Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 127
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 120 | ← | Archive 125 | Archive 126 | Archive 127 | Archive 128 | Archive 129 | Archive 130 |
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katherine Boynton
I, 23.243.204.228, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.243.204.228 (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Grene
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Grene · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Ggrene, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ggrene (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - @Ggrene: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Lisa Hunt
I could not follow the reasoning for deleting her page. She is a well known author and artist/illustrator. I'm not sure what reputable sources you require as there were ones cited. Her professional credentials match or surpass many other similar authors and artists who still have Wikipedia listings. A simple web search shows her to be a well-known entity. I would like very much for this matter to be reviewed once more and her page to be reinstated. Please advise how to proceed to get this accomplished, thank you. -KortKramer (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Hunt, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. DP 01:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Digi-Pas
I, Jing jsb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jing jsb (talk) 07:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. see below Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digi-Pas
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digi-Pas · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Jing jsb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jing jsb (talk) 08:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Born to Kill?
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Born to Kill? · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Rockwizfan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rockwizfan (talk) 02:44, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Matthew Christopher
Hello I am writing the wiki about Matthew Christopher. I AM NOT Matthew Christopher. I am posting this as a living notable person entry. Matthew Christopher is a couture wedding gown designer in the league of Monique Lhuillier. As a matter of fact, i looked at her wiki page to try and make certain all rules were met. Please refer to this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monique_Lhuillier I also added all references and verification you requested. Please be more specific on what you feel is in violation and I will correct this immediately. This wiki is not advertising or promotion it is an article about a notable person in the couture bridal business.
Matthewchristopher (talk) 05:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC) -Matthewchristopher (talk) 05:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well I would suggest that you register a new user name as your name seems to be a name that would promote the company. Even if you are not Matthew Christopher, it looks as if you are representing Matthew Christopher's interests, especially the earlier versions that were promotional. I think that your latest version of the article does not meet the spam deletion requirement and could be undeleted. However your username is an advert. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Henry Behrens
I, Bekittrell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bekittrell (talk) 16:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done At this point I will decline the request, as it was previously restored and you did nothing at all. However you can try to convince my by stating how you would improve the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Goop (newsletter)
I do not believe the page should have been deleted. -Taku (talk) 02:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. Well, several others disagree with you. It was a 1-sentence article that did not assert any significance, therefore it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. Articles deleted that way cannot be undeleted by request. You are welcome to start again in your sandbox or use WP:AFC. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Can you undelete it at the Wikipedia:Draft namespace? -- Taku (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- It said: "Goop is a weekly online newsletter published by actress Gwyneth Paltrow. It has been described as a sort of women's magazine." So hardly worth restoring. Technically out of scope for A7, but you can recreate it yourself in Draft name space if you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Can you undelete it at the Wikipedia:Draft namespace? -- Taku (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Radom Chamber Orchestra
Radom Chamber Orchestra's article has been deleted on the wrongly based PROD - non-notable orchestra. It is an ensemble of NOTABLE phonographic output, active in it's home city Radom, and in it's country. The orchestra hosts every year workshops for conductors: www.conductorsacademy.org and every second year a Krzysztof Penderecki International Composers Competition Arboretum. -109.110.253.220 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Are you aware that Wikipedia has a very specific definition of "notable", and that music-related topics have other criterion that may have to be met? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EBooks on Demand
I, MB75, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MB75 (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done It was also written in Slovenian. You can try this out again and write it in English. By talking about purchasing the products the author has made this promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Little Kids Rock
Little Kids Rock (www.littlekidsrock.org) is a reputable national nonprofit organization that seems to have been taken down from wikipedia. Here is the article explaining its deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Little_Kids_Rock
The deleter, who is no longer editing for Wikipedia and thus has not been available to debate the deletion, claims not to have been able to find any recent news coverage of Little Kids Rock on Google News. I find lots! Please refer to their news index: http://www.littlekidsrock.org/news-events/news-index/
Please also refer to their 4 star rating on Charity Navigator: http://www.littlekidsrock.org/news-events/news-index/
Finally, see all of the artists who have worked with them to help transform more than 300,000 kids' lives by donating music educational resources to their schools: https://www.littlekidsrock.org/friends/our-big-fans/
The person who initially created the page back when Little Kids Rock was a much smaller organization was, in fact, an employee there. The organization has since grown, as has its independent network, and the content has been edited drastically since the time it was initially created.
How can I get this page reinstated to Wikipedia and the relevant hyperlinks on other pages (like their artist supporters' Wikipedia pages) also reinstated? -100.1.8.28 (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Kids Rock, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ES&L 16:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Joseph Culp
The deleting admin told me to request here. I request the first half of the page with film and TV credits restored to give me a chance to rewrite whatever copyright issues are in the second half about Walking-In-Your-Shoes. -05:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)TBliss (talk)
- Done I did not restore as no version was free of issues, But I have recreated without infringing content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks!TBliss (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Adur Sea of Lights
Could you explain this further? The page we are looking to undelete is 'Adur Sea Of Lights'. (Not Adur SEAS of Lights)-H3ckyeaht0m (talk) 16:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done A community-level festival, recurring or not, is not something that meets thenotability guidelines for inclusion in an encyclopedia (even if U2 once played at it, which they didn't). On top of that, the wording of the entire article was promotional - even down to including the exact time of an event. This is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia at this time DP 15:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alphabetagrams
I, 84.93.180.228, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 84.93.180.228 (talk) 14:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
djandmpvlogs
i have put extra material that meets with wikipedia rules -Thetruthman2 (talk) 17:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done You're kidding, right? That even remotely meets notability and external sourcing guidelines? This is an encyclopedia, not Facebook - there is ZERO material that meets Wikiepdia requirements, and it's not a topic that meets Wikipedia requirements ES&L 18:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
David Boorboor
There are several articles by reputable sources to prove this is a real person. From imdb, to news articles with pictures to prove his identity. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1237255/ -DavidBoorboor (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Identity is not in question. Notability is what matters here. Please read:
- Wikipedia:Autobiographies
- Wikipedia:Notability (people)
- WP:42 provides an overview.
- Basically a subject must have had significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, before meriting an article on Wikipedia. I know this was deleted via PROD, but it's been in this state for years without improvement, and simply restoring it will not cause it to improve. This would be best userfied and submitted to WP:AFC. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Introduction base for Menshop79.com
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Quangvu1502 (talk) 20:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. DP 20:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yatharth
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) GypsyPop1928 (talk) 19:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - @GypsyPop1928: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the draft article for review. This is done by clicking on the green button labeled "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
How to structure an IT Outsourcing Contract
Editing was being carried out in an Encyclopaedic style the "Save page" button below -Rajkurup (talk) 03:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The article was clearly not in an encyclopedic style; it was an essay on outsourcing contracts in information technology, and Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. I don't think it's necessary to undelete the page (and nominate it for a full deletion debate) just for the sake of process, so Not done. If you disagree, you can go to deletion review, but be assured that one way or other the article would remain deleted. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeremy Redmore
I, Killaduck, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Killaduck (talk) 03:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Ni-Ni
People should know about this bubblegum project. It is real, and my resources are legitimate. I have had to re-write this article 3 times because of other people's foolishness. Please stop this. If you do, I will add a picture of Nynne Qvortrup. -Roy Nave (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The article is currently not deleted; I have nominated it for a full deletion debate as contested proposed deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ni-Ni. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Igor Janev
It has been proven on 17 Wikies that article on Igor Janev was not a HOAX. See http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1449737#sitelinks-wikipedia I can see that the operator of these accounts has behaved foolishly and may well continue doing so, but I don't think deleting the page is the right answer for an encyclopedia. It seems clear to me that there's no hoax: he exists; he is an expert on the topic of Macedonia's international position. --212.200.213.94 (talk) 10:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. This may not have have been a per se "hoax", but in light of m:Stewards' noticeboard/Archives/2013-08#Igor Janev, undeleting this through this page would not be uncontroversial, which is the only types of undeletion we address here. (ping@Rschen7754:) --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly. Where's the reliable sources to prove it, if he is notable? --Rschen7754 16:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Some reliable sources to prove notability can be found at Russian Wikipedia. Nevertheless, I found interesting that art. on Igor Janev had survived 3 attempts for deletion on Serbian Wikipedia. --212.200.213.94 (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- It has been proven that designation "BLATANT HOAX" was a FAKE on 13 wikies, and that the case against Igor Janev was fabricated!--178.222.91.166 (talk) 01:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly. Where's the reliable sources to prove it, if he is notable? --Rschen7754 16:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Aaron Fisher
I did not receive a response on how to improve the page after sending in an inquiry. I would like to improve it so that it will be approved, and hope to have it undeleted so I don't need to go through the entire process again. Please help! -RosemaryReid (talk) 05:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done What you see here is a redirect. This can be edited to change. However it is not deleted and there is nothing to restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Fisher
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Fisher · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, RosemaryReid, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RosemaryReid (talk) 05:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Paul Anderson (Guitarist UK Midlands)
I have been a musician for over 30 years and in various bands notably with Motorhead Tribute band Motorkill (motorkill.com) and original band Agincourt (agincourtmusic.com) The latter with album Angels of Mons out on Spiritual Records in Japan and Hi Roller in Germany. The band has connections with Tygers of Pan Tang, Praying Mantis and Jameson Raid — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulandersonmusic (talk • contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Paulandersonmusic (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
motorkill.com
agincourtmusic.com
http://paulandersonrocks.wix.com/paulandersonrocks
http://www.hrrshop.de/AGINCOURT-Angel-of-Mons-TEST_1
http://www.metaltalk.net/news/2010791.php
I have been a musician for over 30 years and in various bands notably with Motorhead Tribute band Motorkill (motorkill.com) and original band Agincourt (agincourtmusic.com) The latter with album Angels of Mons out on Spiritual Records in Japan and Hi Roller in Germany. The band has connections with Tygers of Pan Tang, Praying Mantis and Jameson Raid
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Please do not write about yourself here. WP:Autobiography describes what you are trying to do. Let someone else notice the importance of a subject and then write about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Aamir Ali Sultan
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sahil Khanz (talk) 11:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
This page should be restored as it is the page of a well known celebrity from India. His Name is Aamir Ali Sultan and he is a playback singer in bollywood. He is also a radio Jockey. Kindly Restore and Dont Delete because he is a well known face in india
- Not done Well this page had no content just a very broken reference tag. You can write this again with some actual content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Alive by Adelitas Way
This article that is being developed must NOT be deleted since,it is trying to be reliable as possible.I love Adelitas Way and want to enform people and do this with a passion, but some of you administrators don't seem to care.I have taken my free time to make this article.It's not fair that lame pop artist get all their articles and rock ones like these get ignored and forgotten.I'm a Adelitas Way fan and I know alot about the band's history.I try to put as many references as possible I want these song articles to exist.Sharing my ideas and expresing it makes my feel ALIVE. -Awesomeone3624 (talk) 12:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alive (Adelitas Way song), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Shirt58 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
International Association of Fairs and Expositions
I am an Administrative Assistant for the International Association of Fairs and Expositions (IAFE). I noticed that we lacked an entry on Wikipedia, and am investigating why the page was deleted in January of 2007. The reason given was 'closing prod', the meaning of which I am uncertain. If there is no substantial reason for the removal of the page, I would ask for its reinstatement, as the IAFE is alive and well and would enjoy a place on Wikipedia. If the article was deleted due to any kind of lack of information, and requires more in order to be published, I would appreciate receiving a copy of the article text so that we may improve upon it and resubmit for entry. Thank you. -74.84.98.246 (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. The article was just one sentence and a link to the organization's web site. It was deleted because there was no evidence that the organization meets the inclusion criteria spelled out in WP:CORP, (see WP:42 for a simpler overview).
- The fact that IAFE is 'alive and well' is an invalid reason for having an article on it. Mere existence does not equate to notability. I am sure IAFE would 'enjoy a place on Wikipedia', but we have a cornerstone policy that Wikipedia is not a publicity medium, therefore 'enjoy a place on Wikipedia' is also an invalid reason for restoring the article.
- Because you clearly have a conflict of interest (see WP:COI for guidance), your best approach is to submit a new article using Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. I am new to anything regarding submission/editing of articles, and was unaware of the COI guidelines. We will look into submitting an AFC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.84.98.246 (talk) 17:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
National Institute of Broadcasting
Was deleted by PROD which I don't recall being made aware of. Although I recognize the school is now closed, it met WP:NCORP when it was originally created (and last time I reviewed it) I don't feel it to be appropriate to undelete it myself -ES&L 12:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, OK... but as you can see, the article is a 1-line stub with no references. Are you sure this is the one you had in mind? It looks now like it would qualify for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- I see it underwent a crapload of stuff. I'm not signed into my admin acct, can you move it into my userspace and delete the redirect for now? ES&L 18:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Neubauer Collegium for Culture and Society
- Neubauer Collegium for Culture and Society · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I intend to fix the issue found under article seven and re publish this article. I would like to have the original article that was published to serve both as template and as a way of understanding editorial error so that I may produce an article that will be, and will remain, published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kakejaufman (talk • contribs) 19:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Use the source material that was copied from http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2014/02/03/neubauer-collegium-s-new-research-projects-tackle-complex-global-questions instead. -~Amatulić (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
AAP_2014_Lok_Sabha_Candidates
The page has be to build up progressively with data available, starting with candidate list for each constituencies. The objective of the page is to provide readers with the minimum information of the candidates in each constituencies. Also please note that there are similar pages in progress other parties like
- List_of_United_Progressive_Alliance_candidates_in_the_Indian_general_election,_2014
- List_of_National_Democratic_Alliance_candidates_in_the_Indian_general_election,_2014
specified in India General Election Page - .Indian_general_election,_2014
Those pages are almost the same structure but not considered for deletion and still exists in the general Election Page. It looks lke a targeted attack towards the AAP for providing biased information to the Wiki Readers. Especially this being a political section which can create wrong impression on readers about a specific party.
Considering the similar list for other parties that exists , the page should be undeleted and a progressive update of page has to be done. -Soorejmg (talk) 05:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AAP 2014 Lok Sabha Candidates, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RoySmith (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Omemee Pigeon eFlyer
I, Yrhelper, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Yrhelper (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dean M. Brenner
I, SlatersGarage, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SlatersGarage (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ada Hittchins
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ada Hittchins · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Mary Mark Ockerbloom, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. -- I believe the title is currently misspelled, it should be "Ada Hitchins" -- it was being worked on by a participant at a GLAM editing event; I would be happy to take it over and develop it further. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 17:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- The deleted article is actually about Ada Hutchins, not Hitchins or Hittchins. Are you sure you have the right article? ~Amatulić (talk) 19:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- If it was about the chemist, which is the one I'm looking for, the correct spelling is Ada Hitchins, see University of Glasgow Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. She looks like a Chemist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- If it was about the chemist, which is the one I'm looking for, the correct spelling is Ada Hitchins, see University of Glasgow Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trip Tank
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trip Tank · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Nauticasmexico, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nauticasmexico (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kellie Torrey
I, Davisj1359, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Davisj1359 (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Bryan (songwriter/musician/music producer
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Bryan (songwriter/musician/music producer · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Jamesbryanmccollum (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Waterville Historic Hotel
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Waterville Historic Hotel · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 66.172.101.16, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.172.101.16 (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Colby morrison
I created this wikipeda page to get me and my ex boyfriend back together, we were together for over 4 years and i don't even want to put the page back up, i just want to show him what i wrote about him. Once my article is undeleted i will copy the information and delete it again, i know it isnt a legitimate page but i spent a lot of time working on it.
nvm
- Much as I disagree with this, it's been restored to User:KaileyVera/Colby morrison. Wikipedia isn't your own personal web space. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
cyclic corrosion testing
I was not given the chance to amend the infringements on the article before it was deleted, could i please have the article re-instated or emailed to me with the source code, so i can amend within the guidelines? This is the first article i have written for Wikipedia, i will gladly remove any text which is found to be copyright, or supply the copyright agreement from the users if given the chance. -Jlr83 (talk) 11:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. Nearly all of the text was copied from http://www.ascott-analytical.co.uk/salt-spray-or-cct.html
- See WP:CONSENT for information about permitting reproduction of copyrighted material, including the images you uploaded, which are labeled as copyrighted by your company but which you claim as your own work. Both cannot be true. The actual copyright holder needs to give Wikipedia permission, or you need to prove that you have that authority for your company. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Amatulić How do i go about proving i have authority from my company, what would be required? Kind Regards Jlr83 — Preceding undated comment added 09:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- A strong way to prove this is to get the company web site modified so that there is a copyright statement that says the content is available under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. it could be placed on the bottom of the page you copied or a sitewide statement say at copright.html. That WP:CONSENT link will tell where to send the email that comes from the company, in which you would state the copyright permission. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Another way is to have your company's CEO or attorney answer the OTRS ticket you created, saying that you are permitted to release company-copyrighted information to the public. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Bernardo Recaman Santos
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bernardo Recaman Santos · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I have already searched for the author on wikipedia. A page on him exists in 'Spanish Wikipedia', I was only intending to create a english page for him. Here is the link for the spanish page (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernardo_Recam%C3%A1n_Santos). When already an author's page in another language exists I don't see the problem in deleting his page and most importantly he is an author who has written a lot of books. I think this should satisfy the reason for his page on wikipedia. -Foliate08 (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. Please also read WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Translating from other language Wikimedia Projects, and also note that different Wikipediae have different inclusion standards, so what is acceptable for es.wp may not be acceptable for en.wp. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paul Hanna
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paul Hanna · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 129.78.233.210, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 129.78.233.210 (talk) 23:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anatoliy Lesnikov
I, E Guano, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. E Guano (talk) 09:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
E Guano (talk) 09:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - in fact, it was restored back in October. JohnCD (talk) 09:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Harisuman
I, Harisuman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harisuman (talk • contribs)
- Not done as it's a copyright infringement. Please also re-read WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO DP 08:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Punisher Skateboards
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -AllAroundTheWorld1 (talk) 23:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
This is not trying to promote business. Punisher Skate boards have over 40,000 followers on Facebook. This is simply a page explaining what it is. (Example: why is there a page for justin bieber?)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Plus it was horribly promotional...might have even been copy/pasted from somewhere. To answer your other question, Bieber has an encyclopedia article because he meets our notability guidelines. Also, please note that the purpose of Wikipedia is 100% incompatible with the purpose for your presence that you state on your userpage DP 09:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Rat Race EP
This is a brand new article. I am still planning to improve and expand it, but wasn't given enough time. Plus, this was a significant release in the catalogue of a notable band. -MetalicMadness (talk) 15:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done There is nothing in the text of the article as submitted that suggested it met notability requirements. If you would like it to be moved to your userspace for further work, it can be done, but you will need to obtain approval before moving it back into mainspace DP 09:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 41.202.233.189, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 41.202.233.189 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP 09:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Akachukwu Sullivan Nwankpo
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Akachukwu Sullivan Nwankpo · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Polibiographer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polibiographer (talk • contribs)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP 09:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mohak Meet
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mohak Meet · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 117.200.56.78, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.200.56.78 (talk) 13:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done history merged back on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Caterina Nix
Hi! I created the page yesterday, and I thought I could add the references later, I'm sorry I took too long, when I was going to do it the page had already been deleted, Is there any way we can restablish the page? I'm a singer and I'm currently working on two big projects, one is Avalon II by Timo Tolkki and the other is my solo album, managed and produced by Frontiers Records and Timo Tolkki, so I think that's pretty relevant, I'm the only latin American who has signed a contract with Frontiers Records, and my previous work was performed under a different name, so I have to have Caterina Nix on wikipedia, since all the other artists I'm involved with are too, thank you very much! I hope we can work this out. BTW I think my page was deleted because I did not add the references...I'm new to this, I'll try to fix all mistakes, thanks! "Save page" button below -Bringmethestarlight (talk) 13:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Read also WP:COI, WP:AUTOBIO and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS DP 14:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halloween Howls Comedy Festival
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halloween Howls Comedy Festival · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Deuceventura, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deuceventura (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Mighty Oak Entertainment
I am asking for this page to be undeleted so that I may make changes to it that will hopefully answer the concerns of the Wikipedia admin who deleted it. I'd like to add material that will demonstrate the importance/notability of my subject. Thank you very much. -Kristienb (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done @Kristienb: Articles deleted as A7 are generally not restored to article space, so I've moved the content to a subpage under your account here: User:Kristienb/Mighty Oak Entertainment. If you have a conflict of interest please use the articles for creation service to have another volunteer review it before moving it back. And make sure the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
User:EucalyptusTV/Eucalyptus(band)
I, 180.194.185.206, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 180.194.185.206 (talk) 15:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done The subject of your article does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You should wait until they receive significant coverage in reliable, independent sources before trying to create an article for them. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Rugulous1999
I wish for my user page to be undeleted so I may fix the page and make it suitable for the project. -Rugulous1999 (talk) 18:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done If you're going to create a userpage that is suitable for the project then you can do so from scratch - not using a fake article about yourself, which is also an attempt to circumvent the deletion of Luke Taylor. If there was evidence that you have contributions besides trying to promote yourself then it would be another story, but that's not the case. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Outer Banks Voice
It is not deleted yet, but I know it should not be so this request exists in case it gets deleted. -Cagememberaccount (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Further, I've declined the request for speedy deletion, because there is enough context to identify the subject of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 19:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Liquid EP
Please restore the page for this EP as it was deleted before I could attach the proper sources to it. I feel its deletion was premature and am more than willing to update it with the necessary citations to validate its presence here on Wikipedia. -Cmilette (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. @Cmilette: I've notified the original PRODer as well. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Morgan & Morgan
In addition to being one of Florida's ten largest law firms, the firm is WIDELY known in FLorida for their advertising campaigns and for their advocacy for legalizing marijuana. They've received very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ARticle was deleted years ago, perhaps it was less notable then. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- The old version was an advert created (judging by the username) by the firm itself with one line of prose plus contact details. I'll email you text if you like, but there's nothing salvageable—you'd be much better off starting a completely new article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Okay. Thanks very much for your assistance. Enjoy your weekend. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
My DNA Fragrance
Please restore my page, which was deleted because someone tried to update the content and reformatted our page. My email address is changed and i can not access my original account, which is JadeIce. The original page was an orphan page, but had passed the review process to be posted. My DNA Fragrance has a rich history and international media attention behind it. I would like to request that the page be restored to the original content before someone attempted to revise the page on April 10, 2014. The original article has been on the Wiki since 2008 and there are so many global links back to this wiki page it is impossible to amend this issue if this page is deleted. Thank you for your assistance in helping to restore the page My DNA Fragrance. -Jadeice1000 (talk) 00:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. You have got to be kidding. Every paragraph of that article contained PR-speak. It isn't salvageable without a complete re-write, therefore it will not be restored. Also, it didn't exist before 2010, not 2008. Global links to the now-deleted page isn't really a problem for Wikipedia. I suggest you start from scratch, to write a neutral, well-sourced article using the process described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Speedy Pete Internet Directory
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Speedy Pete Internet Directory · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Dogzzy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dogzzy (talk) 14:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Eh, why not. It's a site clearly set up as a long-running joke, but if it has any national reporting about it, it just might qualify for inclusion. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)