Wikipedia:Peer review/Johnny Depp/archive1

Turned this article from a great big structural mess to - what seems like - good enough for a "Good Article". Any comments appreciated. Mad Jack 20:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should summarise the awards in a paragraph, maybe just list the most significant ones, preferably with brief comment on nomination statement or some such. - Samsara (talkcontribs) 11:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Images are a problem. Three unfree images, one of which claims to be promotional, but is taken from a commercial information provider with no indication that the image was a work-for-hire for Depp or his agents. The other two are both from films, show the same character, and one is used purely decoratively in violation of Wikipedia:Fair use criteria. Jkelly 04:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]