| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to upgrade it to Good Article. Thanks, TwoScars (talk) 20:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, this is a very interesting article. I learned something! I have a little passing advice, but not a full review.
- Maybe turn the list in the other manufacturers section into a table.
- Can do, but I think they are ugly. I'll see what others say. It seems like Wikipedia does not like bullet points and prefers tables. TwoScars (talk) 16:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Review WP:IMAGE and make sure you are following all the image guidelines. Remove the forced image size, add alt text, etc.
- All images are from before 1923 except the first and last. As someone with not-so-good vision, I prefer large images. However, I removed forced image sizes. TwoScars (talk) 16:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe use Template:Inflation for any references to money, this will help the article age better.
- Using it now. I learned something—did not know about that template. Hopefully readers are smart enough to know that the cabinet market has differing supply/demand from other things. TwoScars (talk) 16:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Referencing is excellent.
- The prose and referencing is pretty good. I think you could get through a GA review pretty easily.
- I did not perform any fact checking
Cheers —Charles Edward (Talk | Contribs) 15:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)