Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Archive 7

Archive 1Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10
Daily Wikipedia reader and an editor with a long history of positive contributions going back to 2005. I have a significant interest in keeping the encyclopedia free of noise, am familiar with the policies concerning what is and is not considered vandalism, and revert vandalism wherever and whenever I see it (note: I've generally tended to do RVV edits without bothering to log in). I'm not at all sure about the wisdom of adding this new layer of editorial review, but if we're going to try it, I'd very much like to be a part of the trial. Killdevil (talk) 03:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  07:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I am a regular editor on Wikipedia and agree with the pending changes. I often revert vandalism and copy-edit related articles. A recent vandalism I saw on a high-profile page lead me to believe in a stronger stance against it. NortyNort (talk) 04:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  07:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been a member of wikipedia for a while now, and just a few months ago was granted rollback rights, however, immediately after that, I had to take a small break due to school. However, with this new feature being introduced, I would like to be in on the ground floor and try it out, in case it becomes a more frequently used feature in the future. I am a new changes patroler first and foremost, so I see the changes as they happen, and I'd love to do this. Fbifriday (talk) 05:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  07:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


I frequently patrol the recent changes, along with random pages, looking for vandalism to revert. I think that possession of reviewer rights would help me in my fight against vandalism, as I would be able to quickly revert vandalism on pages that are part of the Pending Changes trial. I would love to help with the trial, as it allows unregistered users to contribute to an oft-vandalized page. Coasterlover1994 02:29, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY Happy 4th of July!!! 07:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Experienced editor and I regularly (usually several times a day) patrol my watchlist to "review" edits made to pages on it. JorisvS (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I have an ever-expanding list of articles on my watchlist which I check several times per day. I'm a stickler for NPOV and ensuring that additions are properly cited (where appropriate and from valid sources) as well. Finally, when time permits, I sweep for obvious vandalism (particularly as it relates to military, school, and city articles). I like to help out where I can. Jonathon A H (talk) 19:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 19:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Experienced user, I regularly do anti-vandalism work and patrol recent changes, so this permission would be very useful! Jack?! 23:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  00:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Aside from my vandalism and housekeeping edits from random browsing, I often patrol recent changes, as well as new pages. Reviewer permissions would be useful. Pyho T / C 03:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY Happy 4th of July!!! 04:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I have been around wikipedia for a while... I just got back from a vacation, where my activity dwindled, however I am back now. Thanks CrimsonBlue (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I have been a user for several years with no problems. I have vandal-chased from time to time. I think I could help out with reviewing. Adam in MO Talk 08:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm an experienced user, I often patrol new pages and recent changes, I also have rollback rights, and ability to review edits would be very useful for me. Kubek15 write/sign 11:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been around for a while and perform various anti-vandalism jobs. Gosox(55)(55) 15:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Reason for requesting Reviewer rights GunMetal Angel 16:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I have had an account for a few years. I get on and most ususually revert vandalism from time to time when nothing seems better to do. I have quite a few pages watchlisted, me becoming a reviewer would assist in the wide use of this new tool.
"I want to try the new toy! Mommy, make him give it to me!" Lame joking aside, I want to help with teh new process. Hamtechperson 18:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm an experienced user with almost 2 years editing and 1,000+ edits. Nowyouseeme | wanna chat? 19:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I am an active editor with 4 years of experience and 4500+ edits Coaster1983 (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been here at Wikipedia for a few years and am seeking to expand my contributory effort. I have rollback rights here on the Wikipedia and have been a long time RC Patroller. The addition of reviewer rights would help me greatly with contributing to Wikipedia. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ talk 20:14, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I am interested in testing out the trial to see if it will be good for the project in the long run. I am a rollbacker and have been editing for about a year and a half, mostly regularly. Outback the koala (talk) 00:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 00:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I would like to look at the reviewing process in detail, so as to decide whether I think it is a good idea Cardamon (talk) 04:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


I understand the policies involved, would be pleased to help out SJK (talk) 09:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm an active editor, understand the relevant policies and would be interested in helping out in the process. I also fight vandalism with Twinkle and having this tool would be useful in pre-empting vandalism. SBC-YPR (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Although I tend to edit articles on topics that interest me, I would like to contribute more and build on the work of the Wikipedia community in more helpful ways. I have familiarised myself with Reviewing, Reviewers and Pending Changes, amongst various policies, and believe that I would be able to contribute as a Reviewer. Sroc (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
The process seems like a good addition to WP but I would like to actually use it before passing judgement. raseaCtalk to me 13:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 13:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I am a Wikiepdian who mostly monitors pages for vandalism. I have several pages on my watch list involved in the trial. I feel i would be able to assist more if i had reviewer rights Weaponbb7 (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been editing for a while, fighting vandalism wherever I see it, and would be happy to help review. —Kenyon (t·c) 14:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Though I admit I've been on wikibreak a few months, I participated in RFCs and informal straw polling this past winter that led up to this trial and I'd like to be able to best participate in discussions of its future as well--this is a defining matter for Wikipedia. I've haunted BLP/N in the past and a check of my history will show past BLP cleanup work with unsourced and dubious edits. Feel free to ask with any questions/concerns. daTheisen(talk) 14:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I think I could be useful. TEK (talke-mail) 16:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I hope, I qualify to the criteria for becoming a reviewer. I think this new feature will help me contributing to Wikipedia in more helpful way.-- Ranjithsutari (talk) 17:07, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm editing a few articles in the "reviewer" test, and would like to familiarize myself with the proposed process. Thanks! JeffJonez (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I am a long-standing member of Wikipedia (since 2003) and would like to be able to take part in the trial of this new system. Angio (talk) 05:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY (TALK) 06:13, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been an editor for quite some time now, mostly concerning myself with the removal of vandalism, so I know the related topics quite well. It's true that I haven't edited much in quite a while, but I'm returning from a wikibreak. Der Falke (talk) 08:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:00, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Although I'm only a couple of months a Wikipedian and don't have that huge an edit count, I am ambitious and would like to help building Wikipedia. I have experience in reverting vandalism, I know the policy on vandalism. I also know the basic content principles: NPOV, NOR, etc and I have read the guideline on reviewing. I hope to build experience with this new feature. GoldRenet (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
I like the idea of Pending Changes and would like to help out by reviewing articles. kslays (talkcontribs) 17:07, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
i am a long-time, regular contributor and would be happy to assist emerson7 18:27, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Right now, I am enjoying the rights of being a Rollbacker. I have been on Wikipedia since October of 2007. My purpose of joining this project, being a Reviewer, is for me to give insights, share my thoughts and do a constructive criticism on whatnots regarding this new tool. I hope to be of help in this endeavor. ax (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have been doing a lot of edits lately, both on articles I follow closely and some general typo fixing and copy editing. I understand the new system and would like to have the opportunity to help Iangurteen (talk) 12:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Many pages and users need much reviewing and I do think I qualify. Although my history says I've made but one edit, I have made many more edits with this account and my account before I changed my name. Thank you! Belugaboy 13:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 16:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
This looks like it could be useful, and I'd like to participate in the test. I've been editing off and on for 5+ years; I have rollback rights (1.5+ years) in order to vandalfight using Huggle, and as far as I know I've been a good little editor on Wikipedia thus far. - Minkus (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 16:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
I've read the info, and it seems like a good idea. I'd like to give it a go. Jorgesca (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
I have read the WP:REVIEWING and WP:VANDAL. I have understood what our Wikipedia is and what it isn't, and all other I found at the WP:REVIEWING page. I took help of administrator Acroterion too. I wish to help Wikipedia by reviewing it. I will review it several times a week. HG Mitchell has also helped me. I thank them. I also, really, want to help those who require help. I will give good service to this nice encyclopedia.--Sainsf<^> (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY (TALK) 17:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
I have read and thoroughly understand the Reviewer policies and wish to further the value of my daily contributions to Wikipedia. I have a track record attesting to my keen observance of WP policies, esp. no original research, citation of verifiable and reliable sources, and maintenance of NPOV. I look forward to increased responsibilities. Thank you. -- Paulscrawl (talk) 19:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 20:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
I am a Wikipedian with >2000 edits and I feel I have much to offer as an editor. I have many areas of interest as seen by my edits.Mwinog2777 (talk) 03:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC) Mwinog2777 (talk) 03:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Astonmartini (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

I've been a registered Wikipedian for about 5 years now and have been a fairly consistent editor during that time. My wide ranging interests and countless hours spent on this website mean that I will easily be able to scour the site for vandalism which I shall promptly rectify. Cheers Astonmartini (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been on Wikipedia for about 4.5 years now, and (though not always logged in when I do so), routinely will correct the sort of vandalism that a reviewer would check for. I don't blindly go in and edit everything, and some of my edits may be pedantic, but I wholly support the most reliable and utterly accurate Wikipedia possible. Tigerhawkvok (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 12:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Fairly experienced & regular editor, new page patroller, fighting vandalism, familiar with Wikipedia's basic guidelines. Amsaim (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I would really like to help out with this. I have plenty of Vandalism experience. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 14:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
User for ~5.5 years. My edits are pretty exclusively RCP and general vandalism/typo fixing as I find it; I'm already a rollbacker, and this seems a similarly useful way to help. MoraSique (talk) 15:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY (TALK) 19:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Fairly Experienced Editor with WikiProject Puerto Rico. Hope to Contribute Further with this right. Have made enumerable Vandalism reverts and currently have over 700 articles on my watchlist. Quazgaa (talk) 19:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done, no issues that I can see. ~ mazca talk 21:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm almost strictly a vandal fighter. For times when I do patrol RC and am around, this tool would be helpful. I've not been as active in past months, I've been working at another MWF wiki, however I'm still around and am interested in continuing to help out around here. I feel this tool would allow me to do that. Thanks for your time! Gordonrox24 | Talk 21:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done, looks fine to me. ~ mazca talk 21:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I would really like to help out with this. I have plenty of Vandalism experience (with my back-up account) and I've been a Wikipedia editor since 2006. Although I am usually active in the Tagalog Wikipedia under a different name, (since global accounts did not exist back then) I believe my experience as a vandalism fighter in the TL Wikipedia can now be applied here in the English Wikipedia. KonsulRomanumSPEAK to the Consulate 02:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY (TALK) 07:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Experienced editor, routinely perform anti-vandalism tasks --Andrensath (talk | contribs) 12:42, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
I have been fighting vandalism for a while now. I currently use twinkle but I want to see if Rollback would be better. JDDJS (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
I have rollback rights and have been reverting vandalism lately. I know how to use reviewer as I have tested it on flaggedrevs lab Wikimedia. πr2 (talk • contributions) 18:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 18:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Coming back from a hiatus, familiar with policy. PerfectProposal 19:41, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 19:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
I have plenty of experience from the Swedish Wikipedia, where I've been an administrator since January 2010 and made a total of about 15,000 edits. Here my edit count lies somewhere around 2,500, and it consists mostly of vandalism fighting. I have rollbacker rights here. tetraedycal, tetraedycal 22:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:33, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Ksaraf (talk) 23:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I am a physician. Been using Wikipedia for >5 years. My contributions have mainly been adding to medical articles and history and newsworthy items. I have also edited many vandalized pages. Ksaraf (talk) 23:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

  DoneDoRD (talk) 00:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I am well acquainted with the Wikipedia cultures and policy Angpradesh (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been an editor on Wikipedia for 7 years and have contributed thousands of edits and I don't think there's ever been an incident. Benwing (talk) 21:42, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 22:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Well-acquainted with Wikipedia policy. Been an editor for many years with no incidents. — Super-Magician (talk contribs count) 22:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 22:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I am requesting these rights since I am an active editor who has Rollbacker rights. This would be a useful tool in helping inexperienced editors and fighting vandalism. I am very interested in this new feature. Brian Halvorsen (talk) 01:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 01:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I have been a user on Wikipedia since August 29, 2008 and I edit frequently upon game, movie, software, and occasionally other articles that I come across in everyday reading. I have never been accused of vandalism; never been banned; and I have a few commendations from fellow game editors. I am good with grammar, punctuation and spelling; which gives me an edge when refining edits from new editors. Thank you for your time. Ffgamera - My page! · Talk to me!· Contribs 02:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 02:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a bunch! Ffgamera - My page! · Talk to me!· Contribs 02:33, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I am requesting these rights since I am an active editor who has Rollbacker rights. I would like to help inexperienced editors and fighting vandalism,
I have been here since 2008 so have plenty of experience with wikimarkup and understand the policy's and guidelines Paul2387 10:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done hop aboard. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I am an experienced user with over 3,000 edits and I know policy very well. ActivExpressionTalkGuestbook 17:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I have a a 3 year history of editing here, mostly reverting vandalism, including on some controversial or contentious entries. I already have rollback. Thanks! Dawn Bard (talk) 20:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 20:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been around for about 4 1/2 years & have ~40k edits w/o any blocks or serious conflicts -- Rrburke (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 21:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I'm looking to test this. Never bothered getting any other permissions but I think my record for adding high-quality references and content speaks for itself. II | (t - c) 23:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 00:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
10,000 edits over six years. Rajah (talk) 01:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done fetch·comms 02:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm an active editor and feel I would be a good candidate for this role. Fryede (talk) 13:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
This is MC10's alternate account, and I'd like to request reviewer permissions for this account. MS10 (MasterCL) 15:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed. MC10 (TCGBL) 15:06, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done The Helpful One 15:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
On-and-off vandalism fighter for the last few years, would like this tool to help me out —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 16:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
alt account of mono. mono 01:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Didn't I just do this a couple of weeks ago[1] for another alt? —DoRD (talk) 01:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I believe I would be suitable for this role as I am an active editor, and often fix/report articles that have been vandalized. TALLeN talk 13:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Although at the moment the only page I watch to which this applies (as far as I am aware) is the PlayStation 3 article, I feel it would be a useful anti-vandalism tool to have access to (especially if the trial proves successful and such protection is applied to other articles). With the PS3 article specifically I have been able to revert vandalism up to now using twinkle, but since there is an official tool it would be preferable to use that. I think have a good track record when it comes to dealing with vandalism (especially on the Xbox 360 and afore mentioned PS3 articles) and upholding Wikipedia's other policies. AlphathonTM (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Experienced rollbacker, NPP-er, WP:HUGGLE-er, and I came back from a month-long wikibreak to find this trial started. I'd love to join Saeb(talkjorn) 15:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
This sounds like a good idea and I would like to be a part of it. Rollbacker with over 2,500 edits. E♴ (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I like getting rid of vandalism. Oh, I also love reading and editing Wikipedia. いただき (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Over 900 edits, active fighter against vandalism. I believe I'm a good candidate for this role. -- ĴoeĴohnson|2 17:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 19:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I would like to help keeping the quality of Wiki high Winston (talk) 18:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 19:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I am a regular, active editor and try to be very objective on matters. I believe in keeping Wikipedia a highly accurate source. Kierzek (talk) 19:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 19:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
9,685 edits. Most of which added content. John Nagle (talk) 19:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 20:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Been here for almost two years, I fight vandalism/copyedit articles. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 20:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Just under 6,000 edits in under 2 years.  ChaosMasterChat 22:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I have rollback and would like to do reviewing too. PvsKllKsVp (talk) 23:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm an established editor who reverts vandalism on sight. I'd like to contribute more by becoming a reviewer. – Acdx (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, I know policy and I've been reverting vandalism on a number of pages for a while so I guess it makes sense to formalise it! DiverScout (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done, looks fine to me. ~ mazca talk 18:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I already have rollback& would like to check out reviewing NotedGrant Talk 18:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done, looks fine ~ mazca talk 18:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
My track record is pretty positive and I'd like to test this out. Sounds like an interesting tool proposal. I don't have rollback strictly speaking, but I use Lupin's tool and Twinkle which both include that feature. Millahnna (mouse)talk 19:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I saw the invitation to join the project on Wikipedia page headers, and I thought I would like to help. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 20:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
  DoneDoRD (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Deal with a lot of IP nonsense and SPA vandalism on pages that I patrol Pectoretalk 00:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)