| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it has been designated as an GA for about 15 years and in my perspective has exceeded that recognition and is worthy of FA status. I would like some peer review to cover my blind spots before I officially nominate it for FAC status Thanks, Jaydenwithay (talk) 02:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template.
- Since you are still working on nominating your first FA, I would suggest seeking a FA mentor. They can comment on this PR and guide you through the FAC process. Z1720 (talk) 16:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
@Jaydenwithay: This has been open for over a month. Can we close this? Z1720 (talk) 18:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since there was not response to the query above, I am closing this. A new PR can be opened when the editor returns. Z1720 (talk) 13:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)