| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this film is regarded as a cultural milestone, and I feel the article is in need of improvement.
Thanks, Slowends (talk) 01:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- JoshuSasori back from the dead? He started the last PR asking for "improvement," ending it with a new paragraph and "Thanks,". Ribbet32 (talk) 03:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's definitely JoshuSasori. Blocked (again). People more familiar with peer review than I am can decide what to do with this request. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- For the record, I noticed that Slowends was JoshuSasori back in May. Under one of my alternate accounts I asked the community to deal with it on that account's user page three days ago (I had been encouraged to retire, and didn't see any more reason to keep the info to myself). The page got deleted as an attack page. (>_<) Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 13:14, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's definitely JoshuSasori. Blocked (again). People more familiar with peer review than I am can decide what to do with this request. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
As the nominator is blocked and therefore unable to respond to reviewers, I don't think this article will get many review comments. Probably best if it's closed and reopened by another editor willing to take responsibility for it. Brianboulton (talk) 22:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)