Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 129

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Tokyogirl79 in topic J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly
Archive 125←Archive 127Archive 128Archive 129Archive 130Archive 131→Archive 135

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IPR Aware World

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Davidwr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13 on behalf of Sandeep K Khichar. Please restore the page as this editor re-created a new draft (which I moved from Wikipedia:Articles for creation/IPR Aware World to User:Sandeep K Khichar/IPR Aware World (2)), which is strong evidence that he intends to work on this topic. This same editor was involved in the G13-deleted draft. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Added "moved". davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 05:12, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Como Brothers Band

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

To Whom this may concern,

The page was charged with these counts: 21:57, 19 April 2014 FreeRangeFrog (talk | contribs) deleted page The Como Brothers Band (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) 18:58, 19 April 2014 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted page The Como Brothers Band (A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content) 07:27, 24 February 2013 Qwyrxian (talk | contribs) deleted page The Como Brothers Band (A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

I do not understand why The Como Brothers Band Wikipedia page was deleted. I contested the deletion and it appears no one even looked at my objections. I request this page be restored. Read through the page and you will see that all information being relayed can be verified by third party persons. All facts written are referenced and sources are clearly outlined. All material is objective and unbiased. This page was not created for the promotion/advertisement of any person, place or product - FreeRangeFrog is with G11 unjustly labeling the page before reading its content. The Wikipedia page is needed to clarify information regarding the nature of the band, history, and its verified web sources - NawlinWiki and Qwyrxian with A3 and A7 are wrongly assuming that the facts being relayed are not relevant and important to fans, agencies, and record companies. The band needs a source to relay information that is accurate as there have been several discrepancies. The Como Brothers Band is even referenced in other Wikipedia pages. Several bands of lower caliber than themselves, with fewer references have Wikipedia pages. Please explain what make the Como Brothers Band a lesser entity than The Brooks Young Band, Kingsfoil, Jeff Leblanc,Push Play, Rachel Elelynae, Patent Pending, Colortheory, John Tagileri, Juliet Ashby, Katie Cole, Erene, Jamestown Story, Joesph Jett,Rattlin' Bones, Gary Hoey, Jenn Bostic,NO (Band), Action Item, and many many others. You did not even give me a proper amount of time to complete or fix the supposed problems. I do not understand why this band is being discriminated against. Fans have tried to make a Wikipedia pages for the band int the past and it is consistently deleted. Please let me know how this problem can be resolved.

Thank you, Marissa

  • contribs) deleted page The Como Brothers Band (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

18:58, 19 April 2014 NawlinWiki (talk contribs) deleted page The Como Brothers Band (A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content) 07:27, 24 February 2013 Qwyrxian (talk -Bco66209 (talk) 23:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Although I disagree with the A3 delete (it was only minutes old), and the G11 delete, (it was written like and advert but would be easily stripped of marketing language) it qualified for A7 deletion: read WP:Band. I have read your objections, and there seems to be more claims of importance on the talk page. So it can be recreated if you wish, including the reasons why the band is important and leave out terms like: "in depth knowledge" "songwriting genius" "deep appreciation" "clever lyrics" as they sound promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Sauer S 1800 UL

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Someone mistakenly have thought Sauer S 1800 UL is the same engine as the certified Sauer S 1800 engines and then just deleted the Sauer S 1800 UL article and redirected to Sauer S 1800. They have similar names, but all Sauer "UL" versions are different from the certified versions, different cylinders, different crank shaft, different characteristics. I find it extremely odd that someone would delete pages based on purely on semantics, not content and facts -SvingenB (talk) 00:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC) SvingenB (talk) 00:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

  Comment: - nothing has been deleted, as far as I can see: there has never been an article at Sauer S 1800 UL before it was created as a redirect yesterday by user Petebutt (talk) (nor at Sauer S 1800UL or Sauer S1800UL). There is nothing to stop you creating an article there by over-writing the redirect, if there is enough material and sources to justify a stand-alone article. JohnCD (talk) 11:16, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
There is an article titled Sauer 1800 UL. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
So there is, created by the OP a day before he posted here. @SvingenB: - the names of all these engines are confusing, but if your article Sauer 1800 UL should actually be called "Sauer S 1800 UL", leave a note below here and we can move it to that title. JohnCD (talk) 20:40, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  Done - article moved, now at Sauer S 1800 UL. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dakshin Gujarat Adivasi (Tribal) Sevamandal

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I, Nsdesai, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsdesai (talk • contribs)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trillbass

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Kittycolada911, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have new reliable sources and plan to shorten this article. Kittycolada911 (talk) 11:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. GB fan 11:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Ramakrishnan Swamiji

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Themunozgroup (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Both the criteria applied for the Speedy Deletion of this Page doesn't apply to this page.

This is not a page created to promote Swamiji Ramakrishnan. He is already a popular Swami in North India - Rishikesh, Himalayas. He has an Ahsram that is visited regularly by many people. Moreover, his contributions & works on the traditional Sanskrit works in particular Bhagawad Gita, Brahmasutra & the canonical philosophical systems of India has been lauded across the country & adopted as texts in many of the Universities. He has been christened "Dravidacharya" owing to his works. He is regularly invited for lectures in all the important Mutts in India including the birth place of Shanakara the most revered of Indian philosophers.

Surely the deletion of this page is by someone who is unaware of the importance of such young Swamis & their contributions to the contemporary philosophy & scholarship of India.

I request an un-deletion of this page.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nightfever is an open prayer evening with Eucharistic adoration, prayers, music, confession and talk.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Diana.Sylvia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Diana.Sylvia (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Lorenzo Tartamella

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -174.94.92.85 (talk) 22:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

I am the owner of the page. All the content and information is completely legitimate and ethical. I have conducted some of the the most important interviews of our time for New York Wisdom. There is a fine line between many od the pages I see posted on Wikipedia and this page which demonstrates the many accomplishments as an entrepreneur and active member of the community are rather puzzling and maybe personally motivated by third parties who envy the success of others.

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Tartamella, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tawker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas C. Card (photographer)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I now have more information and links to add to make this page a substantive one. In the past I did not have enough citations. -Marygv (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Neubauer Family Collegium for Culture and Society

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -A.Jacobin (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

I have just added sourced info, including the $26 million founding gift, and the fact that a large Gothic revival building (former home of a theological seminary) at the edge of te campus is being renovated by a notable architecture firm to house the new Collegium. The Collegium is new, but it is clearly a well-supported, major institute. I also linked the names of the leading professors involved to their Wikipedia pages, but note that the unlinked faculty on the list all qualify for Wikipedia pages because they hold endowed/distinguished/named professorships at a major university.A.Jacobin (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

I have corrected the malformed request. The draft has not been deleted, so doesn't need undeleting. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I think. If it is not too much trouble, can you explain why this article is still not qualified to be a "regular" article, it seems patently notable to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.Jacobin (talk • contribs) 17:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Now that you have made the page Neubauer Family Collegium for Culture and Society you don't have to worry about the AFC page so much, and I have redirected it. The decline reasons were for promotional language, rather than non-notability. There was a threat to use WP:MFD but it did not eventuate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Logo_Tecnologico_de_Monterrey.svg

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The logo is under copyright. We had this fair-use version but was deleted because someone falsely claimed copyright on it. -José Gnudista (talk) 23:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Media Idee

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -115.186.121.30 (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello. The Page 'Media Idee' was deleted for the company not being notable at the time.

Since then, the following are some of the projects that have gotten it into the limelight:

The biggest one is the Organization of the first ever Dolphin Show in Pakistan. Please see http://www.dolphinshow.org/partner.php and www.facebook.com/dolphinshowkarachi for proof that MI was the main organizer. Just Google 'Dolphin Show Karachi' and you will get about a 100 links back from major media companies in the country discussing that including some that actually Cite Media Idee. This is one FB page which lists the event's as MI: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Media-Idee/346860588664883.

Some pages which list MI are: http://tcsconnect.com/dolphin-show-ticket-12897.html

http://www.awamiweb.com/dolphin-show-in-karachi-from-10th-of-january-67671.html

http://www.mediakorner.com/pakistans-first-ever-dolphin-show/

Media Idee is also part of PAS - The ruling body for all advertisers and agencies.

PAS - Pakistan Advertisers' Society: http://www.pas.org.pk/media-idee-celebrates-8th-birthday/

Other Links Include: http://trango.co/interview-with-umair-mohsin-of-media-idee/

http://www.pas.org.pk/mira-media-idee-research-analytics/

http://www.crunchbase.com/company/mi-digital

http://www.midigital.co/nestle-fruita-vitals-production-handled-mi-productions/

Network Companies include: www.miproductions.tv

www.mievents.asia

www.creativecom.co

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Idee, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Image:Alice 2010.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Image was deleted as orphaned, but it shouldn't have been put in that situation; it was being used at article Alice (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland), for which there was a discussion with consensus to keep it (along with the video game cover art, which is currently used at the article). -Diego (talk) 21:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

How did that discussion happen? User:Grandiose states that (s)he would address a notification to editors involved, but I didn't get any. The decision to remove the image seems to be based on Masem's assumption that Alice in Wonderland (2010 film) already contained a depiction of Tim Burton's depiction of the Alice character in its cover art, but I explained that the film's cover art did not contain it. I disagree that that this discussion shows a "consensus that live action should be removed from article". I would have liked to expand my stance at that discussion before it was closed by a non-admin. Diego (talk) 10:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaali_Venkat

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Avskishore (talk) 06:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Its my brother's page -Avskishore (talk) 06:27, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

  •   This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. You will need to come up with independent references such as in magazines or newspapers. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Judicaël Perroy

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The reference deficiency has been addressed - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zinjanous (talk • contribs) 22:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Plini

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I provided more than enough sources to prove that the subject was notable, yet the page was deleted anyways. I worked rather hard on creating this page, so it irritates me that it would be deleted so quickly. -John Weiss (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Exactly what criteria in WP:BAND does this band meet? ~Amatulić (talk) 06:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ben Harrison (Sound Designer)

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Nicole Diar

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I personally think she is notable enough to have a wikipedia page - she murdered her own son which is rare.

What you personally think doesn't matter. Rarity doesn't equal WP:NOTABILITY in Wikipedia standards.
However, the subject seems to meet the standard, at least minimally, and since it was deleted as an expired WP:PROD, I have restored it.   Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stacy Doris

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Wattsirod, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wattsirod (talk) 12:23, 22 April 2014 (UTC) ,


Maybe this time around I will be able to work more fluidly with your system. Maybe with acceptance for non deletion I won't use my Mac... and things will be clearer and easier. I think you wanted me to provide a source for where Stacy Doris was born? The verification of sources for each of her books seems odd, if that is what you were asking me for. Should I put links to the Library of Congress or the Bibliotheque Nationale de France for each? I found the system hard to work with, but can perhaps get used to it. But then having the minimal things I started putting in there questioned was disheartening... How can I start editing this again? Many thanks!!!! -Wattsirod (talk) 12:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done. Please read the links in the rejection message carefully, particularly the golden rule. That should give you a good overview about what is required before the article will be accepted. Links to libraries won't be considered sufficient, because those are simply directory listings, not actual coverage of the subject by an independent reliable source. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Sitka Fine Arts Camp

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Contested PROD yesterday morning, after noticing through Article alerts that the PROD was about to expire. The contested PROD was either ignored or overlooked (or not saved, but since I posted it through my phone rather than a real computer, it would be difficult for me to determine if that were the case) and the article was deleted perhaps less than a half hour later, which was about three hours short of the time listed on the PROD notice purporting to be the "deadline to contest PROD". Seeing as how the article does at least give hint of the organization's notability, AFD is the more suitable venue for this. - RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 18:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Trawick international

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Waheedchuahdary (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Darkwind (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brodie Smith 21

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jlsmith5963, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jlsmith5963 (talk) 14:40, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" ~Amatulić (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Kamrul Ahsan

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Lixiaowang, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lixiaowang (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Nothing to do. The article has never been deleted, and has existed for several years. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kamrul Ahsan

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I didn't edit the text within the stipulated 180 days and then click the "Save page" button below -Lixiaowang (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

County Road 869 (Lee County, Florida)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 19:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Loki Ojha The Dancing Devil

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Loki ojha (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC) I hope and wish that you would be doing good

Here i am facing problems again so please help us

First i was finding to how i can authenticate my work in which you help me out (and i am really very grateful for your kind help

)

Now second problem is Wikipedia person remove page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Unique_Artist as they find its bit of

promotional but its bit of inspirational and motivational

See if i give you one Gift and say u cant open it you can see it you cant use it so what the point of that gift

see Wikipedia is a gift but with many limitation thought i respect there systems but some time system create limitation and bounding.

Plz help me to let keep page

Loki

  Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Among other things that Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not a platform for you to "authenticate your work". It is not a platform for providing inspirational or motivational gifts. We don't publish original work, original research, or original thought here. See Wikipedia:No original research for more information. Please use Facebook or your own website or any number of other venues for promoting your work. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Ryaneagle

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to contribute to the website and I have revised my user page to remove the promotional-type / resume-type information for your review if you'd like. Please give me another chance, I would really appreciate it. I'm new to wikipedia and I didn't mean to make the mistake I did -Ryaneagle (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. There is no value to the Wikipedia project in restoring promotional pages.
The page is not protected, you are not blocked, so you are free to re-create the page in compliance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

County Road 509 (Brevard County, Florida)

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

history undeletion under redirect (the history might be in Wikipedia:Article Incubator/County Road 509 (Brevard County, Florida), in which case that should be undeleted, moved, and redeleted) -NE2 19:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done. The history from Wikipedia:Article Incubator/County Road 509 (Brevard County, Florida) has been merged with the redirect page County Road 509 (Brevard County, Florida). ~Amatulić (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. --NE2 20:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Nathan Swann

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Nathan Swann is owner of SURE! Industries I think people should know about him. Nathan has been a close friend of mine. He deserves to be on here. -Heshwear (talk) 03:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. If a claim of significance is made (and owning SURE! Industries is not necessarily such a claim), the article will no longer be subject to speedy deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
The lowercase version Nathan swann did exist, but still...
  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Mojo Hand (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandown Park Greyhounds

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My article was deleted due to copyright infringement, I requested my article to be recovered to edit and re-do the page, he refused saying I'll restore almost anything, but I don't restore articles deleted as copyright violations. I would like my article to be restored for editing to correct the issue. Thanks. -Jason3613 (talk) 06:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Sorry, there is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring copyright violations. We won't do it. You must start from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Lihoreau

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sciencebase, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tim Lihoreau is an important member of the radio community as weekday breakfast presenter on UK radio station ClassicFM.Sciencebase (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Kali Venkat

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Avskishore (talk) 08:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. You do not need to copy the speed-deletion notice here. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.. Read WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:CREATIVE for the relevant WP:Notability standards. JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
  Comment:: I see that this has been twice deleted and protected as Kaali Venkat; rather than try to get around the protection by mis-spelling the name, you should talk to the administrator who protected the title, user Alexf (talk). JohnCD (talk) 11:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quest Food Exchange

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The reason for the removal was an issue of notability, but the context and work done by this organization is important in the Vancouver, Canada setting. The issue of poverty and hunger are not trivial matters in Canada's lowest income area. The organization in contention provides social aid that is different from other responsive initiatives, where they address mostly symptoms of poverty and hunger. Where other organizations try to simply give people food, this organization helps its users to break out of the cycle of poverty giving them choice in their food consumption. If the Vancouver Food Bank Society deserves a page then there isn't a reason why Quest Food Exchange should be deemed irrelevant. The article I have written also contain other sources of reference, including a third party research on the organization. -Plui852 (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Organizations need to have national, or at least regional coverage by multiple reliable sources, not simply be locally notable in a city. WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments are also not valid, each article stands or falls on its own merits. Also, articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, as this one was, don't qualify for restoration by request on this page. Talk to the deleting administrator Tawker about it. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Also, see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

K C Philip

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

because it is not an advertising -Stephen philip (talk) 18:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you are related to the subject of the article, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 19:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Hold 'Em (Windows)

Latest comment: 10 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion

I am requesting history-only undeletion for this page (and the corresponding talk page); that is, for the page history - this page is currently a redirect but was previously an article - to be restored. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, the problem is, those revisions were deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hold 'Em (Windows), and therefore they don't qualify for restoration by request on this page.
I suggest you contact the deleting administrator Salvidrim! if you have not already done so. If the deleting administrator doesn't agree to restore the revision history, then your next step is Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
  Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Amatulić: Looks like I restored it just as you were writing your comment. According to my understanding, the deleting admin's permission or DRV is not required in the case of history undeletion, unless the admin intentionally specifies that the history should not be restored. Per WP:DRVPURPOSE, "Deletion Review should not be used: ... 4. to challenge an article's deletion via the proposed deletion process, or to have the history of a deleted page restored behind a new, improved version of the page, called a history-only undeletion (please go to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion for these)." -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
I specifically declined to restore the history of the page on my talk page, but I don't feel strongly enough about it either way to go back and unrestore it now that it is done. This is not a request for "the history of a deleted page to be restored behind a new, improved version of the page". ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 12:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
King of Hearts: the part you quoted doesn't apply here, because this isn't a case of restoring the history of a new improved version of the page. There is no new improved version of the page. Therefore, DRV is the appropriate place to discuss it, possibly for re-listing the debate, given that the AFD discussion had only two participants. But the deed is done now, and Slavidrim! doesn't mind either way, so the issue is now solved. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Amatulić: Ah, I've found the relevant discussion. It seems that while the general idea of bring history-only undeletions to WP:REFUND was endorsed, unfortunately the specifics were not clarified, and apparently you and I interpret the result of the discussion differently. I will start a new discussion to clarify this issue. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, you know, I'm not even sure how I interpret it! As you can see from the couple of sections above, I restored the history under two redirects. In one case, the history had been deleted as a PROD, so that was okay. In the other case, the history was on a different page that was deleted as a result of WP:MFD rather than WP:AFD. When I performed the merge, I could have re-deleted the history but left it in its restored state. In the case of this subsection here, I deferred to the deleting admin, which I felt was the best course of action, rather than override his decision.
It's a good idea to start another discussion to clarify things. The appropriateness of restoring history seems dependent on the situation. If it's history of an improved article or deletion due to PROD, then no problem, unless the deleted history is a copyvio. Restoring history that was deleted via AFD, when there isn't an improved article but just a redirect, is a different situation that should have community consensus. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 69.198.232.14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 69.198.232.14 (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It was rejected because it reads like an advertisement, so please address the reviewer's concerns before re-submitting. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Eventials

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

It's the history of the company and not a promotion -Mpilipo (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The purpose of the article appears to be for publicity. Furthermore, this is the English Wikipedia, and that article was not written in English. Please use WP:AFD WP:AFC to submit this article if you want to try again. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Actually, it's WP:AFC that's the WP:Articles for creation process page. —C.Fred (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Eh, what can I say? The D and the C keys are adjacent on my keyboard. :) ~Amatulić (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aplos Software

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, CaliAggie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CaliAggie (talk) 04:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Reality GameMasters

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nobo71-Wikipedia.org 01:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC) I will create this article, please let my create the page and then you can think about deleting it.

It's apart of many people including, Rob Cesternino, Ian Terry, and Some of the other contestants.

  • It looks like it's still in the mainspace and will likely be speedied, but requesting this to be re-created before it's actually deleted is a little premature. Offhand I can't find anything to really justify it being on here, as I can only find one source to assert notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • In other words, I honestly don't think that this should be re-created even after it's speedied because it's highly unlikely to ever pass notability guidelines given that it aired in June 2013 and never received more than a passing mention here and there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SED-ML

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Dagwa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dagwa (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I still wish to publish the article and would like to try going through publication process again -Dagwa (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Agosto Machado (Performer, Artist, Activist)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Omaether (talk) 13:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC) I have also listed this in the contesting of the deletion. In brief, Agosto is a real person. He has been an important part of downtown theater and gay history in New York. The fact that he has little presence on the web is exactly why he has requested me to make a Wiki page about him. Please allow this article to live. Honestly I do not see any valid and just reason why you would delete it. We are still in the process of adding links and references.

As per your request I have put in the text "Coming Soon". Please review the earlier drafts. I do not see how this content violates any of the rules you cited. thanks again John Hoge, NYC

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Try WP:AFC instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

First attorney consultants, ltd.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I edited the article to explain the significance of First Attorney Consultants, Ltd. -Joefacl (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
I suggest you take Smalljim's advice in answer to your query on his talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Social Venture Partners

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Benignfun, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Benignfun (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Social Venture Partners now has a dedicated staff for digital media that will respond to the wikipedia standards and guidelines to ensure the article library about SVP and it's actions/programs/history etc comply and are a meaningful contribution to the wikipedia corpus.

Um... does this "dedicated staff" communicate through the "Benignfun" account, or some other way? ~Amatulić (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Giant Woman

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article was successfully WP:G7'd from a request I made out of spite that I didn't think the article met the general notability criteria well enough, partly influenced by some personal stuff. I regret making such a poor judgment, and would like it restored so that it may be tested by the community in time, instead of airing my dirty laundry. -Whisternefet (t · c) 23:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done. I remember deleting that one, thinking it was a pretty good article and wondering why you'd want to delete it after what appeared to be a lot of work. I'm glad you changed your mind. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enid Robbie

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Angusrobbie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Angusrobbie (talk) 01:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Fortune_softtech_Milan

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

It is not an priomotional conetnt and then click the "Save page" button below -FsitDzyn (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

It does not appear to meet our guidelines for notability and based with the content and the username I do believe it is promotional in nature and have nominated it for deletion. Please read WP:CORPDEPTH Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
In addition to being promotional, it was also deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, which disqualifies the article for restoration by request here. For that reason as well as promotion,   Not done. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Judicaël Perroy (2nd request)

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Here is an article from Wikipedia that I used for guidance: Thomas Viloteau. I do not see how my article is any different or any less referenced. In fact Viloteau was one of Perroy's students -06:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Zinjanous (talk)

References are not the problem. The article was promotional in nature. There are a couple of points to realize here:
I suggest you contact the deleting administrators shown in the deletion log of the page to ask for reconsideration or userfying to your own user space to allow you to continue improving the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:11, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Nariman Mehta

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Would like to rewrite article showing notability in the opening paragraph, followed by subheadings, "early life and education" and "career" with 2 additional subheadings under "career" for "published research" and "patents". Please advise. Thank you. --Beach4444 (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)beach4444--Beach4444 (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Beach4444/Nariman Mehta (draft).
The page User:Beach4444/Nariman Mehta already existed, so I didn't move it there.
There's a "Submit" button in the box at the top of the draft article to submit it when you think it's ready, but you will need an administrator to override the create protection to move the article back to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Cardiff Council

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I cannot see why the updated information can not be displayed please at it reflects facts rather than opinions. Please can I have a response a.s.a.p. Many thanks, Helen - comms2014 -

I have tried to post updated information on the Cardiff Council page for the past couple of days.

the informaiton included is purely factual informaiton about the new arrnagements at the organisaiton and do not have or hold personal viewpoints, I therefore request that my edits which have been saved yet again this afternoon are uploaded to the page a.s.a.p? The organisation official name has recently changed to City of Cardiff Council following the election of a new Leader, again, this is a fact and needs to be reflected in the Wikipedia informaiton in terms of the title.

I look forward to hearing from you.

thanks,

  Not done because there is nothing to do. This page is for requesting undeletion of deleted articles. The Cardiff Council article is not deleted, and isn't even proposed to be deleted.
Because you are associated with this organization, your best approach is to propose any substantive changes on the article's talk page, in accordance with our conflict of interest guideline found at WP:COI. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Shopatron

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

this page explains our company's history and mission. We are more than happy for someone to edit or revise, but we have gotten numerous emails from people who were searching for information about us on Wikipedia and unable to find anything -Bluemeringue1 (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. G11s also cannot be overturned here, as such pages would need a fundamental rewrite to remove all the promotional writing. Please see WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Notability, and ignore those emails from here on out. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
It is deleted now (for the third time) and salted to prevent re-creation.
A cornerstone policy here is that Wikipedia is not a publicity medium. Wikipedia does not exist for your company's convenience or marketing goals. If you want to write an article about your company, please submit it through Wikipedia:Articles for creation in accordance with our conflict of interest guideline, because you clearly have a conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Renee00124, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Renee00124 (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

undeletion -Renee00124 (talk) 04:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_129&oldid=1148219476"