Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Archive 12

< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions | Pending changes reviewer | Historical
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Dabomb87
Archive 5←Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13

User:Rmosler2100

I have been working with vandalism and a patrolling new pages, and I feel that I have good working knowledge of WP:VANDAL, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:!, and WP:NPOV. I also have rollback rights. Thank you for your consideration. Rmosler | ● 19:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Kelly

Longstanding editor/rollbacker/article creator, familiar with all the relevant policies. Kelly hi! 19:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 21:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

User:GreatOrangePumpkin

  • I have lot of experience with reviewing.
  • I have created alot of template messages, mostly concerning of vandalism
  • I have all template messages in my sandbox (a copy of WP:WARNING)
  • I red all guidelines mentioned in the "how about" section

I hope I convinced you. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

User:The Arbiter

I have been fighting vandalism and patrolling new pages for some time, and have the rollback right. I would like to be a reviewer to help me continue to accomplish those goals even more. The ArbiterTalk 17:27, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Ziansh

I have been helping in improving wikipedia for quite some time now, and I am quite familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR and WP:NOT. Thanks - zyanshafyu, Ziansh (talk) 10:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 18:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

User:In fact

This is actually what I have been doing; fighting vandalism, editing and watching some certain articles. The most important part is that I want to improve. Regards, *** in fact *** (contact) 12:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Csloomis

I have been contributing off and on to Wikipedia, not always while logged in. I have recently started to contribute regularly again. Over the past week I have been routinely helping revert vandalism. While doing this I have come across quite a few article with pending changes. I would like to be able to help by reviewing these changes when I come across them. I have also been given rollback permissions. CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 21:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 00:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Betsythedevine

I would like to be able to review changes on frequently-protected topics on my Watchlist, including a lot of BLPs. betsythedevine (talk) 16:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 16:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Zachlipton

Hi. I help with RC patrol from time to time and have rollbacker perms. Would be happy to help with the review process as well. Thanks. Zachlipton (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 19:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Wexcan

On and off editor with a number with many vandalism and newpage related edits, familiar with relevant policies. Wexcan  Talk  16:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 02:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

User:CarbonX

Been editing wiki for a few years and would like to test out this new feature. CarbonX (talk) 06:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Wifione ....... Leave a message 10:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Becritical

I do a lot of stuff like this, and noticed one request wasn't done for 13 hours. BE——Critical__Talk 00:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Wikipelli

I have been editing for almost a year now with a significant number of edits - primarily reverting vandalism. I would very much like to participate in this project to improve Wikipedia. Wikipelli Talk 06:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 06:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


User:Spinach Dip

I have been working on wiki for a few years now, and I would like to help in any way I can. Spinach Dip 08:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Disneyfreak96

My primary edits here are anti-vandal and this looks to be a helpful tool, in addition to Lupin and IRC among others DizFreak talk Contributions 07:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 15:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Baseball Watcher

I have been on Wikipedia doing a lot of anti vandal fighting and feel I am ready for this Baseball Watcher Lets Chat 14:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 15:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Tingo Chu

I am an active contributor in wikipedia for more than a year and I have over 400 constructive contributions and created 17 articles in wikipedia (although I knew that's not a lot, but at least that fulfilled the basic requirements for being a reviewer). I am delighted to help wikipedia in all the ways that I can, and I have already read the policy on vandalism and fully understand what is and what is not vandalism, I have read the guideline on reviewing and if I was granted the permission to be a reviewer, I will decide carefully whether I should accept the new revision of pending changes or not and also, I WILL continue to make constructive contributions in wikipedia. Thanks very much anyways. Tingo Chu (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

User:CrowzRSA

I have never seen so much IP editing on an article. I want to clean up the article and nominate it for FL, so vandalism would mess the nomination up. CrowzRSA 21:44, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Um... look where you are. This is RFPERM, not RFPP, and without the page first being pending change protected, the reviewer flag won't do you any good there. Second, looking at the article, there isn't the history of disruptive activity to justify protection. Third, I've written a fair few FL's myself, so if you have any questions, my door is open. Fourth, since this is RFPERM, you do meet the standards for the reviewer flag, so   Done. Fifth.... um, there isn't a fifth. Courcelles 21:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Seahorseruler

Hi. I am currently a rollbacker (Since March 2010) and actively fight vandalism, and would like reviewer rights to patrol pending changes as well. Thank you! Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) (Report a Vandal) 19:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:30, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Trijnstel

Hi! I've been editing for a couple of years on multiple Wikipedias. I'm actively fight against vandalism and I'm also a sysop on the Dutch Wikipedia (nl.wikipedia) and a global rollbacker. Therefore reviewer rights here would be very useful for me. Thanks in advance. Kinds regards, Trijnstel (talk) 19:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 22:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Matthew Stannard

I am a QA professional, contributor to Wikipedia for a long time, happy to help ensure that the reviewing initiative is a success Matt Stan (talk) 11:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Calmer Waters 11:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

User:PierceG

I have been editing occasionally since 2006 and I feel that my record demonstrates my ability to adhere to the established guidelines. I have done my best to familiarise myself with the new policies. PierceG (talk) 20:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 22:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Nick Wilson

I routinely fight vandalism and patrol newpages when I'm on wikipedia, and I'd like to start becoming more active in contributing to the project by reviewing changes. Nick Wilson (talk) 20:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Pontificalibus

Rather than ignoring Pending Changes pages, I'd like to help out, as I have been doing with other pages for some time Pontificalibus (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 18:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Iadrian yu

I am a constructive editor in "on and off" doses, in the last period mainly having anti-vandal edits. I am using Wikipedia for a while and I am familiar with policies required for Reviewer right. The main reason for requesting this right is for anti-vandal purposes and I saw in many instances that changes although they were valid, waren`t accepted for many hours. Thank you. Adrian (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 18:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

User:MichealH

I have had rollback rights for roughly 1 and a helf month. I have reverted around 200 vandal's edits. I think I am a perfect candidate for Reviewer privelages. MichealH Have I done something wrong? 13:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Ravensfire

A few articles on my watch list use this - wouldn't mind helping out. Ravensfire (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 20:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Just Feel It

I have done so much work on Wikipedia in a very small time. Perhaps I am now able for this. —just feel it (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

User:FormerIP

I have a fairly good WP history and just came upon the first occasion where I wanted to review a PC but couldn't FormerIP (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

User:SteveStrummer

I've been an editor for about three years and I do regular anti-vandal work so I'd like to join in this trial feature. SteveStrummer (talk) 01:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 02:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Peaceworld111

Hi, i've been a relatively active editor for over a year and have been fighting vandalism often. Reviewer rights would be very useful. Peaceworld111 (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 00:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Shoessss

Becoming active again in review. Thanks ShoesssS Talk 01:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 01:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Wustenfuchs

I'm to fit all the 6 points listed as requirements and I'm willing to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. Wustefuchs (talk) 07:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 07:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Weebiloobil

Most of my work is in reviewing, for example Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who/Assessment and Good Articles, and this seems like a logical extension. I've been on Wikipedia for 4½ years, and I already have the Rollback right - weebiloobil (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Fezmar9

I've been an editor for 3+ years and I've never been blocked or banned as a result of one of my edits. I edit a lot of band/musician articles which fall under BLP, and those are generally the articles with reviewed edits, so this would be useful for me. Fezmar9 (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 18:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Demiurge1000

I've been editing for a little over six months and a few thousand edits with no problems. I often find myself dealing with pages that are part of the Pending Changes trial because I frequently help in dealing with BLP issues, so having the Reviewer right would be useful for that. Demiurge1000 (talk) 07:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Rcsprinter123

I do lots of editing, good record, lots of tools, feel up to the job! RCSprinter123 (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Wireless Keyboard

I've worked for a couple years in reverting vandalism in Wikipedia, and improving/creating various articles. I've been inactive due to schoolwork for a while, but I still have my "skills" fresh in my head! Thanks! ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 02:34, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Pstaveley

I have done a reasonable amount of editing and those edits seem to have been accepted. I would like to help the project by confirming any edits that I think meet the set criteria Pstaveley (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  Question: Do you understand what pending changes is and have you edited any page on pending changes protection? It's only these pages to which the reviewer permission applies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I have edited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukip which is level 1 protected. In fact that is how I can across this former trial. Pstaveley (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:37, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

User:OSborn

Fairly active on antivandalism, good edit history, frequently check up on articles in my watchlist and some of them are under pending changes. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 01:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

User:JohnDoe0007

I meet all 6 requirements and feel I can help fight vandalism on this great site. JohnDoe0007 (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

User:De728631

With spending a lot of time on editing and patrolling new pages, regularly assessing Changes related to "Portal:Middle-earth/Pages" and being familiar with the pending changes system on de.wiki I think I'm fit to review pending changes over here as well. De728631 (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Hugahoody

I feel I fit the criteria for reviewers, and have an edit currently pending on the Wikipedia:Contact us page. Hugahoody (talk) 20:02, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Peteg913

I frequently edit and modify articles pertaining to aviation. I meet all of the criteria specified for this right, as well. I have, in my experience, acquired an eye for suspected vandalism and would enjoy the privileged to help week it out and increase the users' experience by eliminating it. Thanks. peteg913   leave me one 20:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Elipongo

This system seems a good alternative to semiprotection... so long as good edits are accepted as soon as possible because we need to encourage helpful editors to join the project and not frustrate them too much. The only way to do this is to incrase the number of reviewers, so I would like to join the group to be of assistance as I can. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 19:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Ktlynch

Pending changes is a pragmatic solution to a perennial problem, long advocated on German Wikipedia. I've written several biographies and fought vandalism on pages such as Oscar Wilde and Blackrock College. Five GAs, 3 noms, 2 nearly there. Active GA reviewer.(Note: my userpage needs to be updated!) Ktlynch (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Egg Centric

I don't have a massive amount of edits but I've seen enough of Wiki to be trusted with this. Have been quite a collaborative fellow in the main :) Egg Centric (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Hazardous Matt

I don't have the highest edit count, but I believe the corrections and vandalism reverts I'm performed will speak well of my contributions. I think this would be a good alternative to semi-protection in many cases. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 22:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Danlaycock

I satisfy all six criteria here and would like to be able to help approve proposed revisions. TDL (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Feezo

Longtime editor and rollbacker; would like another way to help out. Feezo (Talk) 01:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Waterloo Road ED

I spent a lot of time reviewing the Waterloo Road articles and would like to further this by becoming a reviewer. I feel that, despite not a huge amount of edits, I still have the knowledge which meets the criteria. Waterloo Road ED (talk) 17:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  Question: Do you understand that reviewer only allows you to accept edits to articles on pending changes? Are any of the Waterloo Road articles on pending changes? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I fully understand what the task of a reviewer entails. The main article for Waterloo Road is regularly on pending changes due to the high level of vandalism over the last year or so. Waterloo Road ED (talk) 21:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Iaaasi

I am a very active contributor on wikipedia. I was blocked in the past, but since my return I've totally respected wiki policies, and now I am familiar with the rules. I often make anti-vandalism edits and I think I have enough experience in this moment (Iaaasi (talk) 08:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Halemane

I have been actively contributing on Wikipedia for the past few months and I am interested in helping out as a reviewer. I also meet the criteria for becoming a reviewer. Halemane (talk) 10:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 10:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Icealien33

I am an active user and I understand the policies. I have also been around for a couple of years. -- Ice (talk) 18:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Skier Dude (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Ceddyfresse

main work at german wikipedia, would be nice to get here Reviewer rights, too Ceddyfresse (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

User:IZAK

I have been a WP editor for over eight years. I am mostly involved in editing articles and and improving categories in Category:Jews and Judaism. In the process I am coming across submissions and edits by newer and less experienced editors that require "Reviewer" capabilities to improve and monitor them. I am familiar with WP policies and procedures in this regard. Thank you. IZAK (talk) 12:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 12:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you so much! IZAK (talk) 12:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Josh3580

For several years (in bursts) I have enjoyed patrolling recent changes, as well as new pages, and helping combat vandalism. Although I make a mistake from time to time, I pride myself on trying to make Wikipedia a reliable source for everyone. (Hope that's not too cheesy. :P}} Josh3580talk/hist 02:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

User:WikiManOne

I have edited and collaborated on quite a few wikipedia articles over the years. (I distinctly remember doing this through other accounts in the past but sadly do not remember what the names of these accounts were...) Since establishing this account, I believe I've been productive and am learning wikipedia policies quickly. WikiManOne (talk) 06:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done GedUK  08:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Mìthrandir

I have been on Wikipedia for my third year, although I took a break for a year, I have plenty of experience and I combat vandalism and also have created an article, Lightspeed Systems. I look for companies I think are notable enough and work on them with a friend. This tool would be very helpful for me. Mìthrandir (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 22:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Frap

I am long-time contributor with thousands of edits. Frap (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 15:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Chrisahn

I have been a reasonably active and construcitve contributor for almost five years. I also contribute to the German WP, where reviewing was introduced two years or so ago and where I already have reviewer rights. Chrisahn (talk) 02:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 05:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Untitledmind72

I am a reasonably active user with a history of constructive edits, ranging from copyedits to vandalism reversion to working with the Articles for Deletion. —Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 16:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 16:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Etron81

I have been a reasonably active editor for some time now and have not incurred any serious action against myself Etron81 (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Mabuska

I have been a regular editor of Wikipedia for nearing 5 years and do my best to ensure information added to articles that i come across meets standards and manual of styles as well as reverting what vandalising i come across. Mabuska (talk) 00:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

User:MelbourneStar1

Even though I havent been on Wikipedia for as long as other editors, I do have an interest in reviewing and correcting other editors edits on many different articles. I have read all policies on reviewing, and I understand them. I am on Wikipedia in a lot of my spare time, nearly every single day. If granted, I will use those rights to the best of my ability, by reviewing edits, as well as correcting them. Thankyou. MelbourneStar1 (talk) 02:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 10:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Jeremy706

I check Wikipedia every day and although I don't make edits all the time like I used to, I do keep an eye out for anything that needs fixing and feel that I can make a contribution. Jeremy (talk) 00:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Angiex3-2

I check Wikipedia every day and although I don't make edits all the time like I used to, I do keep an eye out for anything that needs fixing and feel that I can make a contribution. Angiex3-2 (talk) 03:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 09:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Basawala

I've editing Wikipedia for years and have been active in fighting vandalism and making constructive edits, despite temporary hiatuses from editing. Bʌsʌwʌʟʌ Speak up! 02:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


User:Wificlassone

For my alternate non-bot automated edits account. Wifione ....... Leave a message 07:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 09:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Ladsgroup

I want to patrol and check edits of newbies, Thanks :)Ladsgroupبحث 20:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Cprice1000

While I've only been on for around six months and have only registered under 2,000 edits, I do edit Wikipedia everyday and I want to further be able to further keep Wikipedia free from vandalism than just using Twinkle. ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 00:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Ashanda

It seems to be working well, especially on WP:BLPs. I would like to help out and also so I'll be well practiced when WP:PC is fully implemented. Ashanda (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 23:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Boolyme

I am applying for the second time. I have been blocked before. Someone suggested I apply again after 1 week. I have been here for almost 2 years now and am familiar with the rules. I have about 450 edits and would like to help more in the project. Boolyme Talk!! 09:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Crunch

I have been an editor on Wikipedia since 2005 with a history of making constructive edits, doing page cleanup, creating new articles, reverting vandalism and participating in AfD discussions. Crunch (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

User:TheVirginiaHistorian

autoconfirmed user access to 19th Amendment, etc. to edit TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 21:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:35, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Anne-theater

Hello, I would like to become a reviewer. I have been here for 6 years now and done some editing. I am also a reviewer in the German wiki.Anne-theater (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Hydrox

I have been an active contributor for long, but now I for the first time ran to the need to accept a constructive change to a revision-watched article. --hydrox (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Bped1985

I am an active member of WP:RCP and have spent quite a bit of time patrolling the New Page section, checking that articles meet WP:CSD. I also frequent the Recent Changes section, checking that the edits made are constructive and meet NPOV, WP:V and perhaps my favorite, WP:OR. Since WP:RVW mentioned that it may help, I have rollback rights. Thanks for your consideration! Bped1985 (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Krazytea

Just stopping by to ask for reviewing rights, I have been on Wiki for quite some time now and am very familiary with BLPs, Vandalism, and the like. I recently ran into trouble trying to prevent a BLP editing war on an article and it was quite cumbersome without review rights. Cheers, Krazytea(talk) 23:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done - Tiptoety talk 00:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Cherurbino

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights

Hi everybody! Since April, 2010 I wrote 388 articles for Portuguese and 147 articles for Russian Wikipedia. An interwiki from one of my articles here brings to an article which has earned a featured article barn star in ru-wiki; another article there is categorized as the good one. My SUL has +11 000 edits. Hope that my experience shall be useful for those seeking for the reviews of their articles here, in en-wiki. — Cherurbino (talk) 09:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

{{not done}}Reviewing is the process of checking pending changes to determine if they should be accepted, reverted or fixed through editing. This right is not, in general, about providing editorial review and input on how to improve articles (any editor can do that). Please read WP:Reviewer to understand the modalities of the right. Your global contributions are highly appreciated. However, I suspect that you've not understood what this reviewer right is specifically for. Hence, for now, not done. Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but I didn't say a word about editorial reviewing. When I wrote about "those seeking for the reviews" I meant a routine practice in ru-wiki when somebody requests the reviewers (and I do have such a flag in ru-wiki for several months) to review their changes. Also, I have the autopatrolled rights in en-wiki. Cherurbino 14:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
I understand your point of view. I have to mention that the reviewer right here is granted for use on the English Wikipedia, and in general, this would have been given by me on the basis of your contributions to the English Wikipedia. I could not see any anti-vandalism reversions that you may have made on the English Wikipedia. So I have no way to determine your proficiency in identifying vandalism and what is not vandalism on this project, especially as it relates to a quite different language than Russian (I mention this because a few of your edits document lack of full proficiency in English). I should suggest that you put in a week or two of anti-vandalism edits on this project and re-apply. I should have no issues granting you this right then. Irrespective of my refusal, if any other administrator in the between wishes to grant you this right, they can do so. My apologies again. Thanks. Wifione ....... Leave a message 15:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Re: "I could not see any anti-vandalism reversions that you may have made on the English Wikipedia" — sorry I didn't emphasize them separately, well… this one as of January, 15 is probably exactly what you've been looking for ('rv' in comments to this diff stands for 'reversion' of the promo link). — Cherurbino (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Meanwhile, the point of my particular concern in en-wiki is a cross-wiki vandalism (namely, «Abuse of tags») aggravated with the use of the open proxy servers (see my topic in 'Adm.noticeboard\incidents' "Proxy fraud in Articles for Deletion", published on January, 13, 2011). Sorry for having not drawing your attention to this specific issue as well. — updated Cherurbino (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done You're a generally trustworthy editor. I'm granting you this right, but with certain qualifications. I have left details on your talk page. Thanks. Wifione ....... Leave a message 03:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
I'll leave a note on your talk page with all the necessary confirmations. Your strict, rigorous approach to carrying out your administrative functions inspires me as an example to follow. It also encourages my expectations to rely upon your advices and experience in future. Thank you very much for your confidence which will be undoubtedly justified. — Cherurbino (talk) 04:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Cls14

Just read up on being a reviewer, seems like something quite rewarding I would like to try if you'll let me. No sweat if you don't though! Cls14 (talk) 23:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 09:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Cliff

I'm newer to the editing side than most, but am learning much about markup and wikipedia policies. I noticed a protected page and have read up on instructions as well as discussion about the reviewing process. Would like the ability to help, though there's clearly not any sort of backlog since only about 3 hundreths of a percent of total WP pages are protected. Thanks for consideration. Cliff (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 22:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Pax85

After an absence of some time, I am able to participate in Wiki again, at least on the weekends. I have over 2000 edits, many of which deal with vandalism. While I am still re-acclimating myself to the changes since I was last here, I would like to give a hand in reviewing. I have read all of the guidelines about being a reviewer. I also have rollbacker. Pax85 (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 10:23, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Freakmighty

Been on wikipedia a few years, know about what counts as BLP's, vandalism etc. FM [ talk to me | show contributions ]  20:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 22:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Ilyushka88

Hello. I am an user with over 5,000 edits (most of them have something to do in fighting vandalism). I have rollbacker rights so far in en-Wikipedia. I am very familiar with WP:VAN, and I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing#Reviewing_process. I had a long break from Wikipedia editing because of real life issues (job), but I returned couple of days ago and I have no plans on leaving again. If I do not get a permission to be a reviewer, I understand. Thank you Ilyushka ☃Talk!Contribs 21:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 22:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Alexjohnc3

I have gained a reasonable amount of experience on Wikipedia over the past few years, and I always revert any vandalism I come across. --Alexc3 (talk) 03:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 09:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Cwlq

I've been editing Wikipedia for 5 years or so. I am familiar with what constitutes vandalism. Chris Quackenbush (talk) 21:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Best, Mifter (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Pi

I have been on Wikipedia for nearly 5 years, although have at various points been absent. I spend a fair bit of time patrolling the recent changes list and an familiar with vandalism rules and the crux of content rules here. I have had rollback rights for a couple of years PiTalk - Contribs 08:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 09:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Banaticus

I have a few thousand edits, mostly anti-vandalism. I do not currently support this pending changes thing but I thought I should become more familiar with it by actively participating in it. I'd like to form my own opinion as to whether any problems inherent in pending changes are due more to user interface or to the general concept and just how useful it is. Banaticus (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 15:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Golgofrinchian

I have been a member here since 2004. My account was compromised and I made a new account in 2007. Since then I have been an active reviewer of changes and have made several contributions to WP, including anti-vandalism and consolidating. I would like to be part of the Pending Changes trial. Thank you Golgofrinchian- Dont Panic! (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Acalamari 22:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Felis domestica

Hello, although I'm mostly active in Pl-Wiki and here I mostly add interwiki and sometimes making some corrections, and although I'm not a native English speaker, I believe I know enough of both the language and Wiki-rules not to do much harm ;) Basically, I think I may help from time to time, not only as an editor, but also as reviewer (in pl-wiki I have both reviewer and rollbacker rights and no complaints so far). If you do not think me worthy enough ;) may I have an autorevier status without applying again to the "proper" list? Thanks in advance Felis domestica (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done - Tiptoety talk 21:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you kindly :)--Felis domestica (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Juno

I have been editing for more than a year and a half, I have read the guidelines on Vandalism and Biographies and am familiar with the other applicable guidelines. I have just read the guideline on Reviewing and I would like to help with the trial. Juno (talk) 14:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Willscrlt

I am an established user (8200+ edits total across all projects, with 5700+ here on en.wiki), and I hold Rollbacker rights here and Image-reviewer, Patroller, and Rollbacker rights on Commons. While my level of activity here has dropped way off due to a very busy job off-wiki, I think that helping to reduce PC backlogs is something that I can do on any page I am visiting where I notice it needs attention. Thanks! —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 21:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done - Tiptoety talk 21:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Buster7

I feel I have proven my trustworthyness with over two years of problem-free editing. The integrity of WP as a reliable information source for all is very important to me.Buster Seven Talk 15:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 23:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Bility

Reason requested: to help with review backlogs and increase the speed at which good edits become visible. Bility (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 23:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

User:BurtAlert

I am familiar with all applicable guidelines and have been editing for almost a year. I'd like to help with the trial and reduce some of the backlog. BurtAlert (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Yaksar

I've been a pretty active editor with a fairly substantial amount of anti-vandalism work and recent change patrolling. I believe I clearly understand the rules and guidelines needed to be approved for this. Thanks! Yaksar (let's chat) 17:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done - Tiptoety talk 17:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Nyswimmer

I think I should have Reviewer privileges because I am an active editor, I understand what my responsibilites and rights are if I get reviewer privileges,revert lots of vandalism, and Understand Wikipedia policies. This is my second time trying to apply for Reviewer priviliges, and I believe I have more experience now. Nyswimmer (talk) 19:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 20:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Aspensti

I am an active editor. I have been a Wikipedia member since 2006. I patrol the recent changes page and use my Rollback Authority to fix vandalism when applicable. I also like to spend time discussing articles for deletion. I have enough knowledge about Wikipedias guidelines and am also aware of what should not be on Wikipedia. I also carefully read the guidelines on reviewing. I would be a very active reviewer if given the permission to become one. —ASPENSTI—TALK—CONTRIBUTIONS 21:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 00:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Warfieldian

I have been contributing off and on to Wikipedia for years, not always logged in. I have recently started to contribute more regularly again. I have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and have experience with reverting vandalism. I would like to be able to help by reviewing pages with pending changes when I come across them. Warfieldian (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
  Done Dabomb87 (talk) 00:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical/Archive_12&oldid=1190233762"