The contribution I am looking for is in the form of criticism from authors who do not have a direct interest in this topic. Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory is a theory of transsexual behavior known mostly for part of it's taxonomy as the "theory of Autogynephilia". This theory attempts to explain the phenomena of male to female transsexuality by way of the sexual preferences of the subjects of the theory. This theory has been the source of much controversey. The history of the article reflects this controversey. The current version of the article seems to be as Npov and of the best quality it can be.

Authors and editors who are not personally involved in this topic could advise on the clarity of the article to someone who is just looking for casual information. Does the article inform the reader without any bias? Is the article a clear presentation of a psychological theory? etc. My personal background is some education in physics I am not sure how psychologist structure the presentation of their theories. In short is the article clear, concise, and informative with no bias.

Please help. Hfarmer 01:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]