Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because... I want to get GA review. anything missing must be called out. also pls ignore genres because that was a mindfuck when trying to do funeral for yesterday and I know.
Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 17:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Chchcheckit: Well, good news! I don't see any major problems from my short reading — prose and sourcing are looking pretty good. I think this article is close to meeting the good article criteria, so you might consider closing this PR and nominating it right away. It'd also be excellent timing for the upcoming backlog drive! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)