This request is mainly to obtain a broader perspective on how this article can be further improved. Any contributions/comments are welcome. In particular, I think the Astrology and science section needs a review. A problem in this section is whether the section is covered from a NPOV but still emphasis the majority (scientific) viewpoint as such. Thanks Vorpal Bladesnicker-snack 11:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- It looks like a pretty good job of covering this topic, and overall it seems pretty neutral.
- I'm not clear about the purpose of the Flammarion woodcut near the top; it doesn't seem to have much to do with astrology other than being about the heavens.
- The "See also" section seems overly long. Perhaps the list can be organized in some manner and sectioned up in a table based on sub-topic? Also if any of those topics are already listed in the above, they could be removed.
- Since the motions of the Sun, Moon and planets are at the core of astrology, I think I would like to see a brief summary section or table on the beliefs associated with the different bodies in the solar system, particularly their supposed effects. (As per Solar system in astrology).
- Thanks! — RJH (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- * That's a good point. I've removed that picture. Perhaps a different picture, like a natal chart will be applicable
- * Suggestion noted for your other two points, thanks.
- Vorpal Bladesnicker-snack 16:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 00:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)