:SANDBOX instead of their lowercase formats, as many places on Wikipedia don't have lowercase shortcuts. –sebi 08:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Reply Changed to uppercase format--Sunny910910 ^{{talk|Contributions}} 13:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like it! •97198 talk 10:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support, yes, a very good thing to remember in WP. Be bold! Hersfold ^(talk/work) 19:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever.

•97198 talk 07:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support How true... ♠TomasBat 10:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Makes people aware of the policies. ~AH1^(TCU) 13:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Cool and Funny! --  PNiddy  Go!  0 17:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support --Sunny910910 05:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)but
• SupportThank you. How very true!K14 00:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

If your strength is small, don't carry heavy burdens. If your words are worthless, don't give advice.

•97198 talk 07:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support, totally agree. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 07:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support I also agree... ♠TomasBat 10:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support --Sunny910910 10:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Support This is a great motto! --  PNiddy  Go!  04:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Don'tcha wish your Encyclopedia was free like me?

Inspired after hearing this song way too many times on the radio...¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 06:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected in favor of Edit one. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ Don't cha wish your 'Pedia was free like me?

Edit one, a link to the song might be helpful. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 07:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Nice job making it even catchier T-borg :).¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Why, thank you Persian Poet Gal! :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 19:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 07:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Like the link, plus it's less beats squeezed in! •97198 talk 07:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per all of the above. ♠TomasBat 10:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong support. Creative and true! ~AH1^(TCU) 14:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support. Don't Cha?...Don't Cha? Funny! I love it! Chrishyman 21:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support - I've heard the song, and I don't see a reason to oppose it! ~Iceshark7 10:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. I put it on Wikipedia:Song. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 16:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Watch your mouth young man.

A common thing to be heard of a nagging mother. Many, many ways this can be changed, so I added my own edit below. Chrishyman 07:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Rejected in favor of Edit one. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Watch your mouth.

Edit One. In case you don't like the last link. Chrishyman 07:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support, this version's better. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 18:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support Its a bit too plain and short, but its better than the first one per not having that link. ♠TomasBat 10:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support, yeah, "noob" does have a tendency to offend some people for some reason. Seems like this could be a bit more, though... but how? Hersfold ^(talk/work) 19:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak oppose "Watch your mouth" sounds more like a policy than a motto. •97198 talk 12:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

When in Rome, do as the Romans do.

•97198 talk 12:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support - Now that's nationalism! (Joking. This is a great, encouraging phrase.) ~Iceshark7 13:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment - Wikipedia:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations/Frequently_used_ideas - Already used? ~Iceshark7 19:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose,great,but is a FUI.Kfc1864 05:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, on FUI list. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ Very nice, how much?

Lets make this one a bit funny :P — E ^talk_bots 20:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - The phrase is nice, but I don't understand why it's linked to WP:FC only. How about a WP:BOUNTY link onto "how much", and leaving WP:FC onto "very nice"? ~Iceshark7 13:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

• Reopened. More consensus required. ~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, in favor of second version. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ Very nice, how much?

Second revision as per request of Iceshark7. — E ^talk_bots 06:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support, it's better now. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 19:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Haha, very clever! •97198 talk 12:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• Reopened. More votes required. ~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Support. LOL Borat references. ~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Note that this only works on the user pages - it is designed to take you to your user talk page. ~Iceshark7 20:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Good, but try using a link to Special:Mytalk instead of {{TALKPAGENAME}}. — E ^talk_bots 20:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I didn't seem to notice that it would take into the talk page of the article you are clicking the motto from. I have made a second version below. ~Iceshark7 13:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

• Reopened. No consensus reached. ~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Rrejected, no discussion after reopening. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Edit - Switched {{TALKPAGENAME}} into Special:Mytalk. ~Iceshark7 13:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

• Support this version.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone} 23:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Reopened. Not enough votes.~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Support. I like getting mail (messages). ~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough votes. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→ Vandals will be shot, sockpuppets will be shot again.

Original phrase: "Trespassers will be shot, survivors will be shot again." ~Iceshark7 14:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, nice reference. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 17:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support - I love it! Confusing Manifestation 22:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very clever! •97198 talk 09:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• SupportAh,great.Kfc1864 05:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support I love this game quote. In fact, I've seen it other places since. Still, great motto with a clear message Chrishyman 07:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Approved per consensus. ~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia: The Encyclopedia that love built.

Just like my first marrage. Dfrg.msc 10:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support - Sounds soothing - but might be more suitable when it's Valentine's Day. ~Iceshark7 19:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Spelling error in the motto: 'Encylclopedia' should be 'Encyclopedia'. — E ^talk_bots 20:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Awww, how sweet. Definitely would be a good one for 2/14. Shall we move this up to special nominations? Hersfold ^(talk/work) 15:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support--K14 12:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Really? I could have sworn it was Jimbo and Larry... ;) •97198 talk 10:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

• Approved per consensus. ~AH1^(TCU) 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

→ Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

Thomas Edison Hires an editor 19:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. arrow.Kfc1864 11:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Too few votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

→ Our greatest weakness lies in giving up.

Edit 1. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 23:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, pretty darn good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 23:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 05:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, very true --Vaishu2 03:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per above. ♠TomasBat 11:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Aproved per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Be Careful! Don't Get Blocked for a Reason!

This will help people for not getting blocked and users have to be careful so they won't get blocked for a reason. PNiddy-~ // ^{My edits} 15:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: moved motto to the top. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 16:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Question - ...So you'd rather they get blocked for no reason at all? I'm confused, sorry. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose, meh, just don't get that feel. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Too few votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Medic! We need a medic over here!!

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 13:17, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Support. I like! And it gets more users involved in the magical land of cleanup ^_^ ~Crowstar~^{crow calls} 20:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Too few votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

→ We will, we will block you!

A search came up empty on this one, but I'm still not sure if it's been used before. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support Yeah, it sounds familiar... but closest I could find was "We will edit you", and that was in fact based on something else. Can't believe this hasn't been done before, but seeing as it hasn't, I'll support. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 17:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support On WP:SONG.Kfc1864 02:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, Sorry, on WP:WPSONG.
• Oppose. Been done before (29th). --Tewy 06:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - That motto is actually slightly different. Again based on this song, but it's trying to convey a different point. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened Too few votes.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Rejected, only one Reopening per motto. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

→En! Wikipedia!

~AH1^(TCU) 19:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: behold? I don't get it. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 19:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: I think "Behold" was intended to link to something other than furniture polish, but I must say I am still a bit confused. Pending an explanation, I'm leaning towards oppose. This probably is the first time someone has tried to use furniture polish in a motto, however. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 17:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Reply. Hi. L.m.a.o. The thing is, I usually don't check the links to see what they point to. I didn't know what you meant by furniture polish, until I clicked the link...<font size="∞^∞">LOL!. What I meant by "behold" was not furniture polish! I just meant the word behold. The reason for this is, according to The Roman Mysteries, "En" was latin for behold. So, the motto would then mean, "Behold! Wikipedia!", a pun off en.wikipedia. If this isn't clear enough, please replace the arrow with a better link. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 17:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Reply to reply - Ha ha, I was wondering what kind of reaction that was going to get. I took the liberty, then, of redirecting your link to Wiktionary and the entry on "Behold" there. Although that might sort of contradict the motto a bit... I don't know, I'm still a bit Neutral on this one. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Reply to reply. I thought that was 'ecce!' Still, I could be wrong. CarrotMan 17:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose, This maybe is not ine of the best..l.Kfc1864 02:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - I love the idea of inspecting such a great sentence, but most people reading the motto wouldn't get any sense. Just a redirect to the word "behold" doesn't help, because you'd originally need to know about the background of this motto before you'd understand it. ~Iceshark7 19:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia, like never before!

~AH1^(TCU) 19:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support Not bad... ♠TomasBat 20:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support --Boricuaeddie ^hábleme 14:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, Very nice </borat>. Dfrg.msc 11:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia, the Bane of Ignorance!

- ≈ The Haunted Angel 17:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, sounds good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 17:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support --Boricuaeddie ^hábleme 14:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Great! Dfrg.msc 11:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

→ Jimbo Toridas!

Hope you know the place it came from.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• where? 86.202.40.104 16:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • It looks like this and this are the only places that explain it. --Tewy 19:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Is it a comment?c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 23:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. I'm not sure how many people will know what this refers to, and since there are only obsure parts of articles that explain it, I'm not sure if I can support. --Tewy 23:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose, I don't really get it. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Sites, sights, and cites. (And even some sights.)

Self explanatory. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 11:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Interestingly enough, there was a similar idea nominated a while ago. However, its homophones were completely different, so I think this nomination can still run its course. --Tewy 18:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Just curious, why does the second sights link to firearms? Simply south 00:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

We got killers and thrillers, but most of all, we got pillars

I hadn't seen the 5 pillars referenced here yet. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 11:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Wonderful use of creative links, a good message, and rhyme (the 5 pillars actually have been referenced in the past). --Tewy 18:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, very clever! •97198 talk 12:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Clever and rhymy. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

→You're all clear kid, now let's blow this thing and go home.

Han Solo quote, to encourage newbies to become more active in vital processes, is the meaning clear enough? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support - Works for me. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Creative use of the quote. --Tewy 06:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

C: DOS, C: DOS RUN, RUN DOS RUN!

Harrison-HB4026 03:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I really like the idea, however, the second two links are redundant. Would you mind if they were removed? --Tewy 04:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Sure. Sorry I haven't been able to check this much for a while. Harrison-HB4026 09:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I added an edit 1 with the links removed, and new ones added for a different meaning. --Tewy 20:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

C: DOS, C: DOS RUN, RUN DOS RUN!

Edit 1. Yes, yes, another vandalism/block motto. --Tewy 20:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. --Tewy 20:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, good one. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like it! •97198 talk 12:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Does it make me a geek to totally get this? Ah, who cares, I'm one anyway! :-) Chrishyman 06:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment by Nominator: Ah, watching television gives you some good ideas:) I will leave it to you how I got the idea for this motto... if you can. Hehehe HarrisonB Speak! 02:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

→How much Wiki would a wikichuck wiki if a wikichuck could wiki wiki?

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: I don't get it. O_o Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • You know, how much wood could a wood chuck wood if a wood chuck could chuck wood. Harrison-HB4026 03:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. I changed the arrow link to the "Popular culture" section. --Tewy 04:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

We do have all day!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. I changed the soft redirect to a direct meta link. --Tewy 19:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I linked the exclamation mark, too; I thought it looked silly as the only part not linked. WODUP 08:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 00:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

You are only delaying the inevitable. (Apocalypse)

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 09:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: I've fixed the spelling of enevetable. « ANIMUM » 12:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. True of a lot of vandals. --Tewy 19:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, although we should make the (Apocalypse) link an "→" at the front to match with the usual format. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Very true. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

→ You are only delaying the inevitable.

Edit One - Like so. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Déjà vu

Simply south 10:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, pretty good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. It is. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

You really can't resist the urge, can you? DO NOT press the

BIG RED BUTTON!

• edit 2, Suggestion. ~AH1^(TCU) 17:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, original idea, but just too, radical. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 19:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Here at Motto of the Day, we try to keep our voters voting by not killing them with shock. But a good effort all the same. --Tewy 19:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: "killing them with shock"? It's not that shocking. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • ;-) --Tewy 20:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment. Yeah, I don't find it shocking either. Where are all the voters anyway? Maybe they got "shocked" by the other mottos (bzzzzzt). ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
      • • Comment. AHHGGGGHGHG!!! MY EYES! Dfrg.msc 11:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
          • Comment/reply. Sorry, I just made it a bit smaller, so is this better? I thought spending a lot of time on wp makes your eyes hurt anyway, but that's just my opinion. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak oppose As said, a bit radical and overwhelming. And being a holic's not a bad thing, is it? ;) •97198 talk 13:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Wikipediholism is not just 'not a bad thing', it's a good thing! And anyway, the formatting really blares! (No offense)--Vaishu2 03:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose AAAHHHH! *Falls over backwards* (see edit #...4? is that what we're up to now?) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 15:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 22:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

→ Quod erat demonstrandum

-Tim^{speak} 19:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Question - I'm guessing that's Latin? What does it mean? ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Q.E.D., "which was to be demonstrated". I can kind of half see the connection here (if someone adds {{fact}}, then someone citing it has "proven" the statement it was attached to), but I'm currently standing at neutral. Confusing Manifestation 04:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. I added an explanation arrow. --Tewy 05:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I like it. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 17:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, pretty good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Not enough votes after reopening.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 22:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

3 + 3 = 6

Well, am I right? —« ANIMUM » 05:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose - Vague, doens't make a whole lot of sense ≈ The Haunted Angel 12:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Yeah, I don't get this at all. What exactly are you trying to say? Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • That RFA was a combination of WP:WIF (well, proof supporting it) and WP:ABF. —« ANIMUM » 23:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, some refined humor never hurt. :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected No consensus reached.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

→Never judge an article by its cover.

~AH1^(TCU) 16:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose - Vague, not fantastic ≈ The Haunted Angel 12:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, though it could do without the first link. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Not that great. •97198 talk 12:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected No consensus reached.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

DID YOU KNOW that blah blah blah blah...

~AH1^(TCU) 16:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose - Vague, not fantastic ≈ The Haunted Angel 12:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral Makes it sound like Wikipedia is boring, as you know its great! Rlest 12:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, per above. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, Per Rlest. Dfrg.msc

Rejected Per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

→ Believe it or not!

~AH1^(TCU) 16:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose - Vague, not fantastic ≈ The Haunted Angel 12:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, its pretty good, actually. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 13:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I like it. WODUP 00:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected No consensus reached.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Even the highest towers begin from the ground.

• Chinese proverb. Any stub may grow out to be a featured article. Freestyle 09:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose,Sorry, but similar one was nominated.Kfc1864 13:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Been done before. ≈ The Haunted Angel 14:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, been done. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, Sorry. Dfrg.msc 11:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected Per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

People First, Editors Second

• In reflection of somethings that have happened to good editors I know. It may remind some of us to be a bit more caring. Dfrg.msc 23:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, good enough message, it's true that sometimes we forget there's another person behind the edits. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 00:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very encouraging —« ANIMUM » 05:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support, something everyone needs to keep in mind every now and then. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support I agree with all of the above. ♠TomasBat 10:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved Per consensus.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Go Put a Camera on a page so you can keep track of it.

Your watchlist is like a security room full of cameras!  PNiddy  Go!  0 00:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose, kinda dull. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, better ones out there. Dfrg.msc 11:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose as above. •97198 talk 09:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Rejected - per consensus. Simply south 20:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

You can't read just one!

Just try it and see ;) Confusing Manifestation 05:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support We all know it's true! •97198 talk 07:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. It is true. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, what the heck, don't see a reason to oppose it. :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, Very nice </borat>. Dfrg.msc 11:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I like that!--Vaishu2 03:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved - per consensus. Simply south 20:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

I'd rather learn about a lot and be wrong 5% of the time than to only learn a few things and be wrong 4% of the time

In refrence to Wikipedia vs EB (Stole from digg) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jman888 (talk • contribs).

• Comment. I fixed the spelling/grammar and added links to clarify. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Down with Britannica! :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support.I like the way this motto talks about where each encyclopedia (Wikipedia/Britannica) is better than the other!--Vaishu2 03:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support It is a very good point. •97198 talk 07:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very good motto, and very true fact! ♠TomasBat 10:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus. Simply south 20:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?
A: To get run over by a car.

This is my second attempt to make a succesful motto. It is suppose a riddle in some way. If this motto is used or is similar to past mottoes, please delete it.--PrestonH 17:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support! HA HA HA! I fell off my chair laughing! —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 19:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Very true. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Is nice! I like it! --Jimbo Herndan 23:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Dfrg.msc 11:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support --Vaishu2 03:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Support Its funny! ♠TomasBat 10:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved - per consensus. Simply south 20:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

You drink, you drive, you lose.

Perhaps this one... Arky ^{¡Hablar Conmigo!} 23:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Raises awareness of EUI. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, like Astro said, pretty damn good too. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support Also makes me think of "real life". •97198 talk 07:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Approved - per consensus. Simply south 20:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Be as Free as a Bird

-- This is the greatest Wikipedia Rule, and the greatest song ever. How can I go wrong? -littlebum2002 21:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. No votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough votes after reopening. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

→Lies for the Liars

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. No votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment. Kinda harsh, but I like it. ~Crowstar~^{crow calls} 20:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support, not bad. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough votes after reopening. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Liar, liar, pants on fire

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Links fit well with the original saying. --Tewy 19:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support --Boricuaeddie ^hábleme 14:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. shouldn't go to waste. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved, concensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

In order to write that which is great, you must first write that which is small.

Who doesn't like a good Featured Article, really? --Thereen 03:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Moved nomination to top, reduced heading level. --Tewy 03:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Thank you very much! --Thereen 06:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support It's good, but not overly pizzazzy. Yes, I just made up a word. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 17:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I like it, and it's true. --Tewy 22:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Encourages new articles. ~AH1^(TCU) 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support, it's pretty nice. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 04:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved, concensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

→We can edit for two months on a good compliment.

~AH1^(TCU) 23:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support - normally I'd say it's a bit vague, but the "Edit" part fits in well. ≈ The Haunted Angel 23:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support - clever and cute. End it with a period, of course. heqs ·:. 07:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. So true. --Tewy 22:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: I've added the period. WODUP 03:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

→We must all learn to live together as brothers. Or we will all perish together as fools.

~AH1^(TCU) 23:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, a good quote with respective links. ≈ The Haunted Angel 23:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 13:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, a nice change of tone from some of the more militant-sounding anti-vandal mottos used lately. heqs ·:. 07:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 22:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support --Boricuaeddie ^hábleme 14:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

All roads lead to Rome

~AH1^(TCU) 23:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, seems that the links have little to do with the quote itself - a bit vague. ≈ The Haunted Angel 23:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Yeaahhh... I don't get it. Sorry. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 17:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose I also don´t get it... ♠TomasBat 21:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

I edit, therefore I am

Wikipedia version of Cogito ergo sum. --ŴôôD éļf 10:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Corrected link. --ŴôôD éļf 10:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Very nice with the links and that. This works. I am going to oppose however as this quote has been done too many times before. Sorry. Simply south 22:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose as repeat. Ditto the apologies. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 17:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected per consensus (too similar to existing motto). Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Consensus:yes. Democracy:no.

edit1, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, sounds good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 16:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose in favor of edit 2. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected in favour of edit 2. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Consensus: Yes. Democracy: No.

Edit 2. Changed the spacing, etc. (minor). --Tewy 19:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support either. --Tewy 19:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, this one's best. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support--Boricuaeddie ^hábleme 14:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

WARNING: Side effects include adminship, participation, being drunk, hypoxia, memory loss, and seizures. Please consult your doctor if you experience any of these symtoms.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected in favour of edit 1. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

WARNING: Side effects include insomnia, dizziness, seizures, and vomiting.

Edit 1. Shorter, changed links and phrasing. --Tewy 19:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support Good idea, AstroHurricane001. --Tewy 19:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like this one better. Although, why are "seizures" bots? Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Probably because of the repetative, fast, and numerous edits they make. --Tewy 04:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support It's true! •97198 talk 07:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support This one made me laugh out loud! ~Crowstar~^{crow calls} 20:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

If there's a will, there's a way.

E ^talk 09:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. It's nice. --Tewy 06:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I agree, not bad at all. I's nice to see some new blood. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 17:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Indeed, I've been at Wikipedia for a while, but just found the motto of the day, and thought I might chip in. Looks like my first suggestion is going a fair way. E ^talk 08:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
    • This is NOrmal.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support --Boricuaeddie ^hábleme 14:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

It's fun to stay at that W.I.K.I.!

From the Wikisong WIKIGreaterWikiholic 04:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Support. It is fun... WODUP 03:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support- It made me laugh :-) --Boricuaeddie ^hábleme 14:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

If they have no encyclopedia, let them read Wiki!

Let_Them_Eat_Cake! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Deddish (talk • contribs).

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak oppose Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. - Gilliam 04:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose 1- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, as stated above. 2- Wikipedia should be first preference before any other encyclopedia! •97198 talk 13:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected per consensus. Confusing Manifestation 02:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Twinkle, twinkle little star,
how I wonder what you are.

So the last one was too negative for ya? ;) Well, what about this, too childish maybe? :D —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 22:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support! Simple and effective. I wouldn't say it's childish, and the links are perfect. ≈ The Haunted Angel 22:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Awesome. Confusing Manifestation 22:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support - love it. - Philippe | Talk 06:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per all of the above. ♠TomasBat 22:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

If vermin keep eating through the power conduits, this ship won't be worth it's weight in scrap.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose Sounds a bit too negative to be a motto. Confusing Manifestation 23:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Sorry, but Confusing Manifestation has a point, even though the motto says "If" at the beginning. --Tewy 03:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

When you see Wikipedia being surrounded by armies, its desolation is near…NOT!

~AH1^(TCU) 19:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, gotta love that "NOT" at the end. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 19:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Per above. --Tewy 20:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support- per all of the above. Eddie 23:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per above. ♠TomasBat 20:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't drink too much wikihol before driving

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Disagree but neutral. Wikihol is what makes Wikipedia fresh. Without Wikiholism, there's no drive to edit. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 03:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, not bad, wikiholics may get carried away and make mistakes that way. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. It's funny. --Tewy 05:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Just not enough support. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Our brains...united!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose in favor of Edit 1. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→Welcome to the United Brains of Wikipedia!

Edit 1. Another suggestion from my own motto. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, not bad. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support Quite good; well done! ♠TomasBat 20:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Count this as my support; per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't overflow, you've still got a long way to go

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 15:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, pretty good message: don't overstress yourself, or you'll have to take a break and lose time for editing. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Good message. --Tewy 00:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support- per all of the above. Eddie 23:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support Also per all of the above. ♠TomasBat 20:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Old McDonald had a farm, eeiaeeiaoh

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 15:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, this was done before (careful, page is pretty big). —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Similar nomination wasn't approved, so this nomination is still open for voting. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→Stay alert, stay alive!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 15:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, not bad at all. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support- per all of the above. Eddie 23:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Count this as my support; per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

Self-ExplanatoryKnowledgeHegemony 12:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, but kind of scary… --Tewy 03:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, in a word. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

With all my love I do commend me to you

Quote from Hamlet, by Shakespeare. The links are a little shabby, but that's all I could think of. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 02:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support, kinda dull, still not enough for an oppose. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ The Web's pretty straight without Wikis.

Advertising slogan: "Life's pretty straight without Twisties". Confusing Manifestation 05:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. I wonder if "straight" could have an explaining link. Depending on what it is, I think it could either make or break the motto. --Tewy 20:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Perhaps Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great? It's the only one I can think of at the moment. Confusing Manifestation 23:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• I've given it some thought and all I can think of for the link is something along the lines of "boring", "unalterable", or "controlled", but none of those are highly creative. --Tewy 02:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Conditional support, if a link is provided for "straight". —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Flash of inspiration: Nupedia! Thoughts? Confusing Manifestation 04:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Works for me; I've added an edit below. --Tewy 05:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ The Web's pretty straight without Wikis.

Edit 1. Confusing Manifestation's idea. --Tewy 05:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Now that "straight" has been linked, I think this motto has meaning. --Tewy 05:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ There's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape 'em off, Jim!

(Previously listed as alternative to a rejected Star Trekkin'-based motto). Why did my only other idea for the song have to be an anti-vandalism one? Confusing Manifestation 23:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, why only use Star Wars references when there's also Star Trek :)? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment You would say that ;) Confusing Manifestation 06:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→'Cause you gotta have faith, faith, faith.

Self-explanatory. Confusing Manifestation 04:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Not bad... ♠Tom@sBat 21:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Reap what you sow.

Because (theoretically) every stub is a Featured Article waiting to happen. Confusing Manifestation 02:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. I think I like it. --Tewy 03:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support: I will support because it has a good point, but I'm getting tired of these Stub to FA mottoes. --Random ^{Say it here!} 03:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, nice one, encourages people to take care of their stubs. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Like a book, we've got an an index, a glossary, an author, and more!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Like a book, we've got a table of contents, a glossary, and an index!

Edit 1. Simplified; added/rearranged links. --Tewy 18:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support both versions, but see Edit 2 below. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Like a book, we've got a table of contents, a glossary, an index, and an author!

Edit 2: Combines both versions into one, only author link here is Special:Mypage. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't be a sitting duck, get your move on!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

What a great encyclopedia wikipedia is

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. Boring. --Tewy 18:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. It's meant to be a parody of yodaspeak, inspired by a comment that User:Nishkid64 put on User:Michaelas10's RfA (not checked for epelling errors), which I saw through links in my watchlist. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 19:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment. Yeah, so what? :)c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per Tewy, and for messing up the Yodaspeak. "A great encyclopedia, Wikipedia is" would have been correct. ;-) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Only real reason for opposition was my own. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

A great encyclopedia, Wikipedia is. --Yoda

edit 1. Suggestion per Hersfold. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Yoda is the best.RockRNC 02:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes, see original nomination. --Tewy

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rain, rain, go away, come again another day

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support I remember that song from Kindergarden... ♠Tom@sBat 22:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Discourages vandalism. --Tewy 18:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose It's like saying "hey, vandals, come again another day." —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose ...and vandalisw? well, nothing....c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 07:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. More discussion on both sides would be nice. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Be cool, not lame.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support. Interesting, but not the best. --Tewy 18:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support I dig it. —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support with the period at the end. WODUP 06:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The source, by circuit city

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You're watching the Weather network, where we're watching the weather

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ Lex talionis

You Know...Eye for an eye--St.daniel ^Talk 18:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral. Wouldn't it be better to show what it refers to, with an arrow, for example? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 19:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. I took the liberty of adding an arrow, even if it's a redirect. --Tewy 18:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't Panic!

Well, it was Towel Day yesterday. The other link that might fit is WP:BB. Thoughts? Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 07:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support - Recommend a special nomination for May 11. The way the schedule's currently running, it'd only be delayed a couple months... Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes, too dissimilar from edit 1. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

We assume good faith, therefore we are.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Wouldn't think be a better link? ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 00:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak oppose. This one doesn't make much sense to me, "therefore we are...What?" So, I think the one below makes more sense. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 19:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

We think, therefore we are.

Edit one: per Magnus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 06:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The Overlord doesn't work? Nah, he does!

Where did I get this?c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 06:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

REopened,No discussion.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 08:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You put your right foot in
You put your right foot out
You put your right foot in and you shake it all about…

Do I need to explain it? > Animum < 00:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support- One themed on sockpuppets, interesting. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GreaterWikiholic (talk • contribs).
• Support - great quote ≈ The Haunted Angel 17:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Count this as my support vote; per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

How do we spell knowledge? Simple: W-I-K-I-P-E-D-I-A

alternative is How do we spell knowledge? Simple: W-I-K-I †Bloodpack† 14:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no discussion. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support - Funny, thought I'd already done so. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't get into a civil war, ok?

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no discussion. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. Sorry, just not interesting. --Tewy 06:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like it. TomasBat 21:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• OpposePer Tewy-c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been rejected

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Question, I don't get how the links work. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Answer. It means "deny", as in "deny banned users", etc. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 21:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, but it gave me an idea for another motto, #Who? (reason for this motto: Rejection and denial are two different things.) --Tewy 18:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandal, the end is nigh

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Clever --St.daniel ^Talk 18:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, only one vote. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Repent! Confusing Manifestation 03:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support Accepted!c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ He's just a poor boy from a poor family. Spare him his life from this monstrosity.

From Bohemian Rhapsody, which is currently my favorite Queen song. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 21:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak oppose. Slightly too long and overlinked, and may be offensive to poor people. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 19:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Per AstroHurricane001. --Tewy 18:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, a bit more discussion would be nice. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ Easy come, easy go; will you let me go?
NO! We will not let you go.

Edit one: Less offensive to the poor, yet conveys the same meaning. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 01:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, I like this one better. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Nice! ♠Tom@sBat 21:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment/Question Wait... when did we start to have to reference our parodies with teh arrows? I thought the point was to pick something (if anything) that would be "well known" enough not to need reference? —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

• Response: It's so that if people don't recognize the music, they know where it comes from. Also, since the lyrics are copyrighted, we need to at least acknowledge where they come from. I support this version, but please see edit below. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, to generate more discussion. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ Easy come, easy go; will you let me go?
NO! We will not let you go.

Edit two: Added some links for "Easy come, easy go" to WP:EDIT and WP:VAND. Wikipedia is easy to edit by every one, and as a result we get a lot of vandalism, such as Willy, and you know the story from there. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ It knows the kings of England and it quotes the fights historical...

Reference to the sheer amount of knowledge located on Wikipedia. CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: moved nomination to the top. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 05:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• OpposeSlightly Eurocentricc'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 07:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose, yeah, we could do with a few less links (as in not one per letter) and some more variation. See Edit 1. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Cleverly done, although a trifle overlinked. bibliomaniac15 Join or die! 04:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ It knows the kings of England and it quotes the fights historical...

Edit 1, far less links, and less "Eurocentriccity". "Knows" is a random article link, "kings" goes to List of current monarchs, "fights" links to Category:Wars, and "historical" links to Category:History. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ It knows the kings of England and it quotes the fights historical...

Edit 2, suggestion. ~AH1^(TCU) 17:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

~ It knows the kings of the World and it quotes the fights historical...

Edit 3World link obvious.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The bigger they are, the harder they fall.

Umm, this hasn't been done before, has it? Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 06:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. Yep, it's been done before. Sorry. --Tewy 19:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia: The website that never sleeps

Add some links if you want, be my guest :) Harrison-HB4026 03:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. No links, please. --Tewy 04:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, how true! —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 16:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, indeed. About the only website you'll ever find me on past midnight. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 16:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support But a link to Special:Recentchanges wouldn´t be a bad idea... TomasBat 21:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia: The website that never sleeps

Edit One, as per TomasBat's suggestion and my own (link to Wikipedia). E ^talk 08:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment,Take Wikipedia link out.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 06:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia: The website that never sleeps

Edit Two as per Kfc1864's comment. E ^talk 08:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Randomness galore!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, and I fixed the spelling on "gallore". --Tewy 19:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • And the capitalization. --Tewy 19:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Hooray for randomness! bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 19:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support Randomness? How about Random Galore Harrison-HB4026 03:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • "Galore" is used after a noun, which "Randomness" is. "Random", on the other hand, is an adjective. See wikt:galore. --Tewy 17:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

This encyclopedia may contain violence, coarse language, nudity, and mature subject matter. Viewer's discresion is advised

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, done before. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 16:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Per T-borg. TomasBat 21:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Please don't talk when I'm talking.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Could we add a "please" to the beginning of that? It comes off as a bit harsh. Otherwise I support. I also added a period at the end --Tewy 19:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support w/ suggestion given above by Tewy. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment w/ reply. Per consensus, I've added a "please". -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 22:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support-c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

This is my motto. Hope you like it!--PrestonH^{(Review Me!) • (Sign Here!)} 04:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Note for people who reviewed my previous mottos: Sorry if I deleted 7 other suggestions. For people who previously support/oppose the 8 mottoes, you may have to revote my one motto. I just had to delete the other ones because all 8 of them will not reach concensus and it will take a long time for concensus to reach. I pick this one because it is my favorite version.

• Comment. I archived what you removed, but keep in mind that removing the votes compromises consensus on this motto, since this is basically a reopening. --Tewy 05:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. --Tewy 05:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, it's good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. See this. Basically, everyone has supported some version of this motto, but with 8 edits, it's hard to decide on the best. It's clear that voters like this motto. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Even the Roman Empire fell, so don't let your nation, whether it is big or small, fall too…

♠Tom@sBat 23:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. A bit long, but good. Cutting out whether it is big or small would work to shorten it, if needed. --Tewy 18:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, only due to length. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• SupportYes.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 07:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Little discussion. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, sorry, too lenghty. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Even the Roman Empire fell, so don't let your nation fall too.

Edit 1. Opposition was due to length, so this is shortened. I also combined the first two links to make finding the important one easier. --Tewy 19:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Just a good motto. --Tewy 19:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support This version´s better. :) ♠Tom@sBat 19:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Opposesorry, wording not used to me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kfc1864 (talk • contribs).
• Support, better. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus, but close. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Ve vill bury them!

From the phrase We will bury you, the "V"s are to give it some accent. Hmmm… maybe the "bury" link isn't needed, what do you think? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support either. But this one's more interesting. --Tewy 18:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

We will bury them!

Edit one: no "V"s. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, it's pretty okay... *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose both of these, sorry, I don't think the reference to Khrushchev is entirely appropriate, or reflects the community spirit. heqs ·:. 07:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ They see me mowin' my front lawn

I couldn't add in the other intro line because not all wikipedians are White. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 15:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, I love that song. Also like your parody of the parody of the parody, Magnus Animum. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, oh yeah, Random Editor? Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, in case you don't know the meaning, it means Bison from Buffalo,New York, intimidated by other bison from Buffalo, New York, intimidate other bison from Buffalo. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 05:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Needs more discussion. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. I'm sure all the popular culture people will love this one. (And not everyone has a front lawn, either.) --Tewy 19:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, but I think front lawn links better with Special:Mypage. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 19:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support either random or mypage. WODUP 08:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Going equipped

From the police jargon of "Going equipped to steal" meaning having a hammmer or axe with you and you intend to use that object to help you steal. In this case it is "going equipped" to fight vandalism with TWINKLE or maybe POPUPS. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 14:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Hersfold ^(talk/work) ♥'s popups. 14:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support this version. WP:TWINKLE could use some more awareness. --Tewy 19:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Going equipped

Edit 1. Changed from TWINKLE to POPUPS. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, I prefer the original. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

He shoots, he scores!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support A user assuming good faith and going for adminship would usually succeed if he seeks to help to improve the encyclopedia, and not seeketh power... This motto tells us that... ♠Tom@sBat 00:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Wouldn't this be a better 2nd link? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, it's just okay... *Cremepuff222* 01:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I think one with FA nominee and FA would be better. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support Harrison-HB4026 03:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support also. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

An island in the vacant, yet massive ocean

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Well done! ♠Tom@sBat 00:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, still true, sadly. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 22:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

A contributor is worth a thousand vandals

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, would the motto work without any links? *Cremepuff222* 22:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, better without links. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

A contributor is worth a thousand vandals.

Edit 1, it makes just as much sense without links. *Cremepuff222* 22:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Strong support. Easy to read, because you don't have to click on anything! (Plus it's true.) --Tewy 19:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• I've added a period to the end. I support this motto. WODUP 08:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, now it's better. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

A brick wall stands between you and me

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Nice! ♠Tom@sBat 00:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

It only takes one lightning strike to get you

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Shows how easilly vandalism is stopped. ♠Tom@sBat 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support, not bad. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 21:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a democracy, right?

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Nice! ♠Tom@sBat 00:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support in a word. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 22:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't get caught in the crossfire

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support All users should be carefull with this issue; many accidentally break it... ♠Tom@sBat 00:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Throw it in the garbage, and throw him in jail for littering

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Quite creative... ♠Tom@sBat 00:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose- not all articles in AFD are created for bad purposes, and users who's articles are put on AFD aren't blocked anyway (mostly.) Alphablast 19:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose per Alphablast. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 21:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Speak now, or Forever hold your peace!

If you dont vote in an RfA, forever hold your peace Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak oppose, sorry, you don't really vote in an RfA. Wikipedia has a system of consensus, so maybe a link there would be better? *Cremepuff222* 21:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Speak now, or Forever hold your peace!

Edit 1, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• • This version is better than my other one Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints )
• Support, Not half bad. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support Very creative, and better then the last one... Arienh4 15:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ Smack that all on the floor!

From the semi-new song Smack That. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, "Give me some more!" :) *Cremepuff222* 22:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. I'm not quite sure if this sends the right message about Wikipedia… --Tewy 18:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

→ I wanna love you, up on that pole!

edit 1, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

When you have elimanated the impossible, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truth.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose: It seems like you've just interspersed arbitrary links into the motto. Of course I could be wrong… ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia, one step closer to being self-aware every edit.

A modification of somthing said off of X-Play (The Wikipedia logo saying that it became self aware in 2004). What do you guys think? --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 12:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral: I don't really get the links. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Bad Boys, What'cha gonna do?

From the song Bad Boys by Inner Circle. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 11:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: What are they gonna do? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I was thinking of: "Bad Boys, What'cha gonna do?" but i feel the current one is better Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Similar reason to this nomination. --Tewy 18:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You're under arrest

Police warning. Could not think of any link for "under". Was thinking of "Your under arrest, you do not have to say anything...etc." Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 10:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, Garcia: please keep in mind that a good motto doesn't neccesarily need links. *Cremepuff222* 19:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I bear that in mind but I can't think of any good ones without links Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints )
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 00:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Fighting Crime, Protecting People

Motto of the Greater Manchester Police see their website. I did think of "Fighting Crime, Protecting People" but there are too many links, so the one in the heading is the one I choose. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 09:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Take the links out.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Um…Wikipedia doesn't actually fight crime, so the links in this case are needed. --Tewy 19:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Fighting Crime, Protecting People

Edit 1 Links taken out, per comment above Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 12:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't try, succeed!

A bit short maybe? Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 09:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very inspirational. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Too few votes. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after relisting. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

This motto have been temporarily blocked from mottoing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive mottos. Your motto is free to make constructive mottos after the block has expired, but please note that bad mottos (including motto blanking or addition of random mottos), spam mottos, deliberate mismottos, motto violations, motto attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral motto policy will not be tolerated.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

• S...Oppose Wha? What do you mean?c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. It's supposed to be another template-inspired motto. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Weak Support If it's like what you say.....c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 07:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support - Heh... I like it, but I'm afraid it'll be a bit too long. This might actually be a good one for April Fool's - making people think they've been blocked. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 19:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Too long, kind of sloppy-looking. WODUP 22:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Support - it is quite long, but it made me laugh. ≈ The Haunted Angel 00:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Per WODUP. --Tewy 21:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The strategy is working perfectly, My Lord.
The Jedi and their forces have stretched thin
into the Outer Rim worlds in a vain attempt
to contain our new offensives.

Ok, let me hear it: too long, too much links, we're not here to wright essays, or all of the above? ;) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 21:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support Heh heh heh. Nah, Good enough, thanks.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 00:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support, Good, although do keep in mind you're making Jimbo = Evil Darth Sidious. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 19:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

P.S. - And also making vandals = the good-guy Jedi...? 19:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

• • Comment: eh, come on, who's gonna take that seriously ;). —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 19:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I don't mind these types of mottos; they're interesting. As for the switch in good guy/bad guy, it's also interesting. --Tewy 19:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

He who angers you, owns you. You don't want to be owned now, do you?

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

He who angers you, owns you.

Edit one: shortened. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Not too shabby. --Tewy 00:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support, although I googled "he who angers you" since it sounded like a quote, and apparently Elizabeth Kenny said "He who angers you, conquers you." Confusing Manifestation 02:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Conditional support, if modified to match quote above, with one of those funny little arrow things. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 19:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. It's a good message. I don't know what we'd link the arrow to if we did that, though. WODUP 04:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

He who angers you, conquers you.

Edit two, per above, although I was actually quoting Boba Fett from The Mandalorian Armor. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support:I like this version--KnowledgeHegemony 15:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Special Nominations

→T'was the night before Wikipedia, when all through the 'net
Not a creature was learning, not even my pet;
The software was written and the servers were sound
In the hopes that knowledge would be spread all around.

Merry Christmas, from the crew at Motto of the Day!

We've already got something listed for this Christmas, but it's not very holiday-oriented. Since we had a holiday-themed song last year, I propose that we replace the above motto (or another christmasy-type) with the current motto, moving it to the end of the list. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Added link to January 14, "the night before Wikipedia". Can be removed if deemed unnecessary. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment 2 Also realized "net" doesn't rhyme with "mouse", so fixed the second line to match. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose it seems too long.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 04:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like it, it is a bit long but I find it to be both entertaining and relevant. Thereen 09:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support, but please change "smarts" to "knowledge" - same number of syllables and sounds so much classier ;) Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 03:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• So it does. Sorry, I'm not much of a poet. Change made. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support —[[Animum | talk]] 23:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Love it! •97198 talk 06:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 21:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Phgao 02:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support It's quite long, but I like it. RuneWiki⁷⁷⁷ 19:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support Who cares if its too long, its brilliant. --AxG ^{@ ►talk} 20:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Question: With only about a month left, do we have consensus to place this in the schedule? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Answer: It's got 8 support and only one oppose, I think we have. :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 20:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Then Approved and added to the schedule on 12/25/07. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 08:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)