Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/July 2008

July 1

edit

July 2

edit

July 3

edit

July 4

edit
It'll save me a lot of time when reverting numerous vandalism edits
  Not done You were recently involved in an edit war as early as May. I'd recommend a month or so of editing before re-applying. Ensure that you don't get into edit wars, and discuss on the talk page instead of constantly reverting other edits. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 5

edit

July 6

edit

July 7

edit

July 8

edit

July 9

edit

July 10

edit

July 11

edit

July 12

edit

July 13

edit

July 14

edit

July 15

edit

July 16

edit

July 17

edit

July 18

edit

July 19

edit

July 20

edit

July 21

edit

July 22

edit

July 23

edit

July 24

edit

July 25

edit

July 26

edit

July 27

edit

July 28

edit

July 29

edit

July 30

edit

July 31

edit

Josh3736

edit
Quickly revert vandalism Josh3736 (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done per experience. You only have 30 or so edits, and only three of them today. The rest were in 2005. I suggest a few weeks of reverting vandalism, with either Twinkle or undo before re-applying. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CyclonicWhirlwind

edit
I would like easier ability to revert obvious vandalism, instead of WP:TWINKLE or WP:UNDO. -- Cheers mate! CYCLONICWHIRLWIND talk 02:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. I don't see any history of vandal fighting and you've less than 250 edits. Come back after you've done some vandal reverts either with twinkle or undo and have 500-1000 edits under your belt. –xenocidic (talk) 02:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Account

edit
I believe in fighting vandalism and nonproductive edits. I will use the rollback back feature for only good. Thanks! My Account (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done Your account is too new. Come back after you've got about 500 edits with some vandal fighting under your belt using undo or Twinkle. –xenocidic (talk) 22:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tj9991

edit
I've made several anti-vandalism reverts, and quite a few other contributions spread over several pages. I believe that by reviewing my contribs you will understand that my intent to assist in controlling vandalism will permit granting me the rollback feature. If for any reason you feel that I should not, I would appreciate being told why in my talk page. tj9991 (talk) 08:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done - Hi there. I'm really sorry, but your account has far too few edits to be able to evaluate your competence regarding vandalism reverts. Can I suggest you keep going as you are and maybe come back when you've a bit more experience - Alison 08:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ChiragPatnaik

edit
I hang around Indian media pages, some like times of india suffer from vandalism often. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. No significant history of anti-vandal work. Consider using Twinkle or undo to fight vandalism for a little bit and re-apply. –xenocidic (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Washburnmav

edit
I am a relatively new user but am very committed to counter vandalism. Most of my ~200 edits have been vandalism reversion. Having rollback would make me even more effective. Thanks for your consideration. Washburnmav (talk) 18:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done I don't think you are particulary ready for the tool, especially with the some examples of your use of the default undo tool, one example. Rudget (logs) 18:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously I did that in good faith. It would be helpful if you could explain what was wrong with that edit. Thanks Washburnmav (talk) 18:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RRaunak

edit
I had like to use this feature for i have earned quiet a good experience in Wiki. MAINLY FOR IP VANDALS--
[+]
• Autographed and Signed by RRaunakWanna meet him ? •

10:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see no experience in vandal fighting looking through this user's contributions. I really only see tons of edits in userspace and no vandalism reverting. -- RyRy (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have not got one chance as others do before me
  Not done Not enough experience with vandal-fighting yet. Please develop some experience with the undo feature or Twinkle. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tiberiu Balint

edit
I want Rollback rights, please! --Ǐ♥Шяєšт£їпġ (talk) 20:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. Your account is far too new to grant rollback. Consider using undo or Twinkle to fight vandalism for a while and then re-apply in a few weeks. –xenocidic (talk) 20:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ammar gerrard117

edit
Revert, Remove and Restablish comromised articles. Ammar gerrard117 (talk) 06:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. You don't have quite enough experience yet to indicate your knowledge of what constitutes vandalism. You only have 78 edits (30 of which are to the mainspace). Perhaps consider using Twinkle in the meantime. Useight (talk) 06:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ajh16

edit
I have been trying to get in to vandalism fighting and this would be helpful for dealing with some issues that have come up that I have been forced to make a new edit to deal with in a timely manner. Ajh16 (talk) 17:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. You haven't been here nearly long enough. Please get a few hundred edits/few weeks worth of vandal fighting under your belt and reapply later. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 17:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]