Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 177

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 9 years ago by ThaddeusB in topic CloudOpting
Archive 170←Archive 175Archive 176Archive 177Archive 178Archive 179Archive 180

Active Time Battle

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This redirect was formerly an article before it was deleted and made a redirect again. I would like for the article's history to be restored, then the redirect reinstated. (This was formerly deleted per an WP:RFD discussion, but it now seems that the reason is no longer valid since an editor found a good target for this redirect.) -Steel1943 (talk) 17:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done As a note to JohnCD who closed the RfD, the history needed to be maintained for copyright purposes since the content was merged at some point in the past. (It could have been moved to a different title, as suggested by Steel in the RfD.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Christoph Semke

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please userfy both talk page and article -Valoem talk contrib 02:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Dragonmead

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Stable article that was WP:Notable. Deleted without notice. Summarily with no chance to comment or challenge the claim, or change the article. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

I have put this on the deleting administrator's page, and if nothing is heard we will proceed to deletion review. See User talk:RHaworth 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done I'd consider this borderline, but I believe that with a decent amount of editing it could be built up to a reasonable standard. I've trimmed what was there to remove as much of the bias as possible. Yunshui 雲水 13:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
There was no attempt to honor the Wikipedia:Deletion process. "Also, in general the article's creator and major contributors should have been notified." If a notice was put up, it was acted on immediately. In a fast trial mode—the constitution may guarantee a "speedy trial" but this is something more precipitate, dire and capricious, where one person makes a decision without input, consensus or an attempt to provide process. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Nineteenth-Century French Studies

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The page was deleted under G8 violation. We are not copying the content, ofcourse I'm the developer of the website and the Editor of the website has provided the rights to share the content. You can see the website section in this page http://ncfs-journal.org/?q=subscribe for the details of the developer. Please undelete the wiki page and do support us in sharing the knowledge. -KambaGiri 05:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - We need explicit permission to relicense copyrighted information for use on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions on how to do this, but keep in mind text originally written for other purposes is unlikely to be useful for writing an Encyclopedia article anyway. It would be far better to start from scratch. See WP:Your first article for straightforward advice on writing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Damian Mohler

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, Achampen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Achampen (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Achampen Question: Your submission has been turned down twice, and you had plenty of notice that the submission was going to be deleted. Furthermore there were several images of questionable copyright status. How do you intend to improve the submission prior to being accepted? Hasteur (talk) 13:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David L. McBurnett

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Lizarnoldhood (talk) 13:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


Article about a prominent New Orleans music producer deleted for reason of abandonment while submission was pending. This biography is worthy of a wikipedia article. iconic New Orleans nightclub owner who helped found jazzfest and went on to produce international hit television and audio recordings of New Orleans music. His live from New Orleans music performances were pioneering for the time and won many awards. -Lizarnoldhood (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Lizarnoldhood: Note submission was not pending, but rather had been declined for a long while at the time of deletion. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Al Eisenstat

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Psantora, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.  ~ PaulT+/C 16:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mindset Evolution

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Skylermindset, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skylermindset (talk) 21:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

White lighter myth

Latest comment: 9 years ago11 comments3 people in discussion

Please userfy both talk page and article I distinctly remember a version with substantial content. I am looking for the version with the most content -Valoem talk contrib 02:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Also both talk page and article of White lighter. There are some sources which may meet WP:N. Valoem talk contrib 02:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done Sorry, there's nothing of value in the revisions of any of those two articles, just unsourced nonsense, e.g. One theory behind using a white lighter is that it is okay to light cigarettes with but not for smoking any "herb" subtances. :) §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
@FreeRangeFrog: Can you please check the revision history, also do you mind if I look through it, if I plan to restore it would obviously be a sourced version. Valoem talk contrib 03:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
@Valoem: White lighter myth has two revisions. The contents were The belief that the usage of a white lighter brings about bad luck to the user.. That's it. The first version of White lighter contained this: White Lighter a symbol of bad luck in many circles of smokers. Some hold this belief so dear that they will refuse to use of buy a lighter of this color. This belief is mostly held by younger marijuana users. The second version is an attack page. There are no sources or usable information there at all. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
@FreeRangeFrog: Okay, that's no good, I distinctly remember a version that had two to three paragraphs when I read the article in 2010, is it probably was not those versions, can you check other similar delete pages? Also on a side note, can you restore Involuntary celibacy full article history and talk page to my space. Thanks. Valoem talk contrib 03:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
@Valoem: The deletion log does not work with wildcards, only exact titles. You'll have to search user talk pages, CSD logs and so on to find the title you're looking for. When you find it, just let us know and we'll take a look. As to the other one, given what that article went through, I would rather not restore it. However, if you enable your email I will send the contents to you if you wish. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
@FreeRangeFrog: Understandable, however I am a biggie when it comes to revision history being intact when the article eventually gets restored through a second DRV, my plans are ambitious regarding that, most discussions about the article hinge on WP:IDONTLIKEIT and I am sure the sources provided by tokyogirl79's revision are more than sufficient. Valoem talk contrib 04:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
@Valoem: Agree, if there is consensus to restore I'm sure it will be in everyone's best interest to restore the whole history. Of course TokyoGirl is an admin so she can do that, as well as examining the deleted revisions to obtain sources. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I've asked the admins that closed the last AfD and the DRV request to weigh in. So far Coffee has said no because of how drawn out the AfDs were and I'm kind of leery about doing this without at least one of the two admins approving the request. The AfD and DRV both were pretty contentious so this is one restore/userfy that would have to really go through all of the proper channels before it gets userfied anywhere. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Mr_Alahan

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Someone want to deleted my article .But I am real Mr Alahan.I am post it .But some request to delete it.It is very bad .because i am Comedy Actor ,Founder ,Project Direct "Save page" button below -Alahanvirtual (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC) Please don't delete it Please help me.

  Not done. @Alahanvirtual: Merely existing isn't a reason to include an article on you. See Wikipedia:Golden rule and WP:NACTOR for an overview of what is expected for a subject to merit an article here. Furthermore, you should not write an article about yourself; see Wikipedia:Autobiography. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Request to Restore Entry on Steve Vining

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have the proof you are looking for. Please let me recreate it.What about a squirrel? (talk) 18:49, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Kacart

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

i need to update my site and company details in kacart page so requesting wiki team not to delete this page -Kkirank86 (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Ali Channa

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ali (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Yilin Zhong

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

writer's general profile -Emptynow (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. Yes, we know it's a profile. So what? That isn't a rationale for restoration. Furthermore, the article is ineligible for restoration by request on this page because it was deleted as the result of a deletion discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yilin Zhong. You would have to appeal to the deleting administrator, Shirt58. After that, you may take the case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Forman Mills

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted for failing WP:CORP but I suspect the tagger and admin did not do any WP:BEFORE, as I've found a few sources -Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Best Arcade Script

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Kireerike, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kireerike (talk) 01:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

@Kireerike:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

learnme2

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This progect is so importment to our student -sanjit khulal magar 03:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

I placed it in your user page per your talk page explanation that it is a teaching project, not an article attempt. It can be found at User:Sanjit.khulal/Learnme2. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
@Sanjit.khulal: Please don't engage in move-warring with administrators. That article is not fit for main article space, and would be speedily deleted. I have re-moved it, this time to Draft:Learnme2. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ronald Gonzalez (Sculptor) (2nd request)

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jpspano, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jpspano (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
...and deleted again by Fuhghettaboutit as a copyvio. Good catch, I missed that it had been requested and denied previously. Renamed this section accordingly. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Paul Easter (Director)

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

There is now no reason to keep deleting the page. -Mrspeeks (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done And will never be done. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Sarodiya

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We Sarodiya are the group of some social workers. We are real group/NGO. We want some interested people to join us thats why we need a wikipedia page. Thank you.ArnabADG 11:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC) -ArnabADG 11:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia is not a platform for your recruitment, it is here to cover topics that have been covered in reliable sources. Tarc (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

arvind rai

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

there are some importent information about indian vastu shastra- for understanding -VyaasJi (talk) 07:47, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

That may be, but a religious lecture in a biography article is not appropriate. Furthermore it was written in a promotional tone. So   Not done. You may appeal to the deleting admin Randykitty if you believe the deletion decision was not aligned with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If Randykitty declines to restore it, you may appeal to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Image:KATE_ANDERTON.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted as orphaned and unencyclopedic in 2008 but probably fits Katie Anderton and could also go at Blackburn Rovers L.F.C. -Målfarlig! (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done Please place the image in the article(s). --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Bompeh senior high technical school

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article should not be deleted because it is the profile of a senior High school which I would like the world to know about.There is more to be added to this article and I will add to it soon,I therefore plead with you not to delete it.Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myraclera (talk • contribs) 09:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done This was deleted as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion, and as such cannot be restored. It was actually so promotional that it was to the point where it wouldn't even be something we'd restore to the draftspace. I have no problem with you creating a new version of the article, but it must be neutral and it should also not be written completely in uppercase letters. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

clonazolam

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is a notable benzodiazepine which is related to other similar ones in that class of drugs. It is appearing more frequently as a designer drug of the research chemical class though it wasn't explicitly synthesized to get around drug laws as it's creation was documented by Hoffman La Roche in the 1980s. If etizolam and phenazepam and the myriad of other benzos with unique effects this one is notable too. Also since people are using it it helps described the basic known properties and chemical structures in an accessible place. If you disagree, please tell me why every other obscure non prescription benzo gets a page but only a few you approve of. With forum posts I can prove that it is being use recreationally, but those aren't particularly notable sources. But for safety safe there is no reason not to have a page. -Wgfcrafty (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clonazolam, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 14:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Our "notability" guidelines generally are based upon the availability of specific types of in-depth, independent source material, and what is specifically needed there, particularly for technical/medical articles, can sometimes be a bit opaque. You can take a look at WP:GNG for the policy specifics, but in practical terms, for a drug, I'd suggest asking at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. That group is active and knowledgable about resources that may, if you are correct, help show that this topic meets our notability guidelines. The general consensus of the discussion, as Yunshui points out, is that it does not, so the burden of proof is now on you to show it. Best of luck, --j⚛e deckertalk 16:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Option pool shuffle

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article Option Pool Shuffle [2] was deleted as considered "non-notable neologism". I contest this:

Firstly, non-notable: the Option Pool Shuffle impacts any startup or small company that is looking raise money from a VC. The Option Pool Shuffle can swing 10% of the value from one party to another (the VC to the Founders and vice-versa). Given that some $48 billion of VC investment [3] was made in 2013, and this has grown in 2014. The Option Pool shuffle has a c.$5 billion impact every year.

Secondly, neologism: the term has been in the use in the VC industry for many years. And a quick search yields the following articles that describe this directly: (1) http://venturehacks.com/articles/option-pool-shuffle (2) http://avc.com/2009/11/valuation-and-option-pool/ (3) http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/07/22/want-to-know-how-vcs-calculate-valuation-differently-from-founders/ (4) http://www.slideshare.net/WilmerHale/option-poolshuffle (5) http://www.reportally.com/cap-table-university/share-option-pool-shuffle

Please can you reinstate this article.

Many thanks -Swfindlay101 (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Swfindlay101, please add your sources to the article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

I've added a few references to the article. Thank you ThaddeusB -- Swfindlay101

Draft:Zobe Records

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 148.129.71.41 (talk) 16:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

References

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Jonathancbpowell/Frank Wright (rugby union)

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jonathancbpowell (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - there was no content at all at the page, just your request that your (blank) draft be reviewed. —Cryptic 18:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
For clarity, feel free to create a new draft (with content), but there is no reason to restore an empty page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Skylaark67/Glenn Patrick Buxton

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Skylaark67, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skylaark67 (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Reasoning I am a direct descendant of the first recorded BUXTON in the American Colonies Jacob Buxton. My father Charles Glenn Buxton Jr. is his descendant and a decorated WWI and Korea Veteran. I am a retired Cowboy of the Southwest who went back to college after being severely injured to become an Educator (Professor). I attained an AA AS BA MA MAT ... my story is that of an American Viet Nam Era Veteran who made something of himself against great odds I have been in great pain and had medical problems that kept me from doing any editing or contributing for well over a year -Skylaark67 (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. However, it is unlikely you meet our requirements for an article, Skylaark67. This is not a judgement on you as a person, but rather a guideline that exists for your own protection. All our content must be verifiable by reliable sources. If we didn't have this rule, anyone could write anything they wanted about you , including highly negative lies. Also, writing about yourself is highly discouraged - see WP:Autobiography for a detail explanation. If after reading this advice, you agree it is not worth proceeding, you have have the page deleted by placing {{db-g7}} at the top of the page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Botchamania

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article was previously deleted under guideline A7 in 2009 by an administrator who has retired from Wikipedia. Since then, Botchamania has exploded in popularity, even becoming recognized by mainstream and independent wrestlers alike. I have reason to believe that this is both credible and significant. -Sasukemario (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done I have restored the most promising version of the page to Draft:Botchamania since it did legitimately meet A7. Once it has been revised with sources, feel free to move it back to mainspace yourself, Sasukemario (or submit through AfC if you prefer). I won't scold the page protecting admin since he is no longer around, but let this be a good reminder to other admins that indefinitely page protection is not necessary and is counter-productive: things can gain notability over time. Instead, protect the page for a year or so (that is what I do). Such protection is sufficient to discourage 99% of problematic users while leaving the door open for legitimate recreation if the subject gains notability later. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cancer Hope Network

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Wandasd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wandasd (talk) 20:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done The page isn't deleted, it is simply at Draft:Cancer Hope Network now. You can edit it there. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Haewoojae

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 24.224.212.86, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.224.212.86 (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Cancer Hope Network

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

{{subst:refund|1= ==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cancer Hope Network==

I, Wandasd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wandasd (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

2= Requesting to undelete Talk:Cancer Hope Network. Have new reliable sources to include. Please restore asap or contact with instructions for next steps. Thank you

@Wandasd: Again, there is nothing to restore - it isn't deleted. The page formerly at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cancer Hope Network is now at Draft:Cancer Hope Network. You can add your source there. We simply changed the name of "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation" to "Draft:" to make it easier to find pages - nothing has been removed. Talk:Cancer Hope Network never existed, nor do you have any deleted contributions whatsoever. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Barbara Kaalnerg

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

She asked me to make a page for her. She is my source. I am semi new to this and didn't mean to violate any regulations. -Hendersonfan (talk) 23:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The article was deleted as the result of a biographical article proposed deletion ("sticky-prod"). Article deletions via sticky-prod will not be unilaterally overturned; reliable sources need to be provided in order to overturn the deletion. Note that we need sources that have no connection to her to satisfy our notability criterion for inclusion, and that you cannot use her as a source for anything but the most uncontroversial information. Also see WP:Identifying reliable sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Michigan Urban Farming Initiative

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Organization is nationally recognized, runs through thousands of volunteers a year and operates one of the highest yield urban farms in the country -129.9.75.246 (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Mark Brent

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -86.187.101.195 (talk) 09:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Robert Connor Dawes Fund

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I recently attempted to create an article on Wikipedia on the Robert Connor Dawes Fund. As it was my first article I wasn’t sure how to go about it and published it before I had finished in the hopes that I could edit it later. I know this doesn’t seem like a smart idea but I just wanted to see if it worked first. As I finished typing it up in Word I saw the notice that it was going to be deleted. I have fixed up the article and added plenty of reputable third party references, which is what it was missing. I also proved that it was definitely a notable organisation. How would I go about getting it reviewed and possibly getting the page back up? Would I be able to send it to someone? -124.190.117.53 (talk) 05:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

NOTE According to WP:G7, blanking in the userspace is not considered a deletion request. Also @Wtmitchell: as the original deleting admin. -- GB fan 12:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Ed Lyon

Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

I added seven links to the talk page, article was deleted before bringing those in as refs that establish notability. Happy for this to be taken to AFD for more time to improve article --- Aronzak (talk) 04:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  • If GB fan has no opposition, I have no true issue with this being taken to AfD as opposed to a speedy deletion. However I do have to caution you Aronzak in that you only put WP:PRIMARY sources in the article, meaning that you used sources that are written by Lyon or one of his representatives. Primary sources cannot show notability regardless of what they assert- you need to show coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspaper articles about Lyon in order to show notability. Showing GB some non-primary sources would go a long way towards helping prove that Lyon could survive an AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
A different editor created the page, I just wanted to fix it with RS sources (1 2 3 4 5 6 7) -- Aronzak (talk) 06:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: Left a message on GB fan talk page. -- Aronzak (talk) 06:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I do not remember deleting this. I have restored it for further development. -- GB fan 11:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Il Giardino dei Semplici (band)

Latest comment: 9 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

I, Giallino83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Giallino83 (talk) 13:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Giallino83 This was previously restored back in june and it slipped back into G13 eligibility and deletion again. How are you going to prevent that from hapening again if the page is restored again? Hasteur (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Giallino83 The band is clearly notable, so I'm inclined to restore the draft. We do need some assurance that you are going to do something to make the article acceptable though. There is no point to restore it if you aren't going to do any work (like the last time it was restored). --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry! I'm Italian and just checked the Italian WIKI day by day, not the American one. I did an huge mistake. I thought the page had not been "accepted" for some reason. Pity on me! Restore the page. I'm ready to add an English bio for the band ASAP. Giallino83 (talk)

  Done --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Added the article. Hope you like it. Will add new contents and picture within days. Giallino83 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The page appeared to have a copy of a blog entry. And now you have blanked it. Does that mean you want it deleted again? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
For the record, the page was restarted at Draft:Il Giardino dei Semplici (band). I deleted the confusing redirects and blank pages (someone accidentally moved it from wikipedia talk to draft talk instead of draft). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Ali Channa (2nd request)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

[[{{{1}}} A.F.C.|{{{1}}}]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali Graphi (talk • contribs)

  Not done - see the response to your first request above. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

11 London

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Fully referenced from 3rd party sites, non-promotional language used, similar posts exist for other agencies, client base is of international standing e.g. clients include multi-billion dollar turnover pharmaceutical companies -Hunter190676 (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - sources such as linked in are not independent of the subject and the reason for deletion was no indication of importance, not prmotional language. As a company that just launched this month, 11 London is VERY unlikely to meet our inclusion requirements. You may request that the deleting admin (User:Deb) restore a copy for you in draft space if you like, but it would almost certainly be a waste of your time per WP:TOOSOON. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The company name may be new, but it is a relaunch of one that is 8 years old. If we remove references to social networks and just leave the other citations would that stand give the article a better chance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter190676 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  • No, removed linkedin and the company's website (which combined accounted for 4/6 references) won't help. The remaining 2 sources are routine "company launches" announcements and don't establish notability per WP:CORPDEPTH. I can restore the article to draft space (where it will have to be approved by a third party editor before it can be returned to mainspace) if you want, but again it is almost certainly a waste of time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Snug Gables

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, AndyEich, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AndyEich (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

XCC

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This entry could contain #REDIRECT[[Machine-readable_passport#Official_travel_documents_.28e.g._identity_cards.29]] -Apokrif (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done, revised the original heading and redirected to Machine-readable passport#Official travel documents. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict) It looks like HJ Mitchell locked it down after a completely unrelated article was created a few times. Probably a good reminder why a page generally shouldn't be locked indefinitely, especially such a generic title that could probably stand for dozens of things. (A year is almost always sufficient to ward off spammers.) I've Amatulic has recreated it as the requested redirect. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Marcius Melhem

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

There is a page entitled Marcelo Adnet on an actor. If this page has significant importance, Marcius Melhem page also has. I know Marcius Melhem page has little information, but I am here to develop it. -Jhonas Boeno (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - While the article technically met A7 as written, FreeRangeFrog could have exercised some discretion here given that 1) the subject is clearly notable and 2) there was a template at the top of the page requesting a translation from the Portuguese Wikipedia (which has plenty of sources). I'm sure he won't object to the page being restored to draft space and so I will go ahead and do so. The page can now be found at Draft:Marcius Melhem. Feel free to move it back to mainspace after it is better developed, or submit it the articles for creation to have an experience editor review it first. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't know that I'd characterize that as clearly notable, but I have no objection to it being restored if the creator feels the subject meets the inclusion guidelines. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Philip Boyd

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, KMWNJ, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KMWNJ (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@KMWNJ:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also please make sure you examine WP:GNG and/or WP:NACTOR. Otherwise it will continue to be declined. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Herman (lawyer)

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, NewAmerica101, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NewAmerica101 (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@NewAmerica101: The draft has not been deleted, only declined. It will be deleted if it is not edited for six months. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
To clarify, it was deleted at one time, but was restored about 2 weeks ago as per a previous request here. Please edit the article to address the concerns raised in the previous AfC reviews. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin N. Hamilton

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Techtacular, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Techtacular (talk) 02:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I had stopped working on it but I am ready to resume. -Techtacular (talk) 02:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

y.srihari

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Naaga 100 (talk) 07:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC) dr .srihari is president of global medical association. nearly 40,000 doctors are participating in this association, he is also member of indian medical association,2,50,000 doctors of india participating in this associations. wikipedia articles clearly states the importence of indian medical association and global medical association. so the article y.srihari is good . so i am requesting you dont delate it.............................naaga

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -115.241.109.31 (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)dr y,srihari is member of indian medical association,2,50,000 doctors participating in this association,wikipedia article confirms this. so this article is nice, .....mani

  Not done This article has not yet been deleted, This is not the venue to argue for keeping of an article currently up for deletion. If you wish to plead your case for keeping this article do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Srihari, where the deletion discussion is currently ongoing.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Hanif Ullah Khan

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

www.hanifkhanartist.webs.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanif Ullah Khan( Hanif Khan) (talk • contribs) 06:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

@Hanif Ullah Khan( Hanif Khan): - what is the exact name of the page that was deleted. Hanif Ullah Khan has never existed, nor have any plausible alternative capitalizations in mainspace or draft space. Alternatively, what is the username of the person who created the page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Ashram Dera Brahamgiani Sant Baba Tota Puri Ji Maharaj Jogi Majra

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Shrishri1008santtotapuriji (talk) 10:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - the page had various problems: its subject was unclear, part of it wasn't in English, it looked like an ad, and it looked like text copied and pasted from another source. Please read WP:Your first article for straightforward advice to editing on Wikipedia and start over from scratch if you think you have something encyclopedic to contribute. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

प्रकाश पाटील

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Prakashpvasai (talk) 11:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC) I will be responsible for any wrong information. Information provided is true.

I went ahead and created the redirect. Prakashpvasai, please keep in mind this is the English Wikipedia. If you wish to write in Marathi, you can do so at the Marathi Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Asociaţia Ghidelor şi Ghizilor din România.svg

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

bad edit broke wikilink, making it seem unused -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done I have restored the image and fixed the article it was used in. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Stormy Atmosphere

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Good day,
On 20 February 2015 my article was deleted due to a suspicion of a copyright violation.
This is the link to an article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Silverray123/sandbox

About the copyright violations - It was a huge misunderstanding actually. The text in the link http://progresja.com/events/mike-terrana-usa-2/?lang=en
was actually taken from the original biography of the band. The owners of the website were the ones who copy-pasted it when making the advertisement for the bands' tour with Mike Terrana in December 2014. They don't own the copyright on that text, it's the band's original bio text. I thought it's okay to citate few words from the original bio of the band, when I write about the band.
Hope that this explains the issue, therefore my article can be brought back from deletition and resubmitted.
Thank you in advance,

Silverray123 (talk) 12:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

<moved here from Wikipedia talk:Requests for undeletion> --- Ed (Edgar181) 13:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

@Silverray123:, no it is not acceptable to copy text from the band's official biography. I restored the page since there is definitely some original work there by you, but it will need to be completely rewritten to be acceptable as an article. Copying even one sentence from another source is a copyright violation. You must rewrite everything in your own words. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

CloudOpting

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article represents a publicly funded European project. -Boryanastamenova (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - As you say the page was "an attempt to widespread the objective of the project". Wikipedia is not a place to promote projects no matter how noble and non-commercial they are. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that summarizes what reliable sources have written about in detail. That does not appear to include the CloudOpting project. Please see WP:Your first article for straightforward advice for editing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_177&oldid=1136068566"