Wikipedia:Peer review/The Height of Callousness/archive1

This peer review discussion is closed.

The Height of Callousness

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because...getting it to featured class, good before that, etc etc. look out for word things, sentences that arent flowy and whatnot, other technical issues, and if i accidently used british english

Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 23:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

Comments after a quick skim:

"Shiels 2000, p. 45", "Udo 2002, p. 162." and "Anon. 2000e, p. 184" have Harv errors.
Reception falls into the "X says Y" pattern. I suggest reading WP:RECEPTION and grouping the information by aspect of the album (lyrics, music, production, etc.) instead of good and not good critiques.
Suggest posting this at WP:GOCE if there are concerns about grammar/British spelling.

Those are my thoughts. Z1720 (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, what do you mean by Harv errors? Thanks Chchcheckit (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok done what has been said. is it better Chchcheckit (talk) 18:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]