Wikipedia:Peer review/Notre Dame football/archive1

Please look at this to eliminate alumni bias and give comments to make to a proper Featured Article candidate. -- KelleyCook 19:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It can be improved by reducing links to solitary years. A monobook tool allows this to be done with one click on a 'dates' tab in edit mode. You can then accept or reject the changes offered and/or do more editing before pressing 'Save'. Simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. Hope that helps. bobblewik 19:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Andy _t 23:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is an obvious pro-Notre Dame POV tone that the article takes, which may be best addressed by doing something like asking for contributors from rival schools. Also, please see WP:CITE as there is a lack of citations for specifics and a sum total of four sources for the article. I also question the Fair-Use rationale on the Fighting Leprechaun image where it is cited as fair use under image criticism where it should probably be fair use under "to illustrate the organization, item, or event in question." Lastly, on the subject of images, there are no pictures of current/former coaches and notable players, no pictures of the stadium and no pictures other than 3 fair-use logos... get some pictures. --Vengeful Cynic 13:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]