Wikipedia:Peer review/Unity Church/archive1

Unity Church

I'm interested in learning what can be done to improve the article. As a member of the church, I know a great many details about it, but also run the risk of creating a non-neutral point of view. --Scottandrewhutchins 00:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The redlinks should be dealt with; create stubs or black them. More references, references, references! And those references you have should be used for inline citations, which are a must-have if/when you decide to take this through either the GA or FA processes. -Fsotrain⁰⁹ 03:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate ^{[citation needed]} marks. They might look messy, but they'll help me so that there won't be as many. --Scottandrewhutchins 19:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have adding a few. Please remember to sign your posts on talk and Wikipedia: pages. Thanks. --Fsotrain⁰⁹ 18:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Ruhrfisch 02:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]