Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because... I want to get this GA. please look for lacking things formatting errors any other gripes thanks
Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 09:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Comments from Z1720
editComments after a quick skim:
- The "Critical reception" section falls into the "X says Y" pattern. WP:RECEPTION has some tips on how to avoid this.
- The lede is quite short, and doesn't contain any information about the background or recording process. Consider adding that in.
Overall, it looks like it's in good shape for a GAN. After fixing the above I suggest nominating it. Z1720 (talk) 23:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)