Wikipedia:Peer review/List of mottos/archive1

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am not sure what it is for and whether the topic of the article is not so broad that it will run away with itself. It seems to contain a lot of disparate topics; lots of examples from very specific areas and none from others. Might it be better turned into a list of lists, split off? Or is it better left as it is? Thanks, Quentin Smith 17:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Cirt
  1. I agree that the quality of the page is quite poor.
  2. There are only five (5) sources listed for the entire page, and some of those appear to be linkspam!
  3. The lede intro sect blatantly fails WP:LEAD.
  4. The article scope is unclear.
  5. The page appears to be unencyclopedic. Maybe if it were sourced to WP:RS and WP:V secondary sources, there would be something to work with here.
  6. It would take a significant amount of time and energy to improve the page to a point where it would have any value whatsoever.

Cirt (talk) 06:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]