Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 190

Archive 185

←

Archive 188

Archive 189

Archive 190

Archive 191

Archive 192

→

Archive 195

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Eamon

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Eamon · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rebub, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rebub (talk) 23:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

William Eamon

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rebub (talk) 23:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Not done William Eamon has never existed as an article. See above request though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Festival Sherpa

• Draft:Festival Sherpa · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was deleted because it had not been edited for the last six months. We received an update saying the page would be deleted if it wasn't edited soon and within 8 hours it was deleted before we could take any action, as we didn't have access to a laptop/pc or internet. Would request you to restore the page so we could edit it and send it back for review. Thanks guys. -122.170.104.249 (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ralph Pallen Coleman

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ralph Pallen Coleman · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rapaco, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rapaco (talk) 15:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page was restored 22 May. Please do NOT post the entire contents of the draft here; this page is not for hosting drafts. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Although there was nothing to restore, someone has removed the G13 tag, and another has moved it to Draft:Ralph Pallen Coleman. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Steven Naylor (composer)

• Draft:Steven Naylor (composer) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, AlexKall, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AlexKall (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Warren Millington

• Warren Millington · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I feel that the deletion was either a mistake or misunderstanding by some one. All Data was correct -120.150.201.3 (talk) 21:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

• @120.150.201.3: This was deleted because it was an article about a person that did not contain a reliable source that discussed Millington in depth. Even if the data is correct, all articles must have coverage via reliable sources that would help assert notability. If you can show a reliable source that is independent of Millington (or anyone affiliated with him) then I have no problem re-creating the article. However since it was deleted as a BLP prod we really can't restore it until you do this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bear on the Square Mountain Festival

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bear on the Square Mountain Festival · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Davemoser123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Davemoser123 (talk) 00:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Davemoser123, I was going to restore this but unfortunately the page is unambiguously promotional. WP:PEACOCK words like "picturesque", "finest", and "impressive" should not be in the article, nor should sentences like "Both bargains and fun can be found each year at the Bear on the Square Mountain Festival’s Artist Marketplace." I have no problem with you creating a new version of the article, but this was far too promotional to restore. It also doesn't help that it is a potential copyright violation since it takes content directly from this source. Even if you hold the copyright to this content and were willing to file a ticket at WP:ORTS to give permission to use it, you would still have to re-write it entirely to remove the promotional content- which is very promotional. Something I do have to warn you about is that Wikipedia is not here to promote an event (even if this was a secondary or unintentional goal) and that if you have a conflict of interest, you need to be very careful about this. (WP:COI) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Tim Henriques

• Draft:Tim Henriques · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 99.246.177.83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.246.177.83 (talk) 00:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done This was speedily deleted as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion, as well as WP:G13. Since it was tagged as such, this cannot be restored on Wikipedia. Your only real option here is to re-write the content from scratch. We could probably email you a copy of the article's history, but you would need to supply an e-mail for that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion undo request: Al Habtoor Motors LLC

This Al Habtoor Motors LLC page was marked for speedy deletion.

With all the respect for Wiki and it moderators, i would like to mention that intention of adding this page was not to promote or advertise this company on Wiki. My intention was to add Al Habtoor Motors LLC company information, I may have added information like Awards won by the "AHM" company which made it sound like it is being marketed.

AHM is one of the leading distributors of several Automotive brands like Bentley, Bugatti, Mitsubishi, JAC Motors etc in United Arab Emirates and deserves to be there like other companies that are listed on wiki.

I would appreciate your help in this regarding or at-least how i can try again to add information about same company on wiki withig the wiki guidelines

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Ritchie333 (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. Also note that "X exists, therefore Y should" is not a valid rationale for retention or undeletion of an article. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Per above. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Biola (brand)

• Biola (brand) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Speedy deletion criteria was A7, G11. I dont agree, its a famous brand in Ukraine and Russia. It produces 170 million liters of water per year at plants in both countries. perhaps a detailed history of the plant was a mistake, I admit it. Was listed a list of brands, I believe it is necessary. Perhaps a detailed history of the plant was a mistake, I admit it. This is a great performance. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

There are also articles in Ukrainian, Russian and Norwegian. The company finances the famous football club Dnipro. -Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Chrislk02 (talk · contribs)) instead. Neither the presence of a page on other Wikipediae or fame are enough to justify an article on en.wp; we require multiple third-party sources that discuss the subject in some depth. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• Note from deleting admin in the form the article was in, it was not appropriate for Wikipedia. If you would like to re-create the article, please make sure you do so after basing it on reliable sources. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 18:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
• Not done Per above. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Yotta Solutions

• Yotta Solutions · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I don't belong to Yotta Solutions company. I am just talking about a big company here in Jordan, since it's an encyclopedia of popular companies that have done such a great achievements. Please take a look on it again. Thank you -Mikon47 (talk) 19:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

• This has already been deleted five times, including an AFD that did not complete. I suggest that you start with a draft at Draft:Yotta Solutions. Make sure that it includes independent references to show notability. Don't just include the companies it did business for, these are not independent. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Given the various reasons for deletion (A7, G11) and that the page is currently salted against recreation, your best bet here is to go through AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UTAX (UK) Limited

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UTAX (UK) Limited · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Leah.bretti, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Leah.bretti (talk) 08:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC) ,

• Not done Leah.bretti, there are portions of this article that come across like it was taken from a press release, so it's a little too promotional to restore. I'm also worried about potential copyright issues since it does read like it was cut/paste from somewhere else. I have no problem with you starting a new version at AfC, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• I did some additional searching and it looks like portions were taken from this page, so it's likely that the rest was likely taken from somewhere else. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text. You could file a ticket through WP:ORTS that gave permission to use the material but since it is taken from official sources (like press releases) it will be too promotional to leave on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishabh_Puri

• Rishabh Puri · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The page was deleted due to no reliable sources, whereas there were 3 reliable sources of newspaper articles and magazine article from reputed publishing houses from UAE http://www.saltnpeppa.me/dare-to-dream/ http://khaleejtimes.com/kt-article-display-1.asp?xfile=data/uaebusiness/2014/January/uaebusiness_January38.xml&section=uaebusiness http://www.masala.com/the-rising-star-rishabh-puri-40909.html-NGupta123 (talk) 06:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done NGupta123, those were listed under the external links and not placed as an inline citation. I did, however, still take a look at the links and this link to the Khaleej Times came up as "no page found". Salt n Peppa doesn't contain any information about its editorial process that Wikipedia could verify, so anything from that site would be considered unusable as a reliable source per Wikipedia's guidelines. This link to Masala.com came up as an error page, so it also couldn't be used as a reliable source. The site does have an editorial board so if you could provide a link to a live news article then that could probably be used as a RS.

However that aside, I also noticed that the article was pretty unambiguously promotional and at best it was written in an extremely non-neutral, casual tone akin to what you'd see on a blog or a Linkedin page. Sentences like "He enjoys learning new things, keeping own self busy, travelling to exotic locations and picking up new hobbies along the way." and "Challenges were indeed a paharder to prove capability and now it seems no challenge in business is too big! " don't fit within Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. They're too casual and as a result it comes across like pretty unambiguous promotion. It actually could have been speedy deleted under WP:G11 and I'm mildly surprised that it wasn't. Given that this was one of your first articles, I'd highly recommend that you use WP:AfC to create any future articles since this would give you more time to edit the article and you'd have the feedback of other editors prior to anything getting published. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Tokyogirl79, I have understood, and will try and a re-do to the article with live links of Masala Magazine and Khaleej Times newspaper. However, i have come across many articles which have 1 link to the source, but have written extensively about a person and as you mentioned, they were all unambiguously promotional and were written in casual tone. Why aren't they chosen for deletion ?--NGupta123 (talk) 08:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• It's likely because they haven't been caught and brought to deletion, although occasionally it will be because the one source asserts something so notable that it would merit a keep per Wikipedia's guidelines, although this is rarely the case. (See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) If you see a page that looks like it violates guidelines then feel free to nominate it for deletion by way of WP:AfD, WP:PROD, or WP:SPEEDY. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Tokyogirl79 Thank you for the tip. I surely will keep a look out for such articles, and will nominate the ones i have read in the past which fit into the criteria you mentioned. I still wonder why the article i wrote earlier was deleted, however at that time, the sources were verified, and its unfortunate that a website had a downlink. I don't see a reason to delete if the content was a bit casual, if a prior intimation was made i could have rectified it. The only reason mentioned was the sources were of external link, and i don't see why a newspaper or a reputable magazine would not fall in the criteria of verifiable source.--NGupta123 (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• The problem wasn't just that they were in the external links, but that two of them did not come up with anything at all (error pages) and one did not look like it would be considered a RS per Wikipedia's guidelines. There was also the additional problem that it was very unambiguously promotional, to the point where (as I stated above) it would not be suitable to be restored on Wikipedia. I'll be very honest: if you post another page to the mainspace with phrasing like the one you created then it is extremely likely to get deleted again. I would highly recommend that you use the AfC process and that you read over the guidelines at WP:NPOV, WP:GNG, and WP:RS. Since it was promotional this does raise concerns of a conflict of interest, so you should also read over the guidelines at WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Tokyogirl79 Is there a way where in the future whenever i write an article or this one per say, i can get it approved before its posted ? Because many a such articles are floating about wikipedia which makes no sense to a reader because the person who they write about haven't contributed to society in any way. The few i have read don't even have a reference, just an external link. If such proof reading is done, then it would make it a lot easier for a contributor to write articles that have not been published here and about those people who have made a difference or contributed to society. -NGupta123 (talk) 10:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• WP:AfC, the articles for creation process, would be able to accomplish this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Warren Millington

• Warren Millington · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Warren Millington is a famous rosierist in Europe. You can check that here : https://www.google.fr/search?q=Warren+Millington&oq=Warren+Millington&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3j69i59&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 Why did you delete it ? -Abrahami (talk) 10:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It still needs references that talk about the person. Please add more references, else it will be deleted in another week. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Sunkalp Energy

• Sunkalp Energy · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I intend to add more links and references and then click the "Save page" button below -TanBat (talk) 12:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunkalp Energy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MelanieN (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Wepecket Island Records

• Wepecket Island Records · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is a legitimate record label that has recorded more than 25 CDs and won national recognition several times -Jack Radcliffe (talk) 17:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Monty₈₄₅ 17:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@Jassplayer: Your draft is located at Draft:Wepecket Island Records. Monty₈₄₅ 17:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Joseph G Thorp

• Draft:Joseph G Thorp · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Crimsonguard63 (talk) 19:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@Crimsonguard63: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oliver Parker

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oliver Parker · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Freddiewoodd (talk) 17:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@Freddiewoodd: Not done. this article on a living person had very little content (i.e. it would be no great burden to start from scratch), and though the content was not necessarily untrue or an attack on the subject, was of the controversial sort that would absolutely require citations to reliable sources to accompany it (but it had none). It would also be a disservice to you if I didn't tell you that unless you were holding back from writing the type of claims most people naturally include in the first line, this subject has no notability – as we use that word here to indicate the world having taken note of the topic by writing about it substantively in reliable, secondary sources – and so no article will likely be acceptable. This is not any type of judgement on the merit of the person but about whether they are encyclopedic. Almost all of the people in the world are not notable in the sense we mean, including myself.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alex Milway

• Draft:Alex Milway · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Shinykatie (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@Shinykatie: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Vocera Communications

• Vocera Communications · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

admin who deleted the page does not monitor their talk page; it was deleted because it had too much promotional language, I'd like to rewrite from a neutral point of view -205.196.201.250 (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Kevin Gorman (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. He does monitor his talk page, and there is no evidence on his talk page that anyone has tried to converse with him about Vocera Communications. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clint_Carney

• Clint Carney · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Subject is notable and should not have been deleted -J1320 (talk) 23:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

GTK Business Solutions LLP

• GTK Business Solutions LLP · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am the owner of this business and I want to share my information. -Kishorsh007 (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done This was speedied as WP:A7 (lack of notability for an organization/business) and as WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion). Kishorsh007, articles on Wikipedia must be neutrally written and they must assert notability for the company per WP:NCORP by way of coverage in independent and reliable sources per WP:RS. I can't really see where you'd established that, so as the deleting admin I'm declining your request. (A7s aren't restored here and G11 deletions will not be restored anywhere.) Since you are involved with the company I'd recommend that you read over WP:COI and that if you want to continue trying to create an article, that you go through WP:AfC. I do have to warn you that not all companies pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines and it's not like Linkedin or CrunchBase where anyone can add information about themselves or their company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Captain Brock: Space Badger

• Captain Brock: Space Badger · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Derrin Tanser, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Derrin Tanser (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• I already restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Captain Brock: Space Badger last year and no one did anything to improve it. What do you plan to do to edit this page? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done It looks like there's already a version in the draftspace at Draft:Captain Brock: Space Badger. Derrin Tanser, you should work on editing the page that is still live. I will be honest though- it's extremely difficult for self-published books to gain coverage enough for an entry on Wikipedia. The Book Awards is not a notable award on Wikipedia for several reasons, one of which is that the main page for the site gives off the impression that the organization does promotional work for the winners, possibly for a fee. (Mostly it's that nobody seems to have reported on the award, it looks to be pretty non-discerning with who gets nominated or wins, "wins" can be easily manipulated, etc.) What you need here are things like articles in newspapers, reviews from notable, reliable outlets (Goodreads, Amazon, and blog sources do not count), and similar things that would pass muster at WP:RS/N. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nathan S. Bell

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nathan S. Bell · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 68.62.57.36, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.62.57.36 (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• @Smitty48823: @68.62.57.36: You must respond in order for this to be restored. If you do not then this draft will not be restored and this runs the risk of you getting declined in future requests, as this would show that you would not actively try to improve the draft. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Sri Vedavyasa

• Draft:Sri Vedavyasa · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Cnu550, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cnu550 (talk) 14:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Cnu550, it looks like this was up for G13 back in January but it was postponed by an admin at that time. There were no non-maintenance edits on the article after that point until its deletion on May 23, and the last active edit was in November 2013. What assurance can you give us that you'd edit this page if it was restored, given that this wasn't edited since 2013 and already survived one G13 via someone else's actions? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Captain Brock: Space Badger

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Derrin Tanser (talk) 09:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Derrin Tanser, a better version of this already exists at Draft:Captain Brock: Space Badger, so there's no reason to restore this version of the draft. I'd already posted this at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Captain_Brock:_Space_Badger along with some advice on finding sources. I took a look at the article history at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Captain_Brock:_Space_Badger and there's nothing there that would be worth restoring and merging into the current draft article that is already live. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• Having two draft copies will not improve the chances of this getting accepted. At most it looks like this was an attempt to write an article about the three short stories (as opposed to the collection), but as the currently live version of the article already mentions them, there's no real need for this other page to be restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
• I'll be honest- if this is going to be accepted (assuming you can find coverage to show that this passes NBOOK) it's going to be the version that's already live. The deleted version would be declined on multiple accounts and doesn't expand on anything that isn't already covered at the draft space. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Xtreme Chaotix

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xtreme Chaotix · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Was unable to work on article for several months. Would like to address the issue and hopefully get the article published. -SG Ultima (talk) 07:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• I've fixed this to go to the right draft. SG Ultima, this is the second time you've requested that the article get restored so we'd need some sort of assurance that you'll work on the article this time around. Also I do need to warn you- if this is restored and gets G13'd a third time due to inactivity then it's very unlikely that this would be restored again in the future. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks so much for understanding Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡). I kinda figured out why my previous submissions were declined, because I referenced to alot of things that may not be sufficiently credible references. So will clean that up. I will take this as my last opportunity to publish and work on this properly. Thanks for assisting! Does this also mean I need to retype and do everything? Or does Wikipedia have my WIP saved somewhere?
• SG Ultima: Nah, if it's restored then it should have everything still there. I'll restore this since you've responded. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Nguyễn Công Phượng

• Nguyễn Công Phượng · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Article about a footballer who has since met the required notability standards. The article currently exists as Công Phượng but in my opinion the full name should be the article with content moved from the former as a redirect, or vise-versa. Thank You -Inter&anthro (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

• This isn't really the right place to ask for this since you're not asking for a recreation- you're asking for us to unprotect the page. Since this went through two AfDs I'd prefer that you ask one of the closing admins (Spinningspark or Tone, both of whom I've linked to this discussion) to unprotect and move the page. Offhand it doesn't look like it'd be a problem, but I want to make sure that there's no stepping on toes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

  Actually, neither Tone nor I, nor any of the four admins who have previously deleted this page, found it necessary to protect it from future recreation. That was done by User:HJ Mitchell who should be asked to deal with this first. SpinningSpark 13:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

  @HJ Mitchell: Could you please deal with this request? Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Moonit

• Draft:Moonit · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I want to edit and resubmit my article -editted by bky (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Not done The draft was written with a thoroughly promotional tone and content, and also contained copyrighted writing by others that was copied and pasted there, for example from here, e.g., it states:

"At the core of our apps is a proprietary astrological algorithm that performs an analysis of two people’s full birthdays."

while at the draft it was stated:

"At the core of Moonit's apps is a proprietary astrological algorithm that performs an analysis of two people’s full birthdays."

--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Yomarumon Dreams

• Yomarumon Dreams · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Because yesterday i have seen the page who was deleted because i having a problem for the article that can be edited, and the nomination will be delete until the discussion is closed. Because we felt sorry from this personal page are trouble. So, next time, i'm gonna create the article of this page real soon and first he will read and write the article about the personal essay, without things to avoid and complicated things to write a story. -Kenji Kasuga (talk) 12:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. Might I suggest editing the Wikipedia for your native tongue instead of relying on online translators (which have issues with East Asian languages)? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Not done for the reasons stated by Jeremy above. I am confirming that when this was created 12 minutes after being deleted it was indeed a carbon copy (though it would still be properly deleted under G4 if it had surface changes but was sufficiently identical to the deleted content and any changes did not address the basis for deletion).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neudesic

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neudesic · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.49.145.162 (talk) 17:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

I was the deleting admin so I will leave it to others but let me tell you a story. Once upon a time, the above title was created by User:Schansler almost simultaneously with User:Schansler/sandbox, containing the exact same content, which was subsequently moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neudesic, LLC, which was declined by DangerousPanda, just as the deleted, duplicative, ultimately G13'ed draft named above was declined by APerson and Onel5969. It was then moved to Wikipedia:Neudesic, LLC by Schansler, which appears have been an attempt to move it to the mainspace out of process and while still declined, but it ended up in the Wikipedia namespace, where it should not be, and where it remains as of now.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done based on the above I have moved the extant page to Draft:Neudesic, LLC. This needs serious changes to remove promotional tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Hosea Nyabongo

• Draft:Hosea Nyabongo · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 152.130.6.131, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 152.130.6.131 (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

RePack

• RePack · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

An important, disruptive startup company with broad media attention globally. I created the original article with sources to RePack's website and external links. I believe the speedy deletion was made on the basis of A7 but I'd like to contest this decision. In any case, a temporary undeletion would help me get the material back and, possibly, edit it to better fit the criteria. -Jshore7 (talk) 07:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Chrislk02 (talk · contribs)) instead. Administrators do not restore A7s on request here, but if your account has an email address associated with it and you have the option enabled in your settings, it's certainly within their power to email you the text of the article at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 08:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Done article did include a claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/University of the World

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/University of the World · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 2601:A:2440:266:421:C190:35D3:4747, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:A:2440:266:421:C190:35D3:4747 (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Eric Mason Draft:Eric Mason

• Eric Mason · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] Draft:Eric Mason · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, AWolgs, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AWolgs (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

@AWolgs: Not done While many people do this without any bad intent or knowledge what they were doing is not allowed, that draft blatantly infringed on copyrighted content by copying and pasting content from here, which was also plagiarism as it presented this content as if written for the article, without acknowledging it was someone else writing. For those reasons it cannot be undeleted. In the event the original source of the writing found elsewhere is actually you, it still could not be used without a verifiable release of the content to the world under a suitably free copyright license.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

• AWolgs, if you are editing on behalf of Mason then you can have him file a ticket through WP:OTRS, but make sure that you are careful about two things:

First is that while this would give Wikipedia permission to use the material, it's almost always better to just re-write the material in your own words. This is because most material of this nature was written with the intent to promote the person and as such, will likely contain WP:PEACOCK phrasing that would be considered inappropriate for Wikipedia. Material taken from somewhere else is almost always contested in some form or another (as many associate this with promotional editing), which leads to the inevitable re-writing. It's just easier in the long run to re-write it in your own words. I've edited articles where content was fairly neutral, but the usage of the material caused the article to be continually bombarded with promotional tags.

Secondly, if you are editing on behalf of Mason you will need to look over the WP:COI guidelines and declare a conflict of interest. You can still edit with a COI, but you will need to be transparent about doing so. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

HedgeSPA

• HedgeSPA · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Our professional staff members have not had the time to update the page based on the feedback provided, but this can now be assigned to a summer intern this week. -166.255.55.123 (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment: See Requests for undeletion/Articles for creation/HedgeSPA JMHamo (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• Quick question, 166. Are you aware of the Terms of Use conditions regarding paid editing, and are you aware of our guideline on editing subjects one is involved with? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• I'm concerned about the COI, but I'm also concerned that they're not following/checking the original request. I hate to say it, but this doesn't exactly fill me with a lot of confidence that they'll actively edit the draft article if it's restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society of Quantitative Analysts

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society of Quantitative Analysts · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Peghd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peghd (talk) 02:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Peghd. This was undeleted at your request on May 19. Are you aware that at the top of every page there is a link for your contributions? There you can see edits you've made and thus easily find both your prior request and the result, and your live edits to the page. It is currently at Draft:Society of Quantitative Analysts, which the above link redirects to.

Also, I am curious what prompted you to post your request three different times. I am not criticizing you for doing that, I am actually asking. We see this constantly at this page (and rarely elsewhere) so I know there must be something about the process that results in that, but I have not been able to pin down just what it is. Can you tell me the process of how your posting here came about? It might help us fix a problem.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• I wonder if people are expecting to get a comment on their talk page about the decision of whether to accept or decline the request. Ideally the users would watch this list and the requested article, but they may be looking for a separate notification. It might not be a bad idea to add this in, just to make sure that the editor/requester has been made completely aware of the response. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• I'll start a post on the talk page about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Hugh Heinrick

• Draft:Hugh Heinrick · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Steve.kimberley (talk) 16:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Mkdw^talk 16:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Moonit

• Draft:Moonit · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bktrl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it not publish right away. I need to edit some promotional voice issues.. editted by bky (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Mkdw^talk 16:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• It looks like this was previously declined but it's restored now. I've sent you a copy via e-mail so you can just ignore that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

ajai kumar chhawchharia

{{subst:refund|1= Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia |

2= Sir, I got a message on my email that my newly opened wikipedia account has been deleted because it violated some of your rules. I am so sorry for it because I did not know what wrong I did. Actually I do not have the time or technical know-how to learn about such things on internet. However I do wish to retain my account, but please guide me what went wrong. I thought that my page would tell the world that I have been writing so many books in English that are based on Indian literature which are yet not available to the world because they haven’t been translated and explained in English. I have no ulterior motive. If any thing I wrote violated your policies, I will withdraw it and suitably amend my post. So, please be kind to advice me what to delete and what to retain. But do not delete my page completely, which I opened with great expectation and clean heart. If there was any violation it was unintended and done because I did not know what is to be uploaded and what not. I thought that my bio-data would come under the category of ‘living biography’, but I realise that I may have inadvertently overstepped certain limits of which I was and am still unaware. So Please help. With thanks. Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia (talk • contribs) 17:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Possibly referring to the deletion of User:Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia per WP:CSD#U5. --Finngall ^talk 17:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia, the issue with the user page is that you were using it as a basic profile akin to how people will create profiles on sites like Linkedin or on a personal blog/website. It was fairly promotional in how it was written and terms/phrases like "countless numbers of wonderful and rare e-books in standard PDF format" are not permitted on Wikipedia. There's really no way that you could re-write this, as a user page on here is not the same as a user page on other sites. While you can have some personal information the page should only be about yourself as it pertains to your editing on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• You can still edit on Wikipedia but you cannot have the deleted content restored to your userpage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Alright sir, I realise my mistake. Can I at least restore a blank ‘user page’ to start all over again? If yes, then how. Another point, can I upload a write-up or part of my book here, or not? At the end of such write-up or article, can I add my full contact details or my original website or not? I made a mistake without knowing that what I posted was not allowed on wikipedia. So please help me to restore a blank ‘user page’ with guidance on above points. Thanks Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia (talk • contribs) 17:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia, no- your user page should not contain information about your book or your contact information. I have to restate that this user page should only contain information about you editing on Wikipedia. It is not to be used to spread awareness of your book, yourself, or your website. Wikipedia is not Linkedin. I do have to ask and I hope this doesn't sound too brusque, but are you planning on editing Wikipedia outside of this user page or on any topic other than yourself? If not, you need to be aware that Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself and it is not a website. You might want to look into places like Wikia, as they are more easygoing with user content and creating pages like that would be permitted. If you are, then you can re-add some limited information but again, it should ideally be about things that you plan on editing as far as Wikipedia goes. Some small personal information is OK, but it should not come across as an attempt to promote anything. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• I think that you mean well, but I do think that you're confusing this with Linkedin. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Wolff Companies

• Draft:Wolff Companies · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 24.227.199.170, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.227.199.170 (talk) 18:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Note that you will have to cut the promotional tone in the page for it to be accepted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Gabriel Barre

• Draft:Gabriel Barre · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Faeriebleue (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

@Faeriebleue: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Renevanderwal/sandbox

• User:Renevanderwal/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Renevanderwal, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Renevanderwal (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Austen Brassard

• Austen Brassard · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Request to restore edit history for recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done but you should look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austen Brassard (2nd nomination). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brixton

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brixton · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 98.178.225.76, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.178.225.76 (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Robbie Russo

• Robbie Russo · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Request that article deleted via PROD be restored. -Dolovis (talk) 01:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)