Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 131

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Morph94 in topic Alzo David-West
Archive 125←Archive 129Archive 130Archive 131Archive 132Archive 133→Archive 135

RE: Art Spiegelman and my consistent removal from his page.

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I would like to again ask that I be included in the article on Art Spiegelman, my friend and boyfriend from 1966-1996 or so. His most recent book, Co-Mix, shows, in his "Grain of Sand" comics, going down one of the "I's" in the title (may require a magnifying glass), "I love you, Ladybelle."

Please see my discussion with one of the editors on this matter. There are also many images of Art and myself on Facebook, on my page, some of which can be found by running a Google search for Art Spiegelman and Ladybelle Fiske.

He and I were very close and I was the closest thing he had to a wife till he met Françoise Mouly in 1975. He also did draw some of "MAUS" at Quarry Hill, my home in Vermont, in my little writing cabin in the mountains.

Many friends of ours would be able and willing to provide statements as to my importance to Art. I don't understand why it is so difficult to get my name mentioned. I helped Art and Françoise create "Top Drawer Rubber Stamp Company," and the images were made by friends of ours who lived at Quarry Hill. Laurence Mouly, Françoise's sister, lived with us in Vermont (it is Vermont's oldest commune-- see the Quarry Hill Creative Center page.

Quarry HIll and I were an important part of Art's life. I will soon publish a memoir of my life which mentions the relationship, though by no means is the book only about Art. I consider him a friend and an old lover, famous or not. I too am not unknown in my home state of Vermont. To me, he's just a friend I once knew, not God. Thanks, Ladybelle Fiske (Isabella Fiske McFarlin) Ladybelle Fiske (talk) 03:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The article has not been deleted, and this is a dispute over the content of the article. Wikipedia runs on reliable sources and WP:CONSENSUS. A person should never be directly editing an article where they have direct involvement. You may propose edits on the article talkpage, but ensure they are sourced to valid, reliable, third party sources - never personal knowledge. Through talkpage discussion, it will be determined if your proposals are accpted into the article or not the panda ₯’ 09:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
See also Talk:Art Spiegelman#Removed digressive material. Ladybelle Fiske, did you read the policy page you were referred to there regarding no original research? The issue is not that anyone has said they don't believe you or discounted your relationship. It's that Wikipedia only properly covers material that is the subject of, and verifiable in, reliable published sources, giving such information due weight in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those published, reliable sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David W. Baird

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 23.242.185.200, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.242.185.200 (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 15:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

SbX Green Line

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The sbX Green Line needs a page separate from the page entitled San Bernardino Express because the Green Line is a specific route of an entire BRT system in development by Omnitrans. The information on the San Bernardino Express should be amended to be a more general overview of the system. Information about the lines and network and the differences are already included on the websites that are/were cited on both the (now deleted) Green Line page as well as the San Bernardino Express page. -Snoopyloopy (talk) 05:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The two articles are substantially identical, with the only major difference being in the lead of the deleted article. Essentially all of the content already contained within San Bernardino Express was included in the deleted article. Please consider expanding the existing article instead, creating subsections as necessary. Alternatively, the existing article can be renamed. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

O manasa preminchake

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is very good film , Director sivaji is wonder full director , Gundu hanumantha rao is very good camidian -106.220.114.157 (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

  Comment: This article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O manasa preminchake, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. The question is not whether it is a good film, but whether it is notable to the standard of WP:Notability (films). JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. It's still on the mainspace. The problem is that even if it is deleted via AfD, we still couldn't undelete it via this manner. You'd have to go through Wikipedia:Deletion review for that, although I'd prefer that you work on saving it now rather than after it's deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oxford Hawks Hockey Club

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 91.85.216.76, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 91.85.216.76 (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This will be the final time it is restored. It was previously restored last year per a request, but nobody actually worked on it. Please understand that AfC is not a permanent webhost and when we restore it, we expect for there to be some work on it. It doesn't have to be lightening quick, but some actual progress on the submission must be done. If it is deleted a third time, then I would recommend that it not be restored again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Anukriti Gusain

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Anukriti Gusain is participating in Miss Asia Pacific World 2014 and representing to India. I would like to request for review the afd, she is enough Notable to create page e.g. Miss India Delhi 2013 winner, Miss India 2013 -in Top 5, BOW India 2013 and Miss Asia Pacific World India 2014 -182.68.90.182 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Connor Roberts

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you please restore the previous history prior to deletion as subject is now notable. Thanks! -JMHamo (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hamidou Traoré

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the article history prior to it being deleted. Thanks! -JMHamo (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

  • Hey, JMHamo. Has the reasoning behind the AfD been vacated or is this article likely to be deleted again as a recreation of a previously deleted article? It's done regardless, but I'm curious. Protonk (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
It passes WP:NFOOTBALL now as he's made his senior debut for the Malian national football team. The article needs tidying up still. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Cool beans. Thanks for the followup. Protonk (talk) 21:25, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

High Spy Prog Band

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hss1138 (talk) 21:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Not sure why it has been deleted?

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruno Chikly

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 86.193.226.39, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.193.226.39 (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC) I just need to see this page to redo it properly, I was not really aware of its deletion, sorry about this, my mistake.

  • I can't restore it (because it was deleted as a copyright violation of this link. Near as I can tell the deleted text was pretty close to that page, so working from that as a baseline is probably going to lead to close paraphrasing and additional copyvio issues down the road. If you really need the deleted text you can make an account and I can email it to you but you may be better off working from scratch. Protonk (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

o manasa preminchake

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

In *my web cafe* many customers are very interesting to watch this film. It is one of the nice movie in Telugu language.....Raja (Web cafe owner -106.220.61.118 (talk) 02:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Already answered, above. You are on the wrong page. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Please stop posting here. This board cannot and will not restore pages that have been deleted via an AfD. you must go through deletion review or the closing admin. There's no other option here and spamming this board with restore requests will not change anything and could run the risk of you being temporarily blocked as being disruptive. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Umesh Jakhar

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Umeshjakhar (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hardik Malaviya

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

because this page is should not be deleted see on google -Hardik98248 (talk) 08:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardik Malaviya, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. Besides, if you are Hardik, you should not be writing about yourself the panda ₯’ 09:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

FlexRAID

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlexRAID should be restored. FlexRAID is a technology used by thousands of users around the world. It promotes a technical approach that's worth documenting for the benefit of data protection. The page was deleted due to lack of its understanding and origin. Wikipedia is meant to educate and not enforce ignorance. Deleting a page that discusses of a technology with growing following is more of a sabotage rather than furthering any objective goal. Please restore the page for the thousands if not millions of users that can benefit from understanding the technology. The wiki page was created by this user who has no relation with the developers (search for FlexRAID on this page): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smurf-IV/Toolset. You even have companies talking of the technologies on their sites: http://assassinhtpcblog.com/server-flexraid/. A Google search will reveal various independent discussions of the technology: https://www.google.com/#q=flexraid. Thanks. -Spectwiki (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexRAID, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Lankiveil (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Also, please be aware that in order to re-create the page you must show how the company passes WP:CORP by way of coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS). Saying that something is popular (WP:ITSPOPULAR) or that it'd be useful (WP:USEFUL) are not good arguments to show notability. Only coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject can show notability. Now when it comes to why it was deleted in the first place, please assume good faith rather than making comments that insinuate that this was a deliberate sabotage. That will not help you when it comes to approaching people, as it puts people on the defensive and makes them less likely to want to help you. It's better to ask politely and to not say things that may sound disparaging. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Kang Jun-ho (born 1996)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

just now i join Wikipedia with my dreams to write about my mother -Kang Jun-ho (born 1996) (talk) 12:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done I deleted the page, but the problem here is that you edited the page to seem too much like an article and a personal webpage. As far as editing about your mother goes, I would highly recommend that you get someone to help you out with that to ensure that you understand notability policies but also deal with issues of WP:COI. Since you have an obvious conflict of interest here, it would be very easy for you to see notability where there might not be any. I don't mean this to sound harsh, but people do not have automatic notability because they exist or have existed. We would have to see where she's received coverage in reliable sources. Now as far as userpages go, I always recommend that people look at pages such as User:Yunshui, as it's a great example of how people can be very creative and have some information about themselves, but still fall within normal guidelines. All userpages must pertain to how you edit on Wikipedia. Some personal information is fine, but the page should not be written as if it is an article in the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:24, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sangit Om (2)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Lyraris, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lyraris (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Parkside Killers Australia

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is a resurgence in the interest of this ground breaking band. -124.168.28.169 (talk) 15:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done, article restored because it was deleted as an expired WP:PROD. However, the article has now been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkside Killers because the band doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria in WP:BAND. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Aboleth.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

For fair-use at List of Dungeons & Dragons creatures (A)#Aboleth. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure that is a good use of the image as it would fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFLISTS in that article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Aarakocra.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

For fair-use at List of Dungeons & Dragons creatures (A)#Aarakocra. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Same as above: I'm not sure that is a good use of the image as it would fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFLISTS in that article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Taymir

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Unallowed link ( Youtube ) and I think I didn't write enough things about the importance of the band. Of course, I can erase unallowed links and explain why this band is important. I just wanted to create this page, since a Dutch page exists but most people understand English -Nina77zz (talk) 19:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Kurt Gutenbrunner

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I came across this article at AfC. I added cites to the first sentence to establish the subject's notability, but the article deleted after I moved it to mainspace because the rest of the article was a copyvio. Can an admin please peel off the first sentence with the cites I included (and images if there were any) and post the content to my talk page so I can start the article without having to wade through a Google search looking for the cites and formatting them etc. again? Thank you very much. Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done See your talk page. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Mossèn Costa i Llobera Gardens

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I got an auto-deletion message about 2 seconds after saving the article. Obviously, the content is not the issue as it could not be checked after such a short amount of time. A copy-right infringement is impossible because the article is a translation of the German version on wikipedia that I wrote myself -Creichmann (talk) 22:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done because there is nothing to do. No page has ever existed by that name, or by any name starting with "Mossèn" and it isn't in your deleted contribution history either. Perhaps you didn't actually save it? There have been times when I accidentally clicked "Preview" instead of save, and then leave without realizing that my changes weren't actually saved, so I am sure it happens to others. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Alzo David-West

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I noticed this Wikipedia bio of a living person (social scientist) originally linked at The Cleanest Race page. Now, the living person bio has suddenly disappeared. David-West is a well-known social scientist in the North Korean studies field. If I recall correctly, the bio was on Wikipedia for seven years. -Morph93 (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Observation: The article didn't contain evidence that the subject was notable, and it was tagged as such for almost 8 years without improvement. It was deleted in accordance with WP:PROD, which, when tagged, allowed for at least a week for improvement to save it from deletion — but again, nothing was done. Now it's deleted, and suddenly its absence gets noticed? Will restoring it result in improvements, if none have been made in so many years? Will you make improvements if it is restored? ~Amatulić (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I have to kind of second this statement as well. I'm just a little concerned over the lack of attention the article received and I'll be honest, there are a lot of articles that get restored that never get the promised attention. I'm not really finding a lot when I search for sources either, so I think I'd like to see some sort of evidence that he passes notability guidelines. The thing to remember is that being known isn't the same as being notable per our guidelines, which are admittedly fairly strict. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Hi. Morph93 here writing under Morph94. I lost my password for the first account. About the deleted bio, I looked up Wikipedia:Notability (academics) and searched Google, Google Books, and Google Scholar. David-West meets criteria #1 (scholars cite him in academic articles, books, and dissertations, and he is published in high-profile journals like Critical Sociology and Korean Studies) and #7 (he publishes short stories, and the literary journal Cha interviewed him). So the subject is notable. I guess I could make improvements to the bio if it is restored, but I would have to do all those Google searches again for the sources. >_< - Morph94 (talk) 02:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Hello again. I wrote two months ago (above) about the notability of David-West. I did a bunch of different Google searches, and he is published in really high-profile academic journals and also in literary journals. Other scholars cite him too, and a journal interviewed him. - Morph94 (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natalia Elerdashvili

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Tbarabadze, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tbarabadze (talk) 04:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Michael G. Brown

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Michael G. Brown · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] reference for verification http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1042668/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 Way2cute (talk) 05:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done because there is nothing to do. The article has never existed as anything but a redirect to Michael Glyn Brown which is not deleted, nor is it being considered for deletion. If you want to write an article about the actor, try WP:AFC to get started, or create an article like Michael G. Brown (actor). ~Amatulić (talk) 05:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Espoo Adult Education Centre

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Spalemane (talk) 06:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  • On a side note, there are some issues with tone. It's not so promotional that I wouldn't restore it, but there are some phrases that come across as slightly promotional and will need to be cleaned up before submission to AfC again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

smart wiki

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 117.211.106.178, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.211.106.178 (talk) 06:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done I looked at the article history and there isn't really anything to restore. It looks like someone created a page with a link to an outside website and that was about it. There's nothing there to restore that would even be remotely helpful to building a new entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Share2B

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 46.252.128.98, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 46.252.128.98 (talk) 07:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done There wasn't much content to restore and aside from the page being abandoned, the entry also has some big issues with promotional tone. You'd have to re-write the article from scratch and since the deleted history is comprised of four sentences with no sourcing, there is not really any point to restoring it. It would be better to start on a new entry entirely. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

D2DFinserve

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

D2DFinserve is a online consultancy portal made by three professionals at the stage of their training and successfully meet to its reach. Currently, serving general business houses with their research reports , market scenario updates and many investment opportunities alerts. Basically,it works together with due diligence to meet its personal as well as organisational objectives. With this name D2DFinserve , they generally meant for Door to Door Financial Services with the help of many online client servicing portals. They are all known for their work and knowledge. -D2dfinserve (talk) 10:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done This page was deleted via WP:A7 (lack of notability established for a company) and WP:G11 (unambiguous advertising). Because of this, I'm declining the request. I've also blocked you for having a username that represents a company. You can choose a new username, but I would recommend against trying to add the company to Wikipedia since I can't see where this company would pass our notability guidelines as a whole because I can't find where it's been the focus of reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Elmedin Ademi

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Elmedin Ademi is not a spam ! Its a businessman from FYROM Macedonia and he's best known as founder of Screenmedia Macedonia (www.screenmedia.mk), Eurovia (building company) wwww.eurovia.mk and some others trading business -Elmademi (talk) 20:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself and promote your company. This was a blatant advertisement: "one of the most successful personalities... one of the most influential businessmen... market leading... fully integrated marketing program of great depth and scope... highest quality service in every field... " Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. JohnCD (talk) 21:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RefNet (Reformation Network)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please undelete this article so that it can be worked on to meet the guideline requirements. Wseaton (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Kuhn

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

-216.254.82.65 (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Manga High

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 70.198.3.145, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.198.3.145 (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done I'm declining this because the deleted version was fairly promotional in tone and because it was only 1-2 sentences long. You'd have to completely delete and re-write everything, so there's really nothing there worth saving. It'd be far better for you to re-write the entire article from scratch. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Island Dreams (2013 film)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tamodbx (talk) 20:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Museum of Morocco

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mestrekamcio (talk) 09:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Page is showing unofficial museum of Morocco.

Grace helbig

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Probably shouldn't have been indefinitely protected from further creation, but just stick in a redirect to Grace Helbig; thanks. -Abeg92contribs 15:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done. JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Easthetic (festival)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, HuhuLesny, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HuhuLesny (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Enteros

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Saeed5443 (talk) 18:08, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Hello Dear,

I request to undelete the page as it conforms to the guidelines provided by wikipedia. It contains two citations from the news papers.

Please let me know if you have further questions.

Kind regards,

Saeed

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 23.243.229.122, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.243.229.122 (talk) 16:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric Freeman (Pentecostal Bishop)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

99.123.174.196 (talk) 11:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This article has been declined three times already - please address the reviewers' concerns before re-submitting. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beverley Honig

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 124.168.123.134, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 124.168.123.134 (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done The article reads like it was pasted from a CV and could have been deleted as an unambiguous advertisement on any given day. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Friendlyjordies

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I started this article about a significant youtuber in Australian society. His videos reflect the culture of many Australian places. Please undelete this as i plan to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scondralitus (talk • contribs) 10:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Author Hariom Chaudhary

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Chiefhacker.harry (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC) This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...

First Harry, Hariom Chaudhary is an 25 year old young Famous Indian computer Programming Author and scientifically Hacking professional (Hacker) has a unique experience in the field of computers Programming, Hacking and Cyber Security.

Second, He has helped Indian USA, European governments and some multinational software companies of around the globe to secure their networks and securities.

Third, He has authored several books on Various Computers Programming Languages and computer security & Hacking.

for proof see these links-

http://www.amazon.com/Harry-Hariom-Choudhary/e/B00EXIW74C

http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/author/Harry+Hariom+Choudhary

https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/7398857.Harry_Hariom_Choudhary

https://www.google.co.in/#q=harry+hariom+choudhary+

Please Approve this page as Harry, Hariom Chaudhary is leading and world famous Author.

  •   Not done, the page Author Hariom Chaudhary has been tagged for speedy deletion, the way to contest this is on the talk page or by editing the page itself to meet our criteria for an encyclopedia article. If you read the blurb at the top of the page it explains the role of this board, which is only to undelete material which has been deleted uncontroversially (e.g. restoring a userpage, etc.). Protonk (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I'll add on to this by saying that the page was so unambiguously promotional that it would require a complete re-write in order to pass notability guidelines. As far as publishing goes, that doesn't automatically bestow notability regardless of how it is published. Considering that his books seem to have been self-published, that sort of decreases the likelihood that they'd gain coverage. It doesn't mean that they can't get noticed, but it's usually fairly rare. I also note that your username and the name of the author are fairly similar, which gives off the impression that you are writing about yourself. Because of this, I'd like to point you towards our conflict of interest guidelines at WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Great Galactic Conflict

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This game was one of the first MMO's and is not simply a web page. I'm endeavouring to obtain further information on it and ultimately through contacting other ex-players or contributors to the game hope to document the broader characteristics of its game play. Many gamers believe that the games that appeared 5-10 years later, were amongst the pioneers, but this predates them and is significant. My real name is Adrian Ruzsicska and I worked in the Gaming Industry for almost 10 years with Nokia. Additionally, the "Speedy Deletion" provided me little opportunity to defend the article and/or introduce additional content that would have brought it "in order". While I accept that it was brief and may have inadequately fulfilled requirements, as a newcomer who is intending to help broaden Wikipedia's horizons, I would hope some latitude is given as I develop the necessary skills to drive this Wiki. -ARuz888 (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done Please add more content with references. The commodore and Amiga review article has quite a bit more about the game play. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Tsogo Sun

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Copy was deleted before I could better edit it -KLMuller (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Then, obviously, you shouldn't have created it in main article space. Work on drafts in your sandbox or a sub-page in your user space.
  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at user:KLMuller/Tsogo Sun. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact JamesBWatson (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:20, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

File:HEBPANTRY.gif

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Removed several years ago claiming it was "redundant" but there's no other similar item. -TheListUpdater (talk) 15:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

It's a logo. A similar logo is already in use in the H-E-B article. How is the deleted one not redundant? They are both logos for the same company. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Rebecca Burns

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I want to write an article on the journalist and author from Atlanta. I would like to see what was deleted (not sure if it is about same person?) -Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done @Candleabracadabra: Not even remotely the same person, so just take over the title. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for checking. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Global Media Journal

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Global Media Journal is NOT an advertisement or promotion. It introduces and academic publication, which is non-commercial and not-for profit.

Kindly take a closer look at the links provided and retain the pages.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yrkamali (talk • contribs) 03:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A1. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. With respect to Global Media Journal--American Edition · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] that too can't be undeleted here because it's a G11. (As an aside, one can promote something that isn't commercial or for-profit.)
If you are employed by the subject, I strongly suggest you read WP:Conflict of interest and WP:What Wikipedia is not. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Araya Hargate

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) WikiWassili (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please address the reviewers' concerns before re-submitting, and review the notability guidelines for inclusion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Floro International Corporation

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It does not appear that the article is advertising its products. Please undelete or userfy. Thank you. -Shadowgun master (talk) 03:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The article read exactly like a piece of promotional prose. Also, there is no evidence of notability, so even if the article were re-written in a less promotional way, it would pretty certainly be deleted again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

suhail ansari (kushinagar)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Er.suhail786 (talk) 09:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Yunshui 雲水 10:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Women's Spirit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I was just in the process of fixing the article from the NewPagesFeed - and it is not unlike other organizations in the US, UK, etc. There is under-representation about domestic violence except for US, UK. Please restore - or at least put into a sandbox under my user name or the creator's user name. Thanks! -CaroleHenson (talk) 10:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:CaroleHenson/Women's Spirit. Yunshui 雲水 10:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:David-lynch-2011.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

image corresponds to wikipedia page subject (David Lynch) + was uploaded from a public source (circulated both on google/tumblr). reason for replacement being that it is a more modern picture than that which was previously ascribed to the page. this image supports and adds to the commentary of David Lynch to which it is attached.

  Not done and will not be done - I have left a note on the uploader's page explaining the relevant image policy - Peripitus (Talk) 11:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Douglas Nelson Turner

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

In RHaworth talk I see that the deletion was "uncontroversial". There was some redirect involved about my article for creation (Rotating Armature Alternator), that I had no part in.

I was using my page as a sandbox because I had read that actual sandboxes were automatically cleaned out after three days. I did not want to submit my article while I cleaned it. I was looking for a way to protect it while it was under construction.

Someone said my article was "patently" not ready for acceptance. I must be obvious that my article is not ready. If it is patent, then it should be easy to tell me exactly where to start! I know it not polished.

I have been asking for concrete help.

Please give me my name "page" back. Douglas Nelson Turner (talk) 09:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

You can find your contributions by looking at Special:Contributions/Douglas Nelson Turner (which you can see by clicking on the "Contributions" link at the top of any page). If you are looking for your draft article, you can find versions at User:Douglas Nelson Turner/sandbox, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Douglas Nelson Turner, and at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rotating armature alternator. You need to decide which one you wish to work on, and request deletion of the others to avoid confusion. If you want to create a new user page at User:Douglas Nelson Turner, for the purposes described at Wikipedia:User pages, there is nothing to stop you from doing so. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Your main user page User:Douglas Nelson Turner is intended for you to say something about yourself and your Wikipedia activites, if you choose to. You can have as many working pages in your "user space" as you like, by creating pages with titles like "User:Douglas Nelson Turner/Sandbox2" or "User:Douglas Nelson Turner/<Article title>". To request deletion of any page in your user space that you no longer want, add {{db-user}} or {{db-u1}} at the top. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice, all. Douglas Nelson Turner (talk) 12:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RAVN Sysems

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Bekkihawkes (talk) 16:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Raven (Ukrainian, Чорний ворон) or The One Who Was Left (Ukrainian, Залишенець) Ukrainian Novel

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Stefan Kom, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I will now complete this article which refers to the best selling Ukrainian novel of all time. The novel is particularly pertinent now as it covers the Ukrainian Russian war of the twenties which is almost being re enacted now. The novel helps us understand the history of this conflict -Stefan Kom (talk) 17:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Calum Rhys

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Calr93, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I wish to further edit it and have it submitted, I had trouble editing it previously meaning it was removed due to little activity -Calr93 (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_131&oldid=1138663642"