Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Misleading Filename

Misleading Filename

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Aiwok (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Steinsplitter (talk · contribs)
3. Marcus Cyron (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-1.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-2.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
3. File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-3.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• User_talk:Steinsplitter#Irreleitende Namen File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-1.jpg ff
• User_talk:Marcus_Cyron#File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-1.jpg

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. The Files should be renamed according to file rename policy: 3. Correct misleading names into accurate ones
2. Despite detailed explanation of the images content is not Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera like the name suggests but Cerceris rybyensis killing an halictid bee of the genus Lasioglossum (ID to species level most likely impossible). These guys keep reverting the rename request.

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Aiwok (talk) 16:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject: Fails prerequisite to mediation #2, "dispute relates to the content of a Wikipedia article or other content page." These files are at Wikimedia Commons, not at Wikipedia. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)