Wikipedia:Peer review/Lewis Nicola/archive1

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want Lewis Nicola's page to be GA. With me being the only editor, things have easily ran together. The two main, main concerns I have is the lead and the references. For the lead, I'm never certain what to put in or leave out, so I am a bit confused about that. For the references, I used one source for nearly footnotes. I don't know if there is a MOS thing about it or not, but I would appreciate some feedback on what to do about that. As always, however, all comments are greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 14:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

Thank you Hchc2009 for the comments.
Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 23:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]