Wikipedia:Peer review/Last Exit to Springfield/archive1
This article is currently close to becoming a GA, but I would like some constructive comments on how to get this article to FA status. Some specifics:
- Is there enough in the production section? I got as much useful notable information out of the DVD commentary as I could, and since this episode is from 1993, there isn't a lot on the internet.
- Is the review section too cluttered/messy?
- Is the the Cultural references section too cluttered/messy/needed?
- How is the general synopsis? Too short, long, too specific or not specific enough?
- Is there any way I can lengthen the lead?
Feedback on those or any other issues would be MUCH appreciated. -- Scorpion 01:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- A couple of quick things:
- If you're going for FA, you might get in trouble for having too many fair use images to illustrate the article. Each image should be used for "identification and critical commentary", Image:A Thousand Monkeys.png and Image:9f15.jpg are there just to illustrate the article.
- I wouldn't quote IMDB and TV.com ratings - they are highly subjective self-self-selecting surveys and don't really indicate much.
- Yes, I tink the "Reception" section might be a bit too crowded, try splitting it into paragraphs.
- The "Production", "Cultural References" and "Reception" sections don't really flow naturally - they are like collections of disjoint bullet points without actually using the *s. I'm not sure how this can be improved myself, perhaps try looking at similar sections of articles in the "Media" section of WP:FA to see what tends to be acceptable. (Though I did not find any individual episodes there, so there probably isn't as much information to put in these sections as in other FA articles.)
- --Konstable 22:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 20:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)