Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 218
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 215 | Archive 216 | Archive 217 | Archive 218 | Archive 219 | Archive 220 | → | Archive 225 |
Sébastien Socchard
Person of doubtul notoriety, with little sources linking to him and none of recent times (five years or less. The article is completely unsourced -Brc (talk) 23:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Done A strange statement to add when you ask for a restore. I have restored history for you to peruse. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
= I am sorry, I wanted to do a... deletion request !! --Brc (talk) 09:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)brc
- I userfied it as an obvious autobiography of Socchard (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Guy (Help!) 10:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Anders Lindquist Dec 2015.jpg
OTRS Ticket#2015122710008454 received, please undelete. -Darwinius (talk) 04:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Darwinius:
Not done, yet. That OTRS ticket is the subject of the photograph claiming he is the copyright holder of the photograph. This looks like a portrait photo taken by someone else. We have a templated reply for situations like that. The subject of a photograph isn't normally the copyright holder. The photographer is. In a situation like this we'd need him to answer the question of how he obtained the copyright, and provide proof that he indeed has it. We need more than the standard form letter that he already sent. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Amatulic: - Thank you very much for that information, I had no way to see what was in that photograph, as I can't see deleted contributions here. I'll proceed to send the aforementioned message to the user.--Darwinius (talk) 18:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Daniel Young and Christian Giroux
I, Filtrate, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Filtrate (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Vicki Fraser
I, Danielgagnon888, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danielgagnon888 (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Need to add more references so that it will eventually be published -Danielgagnon888 (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I already restored this one before, for an IP, which I guess was you, but there was no improvement. This will be the last chance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:INetFusion
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mdsang (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See Draft:INetFusion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Western Telematic
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mttocs (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The earlier non-acceptance no longer applies, as the other draft was deleted. Draft:Western Telematic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
User:Andrew.W.Farrell/sandbox
I, Andrew.W.Farrell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Andrew W Farrell 18:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done "god among mere mortals"! This has no prospect of becoming an article, and is a joke submission. You would be better off writing a user page at User:Andrew.W.Farrell. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Roberto Delgado (musician)
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Robertodelgadoyorquesta (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Roberto Delgado (musician)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Roberto Delgado (musician) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
List of winners has been deleted. Please undelete. The Hippocrates Prize for Poetry and Medicine is one of the highest value awards in the world for a single poem. Wiki entries for other major literary awards include listings of winners e.g. winners of the UK National Poetry Competition and winners of prizes awarded by the Poetry Society of America e.g. the Writer Magazine/Emily Dickinson Award. The Hippocrates Prize for Poetry and Medicine has attracted interest from over 60 countries with over 7000 entries since launched in 2009. It has attracted reports e.g. in The Guardian, The Independent and The Boston Globe and interviews with winners and organisers on the BBC (Radio 4 Today, World at One and Women's Hour and on the BBC World Service and US National Public Radio. -Hippo37 (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. This page isn't for requesting reversions to a particular article version; it's for asking for pages that have been deleted outright to be restored. Take this to the talk page of the article. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Prem Khan (actor)
Prem Khan ( born 31 may 1996) is an Indian actor.His original name is Washim Rahman. He was born in Dhubri,Assam. He made his film debut with a supporting role in the 2015 Sooraj R. Barjatya's drama film Prem Ratan Dhan Payo. Opposite Salman Khan, Soonam Kapoor, Neil Niten Mukesh and Anupam Kher. Khan was selected out of the 2,000 boys in PRDP Audition. Some director critically praised for his performance. He speaks English, Hindi, Bengali and Assamese fluently. -Washim Rahman (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. We do not restore A7s or G4s by request here anyways. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert. A. Hayles, Jr.
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert. A. Hayles, Jr. · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, CESD-NJ, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CESD-NJ (talk) 00:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
User:Ekn400/Klaftech data systems, inc.
I, Ekn400, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. It was under development and was deleted -Ekn400 (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Bertie Stephens
I, Ernestasvk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ernestasvk (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Samra
The page earlier had substantial information and reliable sources and was gradually eroded due to a sustained effort by User Sitush who discarded reliable published books of James Tod, Magasthenes amongst others. Please look into the history of the page and consider revival of the page -Kulveer (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Middle East Research Institute
I, YAR08, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. YAR08 (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cliff Crumpton (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Pascal Franchot Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Julie Summers
I, Bookygirl17, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bookygirl17 (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Angie tv series.jpg
Now with 400px size preference, there should be a larger size. If undeleted, I'll request a bot size change soon. It can lower to 315px, larger than 250px but better. Also, I can view a maximum size well and prefer it that way. -George Ho (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done though the image restored is pretty poor quality. It could be good to find a better one somewhere else. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Girls Have I.T. Day (2)
I, Ewoodrow17, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ewoodrow17 (talk) 01:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator observation) Note previous request above, which was denied. --Finngall talk 02:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done This looks to be the same content that was deleted in the mainspace. (Here's a link to the request for the mainspace article.) Now while AfC articles are different in that we will occasionally restore problematic articles, the issue here is that the draft article contains material taken from here, which makes it a copyright violation. Even if the content was given up as fair use, the content is still very promotional in tone and would require an almost complete re-write to meet WP:NPOV. The draft article as a whole is extremely, extremely promotional, enough to where I don't feel comfortable restoring it to AfC even if there wasn't any copyvio. The other concerns that I brought up at the last request are also still valid. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Sudarshanam netra
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Lukog (talk) 08:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
we have not projected any marketing type content rather tried to project less known indian medical science knowledge to the world with proper reference links provided.More over we find today lots of similar institutions pages with out deletion but with more offensive manner of content.If you find the photo inappropriate that may be removed. not the full page...!! Thank you Dr.Gokulan
- Not done The article starts as if it was about an eye hospital, but ends up mostly about Dr.Gokulan. I suggest that you write bout the eye hospital, only, at draft:Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam and not write about the people there. Perhaps the eye hospital is notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Shall proceed with fresh content about the mission. Not about the persons. Thank you Dr. Gokulan
Hamid Rajaei
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mahtabshadi (talk) 07:51, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Mahtabshadi (talk) 07:51, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamid Rajaei, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Although the recently deleted article differs, it is far inferior to the one deleted at AFD. I however would consider restoring as a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Wayra
The topic was reasonably well sourced and there's plenty of scope for expansion. The worst case would be merger with the parent company Telefonica and so there's no reason to delete. As for the PROD, I would have removed it if I had noticed it but suppose that Christmas &c. got in the way. -Andrew D. (talk) 12:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. BethNaught (talk) 12:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:The Real Estate One Family of Companies
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) REOmedia (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. @REOmedia: we'll consider it after you change your username to something that represents only you as an individual. Companies aren't permitted to have Wikipedia accounts. Your username is a violation of Wikipedia:Username policy. I'll leave a more detailed note on your talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
PathMinder
Article was PRODed recently by a new single-purpose account who first PRODed and then AfDed at least 11 articles about file managers in a row, including some extremely well known ones. Consequently the discussions have all resulted in "Keep" so far. There are at least 3 remaining PRODed articles and (while I am not familiar with Mac software) given the outcome of the other discussions I suspect that they are notable as well, and that the nominator did not act out of the best motives (as was indicated by various other editors in the discussions). Therefore I'd like to see them being restored. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done. @Matthiaspaul: I restored it because that's what we do when requested of an article deleted via WP:PROD, but personally I don't really see that one as a keeper. You're welcome to expand it. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Path Finder
Article was PRODed recently by a new single-purpose account who first PRODed and then AfDed at least 11 articles about file managers in a row, including some extremely well known ones. Consequently the discussions have all resulted in "Keep" so far. There are at least 3 remaining PRODed articles and (while I am not familiar with Mac software) given the outcome of the other discussions I suspect that they are notable as well, and that the nominator did not act out of the best motives (as was indicated by various other editors in the discussions). Therefore I'd like to see them being restored. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done. @Matthiaspaul: this is a short article with one reference, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it at AFD. Expand it if you can. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Sudarshanam netra
content is regarding a resurrecting medical science of india Ayurveda Ophthalmology clinical practice established since about 1990.Dr.Gokulan was projected as to state that this effort of resurrection or re enlightenment of this clinical practice was carried out by this doctor with efforts from many enthusiasts philanthropists & institutions.reasoning reference links were provided for almost every statement and topics.we strongly feel that in a time when India tries to showcase the traditional knowledge wealth to the whole world,as a pioneer institution Sudarshanam netra chikitsalayam be present in this wiki knowledge bank as a reliable resource to Ayurveda -Lukog (talk) 14:13, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Y (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Omer Dror
Wishing to add more info in order to make the subject - omer dror - more eligble for Wikipedia. Mironit9 (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Virtualstock
I, 81.106.154.233, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 81.106.154.233 (talk) 14:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Disk Order
Article was PRODed recently by a new account and single-purpose account who first PRODed and then AfDed at least 11 articles about file managers in a row, including some extremely well known ones. Consequently the discussions have all resulted in "Keep" so far. There are at least 3 remaining PRODed articles and (while I am not familiar with Mac software) given the outcome of the other discussions I suspect that they are notable as well, and that the nominator did not act out of the best motives (as was indicated by various other editors in the discussions). Therefore I'd like to see them being restored. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done. However Matthiaspaul, your characterization of the prodder is false; the person who prodded it is an established user and definitely not single-purpose. I agreed with his rationale, this is a one-line article with no sources. I have nominated it for AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disk Order. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Amatulić. I just wanted to make sure we don't lose some valuable contents. You are right, this one was PRODed by someone else (not the single-purpose account I assumed) - I couldn't see this until after the article was undeleted. My apologies to the actual nominator for misrepresenting him. I also agree with your AfD of this one, unless it gets significantly expanded now. Greetings.
- --Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:John DeLucie
I, Rm360, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rm360 (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
I wish to edit and resubmit this page -Rm360 (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Rm360: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Template:Navbox video game topics
I'd like this page to be undeleted and moved to my namespace, preferably User:Anarchyte/navboxtest. I requested deletion. Anarchyte 02:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Rhondda tunnel
I, Okiihyoshi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Okiihyoshi (talk) 02:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Daya Singh Bedi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sunamikapreeti (talk) 08:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Baba Daya Singh Bedi comes from the lineage of Sri Guru Nanak - he is the 15th direct descendant of the great saint. The royal family was in Kallar, Rawalpindi, Pakistan and had great political, social and religious influence all the way till Afghanistan. It is important to document his family history, genealogy and traditions given that after the partition of Indian in 1947, Pakistan became an Islamic state and denied the heritage of other Sikh and Hindu princely rulers.
It also seems by the deletion history that Sigmabaroda and Sitush have a personal animosity and they have used my page to fight over and play around with. I have researched myu article on Daya Singh Bedi with great care, dedication and devotion. Everything is historically accurate. I am also formally translating Sikh text and studying Sikh history so believe me all that is there is accurate. Please restore the page back to original. Thank you.
- You are at the wrong forum. The page has not been deleted, but large parts of it have been reverted because of very poor quality sources, and your original research. Primary Research like you have been doing is not allowed Wikipedia. FYI, my displeasure with the other editor is not with his mass deletions on this page, but because he did them without prior discussion on a talk page. Sigmabaroda (talk) 08:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Please advise me how to recover or at least get on a discussion with someone who may help me. This is my first contribution to wikipedia and it seems like a form to be bullied by the likes of Sigmabaroda.
I, 2602:306:CD26:8C10:1CBA:F10:CB4D:756D, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:CD26:8C10:1CBA:F10:CB4D:756D (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Cash Central
I, Joshmurd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joshmurd (talk) 19:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Jaishankar chigurula
i was given 10+ references. jaishankar chigurula he also in IMDB but some editors not cheking below references please re creat tha page jaishankar chigurula. you have to cheek all the references. before delete. -Teena D'souza (talk) 14:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- IMDB is not a reliable source, because it is user generated content. See WP:USERGENERATED.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
i was given 10+ references. please cheek the references belowTeena D'souza (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator observation) Article recreated as Jaishankar (Director). Jaishankar Chigurula has been deleted six times and salted, Jaishankar chigurula has been deleted twice more, including once as per a recent AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaishankar Chigurla, albeit as a soft delete due to low participation. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaishankar Chigurula/Archive. --Finngall talk 15:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- I tagged Jaishankar (Director) for speedy deletion and it has now been deleted by JzG and protected from recreation.--Jahaza (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note the AFD was a soft delete. But I will mark this as a Not done. As a next step write a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note the AFD was a soft delete. But I will mark this as a
David R. Beittel
more notable than some that exist
- That's not a valid argument to make here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Valerie Hansen
I had planned on editing the citations to make it publishable but never had the time to finish until now -71.202.160.188 (talk) 22:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Daya Singh Bedi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sunamikapreeti (talk) 08:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
My contribution to Daya Singh Bedi wikipedia has been deleted without warning or discussion or suggestion for improvement or reason for deletion by a certain Sigmabaroda who by his own admission is not versed in the casts and sects of Sikhism.
I have suggested to revert the page to it's original and go step by step on what is in in sync with your policies. This is my first time on wikipedia and my knowledge extends to Sikhism only.
Thank you.
- This page, Daya Singh Bedi, is not deleted. Instead people are reverting your edits. Please talk about this at talk:Daya Singh Bedi. What I notice is that others are asking about sources. What is required is some kind of reference to know where the information came from. If you know the documents that have this information, pelase provide a reference to them with your additions. They do not have to be in English. However we do not allow personal information, or what is acquired by just talking to people, it needs to be in a fixed form, such as writing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hillerbrand + Magsamen
The Wikipedia page 'Hillerbrand + Magsamen' was deleted at the request of its initial creator Bonniebrunk. Stephan Hillerbrand and Mary Magsamen, the subjects of the wikipedia page had asked if the page could be deleted so they could each have their own individual pages rather then a page about their collaborative career. There have been 4 attempts to create individual pages for Stephan Hillerbrand and Mary Magsamen but they have been denied, citing that they "submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability."
If individual pages can not be created for the two individuals Stephan Hillerbrand and Mary Magsamen, then the original wikipedia page 'Hillerbrand + Magsamen' should be restored. This page was created in 2012 and has been around for 3 years. It has been reviewed and passed evidence the subject's notability. The original creator of the page, Bonniebrunk, is asking for it to be restored and undeleted.
Save page" button below -Bonniebrunk (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Bonniebrunk: Not done. Although deletion by PROD had been requested, the page was actually deleted as a copyright violation from http://www.auxiliaryprojects.com/HMmultiples and other sites, so it cannot be restored. You are welcome to write an article in your own words, but it should be based mainly on what others say about them, not on what they say about themselves. If that is accepted, I would think redirects to it from the individual names could be added.
- The terms of the deletion request: "Both Mary Magsamen and Stephan Hillerbrand would like the page deleted so that they can make their own individual pages", show a misunderstanding of Wikipedia: this is an encyclopedia, not a place for people to make their own pages; that is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
User:Jarrod underground elephant/sandbox/Underground Elephant
- User:Jarrod underground elephant/sandbox/Underground Elephant · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Jarrod underground elephant, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Underground Elephant Inc. (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Jarrod underground elephant: Done. The page was moved to Draft:Underground Elephant and deleted there. A new version of that draft page was created on 4 January by user JarrodRussell (talk · contribs), who I guess is you. I have done a history-merge so that the earlier, deleted versions are available via the "View history" tab. If you take content from them, bear in mind the reviewers' comments on this version.
- Check out WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:Notability (summary); also the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. JohnCD (talk) 22:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Double buffered bike lane family trailer chicago.jpg
- File:Double buffered bike lane family trailer chicago.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
We have received a permission, see ticket:2015111010027225 -Jcb (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done @Jcb: please add the OTRS template, and also consider undeleting commons:File:Double buffered bike lane family trailer chicago.jpg (then this one can be deleted) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Older woman with flowers protected bike lane boston.jpg
- File:Older woman with flowers protected bike lane boston.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
We have received a permission, see ticket:2015111010027225 -Jcb (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done @Jcb: please add the OTRS template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Older women walking with bikes bike-ped pfluger bridge austin.jpg
- File:Older women walking with bikes bike-ped pfluger bridge austin.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
We have received a permission, see ticket:2015111010027225 -Jcb (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done @Jcb: please add the OTRS template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Daniel Ishag
Please reinstate this page as we intent to work on it and bring it in line with Wikipedia's terms and conditions. -2606:6000:67C6:FC00:E919:1F18:A333:CC23 (talk) 22:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- I deleted this as an advertisement, and I think that's correct. I have doubts about notability, but I would not have speedy deleted on that basis alone, but rather used AfD. I have been requested on my user talk by someone who is presumably the same editor to restore it, and I shall email them a copy. DGG ( talk ) 22:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Chong-Moon Lee
I, 50.185.71.209, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.185.71.209 (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Need more time to finalize -50.185.71.209 (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done This was fairly promotional in tone and a search also showed that some of it was taken from this website. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted information and even if permission was given to use the content, it's still too promotional for Wikipedia and would need to be re-written. I have no problem with e-mailing you a copy of the article for you to revise, however. Are you @Bjjung:? If so, do you still have access to the e-mail account you used to sign up with? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Debt-stacking method
I, Max Paxman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Max Paxman (talk) 03:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Max Paxman: This is mildly promotional and at best reads like a personal essay written to showcase this method in the best light possible, so I do need to warn you that this would need to be completely re-written to meet WP:NPOV guidelines. It might be better for you to re-write this from scratch. Also, I have to ask: do you have a conflict of interest with any of this? (IE, do you work in a business where it'd benefit you if this was written in a positive manner?) You can still edit if you do, but you will need to read over WP:COI and disclose this COI somewhere, either on the article or on your user page. I'm not opposed to restoring this, just that we need to know the COI and to let you know that this would need a pretty thorough re-write. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- (ec) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- (ec)
Genghis Grill
This article was speedy deleted back in 2010. I'm not sure what was there before. I think I may be able to salvage this article. If need be, could its contents please be moved to Draft:Genghis Grill? -Steel1943 (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'll move it, but I'm not sure that it'll be all that helpful given the limited information in the article and the fact that it was only sourced to the company website. I don't think that C.Fred would have an issue with this, but I'll tag him in this just in case. On a side note, mmm... Genghis Grill. I've never been there, but their food always smells good whenever I go by one of their restaurants. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- No objections. And on a side note, I think I have eaten there. —C.Fred (talk) 05:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Jeff Reine-Adelaide
Please restore the edit history prior to the article being deleted at AfD. Player made his professional debut today, so in not notable. -JMHamo (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Question: This is not that simple, as the deleted page was moved to Jeff Reine Adélaïde and then deleted. A merge could happen, but what name is better> Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: GiantSnowman had performed the Histmerge, so this is now resolved. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Category:Waheed Murad
No debate has taken place before the deletion because I was not aware about it. I intend to improve it so please give me a chance. -175.107.8.3 (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 24, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MER-C (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note 175.107.8.3 requested help on my talk page with identifying possible articles for this category at User talk:RevelationDirect#Category:Waheed Murad if anyone else wishes to contribute to that conversation. Thanks! RevelationDirect (talk) 02:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Mohun Bagan first logo.jpg
Kindly fix the error/problem from the file and please don't delete it. -— Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 05:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done However this is not the right place to ask. you could have asked at the WP:Teahouse. Actually there is a gallery of logos, so there may need to be a better justification. But if this one is from 1889 as claimed, then it would be public domain by age. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Thanks a lot! — Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 08:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi - Gnatta has won a number of awards in the last 6 months, building up some of the notability that was lacking in the previous submission. I think the page is ready for a redraft. Aebrown1993 (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Aebrown1993: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Caldera Lauca
A few months ago, I requested deletion because the main source I intended to use was gone. Now however the site is back up, so I can start working on it again. Can this page be undeleted please? -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - I have restored the article draft. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's now at Caldera Lauca is anyone wonders what happened. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Karhoo
We believe the page was well within Wikipedia's Terms and Conditions and are happy to edit the page further to conform even more so. The firm is a notable and established company on par with Uber or Lyft. As a result we believe it to merit its own wikipedia page. If this cannot be reinstated we would like the text back for informational purposes -2606:6000:67C6:FC00:E919:1F18:A333:CC23 (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done My suggestion is that you let someone else not connected with the company or its promoters write it. Then there is less chance of promotional writing appearing. I am unconvinced by "on par", Uber has 64,000,000 news stories out there, Lyft over 2 million, and Karhoo has 645. If you are going to write something, please do so at Draft:Karhoo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Understood. Thank you for your help and we will do so. In the meanwhile please can we have the text to the original article.
- Not done because it was deleted as a WP:CSD#G11 promotional article. I personally have no objection to moving it to draft space for submission via WP:AFC, but you'll have to ask the deleting administrator @Ged UK: for restoration. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Slovenian under-17 League
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jstzan (talk) 21:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC) Hi, I do not undersand why would the "Slovenian under-17 League" be deleted? All the info is legit and the source is the Slovenian FA.
- Not done It may be legitimate, but the article will be deleted soon. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovenian under-17 League for why it was deleted before. If you want to have an article on this you will need several independent references with substantial coverage to show notability. Perhaps start at draft:Slovenian under-17 League. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
CSD G13
I, Gdmichaels, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gdmichaels (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gdmichaels (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:TroveStar. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Various logos
- File:Mohun Bagan other logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- File:Dadagiri Unlimited.png · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- File:CESC Logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- File:Mohun Bagan A.C. Logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Kindly fix the error/problem from the file and please don't delete it. -— Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 06:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- @SWASTIK 25: You were requested above to take these requests to WP:Teahouse. This page is to request undeletion, and these files are not deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Man Booker Prizelogo.png
I don't know why it was replaced. However, I nominated the Commons image for deletion due to UK's low threshold of originality. Therefore, this local image should be undeleted and then reinserted to Man Booker Prize. -George Ho (talk) 08:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- @George Ho: Question: the file currently used and at Commons is File:The Man Booker Prize 2015 Logo.jpg and is the current logo. It has more color and is different than the file you want restored. Would it be preferable to wait on the Commons discussion or to make a local copy of that file instead rather than restoring this different image? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- What does the local one look like? Is it similar to the Commons image? George Ho (talk) 09:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- The local one is very different, it is a giant beige coloured lowercase e with "The Man Booker Prizes" text superimposed in white. You can see it here: http://www.thebookpeople.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Man_Booker_Prizelogo.png . So if you don't like that, George you had better rescue the commons image (which is specific for 2015) to upload locally. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I like the one that omits the year, the grey giant "e". --George Ho (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Nevertheless, that should be indefinite or temporary. Uploading the newer logo in big size without a year isn't easy. George Ho (talk) 13:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)- No, wait. I'm able to easily upload a big size PNG image. Should not be SVG. I must withdraw the request if I can upload it soon. George Ho (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Created File:The Man Booker Prize 2015 logo.png. I'm withdrawing request. George Ho (talk) 13:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- The local one is very different, it is a giant beige coloured lowercase e with "The Man Booker Prizes" text superimposed in white. You can see it here: http://www.thebookpeople.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Man_Booker_Prizelogo.png . So if you don't like that, George you had better rescue the commons image (which is specific for 2015) to upload locally. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- What does the local one look like? Is it similar to the Commons image? George Ho (talk) 09:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Cotrobuz
This is a food for which there is no reference on the entire internet. The food recipe is local (extremly few persons know it) and I wanted to make it accesible to everyone because it tasted very good. "Save page" button below -Iuliu pop (talk) 13:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done. Hi Iuliu pop. Your request validates the reason for deletion and that Wikipedia should not have an article on the topic. Wikipedia is by its nature a tertiary source that provides a survey of information already the subject of publication in the wider world. Accordingly, we require that information be verifiable in reliable sources, that topics demonstrate notability, and that articles do not engage in original research. In sum, Wikipedia is never the proper place for first publication of new things, no matter how exciting, novel and worthy one might think they are, because of the type of reference work an encyclopedia is.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Mick Murphy
I, Burlington Bert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Burlington Bert (talk) 15:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
User:Dratslab/Brian Alabaster
I, Dratslab, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dratslab (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Talkwalker
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 213.135.239.28 (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Legacy Devers Eye Institute
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jtrosenb (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
File:StagecoachGroup.svg
I reclassified it as free only in En wiki, not Commons. Previous versions should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 04:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done Though previous version looks to be the same as the visible version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
File:FromGenesistoRevelation.jpg
Same for this one. -George Ho (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done restored the oldest higher res version. The other versions are worse. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
File:New Order Movement Cover.jpg
And this one. -George Ho (talk) 04:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Please Myself pink cover.jpg
I reclassified the image as free to use only in English Wikipedia, not Commons. Previous revisions should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
