Wikipedia:Peer review/Watermelon Man (film)/archive1
Pretty good article as is, but I know it needs some improvements. If you notice anything that's missing, tell me what to add. Also, tell me what you think of the current state of the article. (Ibaranoff24 00:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC))
- Yep, it's pretty good -- always like to see a little recognition for Godfrey Cambridge. A few more footnotes would be helpful. I wouldn't mind seeing more background on the production -- but that's more "nice to have" than "need to have."--Idols of Mud 21:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Good start. However, currently, it's a large introduction. First, a brief plot summary would do, followed by some of the information being moved out of the intro and into their own sections- starting with "Production". Anything reporting a rumour should be cited. Production should cover writing and casting (information is already here, but can use some sourcing). Other important information would be "Reception"- the view of film critics, on one hand, and the box office performance on the other. Then, depending on the movie, you can talk about merchandising or the film's legacy- this already has a little bit of that by talking about the soundtrack. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 22:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Andy t 23:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)