Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 110
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 105 | ← | Archive 108 | Archive 109 | Archive 110 | Archive 111 | Archive 112 | → | Archive 115 |
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Seinfeld guest stars
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Seinfeld guest stars · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, TFSyndicate, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. TFSyndicate (talk) 14:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Trygve Svindland
The article is based on facts and is not advertisment or ambigous, the article will be updatet with more information that are useful for many users of Wikipedia -Trygve Svindland (talk) 22:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Some observations:
- "Based on facts", "not advertisement", and "useful for many users" are all irrelevant. Policies and guidelines matter most.
- This is an article that you wrote, about you. You should not write about yourself on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Autobiography for guidance.
- The article is about a performer. It is not clear exactly what criteria are met for inclusion, as described in WP:ACTORBIO and WP:MUSICBIO, and in general by WP:42. The article would likely not pass a deletion discussion at WP:AFD.
- We could restore it to your userspace for further development. It isn't a main-space article though. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Happy_Plugs
There's new resources of the brand: http://techland.time.com/2013/09/24/finally-handmade-18-carat-gold-earbuds-that-cost-14500/ http://www.tuaw.com/2013/09/24/these-14-5k-gold-earbuds-will-go-great-with-your-gold-iphone-5s/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2427776/Sounds-like-gimmick-buy-solid-gold-headphones-14-000.html http://www.luxury-insider.com/luxury-news/2013/09/happy-plugs-earphones-in-18-carat-gold -83.250.18.113 (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user deb (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Kent Evans
deleted for references. Revised references available, but page was deleted uncontested -50.165.186.199 (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Evans, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user SarahStierch (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Deletion was supported by several people, so the result is pretty conclusive. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Jimmy the Groundhog
Jimmy the Groundhog is the official Groundhog for the State of Wisconsin, and deserves his own page just like Punxsutawney Phil, Buckeye Chuck, Balzac Billy, Wiarton Willy, etc. He is not anybody's personal "Pet" which apparently was the excuse used for deleting the page. If he cannot have his own page then the other mentioned groundhogs shouldn't either. He even has his own official website at www.groundhogcentral.com -Alieder54656 (talk) 07:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done You make it sounds like it important so you should be able to write a new article that explains and references that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation/Jim Fazio Sr.
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 67.8.128.244 (talk) 04:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Daniel Skelton
Article was deleted for A7 / lack of notability. Deleting admin has retired from Wikipedia. I request that it be moved to my user space to allow me to continue working on the article to establish notability. Only after notability is better established will I resubmit to article space. -Stevenmg (talk) 11:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done because there is nothing worth restoring: just an infobox giving his date of birth as November 21, 1986 and saying he is an American actor, and a lot of blank headings like Biography, Personal life, Filmography with no content. If you can find refs to show that he meets WP:NACTOR, go ahead and write an article. JohnCD (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Rakesh Varre
I have submitted the references and everything and i didnt put any wrong information in there. its jus that since i m new i to wikipedia i might miss something. if you please put my page back and let me know what i m missing i would definitely submit it. the reason it said to be deleted was that it failed WP:BIO and WP:ENTERTAINER if you please put my page back i will fulffill the whole requirements that you ask for -Veena Uppalapati (talk) 14:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakesh Varre, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 15:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Basilica, the cannon that destroyed the walls of Constanitople
- Basilica The cannon that the salesman Urban had built to destroy the walls of the Constantinople · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mensatop2 (talk) 06:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
I got this from Wike before~!!!!Mensatop2 (talk) 06:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
and I work slow so don't delete until times up dog!Mensatop2 (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done There is nothing worthwhile here, so you can easily start again, but then again perhaps you should experiment in your sandbox: User:Mensatop2/sandbox. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Dhombaragampatti
- Indented line
A village in Dharmapuri District in Tamilnadu(India). It is located in Salem-Dharmapuri Highway Road. this village will come under Palayampudur Panchayat. Around 300 families are living here. The Hindu Goddess Mariamman Temple is one of the famous temple around the villages.
=== * Pachiamman Temple ===
- Indented line
Pachiamman Temple is in Valli Nagar which is a famous Temple worshiped by the people around it. The construction if the temple was started on early 2008. Mr. M.Dhuraisamy is the root person to start the construction of temple. His relations helped him to construct the Temple only for few days and then they left off. They are opposing him indirectly for the Temple construction. He is struggling very much to build the Temple. Now, the Temple is in unfinished condition.
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dprabhakar4190 (talk) 08:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Dhombaragampatti
Need to update the details -Dprabhakar4190 (talk) 08:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. but see previous. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The Skunk
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Skunk · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Article was originally deleted for failure to indicate notability. Added notability: Editor of this online publication, TheSkunk.org, is a producer (Braddon Mendelson) who was named as a defendant in the historic Rosa Parks vs LaFace Records lawsuit. In addition, TheSkunk.org was the second place winner of the 2009 Annual Humorfeed News Satire Awards HumorFeed -99.174.238.200 (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It was not deleted because of non notability, but declined because of that, and deleted due to lack of editing. Please improve the draft, the resubmit once reliable references are found. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harperbury Free School
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harperbury Free School · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, CliveBG, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. CliveBG (talk) 09:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've restored it. It's an AfC article, so I've just left it at its prior location. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- In other words Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ES&L 11:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Rebecca Skowron
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 76.78.3.149 (talk) 05:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rebecca Skowron Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HiDolls
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HiDolls · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 80.229.47.57, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 80.229.47.57 (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Gerald Huang (cricketer)
He has played in the Australian Test U-15s team. He has made some significance in the cricket world and thus, I think he should have a page. -123.243.11.47 (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment: This player is very likely not notable enough to qualify for an article in Wikipedia. The relevant guidelines are
WP:NFOOTY,WP:NCRICK, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Corrected per below. What was I thinking, I know good and well that football != cricket. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC) - Not done Playing in national/international U-15 does not not meet the definition of notable for cricketers, yet ES&L 00:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Just like to point it out though, that he has made some significance in cricket. The first Test of the U-15s Ashes bewteen Australia and England was recorded on FOX. 123.243.11.47 (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you believe that this person meets General notability criteria or WP:BIO and you can list a few reliable sources, independent of the player or his team/league/etc. which provide significant coverage of this person, you might have success. Otherwise, wait a bit. If he's that good, sooner or later he'll qualify under his sport's notability guidelines. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:29, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Gerald Huang is part of the Australian national cricket team in under-15s level. I saw him playing live in the Ashes U-15s and on FOX. EntirelyTrue (talk) 04:37, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you believe that this person meets General notability criteria or WP:BIO and you can list a few reliable sources, independent of the player or his team/league/etc. which provide significant coverage of this person, you might have success. Otherwise, wait a bit. If he's that good, sooner or later he'll qualify under his sport's notability guidelines. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:29, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Just like to point it out though, that he has made some significance in cricket. The first Test of the U-15s Ashes bewteen Australia and England was recorded on FOX. 123.243.11.47 (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Just to note, the IP is attempting to insert the Userspace version of this article into articles. 130.88.141.34 (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Cathedral bank
This article appears not to exist anymore, the article did not seem as an advertising, in fact I remembered it was a little on the side of a bad publicity to that bank, since there is not much information available about them, seems a good idea to have this restored. -189.253.87.184 (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. see Cathedral Bank Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Strange Case of the Cosmic Rays
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Strange Case of the Cosmic Rays · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 64.40.54.20, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. If the undeleting admin reads down this far, could you please restore this article to Draft:The Strange Case of the Cosmic Rays and remove the {{AFC submission}} template? Thanks. 64.40.54.20 (talk) 08:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. restored to Draft:The Strange Case of the Cosmic Rays. Don't expect a draft to be kept forever though. Please add references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Bradley_L_Baker
correct refenreces -Khocon 07:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Too much a promotion of this person. eg "capitalizes" "wealth of knowledge" show that this is designed to advertise the person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Camp Poyntelle Lewis Village
reasoning -67.243.188.195 (talk) 06:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Please undelete this page. I'm not sure why it was deleted in the first place. We are a 501c3 not for profit agency and our article on Wikipedia contained references. We would like our presence on Wikipedia to be restored.
Thanks!
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. the reason given for deletion was: "Non-notable summer camp; there are few sources on google that aren't from the camp itself and those sources are forums or blogs". It needs more references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Fera
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Fera · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Tfera1 (talk) 03:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Assumed you did want Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Fera and not something called example. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hustlers Convention
And Hustler's Convention - deleted due to prod/g8. Album is notable, see artist: Jalal Mansur Nuriddin, label was United Artists Records -OSborn arfcontribs. 02:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Rereading the PROD it's possible the article in question is not about the same thing I'm talking about. I'd appreciate it if it were undeleted anyways. OSborn arfcontribs. 02:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. let me know if you don't want this one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
News Trendy
reasoning -Newstrendy (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC) place sir check this website and i need make this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newstrendy (talk • contribs) 14:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ES&L 17:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
I, 108.20.153.119, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 108.20.153.119 (talk) 16:41, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done The article Moses Miracle does not appear to have been deleted ES&L 17:06, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Keyes
- This was requested by Nachocheesedip (talk · contribs), but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request - or, rather, I have restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Keyes (2) to which the page listed was a redirect. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
This is an official duo formed by YG Entertainment. http://www.ygfamily.com/notice/NList.asp?LANGDIV=K -Clayoung (talk) 22:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- The article is not deleted, ergo there is no need to undelete. And even if it does get deleted, notability speedy deletions will not be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Not done It's now been deleted, but Jeremy's second sentence explains it well. Nyttend (talk) 22:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
i have not more time. so i create page's slow. so please no delete page's
reasoning 'i have not more time. so i create page's slow. so please no delete page's' -RVS 04:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Your page had this on it:
== Rajasthali Vidyapeeth Sansthan has Two parts== --RVS 14:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC) *[[Rajasthali Vidaypeeth Sr Sec School]] *[[RVS Academy]]
So nothing worth restoring yet. But you are welcome to recreate a page on the school again Rajasthali Vidyapeeth Sansthan, with a bit more content so we know what you are talking about. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Not done We have a computer program (a bot) that removes requests after they're answered. If I don't put the big "X", it might not remove it. The "not done" reflects what Graeme Bartlett's already said. Nyttend (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Bowden Institution
I would like to populate this article with information. It seems that it has been deleted arbitrarily. I am new to wikipedia but I thought that the idea was people can add information to articles they have knowledge of and I would like to provide my knowledge -JergensOriginal (talk) 15:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- The content written by you was: "Bowden Institution is a medium security facility located several kilometers south of Innisfail, Alberta." You can recreate it with a bit more claim of importance. This was nominated for deletion too fast. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Not done because Graeme gave you everything that was in the article. Nyttend (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Fred Pittman
reasoning -Fred pittman (talk) 21:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Info for verification also known as Frederick Pittman, F.L. Pittman, Frederick L. Pittman IMDB consolidated all the names to verify his credits
- IMDb is not a valid source, and you should not be writing an article about yourself. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Also, the page still exists, meaning this particular board can't help you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helene Rompre
I, M cyclops, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. M cyclops (talk) 21:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Surely you jest! That article still exists! All you'd need to do is edit the page to cancel the G13. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Not done because the page hasn't been deleted. Any edit to the page can cancel the deletion attempt, so I've made the necessary edit. Please remember that Articles for Creation isn't for indefinite storage; we'd appreciate it if you'd do more work on the page to get it ready to be an article. If you don't do anything with it for another six months, it will again be tagged for deletion; you can again object, but it's going to be easier for everyone if you can get it ready to be an article, so we don't have to worry about more deletion tagging. Nyttend (talk) 23:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
St. Thomas' Episcopal School Pipe Band
not ONLY grade 1 pipe bands are notable. Restore this page immediately. This band wholly meets the requirements for WP:Band on conditions 1, 7, and 9. 1. There have been numerous newspaper articles published about the band and their accomplishments. 7. They are, by far, the most famous pipe band in Texas, among the most notable pipe bands in the US, and among the most notable juvenile pipe bands in the world. 9. They have won the World Pipe Band Championships 5 times.
-108.67.161.194 (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Thomas' Episcopal School Pipe Band, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user BDD (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Note: Non-admin replying. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph A. Suozzi
I would like to edit the article further so it may be considered for approval. I was unaware of the 6 month deadline and recieved the notification to my work email over the weekend and could not attend to the revisions until today. -Jaeisman (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- As you can see, the "draft" was moved as an article in June of this year. As such, the AFC does not exist anymore - feel free to improve the article Joseph A. Suozzi itself ES&L 15:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Catherine Gross
the documentation of what is essentially a secret society is difficult at best, but I am working on updating the page and references as much as possible. Pleas note that the account of Catherine Gross has also been deleted, but I direct you to the pages of Gloria Brame and Viola Johnson as well as the Kink Aware Professionals page where you will see her name. Links were also removed from SouthEast LeatherFest of which Ms. Gross is the Producer. A comment was posted about the awards she received being "minor" but the person who commented says they do not know the origin of the awards. Awards Ms. Gross has received are nationally recognized awards in the leather community, and in no way are considered minor at all. Additionally, a book by Peter Tupper to be published in 2015 discussing the "firsts" in the leather community specifically names Ms. Gross. I would also like to refer you to the folllwing page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Southeast_Leatherfest_(2nd_nomination) where you will see comments pertaining to the difficulty in finding sources due to the privacy and secrecy of the community. If it is not possible to restore the page, I respectfully request a copy of the page. Thank you. -Mike Shore (talk) 17:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Article was deleted at AFD. See also ticket:2013122310011148 at OTRS. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Gross, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Renate Da Rin
Userfy to User:Davidwr/Renate Da Rin so I can compare it with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Renate Da Rin to better assess whether to accept the submission, move the expired PROD into mainspace, merge the two, or reject both. -davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Please arrange whatever is necessary in the way of history-merging to maintain attribution if you use any of the content from this. JohnCD (talk) 11:17, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. The histories are merged into Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Renate Da Rin and I will tag the redirect at User:Davidwr/Renate Da Rin with db-g6 shortly. I will move Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Renate Da Rin to Renate Da Rin later today as well. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph A. Suozzi
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph A. Suozzi · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Jaeisman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jaeisman (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done See below ES&L 15:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done this was a case where the AFC was accepted and then also declined within a few minutes, an edit conflict resulted with an incorrect tagging for G13 as well. As you can see the creator was confused. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Compliance Monitoring
reasoning -WTEHendriks (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Compliance monitoring was not in the encyclopedic style required. Instead of trying to motivate organisations to have Compliance monitoring. You should be telling us about it, along with the references that show where the information comes from. There should not be any advertising for training for this topic either. You can recreate this article, but not using marketing speak. If you prefer you could have this as a Userspace draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NED Image Printer
I, Wadecobb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Wadecobb (talk) 12:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Trent
I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. —Anne Delong (talk) 19:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BLKDMNDS
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BLKDMNDS · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 142.11.75.8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 142.11.75.8 (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
We will finish the information soon, very important that we get our Wiki page up and accurate. Has been taking longer than expected. -142.11.75.8 (talk) 19:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- This was originally two requests by the same editor about the same file. I merged them. In both cases, the editor left the "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/" part off of the filename. I corrected this. @Peridon:, as you did the deletion earlier today, would you care to do the restoration? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please add independent references to show that this is notable and then submit for review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:02, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Buni TV
Buni TV is notable having on Wikipedia as it's helping content producers in Africa distribute and monetize content. This is a huge problem for Africa and having a place they can use as a distribution (and them knowing about it) will enable go back to do what they live doing which is to produce content. It'll be great if the oage is undeleted. -Natasjalatif (talk) 12:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marie Ruoff Byrum
I, Dlohcierekim, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Dlohcierekim 22:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, JohnCD. Dlohcierekim 00:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bertha May Ingle
I, Mcflann, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mcflann (talk) 14:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Done Dlohcierekim 17:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Rebel fighting Championship
reasoning -Londonted (talk) 05:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC) Previously this was deleted because the legitimacy of the organization couldn't be authenticated and that they have not held an event to support their existence. They have now held its first event on Saturday 21st December 2013 - Rebel Fighting Championship (Into The Lion's Den). See below links for supporting evidence:
http://www.sherdog.com/events/Rebel-Fighting-Championship-1-Into-the-Lions-Den-33087 http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/12/23/5237808/rebel-fc-1-results-video-rob-lisita-lion-inoue-taiyo-nakahara http://www.thefightnation.com/rebel-fc-1-results-rob-lisita-wins-big-submits-lion-takeshi-inoue/ http://fightsportasia.com/2013/12/22/rebel-fc-1-into-the-lions-den-the-aftermath/ https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.510930779020836.1073741826.164559463657971&type=1
They will be looking to hold further events, so the wiki page needs to be restored in accordance with fairness. (http://www.rebelfightingchampionshio.com - official website)
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:07, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
One of only 19 theremin players mentioned on wikipedia - how is this page deemed unimportant exactly? Or different than Gabby_Lala or Carolina_Eyck or Clara_Rockmore? The measure of an artist's reach is (clearly) beyond the scope of a webpage, surely there exists actual, shameless self-promotion elsewhere on the site - but it wasn't on this page, please correct this speedy deletion error. There's a very real concern (by this editor, at least) attached to the deletion that this is a hostile act due to the performer recently being attacked and outspoken about the encounter. -Stepinrazor (talk) 20:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done However don't think this is a personal attack, it is just senseless deletionism. Graeme Bartlett (talk)
- THANK YOU and happy holidays to you, Graeme! Stepinrazor (talk) 11:03, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
macrotechnology
reasoning -Skcazy (talk) 19:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not certain A-11s are contestable here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- CommentA11 was clearly appropriate, so I would not restore. Will let another admin decide. Dlohcierekim 14:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks like the correct venue is WP:DRV. Dlohcierekim 14:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sound of Clouds
I, Bozjones, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Bozjones (talk) 14:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
I need to rescue some links from the page source -Bozjones (talk) 14:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tha Boogiewoogie Man
I, 76.219.224.195, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 76.219.224.195 (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm have new recording & production information to submit and still gathering more film,commercial information to submit in this article -76.219.224.195 (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are aware that we delete advertisements on sight, correct? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Special K Software
I, 114.77.91.74, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 114.77.91.74 (talk) 20:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Spamming the same request ad nauseam will not get you a faster response. I've removed the duplicate sections you've made. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's actually very common for people to make multiple submissions by mistake, so it's best to assume that's what it was. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- yes it happens most days, just clean up the mess and move on. In this case Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- yes it happens most days, just clean up the mess and move on. In this case
- It's actually very common for people to make multiple submissions by mistake, so it's best to assume that's what it was. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Ajay Harinath Singh
We are new at adding articles to wikipedia. We unknowingly add links of our website for references. There was no intention to promote the company/Individual. This happened only because of lack of knowledge of the guidelines in wikipedia. Kindly accept our request and perform the undeletion of this article. -Dataupdater (talk) 12:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:59, 24 December 2013 (UTC) Kindly update on the same please, its very urgent.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dataupdater (talk • contribs) 15:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done You were updated - it's ineligible for undeletion. There's also nothing urgent at all on Wikipedia, especially in cases where living people are concerned ES&L 15:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Umeshwar
Umeshwar is the name of the hindu god and people should know the origination of that name, although the content was not well managed but that could be improved by creating the link of other wikipedia articles. Thats why i belive that should not be deleted but improved. -Ubhandari (talk) 04:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Just because it's linked on other Wikipedia articles doesn't mean it should be kept, especially if it lacked any sort of context that indicated what the subject actually was. On an aside, I assume that English is not your first language; have you tried editing a Wikipedia for your native tongue? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- In this case you can write it again, but please write it so readers know what you are talking about. Make a draft instead if you need help. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:15, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done as per above ES&L 15:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Buck Wild
reasoning -- I am requesting that this deleted article be userfied to my user space. I would like to try to salvage a stub out of it. Thank you. MrX 13:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Update: I've already created the stub, but would still like to see if I can salvage some content from the previous article.- MrX 17:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Never mind - I found a copy in AfC. Thanks anyway.- MrX 17:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Forest Lake, MN residents
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Forest Lake, MN residents · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, MNdude11, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. MNdude11 (talk) 01:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Go and instead edit this section : Forest Lake, Minnesota#Notable residents. Please let us know of there is another reason you need the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Vidya Prasarak Mandal
reasoning -Jayakay (talk) 17:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note, however, that admins will not restore G12 deletions, as those are copyright violations. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- But please feel free to go ahead and recreate the article yourself in your own words. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 06:07, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- But please feel free to go ahead and recreate the article yourself in your own words. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 06:07, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
SAURABH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA A Web Developer
reasoning -SSaurabh22 (talk) 19:39, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Please dont remove this page this is my struggle journey & this is incomplete ... within 2 days it will complete... i want also make my identity on wikipedia & INTERNET..
- We are not here for you to aggrandise yourself. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Tish Cyrus
This article was deleted three times during 2008 and 2009, because Cyrus was not notable in her own right. While this was certainly correct at the time and is arguably still the case, this title should at least redirect to either Billy Ray Cyrus or Miley Cyrus, because there are certainly readers that will search for her and find little coverage under the current setup. Creating a redirect from this title will not only refer readers to a section of an existing article with decent coverage, but will also allow the potential for expanding itself if someone takes the time to gather enough reputable sources. -WikiRedactor (talk) 01:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done but protected for a year. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Simon Katz (USA)
I, EPstudios, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. EPstudios (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Babelfisher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Babelfisher (talk) 16:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
reasoning -189.34.1.201 (talk) 11:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC) I have just visited Wikipedia for the first time in several years and been surprised my page has been deleted. What was the cause of this and how can my page be undeleted and updated?
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Meezi
Please send me the original text so I can rewrite it from a more "neutral" point of view -Daniellimon5 (talk) 15:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - neutral point of view isn't the only problem. It could have been deleted on WP:CSD#A7 grounds as well as WP:CSD#G11, and would not survive WP:AFD if restored. If you have any association with the subject, please submit your article through WP:AFC instead of posting it to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
this page should be included as per the relevance on the nu disco musicians category Category:Nu-disco_musicians -Cresocreso (talk) 00:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Being relevant to a category is not a reason for inclusion. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)