Wikipedia:Peer review/The Who/archive1

The Whole thing to be reviewed if possible, please list the strengths and weaknesses, thanks. Dennis Kussinich 08 00:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't read the article, so there's maybe problems with the prose, but I found some things to fix:

Fix the subsections, make an "history" section and add the first five sections there.
In the discography section, remove the covers of the albums and make a simple list or maybe a table, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works).
All the quotes in the "quotes" sections needs a reference.
Use the Template:cite web instead of those links.
If a date doesn't include month and day, don't link anything, for example: "...Live at Leeds album, on which, recently, the entire 1970 concert is now..." 1970 shouldn't be linked.
Remove the see also section, incorporate the link in the body of the article.
Remove most of the external links. See Wikipedia:External links.
The article is way too long (62 kb), you need to move the "performance" and "in the studio" sections to new articles.

Ok, that's it. If something is not clear, ask on my talk page or here, someone will answer. Cheers. No-Bullet (Talk • Contribs) 02:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Needs more inline citations, and the "Quotes" subsection under "Influence" needs prosifying. LuciferMorgan 19:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]