Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 185

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Graeme Bartlett in topic Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GEC Anderson Limited
Archive 180←Archive 183Archive 184Archive 185Archive 186Archive 187→Archive 190

Draft:Philip_Henry_Martin

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, 91.125.123.83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 91.125.123.83 (talk) 21:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want this to be accepted, I think it would be a very good idea if you read Help:Referencing for beginners.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

stitch.com

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The article is valid because describes all the innovations that stitch.com introduced throughout the years and lists the most important ones that changed and revolutionized the craftwork – textile area. -Fasukus (talk) 10:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Deb (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. In fact, I am amazed this title has not been salted yet! —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:08, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Matt Bradley (musician)

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Matthew Bradley was a known musician in the progressive rock scene. He participated on albums projects such as Explorers Club and Dali's Dilemma, both from Magna Carta Records.

I resent the fact this page has been deleted without any discussion on the matter. At the moment the page was just a stub, and I was collecting material to expand the page further. -Pinnecco (talk) 08:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

A3 deletions are not overturned here. Might I suggest going through the drafting process instead? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey Pinnecco. Even though you asked for direct undeletion, I have instead userfied it to Draft:Matt Bradley (musician) so you can work on it a bit before submitting it for review (by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page) or by a move to the mainspace. We do expect content already in place that satisfies some basics of our policies at the time of creation. It's really the only effective way we can operate because we get thousand of page creations per day, and a vast number of them are entirely unsuitable for the encyclopedia. The only way we can manage the firehose of stuff coming at us is to designate certain types of pages as able to be deleted immediately if they don't meet some basic standards from the get go. That being said, I have doubts that an article is sustainable on this topic at least based on what I saw thus far, on notability grounds. That is not a reflection on the individual's merit but whether he belongs in an encyclopedia because the world has taken note of him by writing about him substantively in reliable sources. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Disco Orange

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Victoddy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Victoddy (talk) 12:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I have not had time to edit and re-write the article since my initial submission -Victoddy (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

@Victoddy:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Disco Orange. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Wikimezmur

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Genemie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Genemie (talk) 02:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

@Genemie:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ella Linnea Wahlestedt

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, Lwahlestedt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lwahlestedt (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC) There are lesser actors in the same movie Earth to Echo that have wiki pages. She was one of the lead actors. She has also appeared in several other tv shows since and Good Morning American and Entertainmnet tonight.

You cannot use the existence of another article to argue for the existence of your own. All Wikipedia articles must satisfy our notability criterion in and of themselves. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
@Lwahlestedt:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Association of World Election Bodies (A-WEB)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 121.171.147.151, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 121.171.147.151 (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:The Association of World Election Bodies (A-WEB). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves: an article should be based on significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yiannis Misirlis

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Bestwikimis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to add citations and references to the article -Bestwikimis (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

@Bestwikimis:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Yiannis Misirlis. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


Arman Noori

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page about Arman Noori contained true and verifiable information from reliable sources. It was about a real person, and credibly indicated the importance and significance of the him. -TheGreatArman (talk) 15:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Vanguard World

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 66.188.12.58 (talk) 12:38, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

  Question: I can't find any trace of this. Please give the exact title of the page you mean, or the username of the account that created it. If you had a notification that it had been deleted, copy and paste the name from that. JohnCD (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
I think they may be looking for the restoring of Draft:Vanguard World, Incorporated.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 12:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, McM! That's one variation I hadn't tried.
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
All of the draft article's references are to the company website or its Facebook, except one which does not mention Vanguard; but Wikipedia requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, both to establish notability and to provide independent sources for an article. An encyclopedia article should not be just the company telling the world about itself.JohnCD (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

David Bensoussan

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I never understood what was controversial with the following data -65.94.20.208 (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

<copy of article removed - not required here, administrators can see the deleted article>
Note: Article was deleted per WP:PROD in 2012. Stated reason according to User:Alan Liefting/PROD log/2012 was "non-notable. Fails WP:PROF". --Finngall talk 14:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Alan Liefting (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article would be improved by references about Dr Bensoussan, not just lists of his publications, to show how he meets the relevant notability standard at WP:Notability (academics). JohnCD (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Shon Brooks

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

StockPicker.Cali.79 19:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DMitchell.78 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 16 April 2015‎

@DMitchell.78:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Aaron Jarman

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Aaronbh15, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aaronbh15 (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

@Aaronbh15:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beverly Hills Sports Council

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, Nyfan2007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nyfan2007 (talk) 23:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  Not done Two deletions so far, no edits at all in the six months elapsed between your last restore request and the latest delete. Wikipedia does not host unsuitable material indefinitely. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Antoine_Fadavi

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This page was deleted due to a false copyright infringement. The bio written is the Wikipedia article is taken from the site www.antoinefadavi.com, which is not copyrighted, so free to use on any platforms. -88.164.12.192 (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. Hello. All sufficiently unique expression is automatically granted non-free copyright and must be assumed to have that status unless affirmative evidence is found to the contrary (there is no need to place a copyright symbol for this to be true). If you are the copyright owner then you can release the copyright under a suitably free license or into the public domain, but that would have to be done in a verifiable way, such as placing that release on the external website. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more. However, the content could not have been used unmodified even without the copyright issue as it was quite promotional.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I placed the public domain copyright license on every pages of http://www.antoinefadavi.com/wordpress/. Please let me know about how to continue the un-deletion process.

  Not done for multiple reasons:
  • The article would be quickly deleted again at WP:AFD due to lack of any evidence of notability, and lack of evidence that Antoine Fadavi meets any of the criteria spelled out in WP:MUSICBIO. It is not worth restoring pages that have no hope of being kept. See Wikipedia:Golden rule for a general overview of what is expected.
  • It appears to be written by the subject for the purpose of self-promotion or publicity. Wikipedia is not to be used for publicity, and Wikipedia:Autobiographies are strongly discouraged. Please see WP:COI for further guidance.
  • A statement that the website is "free of known copyright restrictions" is not the same as releasing it under an acceptable free license or stating outright that it is public domain.
You are welcome to try to re-create the article via the process described at WP:AFC, which is really the best venue for an author with a conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mikroton Recordings

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Staalvlaad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Staalvlaad (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:FinTP Project

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, 5.2.141.168, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 5.2.141.168 (talk) 08:11, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Fruits de Mer Records

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 77.102.206.240, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 77.102.206.240 (talk) 09:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Ho Siu Kee

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hosiukee (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC) his page is not unambiguously promotional, because we are only a group of student of Hong Kong City University, working on a project which needs us to create a Wikipedia page for any artist. Ho Siu Kee is a prestigious artist in Hong Kong and thus, we created this page simply because we believe it worths to do so. Since we are only students and beginner of using Wikipedia, we sincerely hope that someone could help us to modify or guide us, so that the page won't be deleted. Thanks a lot!

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Has your course educator co-ordinated through Wikipedia:School and university projects? If not, point them to that page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Global Traveler

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like request that the deleted content be emailed to me so the content can be improved upon prior to republishing on Wikipedia -76.124.195.246 (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

  Not done, but I will do it if you register an account, or sign in if you have one, and enable email, which you do by clicking "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and then at the bottom of the "User profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users".
If you prepare a new version based on the old one, you should not simply post it (a) because the old one was deleted at WP:Articles for deletion/Global Traveler, and (b) because a history-merge will be necessary to ensure that contributions from earlier authors are properly attributed. You should make a page at Draft:Global Traveler and then apply at WP:Deletion review giving a link to it. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christian Oldham

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 73.129.55.197, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.129.55.197 (talk) 14:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Christian Oldham. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Troll Station (YouTube Channel)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

much more coverage since the article was deleted, restore to Draft:TrollStation for me to work on.[1][2][3][4][5] -Theamazo (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@Theamazo:   Done, but since this was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll Station (YouTube Channel) you should not restore it directly. When it is ready, check with the closing administrator, Joe Decker (talk), and then if not satisfied go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Dilute (band)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The reason the article was deleted is that they weren't "of note". Videos of their songs on youtube have several thousand views, and you can find them on spotify. Being "of note" seems like a highly arbitrary criteria for deletion and I don't think it's true. -90.42.74.7 (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Surajt88 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article has no references at all: Wikipedia's test for inclusion, called Wikipedia:Notability, looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:University of California, Riverside School of Public Policy

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article was left idle for over six months but we intend to edit and work on it as soon as possible. I request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 169.235.173.210 (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Solution chain

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page was prodded on the grounds that it was a neogolism (sic) but there are no new words in the title. The author's other work seems to be good faith and so I want to see what can be made of this too. -Andrew D. (talk) 21:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Kvng (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Check out WP:NEO. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Neon Roots

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I was actually just hoping to get access to deleted article -NamesAlreadyTaken (talk) 00:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

@NamesAlreadyTaken:   Done - I have emailed you a copy of the text. JohnCD (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Wagtail_(CMS)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Wagtail is an Open Source CMS that has a large community of users. Similar Open Source platforms have comparable informational pages on Wikipedia. The intention is to provide more historical information about the software and its roadmap than is available elsewhere. -Pvetch (talk) 07:31, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

@Pvetch:   Not done. That was a copyright violation from https://www.cmscritic.com/dir/products/wagtail/, but quite apart from that it was not an encyclopedia article, it was a blatant advertisement, full of glowing adjectives: "fast, powerful and elegant... unrivalled user experience... lightning fast... slick, responsive UI..." etc. Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. If you can show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability, you are welcome to try again, but you will need to start with a clean sheet. Read User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for advice. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
@JohnCD:Thanks, should have started with a clean sheet as you suggest. I intended the text as a placeholder only (I wrote that CMS Critic text in fact) but will restart page with newly written and neutral prose. Grateful for your feedback.

User:Dredhe15/sandbox

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Please undelete. OTRS problems solved.Ticket#2015041710017111 -Willy Weazley 14:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@Willy Weazley:   Done though, as usual when people copy in their own websites, it's too promotional and will need considerable reworking to be an acceptable article. Will you now add the permission template to the talk page? The system won't let me. JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
@JohnCD:. Well, idk. My job as an OTRS member it's confirm the release. If the page don't fit on wiki's notability guidelines it's an editorial stuff. I can reject the text, if you delete the page as spam.Willy Weazley 05:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
@Willy Weazley: no, not to worry, those remarks weren't aimed at you, but at the page author in case they watched this and supposed that OTRS clearance meant the article was acceptable and could be published. It's in a sandbox, so it's not so bad as to need speedying. All too many newbies think WP is just a noticeboard to pin up copies of their promotional fluff, and have to learn that an encyclopedia article is different. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

user:sanjit.khulal

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

My user page is to infor my information to others user. user:sanjit.khulal is my user page not wikipedia page so i request that don't delete my user page. -sanjit khulal magar 16:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion.. You actually do not own your talk page. NOTE TO ADMINS: The link above is blue and has content, but the page seems bugged, as it's acting like it's an empty page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
@Jéské Couriano: it's not a bug, user has made himself a (quite acceptable) global user page, which is copied automatically from his user page on Meta if he has no local user page defined. JohnCD (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
I was not aware that was even possible, thank you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
@Sanjit.khulal:   Not done - consult the deleting administrator RHaworth (talk · contribs), but first read WP:UPNOT and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook. JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Charity Checks

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 66.209.120.59 (talk) 03:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Charity Checks

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

aakarshanbhardwaj

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Aakarshanbhardwaj (talk) 08:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC) why my page has been delected

  Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion U5, which indicates a user page being used as a personal webpage, blog, or social media site. U5 deletions will not be restored here or anywhere else, though you may ask that its contents be emailed to you if you have an email address associated with your account. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

User: Qazi Ahtsham

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This Page have great informations which may be useful to users. So it is highly requested that do not delete this page -Qazi Ahtsham (talk) 06:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion U5, which indicates a user page being used as a personal webpage, blog, or social media site. U5 deletions will not be restored here or anywhere else, though you may ask that its contents be emailed to you if you have an email address associated with your account. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  Not done Wikipedia is not a social network or a place to write about yourself. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 10:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ian Murray Harris

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, MichelleQuinn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MichelleQuinn (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@MichelleQuinn:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I see that you have already re-created it at Draft:Ian Murray Harris. It can cause confusion to have two versions about, so I have done a "history merge" and the history of your previous version is now there "underneath" the new one. You may like to look at the advice you were given on this version of the old one. JohnCD (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Pocket PC 2000.png

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore this file for which I plan to provide a fair use rationale. (The deleting admin has been inactive for a while.) -Mdrnpndr (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@Mdrnpndr:   Done. I have reset the di-no-fair-use clock, so you have a week. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UNMATA

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) WeeRedLass (talk) 02:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerking title/links to the article Hasteur (talk) 02:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qatari Businessmen Association

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Shadid200, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shadid200 (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@Shadid200:   Not done - this page canot be restored, even temporarily, because it is a copyright violation from http://www.qataribusinessmen.org/support/aboutqba.htm. Wikipedia cannot accept copied text without a formal copyright release from the actual copyright holder.
In any case, even if the copyright issue were resolved, this is quite unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, written in the first person ("We are very proud... Our association..." and in a highly promotional tone, full of "peacock terms". An encyclopedia is not a place for the QBA to tell the world about itself. See User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for advice. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kevin Harman

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, HamishMedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HamishMedia (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@HamishMedia:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

THE FABULOUS DEE HARRELL

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My Article page was deleted I believe by mistake can it be restored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzangel11 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

See below. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

University of Limerick Debating Union

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I'm completing this for an IP that contested the deletion on my userpage. They asked for the page to be sent to them, but since it was deleted via PROD I don't see any reason not to restore it to the mainspace so they can work on it from there. I've restored it, but I'm listing it here just for records' sake. -Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

The Fabulous Dee Harrell

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I was unaware that I could not use excerpts from Articles that were written about Ms. Dee Harrell. Any copyright infringement was truly unintentional. I was asked to write this article for Ms. Harrell, but there was no intentional misuse of copyright material on my part or on the part of Dee Harrell. Please restore the material that was deleted. We will delete any material unacceptable to Wikipedia. The Article written by Hoops McCann is in the possession of Ms. Harrell and can be submitted for verification should that be necessary. } — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzangel11 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jazzangel11:   Not done. I can't trace any deleted article by that name, nor are there any deleted articles from your account. No matter: if the deleted article contained copyright violations it cannot be restored, even temporarily.
If you are writing on behalf of Ms Harrell you have, from Wikipedia's point of view, a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and should carefully read that page and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In brief, you need to be very careful, and should not edit directly about your client/employer, but may submit a draft using the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, writing in your own words and not copy-pasting other people's work. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site and is not for any kind of advertising or promotion. It requires a neutral point of view - no opinions, just plain facts about what Ms Harrell has achieved, cited to reliable sources. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and WP:MUSICBIO for the relevant WP:Notability standard. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Just thought I'd note that I was also searching and could find no trace, including going back in the deletion log to April 1 and looking for a partial title match.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MD Rabbi Alam

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Michaeltleslie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Michaeltleslie (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jayme Gutierrez

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I, Truthless, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The article was deleted from the Articles for Creation space, before I could review and make any necessary changes. -Truthless 08:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Truthless:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Jayme Gutierrez. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Aakash_Pandey

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Genuine people are suffering coz of some selfish people. As far as i know Aakash Pandey is a genuine actor and a very nice human being. -Sahmed083 (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Sahmed083: the article has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakash Pandey, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:DISCUSSAFD. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Pearl Driftwood Sculpture

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Maxentius (talk) 11:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Maxentius:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Black Pearl Driftwood Sculpture. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material not reviewed for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

User:Jinanez/Josiane el zir

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jinanez, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jinanez (talk) 11:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jinanez:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crimes Against Humanity Initiative

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 128.252.33.1 (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Crimes Against Humanity Initiative. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Gene Amoroso

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Gene Amoroso is an American film and television actor, known for such films as Mystic Pizza and Spotlight. -Geneamoroso (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@Geneamoroso:   Not done - there is nothing useful to restore, the article deleted in 2009 was a piece of silly vandalism. Any article would need to be created from scratch; if you are Mr Amoroso, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

The North Bay Hootenanny

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page I was working on was deleted because I did not finish it in time. I now have all of the sources I need prepared to finish the article very quickly. Thanks so much! -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedlimit76 (talk • contribs)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
@Speedlimit76:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material not submitted for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 92.21.160.249, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.21.160.249 (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Mojos Wings Burgers Beer

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page was not done being edited I was in the process of making changes to keep it from breaking any copyright issues. The websites that the information was taken are ours to use, but I still wanted to make the wikipedia page unique. Please put it back up so I can fix the copyright issues. -James.JNEInc. (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

  Not done Not only was it a copyright infringement, but it was hopelessly promotional. I've also blocked your account - per this guideline, the username must read "James at JNEInc", and you also breached the terms of use because you have a conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not an advertisement platform. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Elizabeth Lennox

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 74.96.69.97, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have external references now - two books made the USA Today Best Sellers list and I can point to those usatoday.com pages -Whwright87 (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

AdvaCare Pharma

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is no unambiguous advertising in this page, and it has been deleted for this reason. I think the page respect all wikipedia encyclopedic canons. Please let me know what to do to restore the page. Thank you --RedBud (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC) -RedBud (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

  • I have moved this to Draft:AdvaCare Pharma. Some language is a bit promotional, but I think it can be fixed. Also the whole article is written to describe the products to a buyer, so it should be a bit more balanced. Check with Shirt58 first to see if promotional tome has been removed, before moving it back to an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Trapped In Static, 2013.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Permission received via. OTRS (Ticket:2015021910012385) -Mdann52 (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

@Mdann52:   Done §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

The Gettysburg Address (film)

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -JackSmall (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


The film is legit. The tie-in projects are legit. Check the links. The websites of the renowned companies that are affiliated with the film and the tie-in products all have pages for the projects of this initiative: Oxford University Press (https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-gettysburg-address-9780190227449?q=conant&lang=en&cc=us), Milan Records (http://www.soundtrack.net/album/the-gettysburg-address/), Hachette Book Group (https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/none/the-gettysburg-address/9781478961062/), etc.

Furthermore, there are links that validate the film: Boston Globe article (http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/movies/2013/08/17/four-score-and-two-guys-from-new-hampshire/F8SGFY1pXKn3Mxb7QYXHrL/story.html), other articles (http://www.seacoastonline.com/article/20130706/NEWS/307060333), many of the actor's official websites/resumes (http://www.hamiltonhodell.co.uk/cv/client_michael-c-hall_id_100169.htm), IMDb (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3066808/), etc. Also Publisher's Weekly for the tie-in book (http://www.publishersweekly.com/9780190227456).

The user that deleted this page failed to do his due diligence--but when you average one deletion every 30 seconds it's hard to do good work.

@JackSmall:   Not done For now. Please take a moment to read through WP:PSCOI and m:TOU first. Then please disclose what is your relationship to the film or the people who produce and/or market it, specifically to RisingPictureCo (now blocked) and Seanconant, who seems to have spammed the film across Wikipedia last year. Apparently this film has not been released, and in most cases such articles are incubated until they meet WP:NFILM, however in this case the correct course of action would be to have you submit a draft for review. Until you follow our conflict of interest guidelines however, we will not restore the article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

It is absolutely NOT Wikipedia's policy to only include pages for films AFTER they've been released. One needs only to search most actors' personal pages to see that most of their filmographies include projects years away from completion. This is precisely why thousands of movie pages on wikipedia use the "pre-production" or "filming" status in the production year column. It is not right to discriminate against and delete wikipedia movie pages about legitimate projects. As such, The Gettysburg Address film and cast information needs to become undeleted immediately. People go to wikipedia for information such as this. Businesses and movie studios understand this, and, as such, they load the details of their projects on wikipedia for consumers and movie-goers to find. Who will tell me that The Gettysburg Address film---which releases "spring 2015" and includes a cast of 20 name celebrities--- is any less eligible for inclusion on wikipedia than a film with no confirmed cast and in pre-production and slated for release in 2017 or 2018? There are hundreds of such projects out there already with pages on wikipedia. So please don't stand on policy or COI claims. The citations and references on The Gettysburg Address film page all check out. Everything checks out. It's a desperate reach to say "the film isn't yet released so the page needs to be deleted here". If that's the case, then wikipedia must delete hundreds of its pages for movies yet to be released. It can't be both ways. We can't pick and choose by alternating criteria whose yet-to-be-released films are worthy of wikipedia pages. This is the definition of discrimination. Any user who deletes pages on these grounds should be censured at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackSmall (talk • contribs) 18:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Whether the article is kept or not does not depend on other articles but on whether it meets the notability guidelines, and whether the article meets the notability guidelines depends of course on whether it is actually there to begin with. So instead of arguing with us about that, please disclose your conflict of interest. If you are not prepared to do so or simply don't want to, then please have the courtesy to step away and wait until someone else creates it if they believe it is notable. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GEC Anderson Limited

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Mart1tin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mart1tin (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


Would like to make several changes and resubmit please

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_185&oldid=1138663896"