Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 220

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Lectonar in topic Sarah Duque (2)
Archive 215←Archive 218Archive 219Archive 220Archive 221Archive 222→Archive 225

start.me

Latest comment: 8 years ago11 comments5 people in discussion

Page was removed, citing speedy deletion, but without any chance to discuss. It was a good article and its importance is obvious, as this particular service is more popular and higher ranking than other similar services with aticles on Wikipedia (cf. List of start page services) -Michieldewit (talk) 06:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Michieldewit: On a side note, I do have to say that you need to disclose your conflict of interest up front. Your username implies that you're one of the founders of this company, but you still need to post this somewhere. Also, creating articles on things that you're directly affiliated with - especially if you stand to gain from the article being on Wikipedia - is highly discouraged. If you want to try to create this page again you should only do so through WP:AfC. The thing to remember is that you will need to show how the company/service is notable by showing where it's received coverage in independent, reliable sources. Routine notifications, primary sources, trivial sources, and similar items will not show notability and companies/products are not automatically notable because they exist. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Tokyogirl79: Thank you for your explanation. Honestly, I was not aware of the WP:AfC procedure. I am indeed co-founder of start.me and have no intentions of hiding that. It would have been easy for me to leave that information out, but I chose to be honest, as I believe that is the only true way. I could have asked reputable Wikipedia friends to post the start.me on my behalve, but did do so. Now please tell my I wasn't wrong for choosing to play fair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michieldewit (talk • contribs) 08:09, 21 January 2016‎ (UTC)
You were not wrong to play fair, but you must use the afc procedure. And your must have good suvstantial refenences that ae more than mere notices to get a draft approved/ If you have then, try again in draft space, but the ones you have brought� forward so far do not sdequate. DGG ( talk ) 09:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • DGG is correct - you're not wrong to want to play fair, but you need to understand that there are certain requirements to editing with a conflict of interest and to notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Tokyogirl79: and @DGG: I understand there are more rules than I had anticipated. I am more than happy to comply with these rules. Simply deleting an article I spent almost 2 hours on without any due diligence, honestly feels quite unjust and a little rash. Waiting 2 hours for feedback before deleting the article seems awfully short (considering different time zones) and impulsive. The wait could have been longer, as the article in question was decent and neutral. I feel notability has been sufficiently established and feel confident the page would get a positive vote on the WP:AFD list. So please put it out there and make this a democratic decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michieldewit (talk • contribs) 10:04, 21 January 2016‎ (UTC)
    Honestly, that would be more trouble than it's worth. For what it's worth, mainspace is the most-scrutinised namespace on Wikipedia, both by admins and by the general public, so anything in mainspace absolutely must be up to par as far as policies go. This includes the suitability of sources (if it's as DGG and Tokyogirl say, restoring it to mainspace would only result in a summary AfD deletion), so I would take their advice, find better sources, and write it in the Draft space. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
    @Jéské Couriano: Thank you for your advice. I would at the very least like to continue writing this page in Draft. Unfortunately, the admin removed the page without notifying me, so I haven't had a chance to make a backup. I would have to write the page from scratch. About the summary deletion: I am not too sure about that. I genuinely believe this to be an 'uphill battle'. There is quite some room for discussion about the quality of the sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michieldewit (talk • contribs) 10:36, 21 January 2016‎ (UTC)
@Michieldewit: I have emailed you a copy of the page, but please understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a business listing directory: the WP:Notability standard is delibrately set high, looking for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary). Many perfectly worthy companies, particularly new ones, cannot meet that standard. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
@JohnCD: Thank you for sending me the original article. I created a draft. I still believe start.me is a notable subject, but do realize proving this with reliable sources is quite hard. Michieldewit (talk) 13:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


Draft:Writers & Directors Worldwide

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ocr69am, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ocr69am (talk) 13:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

  Not done. This was a copyright violation of this and this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Mch

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nijamahmed (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nijamahmed. What page exactly are you requesting be undeleted? Mch has not been deleted but has been redirected. That is not undone here, because it's not the type of deletion that requires any administrative intervention. The redirection can be undone through normal editing, but in my opinion should not be, until such time as you've carefully read pages like Wikipedia:Your first article, and are willing to attempt to write this citing to reliable sources, using a just-the-facts neuteral approach without promotional language and not copying from anywhere. The only pages you've created under this account that have been deleted are a A Thousands Years, which cannot be undeleted because it was a copyright violation, and Moju Chowdhuryhat (the same topic as "Mch"), which was blatantly promotional, was very hard to understand by a native English speaker, and also looks like a copyright violation, but was deleted on other grounds.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gerald Gorman

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Kcmaher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kcmaher (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Vijay Batra

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -LaliBanerji (talk) 21:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The article isn't deleted. If you want to provide a policy-based rationale for keeping it, you may participate at the deletion discussion taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Batra. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
(e/c)   Not done. Hi LaliBanerji. This page is for requesting undeletion of pages that have already been deleted (on uncontroversial bases). If you want Vijay Batra not to be deleted, make your case at the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Batra. Note that if this is ultimately deleted based on that discussion, this page would not be a correct forum to request undeletion – as undeletion of articles deleted at a discussion forum like AfD is not uncontroversial. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Open Networking User Group (ONUG)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, CJolicoeur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CJolicoeur (talk) 15:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Michigan Conference of the United Church of Christ

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Pklk5945, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pklk5945 (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Our church organization recently hired a new social media editor for the first time since last school year, and we look to expand and finish the Wikipedia page of Michigan Conference of the United Church of Christ. Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pklk5945 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Your social media editor should disclose their interest on their user page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Sarah Duque

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hi. I work with the PR team of Ms. Sarah Duque. We've been trying to write an article about her career since october, every time we tried to edit the text, it was unsuccessful. We ourselves asked for the article to be deleted so we could rewrite from scratch with all the corrections on the text. Now, we tried to write the article again and it was deleted right away. We already wrote an article for her in the spanish version of Wikipedia - https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Duque_Lovisoni, and we don't understand why is so hard to do the same in the english version. Please take all of this into consideration so we can finish this job for Ms. Duque, thank you. -Unpollofrito (talk) 01:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Unpollofrito (talk) 01:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Unfortunately, this is very much what Wikipedia is not for. Conflict-of-interest editing is strongly discouraged. This isn't a public relations vehicle. Articles must be completely neutral, and they shouldn't be written for the benefit of the person they're about. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
That's why it was edited, it's no meant to benefit anyone, it jus states facts and we haven't been able to do so. We made a neutral version of the article and it was rejected by many times, that's why we tried to delete and rewrite it and it backfired. Now we are unable to write the article at all using the name of Sarah Duque. Unpollofrito (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
A PR person's actions on behalf of a client aren't meant to be for the client's benefit? Anyway, the upshot of the deletion discussion was that no evidence of notability could be found. The only way to fix a notability problem is to bring to light previously overlooked qualifying sources. There isn't any kind of article rewrite that can fix that. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Unpollofrito:  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Duque Lovisoni, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user The Bushranger (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. You may create a draft article at Draft:Sarah Duque and when you believe it is ready for Wikipedia you can add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page to alert an experienced editor to look over the article and decide if it meets the inclusion criteria. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Crime in Stereo

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Contesting PROD of recently deleted article (not sure whether the most recent version was located at Crime in Stereo or Crime In Stereo). Noteworthy punk rock band with several releases on a longstanding record label and one charting album. I would be happy to add substantiating references to this effect. -Chubbles (talk) 04:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Chubbles (talk) 04:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much! Could I also request the restoration of Explosives and the Will to Use Them and I Was Trying to Describe You to Someone? These are full-length albums by the band which were speedy deleted as A9s after the band article disappeared. But now that the band article has returned, A9 is no longer a rationale for their speedy deletion. Chubbles (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Kanda Uruvam

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We are at the pre-production stage of the film and all links related to the film have been provided. We can provide more details like the poster and our official film website -Neilquadras (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Sonic CD: The Movie

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I was the person who made this page and I want to see what it was. -67.82.166.6 (talk) 23:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done Here is the content which will not be restored to article space. It was labelled as a hoax and said: "This movie is coming out December 23, 2023 but first the producer needs to ask the team who made the Castlevania movies! They made a movie out of a VIDEO GAME. Sonic CD needs one. Hey! Didn't someone make Sonic the Hedgehog: The Movie? Oh yeah, there was Super Mario Bros. The Movie! Anyways, this movie is the storyline of Sonic CD. But, you can see what Amy Rose does with Metal Sonic." credit to Amyrose3339 for this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Haha, that's actually pretty cute. I never knew I was so fluent in video game movies as a kid. Now I've gotta play them all. (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Project Shrine Maiden

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This was a hoax that I made in 2012 that Xezbeth deleted. I'd like to see it's source. -Now I've gotta play them all. (talk) 15:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

According to the deletion history, you didn't make that article. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
One of my old accounts made it, but I'd like the source, but I don't want the page undeleted. Now I've gotta play them all. (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Society of Quantitative Analysts

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 2604:2000:E04C:800:4489:FD22:FA93:FDBC, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2604:2000:E04C:800:4489:FD22:FA93:FDBC (talk) 16:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

ace von johnson

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -207.237.149.238 (talk) 03:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Deleted for lack of sources of BLP. Many sources exist.

  •   Not done Not only was the page very promotional, but it's also WP:COPYVIO since it was taken from his official website. I have no objection to anyone wanting to start a new page, as long as it has sources that would pass WP:RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Jdellapina: I saw that you edited the IP's listed sources, so I assume that you're the IP. The bottom line here is that the issue here is no longer whether or not there are sources, but rather that the original article was a copyright violation and very promotional. Either one would be a barrier to recreation, but the copyright violation means that we cannot legally restore the page as it was. I have no problem with you wanting to create a new page that is not taken verbatim from Johnson's official website. On a side note, the sources all have problems with them. The first link goes to a Wikipedia entry and you cannot use Wikipedia as a RS to show notability. The following three appear to be self-published sources, which cannot be used to assert notability on Wikipedia because they aren't considered to be reliable. This is because they undergo little to no editorial oversight that would satisfy requirements on Wikipedia. Now what you need are sources like this interview with Dread Central. Now you'd need more than one source to assert notability, but this is an example of what you'd need to find. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sparks@LSE

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 92.27.7.54, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.27.7.54 (talk) 16:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 17:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Yvonne Drewry

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Djb99 (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

@Djb99:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thelakkat Kalathilthodiyil Kesavan Nayar

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ahsamkr (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I would like to edit and re-submit the same.

@Ahsamkr:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Surfing the Healthcare Tsunami: Bring Your Best Board

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Radom event gen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Radom event gen (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BethNaught (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Brian Tracy

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Brian Tracy is an World Famous public speaker and the author of over 60 books. He has millions of social media fans and followers. -RobertPoling (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@RobertPoling:   Not done. The title has been protected against creation after a series of articles about him were deleted as copyright violations and/or too promotional. If you want to write an article, you should use WP:Articles for creation to make a draft; if it is accepted, the protection can be lifted. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and take care:
JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

BC Safety Authority

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Quinn newcomb (talk) 22:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@Quinn newcomb:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Request for Undeletion - Moved to Drafts for Corrections

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello - I was working on an article title (Martin Babinec) which was deleted on Jan 25, 2016 by administrator @Cryptic while being advised by another uninvolved editor @Drm310 15:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)]. Drm310 advised I place a WP:PAID disclaimer on my user and talk pages. This step is complete. He then advised I submit this request here for undeletion, and ask the article be restored in the draft space where I can work on it and review with other editors. My intention is to create a page similar to @BradFeld and possibly continue shining light on other experienced entrepreneurs and startup investors helping Upstate NY grow. Thank you in advance, --KathrynCartini (talk) 20:10, 25 January 2016 (EST)

I've draftified it myself, against my better judgment. —Cryptic 01:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
So, @KathrynCartini:   Done - restored by Cryptic to Draft:Martin Babinec. Please check out the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jean Tixier

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Js229 (talk) 00:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

@Js229:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Jean Tixier. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" JohnCD (talk) 11:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Now I can see it again, I note an article on this person was independently created after my creation request was deleted. The draft submission for Articles for Creation could now be deleted, but I am not going to do that, partly as I don't know how to. Js229 (talk)

@Js229: thanks, I should have checked that. I have done better than delete your version: I have done a history-merge so that it is visible in the history behind the current one at Jean Tixier de Ravisi. Do you have a source for his birth date? You have 1524, but the current article says 3 Dec 1542. JohnCD (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

File:3FM logo.svg

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -XPanettaa (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC) This image was deleted for this reason: 02:39, 16 July 2015 Cryptic (talk | contribs) deleted page File:3FM logo.svg (F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days). I would like to request this page be restored so I can license it under a free license or in the public domain and put it into articles. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

  •   Done It could be used under fair use. This logo would not be automatically public domain due to simplicity. Do you own the copyright on it so that you can change the license? Our description claims that Netherlands Public Broadcasting is the owner. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Susan Perrow

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello - I would really like this page restored with the following changes - sorry it was posted a few hours ago before I had a chance to put this request on top - here it is again!

Wall of text not relevant to this page removed

I, Jasadam, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jasadam (talk) 01:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Si Panya School

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sarah white 1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sarah white 1 (talk) 05:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I would like to continue working on the age and update it ready for publishing

Federal Aid Highway Act of 1921

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page Federal Aid Highway Act of 1921 (Phipps Act) was moved to this page. Old deleted revisions of this page still need to be restored for attribution reasons. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Angel Sense

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Angelsense (talk) 12:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

  Not done if you are talking about User:Angelsense, this was an advertisement. Wikipedia is not for promoting your company and products. Also User's must be individual people and not appearing to be companies, as your user name appears to be. You can ask for you user to be renamed, or pick a new name. However you should not be promoting your company here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:David Mindel

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Moviebuff2589, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Moviebuff2589 (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

@Moviebuff2589:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Albert Suarez

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page was deleted unilaterally by an administrator without going through an AfD process or, to my knowledge, even being PRODded. The reasoning was "not notable at all," though the individual, a baseball player, is presently a spring training invite, which means he has a good shot at playing in the major leagues in 2016, which would qualify him as notable under WP:BASE/N. I request this page be undeleted so the individual's article can be merged and redirected to San Francisco Giants minor league players. A major league spring training invitation is notable enough for inclusion on that page, at the very least. -Alex (talk) 20:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Thierry Pauchant

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Dragriffin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dragriffin (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Kaeya Majmundar

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Abdella2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abdella2 (talk) 20:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I needed more time to do research and see if person would still be relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdella2 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Marathon_Artists

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, StDionis57a, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. StDionis57a (talk) 17:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Tom Fleming (Artist)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Fleming art, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fleming art (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

galaeantonio

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Galaeantonio (talk) 09:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC) then, if possible can i have my page back to resume my wrote..please is important !thenks very mutch!

@Galaeantonio:   Not done. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own ideas or link people to your site - see WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NOTWEBHOST. You could try Wikiversity, a sister site which does not object to original research. JohnCD (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Frederick Keigley

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Thomasfk12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thomasfk12 (talk) 18:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Thomasfk12:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Thomas Frederick Keigley. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I have to say that, as the draft stands, I see nothing there that meets Wikipedia's inclusion standard, WP:Notability (people). For a footballer to have an article, it is normally necessary to have actually played for the first team of a club in one of these leagues. Also, if you are Thomas Keigley, please read WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Upcaman/sandbox

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Upcaman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Upcaman (talk) 18:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Upcaman:   Not done. I'm sorry, but it would be wasting your time: there is no chance that this can be accepted for Wikipedia. The reasons are explained at WP:NOTESSAY, part of the fundamental policy What Wikipedia is not which defines our role as an encyclopedia. You may get some ideas at WP:Alternative outlets for places where you could publish this. If you need a copy of the text, I wil be happy to email it to you. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Artour Babaev

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

subject is notable (see Arteezy), requesting history to be merged into that article -Prisencolin (talk) 23:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Fixed link. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
@Prisencolin:   Declined. A history merge isn't practical in this case due to the large overlap between edits in both articles. Furthermore, I don't see anything in there worth restoring; the deleted version contains a lot of hype, unsubstantiated claims, and only one useful citation: http://www.dota2.com/international2014/results/ ~Amatulić (talk) 03:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Could you post the last version of the old page to pastebin or something, I'd like to see what i can salvage.--Prisencolin (talk) 23:10, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
@Prisencolin: I emailed the source to you. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:De Profundis (metal band)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 81.136.141.103, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 81.136.141.103 (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Machine the Producer

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -198.241.174.15 (talk) 20:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

I cannot see that there is a page called Machine the Producer or a draft either. Can you please check the name of what you want? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

To Be

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This page was accidentally deleted while Malcolmxl5 moved the page from To Be (disambiguation), which was already moved by BDD. -63.251.215.25 (talk) 21:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done I really don't know why that happened, but I've now restored the page history, which I should've done before. Now it looks like I moved the page twice and Malcolmxl5 did once—all in the same moment! Very strange, but a clear enough picture overall. --BDD (talk) 21:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Yes, a weird edit conflict, never seen that before. But the dab page ended up where it should be! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Automated LGMD Diagnostic Assistant

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Leeer333 (talk) 00:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BethNaught (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Nic Case

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Article creator requested deletion, so therefore article creator undeletion -Donnie Park (talk) 12:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done BethNaught (talk) 14:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

gogrun

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I dont want to advertise on wiki Just wanted to add information about website please review my content and let me know if I missed anything and need any changes. -Pratikmth (talk) 10:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Boing! said Zebedee (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also, if this is your company, your shouldn't be writing about it; see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for further guidance, and submit your article to WP:AFC instead of putting it in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 11:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:VCU Rams.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Files for Discussion discussion has established that this logo is not original enough to be copyrighted. Thus, the previous larger version should be undeleted. -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

galaeantonio

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Galaeantonio (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)thanks a lot of

@Galaeantonio: would you please read Wikipedia:User pages so that you can understand what your user page is for? Your user page is not your personal web space for any purpose you want. If you want to write a draft, please use your sandbox. ~Amatulić (talk) 11:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  Not done Writings that are not related to Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gustav Manz

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 71.161.226.154, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.161.226.154 (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Johnny_Grey

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

{{subst:refund|1=Requests for undeletion|2= Page appear to be maliciously deleted by user with history of blocked edits}

requested by User:JacPaterson
The page was moved to Johnny Grey (designer) and later deleted by Bishonen as an advertisement. There does not look to be any maliciously deleting going on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Babasanya Alimot Olajumoke

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I, Kbabsbaba, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. babasanya adekunle micheal 14:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Clayster

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Clayster
IndustryTelecommunications
Founded2009 by Rikard Strid
HeadquartersSweden
Key people
Rikard Strid, CEO & Founder
Websitewww.clayster.com

subject meets notability (assuming the deleted page is what I think it is -Prisencolin (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC) -Prisencolin (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC))

Scump

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

retrieving expired Prod -Prisencolin (talk) 00:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:OASIS Activities Conference

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Wfh22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wfh22 (talk) 09:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Lucy Simmonds

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Lucy has now Notability http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/whats-on/theatre-news/review-mary-poppins--palace-10793379 , please can you restore the page -Mywikinameis (talk) 10:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Simmonds, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The reference you give only makes less than one sentence note of the person. We need substantial coverage, which I would expect to be over 2 paragraphs. And,... we need more than one to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Sarah Duque (2)

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Hi. I created this article but when I tried to edit the sources and change the way it was written up, the changes I made wouldn't stay on the article. I decided to delete the article so I could rewrite it properly from scratch but then it was up for speedy deletion as soon as it was published. I ask you to takeall of this into consideration, thank you in advance. Unpollofrito (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict) @Unpollofrito: Please read the advice you were given further up this page. As Jeremy says, articles deleted after a deletion discussion like WP:Articles for deletion/Sarah Duque Lovisoni will not be restored here; before posting it again, you need permission from the deleting adminsitrator or from WP:Deletion review.
In any case, since you "work with the PR team of Ms. Sarah Duque" you have a WP:Conflict of interest and have no business writing about her directly. Wikipedia is not for PR. Read that guideline, and read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
Note in particular that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4) to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI.
If you want to persist, and you can find better sources to overcome the reasons for deletion at the AfD, you should make a draft article via WP:Articles for creation and submit it for review by an uninvolved editor. JohnCD (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
  Not done Lectonar (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_220&oldid=1138664061"