Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 192

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 9 years ago by JohnCD in topic Tonk: The Billionaire's Game
Archive 185←Archive 190Archive 191Archive 192Archive 193Archive 194Archive 195

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emporium Melbourne

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 58.162.187.72 (talk) 07:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Caring Friends

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sachsach, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sachsach (talk) 09:45, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Nadia Buhannad

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Can you undelete this page please? RyanRyclal (talk) 11:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Chrislk02 (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:45, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Pages nominated for sppedy deletion by 43.224.156.66

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could I have a list of pages that were nominated for speedy deletion by the user 43.224.156.66 (contribs | deleted contribs), along with the criterion used for nomination? The IP was previously used by me. I recall that most of them were drafts. 103.6.158.193 (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Kate-Margret

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page was build with all the guidelines and is very important to the singer as its a very popular site and there was a lot of work and time put into it to just get deleted without a good reason to do so. Please help us with the page and with contacting us with any question or anything that needs to be done to publish the page back asap -76.108.35.254 (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate-Margret, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Nakon (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Please understand that Wikipedia is not here to help promote anyone. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Nicole Williams

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Works712, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Works712 (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

@Works712:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Rita_M._Johnson

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

One of the original journalists from Wired. She wrote the first article on digital distribution and and the entertainment industry in 1997 called Titans Bracing for Uprising http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/1997/10/7943 This page is temporarily down Wired will repost it. The article has been sited in peer-reviewed journals and inspired the creation of music filesharing programs such as Napster, Bit Torrent and Kazaa. She wrote wrote for Wired magazine from 1994 - 1999. http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/4.11/streetcred.html?pg=14 This is also confirmed here: http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/4.11/streetcred.html?pg=14 and She was also an influential figure in the music industry, this is confirmed by the article in Billboard magazine https://books.google.de/books?id=9g4EAAAAMBAJ&pg=RA1-PA51&lpg=RA1-PA51&dq=rita+johnson+billboard&source=bl&ots=JeZKnzc0Rp&sig=r2m8zsF1p96FDvud6N-l00sjL2o&hl=de&ei=AOQ8Try-BIrz-gauoZCuAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&sqi=2#v=onepage&q=rita%20johnson%20billboard&f=false She also worked as a music supervisor on the film Billy's Hollywood Screenkiss which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in 1998 and launched the career of Sean Hayes http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005003/?ref_=tt_cl_t1 http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0426090/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 She was also music supervisor for film The Gentleman Bandit, directed by Jordan Alan who is the husband of Amanda Righetti who stars in The Mentalist http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1119462/?ref_=nm_ov_bio_lk4 and also appeared in Captain America The First Avenger http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1119462/?ref_=nm_ov_bio_lk4 The Gentleman Bandit stars the actors Ryan O'Neal who starred in Barry Lyndon by Stanley Kubrick http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0183113/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072684/?ref_=nm_ov_bio_lk2 Rita M. Johnson is also the daughter-in-law of Hans-Joachim Maaz, a noted intellectual and TV commentator in Germany https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans-Joachim_Maaz The Wired article http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/1997/10/7943 is temporarily down and will be restored. You can see from the mirrored pages that the link is valid since the page was created in 2005 http://epo.wikitrans.net/Rita_M._Johnson?eng=Rita+M.+Johnson -Simile (talk) 07:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

@Simile:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Agtx (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add some of these references to the article. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Waverley - Salmon River Long Lake Wilderness Area

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Denver & Rio Grande, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. N.S. Meteorologist (talk) 20:47, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

@Denver & Rio Grande:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about that! I thought that drafts were automatically up for review! N.S. Meteorologist (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Howard J. Breen

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The information in this page was gathered from an interview with Howard J. Breen this past week. It is all credible and is not spam or unambiguous advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopherson12345 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. @Christopherson12345: Your intent when writing the article is not what makes it highly promotional (which it was). It was the manner of the writing, full of puffery and praise. For example: "key leadership roles"; "highly successful years"; "exemplary contribution"; "highest award"; "pre-eminent" etc. Putting that aside, Wikipedia articles – and especially ones on living persons – must be based on published reliable sources, and mostly on secondary sources, entirely independent of the subject. A published interview could be used, but would do nothing to establish notability. Information you gathered in an unpublished interview cannot be used at all. This is not to say an article is not possible, but it wouldn't have the content you wrote. In sum, a proper article would be written from a neutral point of view, would contain no original research, and would cite the types of sources we need to determine notability and to verify the content. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Terminology for Large Organization (TerminOrgs)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 104.129.194.133, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 104.129.194.133 (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Terragon Group

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Haphenie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Haphenie (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Matthew Grayson

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Mgfa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mgfa (talk) 00:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Mgfa The material on this page was directly taken from this page. Not only was this a copyright violation but it was also fairly promotional in tone. This is part of the reason that Wikipedia does not use copyrighted material: even if the material was given up as fair use it would still require a complete re-write in order to be neutral in tone. I also note that you are very likely the artist himself, so I'd also recommend that you read over WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Dixon

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I, Mcmatter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. More new information to be added — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkyhuang88 (talk • contribs)

Draft:Marylyn D. Ritchie

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 24.10.117.36, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.10.117.36 (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I would like a copy of this rejected article to be emailed to me so that I can edit in the relevant details to the apparently existing article on wikipedia.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolla Venkaiah

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Kollarajamohan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kollarajamohan (talk) 12:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

@Kollarajamohan:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
The page is now at Draft:Kolla Venkaiah.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Shekhar Chatterjee

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The article was previously deleted on marginal lines that it wasn't meeting WP:GNG (although there were many, they weren't national or international. Now there are handsome amount of national and international article on the subject. -123.201.79.2 (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Admins will not restore AfD'd pages here anyway, so if the page hadn't already been re-created you'd have to take it to WP:Deletion review. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
The previous article deleted at AFD was a CEO, the current one is about an actor. In any case there's nothing for us to do here. If they want to recreate the article about the CEO they'll need to create a draft and go through WP:DRV. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Melville Holmes

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Marspokane, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marspokane (talk) 14:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

@Marspokane:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Melville Holmes. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of Rochester, New York.svg

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted due to being moved to Commons. Commons has deleted it, so it should be restored with a fair use rationale. -Powers T 14:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

@LtPowers:   Done. I have tagged it di-no-fair-use: that gives you a week to add a fair use rationale. JohnCD (talk) 16:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ahecht, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

@Ahecht:   Not done - the article Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment exists in the main space, you are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 16:44, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bear on the Square Mountain Festival

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I, Davemoser123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Davemoser123 (talk) 23:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I did not finish my input and let it languish for 6 months -Davemoser123 (talk) 23:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Davemoser123, I actually informed you about this back on June 1 when you requested this earlier this month. Filing a new request will not accomplish anything different. I also need you to be up front about any potential conflict of interest you may have with the festival and to read over WP:COI guidelines]]. You can still edit with a COI, but you will need to be very careful not to violate the policies on copyrights and self-promotion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Importance of H2SO4 IN SYNTHESIS OF ASPRIN

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Grevins Wanjala (talk) 05:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC) PLease let Students retrieve the information quickly. The whole article on Aspirin#synthesis is to large for one to search for the exact information you really need.


  •   Not done You didn't show how this really merits its own article on Wikipedia independent of the main article. The entire article was comprised of the sentence "It is used as a source of protons (H+) for use as a catalyst during the esterification of the alcohol group from salicylic acid, with acetic anhydride.", once you take away the heading. This is not enough for an article. If you think that this needs to be more clear in the main article then you can feel free to bring this up at Talk:Aspirin, which is what I'd recommend before making what is essentially being seen as a content fork. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

MetaProp NYC

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

MetaProp NYC is a legitimate real estate technology accelerator and has been in the news. It has been in http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/16/metaprop-nyc-launch-idUSnPn7lMxdB+89+PRN20150616?irpc=932 and it has its own website at www.metaprop.org -Slyandvert (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Beyond that, you will want to read this. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TierPoint, LLC

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Patrickjay2 (talk) 16:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

@Patrickjay2:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Nathan Moon

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Request to restore edit history for re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 22:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Ivan Nalimov

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Request to restore edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 22:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Fluxdave/Floify

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Fluxdave, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fluxdave (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done, after a fashion. The requested page is just a redirect to Draft:Floify, which has been restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Jonathan Parker

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Request to restore edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 02:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Konstantin Savenkov

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Request to restore edit history for this re-create article. -Dolovis (talk) 03:12, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:PH-MM-makati-j.p._rizal_street-city_hall_-_pasig_river_view_(2014)_a0001.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-mm-manila-quiapo-quezon_blvd.-plaza_miranda;_quiapo_church_(2014).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-mm-manila-malate-taft_ave.-de_la_salle_university_(dlsu)-saint_la_salle_hall;_henry_sy_bldg._(2014).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Garden International School (GIS)

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Benjalmin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Benjalmin (talk) 01:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Benjalmin, it looks like this was previously nominated for G13 in October 2014 and it was postponed, however there were no new edits made to the page. I'm a little concerned that if it gets restored then this will just be abandoned again. It also seems to be copied from the official site in various places, so the copyright is an issue as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Minor correction- it looks like the only edit was to submit the article to AfC without any corrections or attempts to address the concerns raised by previous decliners. Other than that it wasn't touched at all. In any case, this is a   Not done on my part because of the copyright concerns. Even if a ticket is filed through WP:ORTS there would still be issues with the promotional tone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Nick Shore

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Request to restore edit history for re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done. JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Little & Ashley

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Songfaerie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Songfaerie (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

@Songfaerie:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

AI-10-49

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pcp042015 (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Dion Cools

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Was already borderline decision to delete and now he transferred to Club Brugge. See (Dutch) references [1] and [2]. -Pelotastalk|contribs 18:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Dominik Uher

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Request to restore edit history for re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Jesse Gimblett

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Request to restore edit history for re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Sabah Talat Kadret

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Nimrod1980, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nimrod1980 (talk) 00:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
providing more sources -Nimrod1980 (talk) 00:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

File:CCP F single.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Is the deleted image the same image as File:Finally CeCe Peniston US cover art.jpg? If so, shall it be undeleted? -George Ho (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes it is the same image, but a different larger size 592 × 600. It won't be undeleted at this point because it is a non free image, and it is not in use. Perhaps you can supply a reason why you want to use it. There is also what may be a back cover in the history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-mm-manila-ermita-padre_burgos_ave.-city_hall_-_clock_tower_(2014)_a0002.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Pic_stock-geo_ph-mm-manila-binondo-jones_bridge_-_pasig_river_view,_sunset_shot_(2014)_a0001.JPG.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-mm-pasig-city_proper-immaculate_concepcion_cathedral_(2015).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-mm-pasay-ninoy_aquino_international_airport_(naia)-terminal_3_-_ticketing_hall_(2014)_a0006.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Pic_stock-geo_ph-mm-manila-ermita-rizal_park-old_finance_bldg._(national_museum_annex)_(2014)_a0001.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-bulacan-bocaue-ciudad_de_victoria-philippine_arena_-_led_billboard_(2014).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-mm-manila-ermita-padre_burgos_ave.-old_congess_bldg._(national_museum)_(2015)_a0001.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ph-mm-manila-santa_cruz-roman_santos_bldg._(bpi)_(2014).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:PH-MM-makati-edsa-guadalupe-orense_(2014)_a0001.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are some important tags or information that were not placed during the photo upload. Also, the photos are my original shots, and technical tags about the camera I'd used for shooting are also stated in the upload -Patrickroque01 (talk) 01:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Emiran culture

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I can easily add references, but I didn't see the proposed deletion on time to put them in. This is a completely uncontroversial topic and links referring to the topic were redirecting to something unrelated, which is why I created a stub and planned to finish it later. -Megalophias (talk) 07:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:William M. Krasilovsky

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 2602:306:BCBB:7270:217:F2FF:FE06:A885, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:BCBB:7270:217:F2FF:FE06:A885 (talk) 09:50, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

  Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ben Hartley

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Graham J Morris, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Grey Morris (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

@Graham J Morris:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Google Photos, Google Play Movies & TV, Gongoozle

Latest comment: 9 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

Both of these pages were deleted to make way for move. Or is requested that the deleted edits be restored.

Page consists of deleted redirect edit(s) that do(es) not overlap with the current article history. -103.6.158.193 (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Page seems to consist of one or more deleted redirect edits that do not overlap with the page history. -103.6.158.193 (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. By the way, Google Photos consisted of substantial editing history. It was irresponsible of Czar not to undelete them after the move. 103.6.158.193 (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Contentless redirects do not count as substantial editing history. They're commonly deleted and never restored in G6 mainspacing moves. – czar 14:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

There's no reason why the CSD tagging edit should remain deleted. 103.6.158.193 (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Mhplayme1/sandbox

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Mhplayme1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mhplayme1 (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


Hoping to re-instate previously submitted "sandbox" article to edit/revise and re-submit.

Thank you!

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Emily McKay

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sethdove, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sethdove (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Israel Women’s Network

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, DanielleLachance, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DanielleLachance (talk) 22:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

refund kodspider technologies page

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sarathsarigama, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sarathsarigama (talk) 07:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:David_Alexander_Flinn

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Permission received via. OTRS (Ticket:2015060410016455 -Mdann52 (talk) 14:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Leslie C. Kouba

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, MNdude11, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MNdude11 (talk) 22:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --B (talk) 23:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Saskatoon Flag.svg

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It was mistakenly removed from the Saskatoon article. -Svgalbertian (talk) 23:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The Gay Center, Tel Aviv-Yafo

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I work for the center, and the page I was working on was not finished. There is another page labeled the Tel Aviv Municipal LGBT Community Center, but that is not the name of the center. I would like to finish the page for the center I work for. "Save page" button below -Gsperlin89 (talk) 10:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Pitchside News

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

-Danzanfran (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC) The page doesn't break any major rules, and I'll be sure to edit it to make it unbiased. It isn't even my organization.

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Irish Arts Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Irishartsreview, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Irishartsreview (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

@Irishartsreview:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also, please consider changing your username, per this policy. Your account may be blocked without warning if you don't. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Runtime Patching

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jonmccoy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jon McCoy (talk) 14:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

@Jonmccoy:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mental illness stigma

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Haven't accessed in 6 months, but would like to work on edits now -Tess.m.kilwein (talk) 17:08, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mental illness stigma — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tess.m.kilwein (talk • contribs) 19:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

@Tess.m.kilwein:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Selectel

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 109.205.253.57, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 109.205.253.57 (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Selectel

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, GregFeehan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GregFeehan (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

@GregFeehan: - already   Done, see above. JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Irazu Costa Rica Restaurant

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

For an article on my watchlist which I may have edited, I request the article and its Talk page for review, including contribution history. Speedy deletion reason was excessive promotion. I wish to review my role in the article and possibly contest its deletion or submit a revised article. -doncram 20:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julia St. Vincent

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jadepussycat, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jadepussycat (talk) 00:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

@Jadepussycat:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Julia St. Vincent. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Alessandro Esseno

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

composer of high cultural level with many published works. Work for cinema and television. International collaborations including one with the rock band Toto. -Arizzium55 (talk) 00:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Tonk: The Billionaire's Game

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, 68.12.202.25, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.12.202.25 (talk) 01:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I am learning how to edit in your web site but not very good yet -68.12.202.25 (talk) 01:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done, though it was hardly worth restoring - only nine words! Read WP:Your first article to see what a Wikipedia article needs. In particular, it needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," in order to establish Wikipedia:Notability.
The draft gives no idea what it is about but, looking further, I gather this is a book, in which case the notability standard is explained at WP:Notability (books).
If you are user Genelesliethompson (talk · contribs), the author of the article and also one author of the book, you should read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

screen nsw

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The reason for the page deletion was unreasonable. The reasons were listed as:

1. It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. 2. It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant.

to address them in order: 1 -The pagee is not advertising anything or any of the above. Screen NSW is the state government funding body for film and television production in the state of NSW, Australia. I used the copy from its website which states its mission statement and government function. It is not a company so it doesn't make money or advertise.

2. I disagree that the page foes not indicate why the subject matter is important. It is important because Screen NSW is the NSW governments funding body for the TV and Film industry in NSW. There are many similar government bodies listed for Australia and this is one of the largest. Below are three other such government bodies listed for Australia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_Australia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_Victoria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ScreenWest --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shellyprawn (talk • contribs) 03:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Cryptic (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 13:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_192&oldid=1142568654"