Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 233
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 230 | Archive 231 | Archive 232 | Archive 233 | Archive 234 | Archive 235 | → | Archive 240 |
Dear Wikipedia Members, Please may I request you to undelete the page INTERNATIONAL_SOCIETY_FOR_KRISHNA_CONSCIOUSNESS with url https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTERNATIONAL_SOCIETY_FOR_KRISHNA_CONSCIOUSNESS I wrote in the last 24 hours.
(1) My username at the time INTERNATIONALSOCIETY was one of the grounds for deletion according to member 331dot, although I cannot see why this generic descriptive username was a problem, I have changed my username to Cyan4 and this was accepted by Wikipedia process.
(2) The other grounds by two other members was the page name "INTERNATIONAL_SOCIETY_FOR_KRISHNA_CONSCIOUSNESS" sans content was same as "International_Society_for_Krishna_Consciousness" and my account was blocked. I went through unblock process and was unblocked from contributing by another member Boing! said Zebedee, thank you.
(i) Please tell where my deleted content kept has been filed because I cannot find it Wikipedia archives or please email to my account email address.
(ii) Please may I request you to undelete page name "INTERNATIONAL_SOCIETY_FOR_KRISHNA_CONSCIOUSNESS" I wrote in in the last 24 hours because even though from non-upper and non-lower case differentiation the two pages "INTERNATIONAL_SOCIETY_FOR_KRISHNA_CONSCIOUSNESS" and "International_Society_for_Krishna_Consciousness" verbally sound same, there is an unique and unusual distinction between them from a written perspective and legal document perspective. This was mentioned in the contribution. The distinction is basically "INTERNATIONAL_SOCIETY_FOR_KRISHNA_CONSCIOUSNESS" is non-corporatized descriptive and means everyone including animals and what-not, whilst "International_Society_for_Krishna_Consciousness" is corporatized to a 501(c) organization founded in NYC in 1966. Because Wikipedia page name system has upper and lower case sensitivity this very much helps in explaining the distinction and removing the ambiguity. -Cyan4 (talk) 16:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Differentiation by using all CAPS is meaningless and not acceptable here Legacypac (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please show evidence in the Wikipedia rules about your claim. If email addresses can be case sensitive, why cannot Wikipedia page names? Cyan4 (talk) 22:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- We don't need to point to a rule when common sense dictates otherwise. The only reason you want this name is because you're attempting to confuse the two or borrow their credibility for not-entirely-kosher reasons. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- No it is not any of what you have said, I wish to clarify something which has been ignored, the initial Dr for Doctor and intial DR for drive or someone's initials does not mean they are the same. I am at a public computer and have not signed into Wikipedia account.
- Please show evidence in the Wikipedia rules about your claim. If email addresses can be case sensitive, why cannot Wikipedia page names? Cyan4 (talk) 22:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Differentiation by using all CAPS is meaningless and not acceptable here Legacypac (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
~~
- We do not permit usernames which imply shared use, and I will note that 501(c), in the American tax code, is a tax-exempt charity, not a corporation. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Then suppose Wikipedia members have either username HUMANSOCIETY or surname used as username CORP, are these also banned? Any artificial person is a "body corporate". Cyan4 (talk) 22:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Then we should also suppose that your attempt to use Wikipedia to advertise is doomed to fail. I'm not playing your Socratic game. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand your argument. I am at a public computer and have not signed into Wikipedia account.
- Then we should also suppose that your attempt to use Wikipedia to advertise is doomed to fail. I'm not playing your Socratic game. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Then suppose Wikipedia members have either username HUMANSOCIETY or surname used as username CORP, are these also banned? Any artificial person is a "body corporate". Cyan4 (talk) 22:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- We do not permit usernames which imply shared use, and I will note that 501(c), in the American tax code, is a tax-exempt charity, not a corporation. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
~~
Tim D'Annunzio
Can this please be restored to my userspace as User:Edgarde/Tim D'Annunzio? D'Annunzio is a borderline notable figure who failed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim D'Annunzio because despite his perennial political candidacies he has never held office, and probably won't ever. Aside from that, his privately-produced anti-Obama commercials received a smattering of national notice a few years back—perhaps one day there will be an encyclopedic reason for his inclusion.
Please let me know if this is the wrong forum for this type of request. -edg ☺ ☭ 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Edgarde: Hi! This actually is the wrong forum, since it was deleted at AfD by Michig. You'd have to ask him if he'd restore it first, which he might do since all you're asking for is userfication and the article would likely merit recreation if he wins the election in November. I've pinged Michig here so he can see this request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Madonna-True-Blue-5380.jpg
Previously used in True Blue (Madonna song), but replaced unfairly by sock's PNG. -George Ho (talk) 01:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Done Please use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Softing
I, Tomione, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The article needs to be revived as the german company page already exists in german wiki and in immediate need of an english version -Tomione (talk) 10:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomione: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Inclined lithography
I, Eysenor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eysenor (talk) 12:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Eysenor: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:BookXcess
Meraad (talk) 13:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Meraad: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Alva
I, TBSheets, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TBSheets (talk) 15:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @TBSheets:
Declined pending further information. This was undeleted last October after after this request, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 22:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Michael Ostin
I, Neekmonet cg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Neekmonet cg (talk) 19:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep researching on how to make this page better or eligible for submission but it keeps getting denied. Trying to find better online sources - if that's the issue -Neekmonet cg (talk) 19:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. :*@Neekmonet cg: I restored this last year and no one did anything to improve the page. However it was requested by an anonymous person. Any way the request is for more citations inline. You may need to use name references and then use the reference name a second or third time to support the statements. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Endsight (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)
I, Egarcia2057, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Egarcia2057 (talk) 23:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. The G13 criterion explicitly applies only to drafts, not to pages in mainspace. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- <my inappropriate rant about earlier, spammy version removed> JohnCD (talk) 09:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- @JohnCD: I edit-conflicted; looking at his userpage I believe he actually wants Draft:Endsight undeleted, but probably wasn't aware that there's a distinction between mainspace and draftspace. I was in the middle of modifying the request to reflect this when I EC'd. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Quite right - thank you, Jeremy!
- @Egarcia2057: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page Draft:Endsight has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- @JohnCD: I edit-conflicted; looking at his userpage I believe he actually wants Draft:Endsight undeleted, but probably wasn't aware that there's a distinction between mainspace and draftspace. I was in the middle of modifying the request to reflect this when I EC'd. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- <my inappropriate rant about earlier, spammy version removed> JohnCD (talk) 09:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Tori Amos Spark.jpg
Does this version of the same artwork contain "CD5 Maxi Single"? If so, I request undeletion. -George Ho (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- @George Ho: it's similar to that image, but does not contain the words "CD5 MAXI SINGLE" down the left hand side. JohnCD (talk) 09:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Astimulation/sandbox (3)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -169.229.11.155 (talk) 23:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
""I will email you a copy of the text if you enable email on your Wikipedia account"
@Astimulation: Yes check.svg Done, copy emailed, sorry for the delay. JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)"
I didn't receive it. Was it sent to my gmail account or somewhere else?
The "email address confirmation" seemed to have gone through in the Wikipedia account.
- @Astimulation:. I don't know what's going on here. I used the "Email this user" link which should send it to whatever email address you entered in the "User profile" tab under "Preferences".
- I have now sent it three times, and each time promptly got a notification that my email address had been "unsubscribed due to multiple message delivery failures" and asking me to verify it again. I didn't associate that with your message the first time, but today it happened twice more. "First time is happenstance, second time is coincidence, but third time is enemy action".
- Please check the email address you have entered under "Preferences", because there is evidently something odd about it. Best way to get the sandbox copy to you would be for you to use the "Email this user" link under "Tools" in the left-hand sidebar on my user page to send me a message, and I will reply to that. JohnCD (talk) 08:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- PS: the problem is my end, not yours. I tried emailing my alt account, with the same result. However, emails get through to me OK, so if you email me I can reply to you. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Astimulation: you should now have a copy, and possibly another lurking in your spam folder. Sorry it took so long; I have spent all morning wrestling with email sign-ups. JohnCD (talk) 13:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- PS: the problem is my end, not yours. I tried emailing my alt account, with the same result. However, emails get through to me OK, so if you email me I can reply to you. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Charanpreet Singh
The article doesn't carry any copyright material and references and sources are all authentic and work mentioned are all genuine which can be cross check with the production house as well as DVD end credits,article was up from last 2 months without any negative discussion/talks,I request you to review it and please active it again -Sonusinghmumbai (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Not doneAs I explained on my talk page there were two reasons -- this was largely a copyvio and there was a prior afd. —SpacemanSpiff 15:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
bakkali
There was a Bakkali wikipage about the history and cultural information of that particular family name in Morocco and Mediterranea. Then, when the footballer "zakaria bakkali" became popular, the page got vandalized and disappeared, with a redirection to the footballer. I would like to know if it is possible to create the bakkali page again, for cultural/ethnographic information. regards. -163.1.246.64 (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done, because there is nothing to do. All of the contribution history for the redirect article is available for anyone. All you need to do is revert back to a revision before it became a redirect. However, because an admin Xezbeth converted it to a redirect, please first explain what you want to do on that admin's talk page at User talk:Xezbeth. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Oussama Belhcen discography
This is a discography by Moroccan pop singer Oussama Belhcen -Othmanebenjelloun (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Tori Amos Cruel Raspberry Swirl.jpg
Is this version wider than the PNG version? If so, can it be undeleted? -George Ho (talk) 00:24, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Or maybe this image? --George Ho (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is a completely different image. The deleted .jpg is 325 or 800- pixels wide in a square format. The lead image still there is 316 pixels. The deleted image is like the one in Tori-Amos-Cruel-Raspberry-Swirl/master/67961, your second one, but the deleted one has the dark space trimmed off the right hand edge. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:ERP Security
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Melnikov 91 (talk) 08:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
User:Egarcia2057
Thank you for restoring my Endsight page. However There was 3 different drafts of it. The page of my user might have the complete version of what I wrote. I would like to retrieve the page from my user. Thanks! -Egarcia2057 (talk) 20:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Look in the history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:49, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Jonah Hodges
I would like for the page Jonah hodges to be re instated, all facts are true and have sources. This page is very relevent — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.122.8 (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- I was the one who originally prod'ded this--should be undeleted as a contested WP:PROD, but I plan to take it to AfD in that event if it is not quickly improved. --Finngall talk 23:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
AAL Shipping
I, 180.191.118.151, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 180.191.118.151 (talk) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Some redirects from userspace
The deletion of redirects was pointless. The Traditionalist, who moved the pages appears to have requested deletion. But that G7 request is invalid as G7 is applicable to redirects created from page move only when then the requestor also happens to be the creator of the page that was moved, which is not the case here.
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/William Birch Haldeman · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/William Creighton Woodward · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/William Henry Birkbeck · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/William Henry Santelmann · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/William Wallace Price · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Étienne de Villaret · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Roscoe Seely Conkling · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Leland Stanford Scott · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Arthur Seldon Lloyd · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Francis Xavier McQuade · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Per above -103.6.159.66 (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well... there's really no need to keep these redirects either and it's usually expected that there will be no redirects from the userspace to the mainspace. There's just really no purpose for keeping them around and deleting redirects of this nature is considered to be non-controversial. I guess one of the bigger questions here is this: what would Wikipedia really stand to gain by them being restored? I'm going to ping three people to this discussion: Sphilbrick, since he was the admin that deleted the redirects, The Traditionalist, who requested the page moves, and Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), who originally made the pages. Unless Richard particularly wants the redirects restored and/or there's a particularly strong need to have them, I don't really see where it'd be necessary to restore these redirects since the most important part (that Richard created the articles) will remain in the article's history - along with a record of where the pages originated. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think there's any value in keeping them. I have forgotten why the
tTraditionalist moved these from draft space to mainspace, but we don't want cross space redirects. I agree with TokyoGirl who pinged Richard; if he wants them restored we can discuss, but I suspect he really wants to know where they are now, and he does. There might be some nitpicking violations of the rules but there's no value to the project and having these redirects exist.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think there's any value in keeping them. I have forgotten why the
To be really honest, the only reason I requested the deletion of the redirects was that they had crowded my contributions and I wanted them removed from there. Of course this is not in any way a sufficient reason to delete them, but because, as Tokyogirl79 pointed out, we tend to delete such redirects I decided that requesting a deletion was legitimate. If Richard wants them restored, then I am not even entitled to have a say on it.--The Traditionalist (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm going to mark this as a Not done. As stated above, there's no intrinsic value to retaining these redirects and unless Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) wants them restored, there's no reason to really discuss their restoration at this point. Since Richard has edited since I pinged him to this discussion (pinging him again just in case) I'm going to assume that he's overall fine with the articles being moved to the mainspace and the redirects deleted. Again, deleting the redirects doesn't really have any direly detrimental effects since people can still tell that Richard created the articles and that they were moved from his userspace. Deleting the redirect is just routine maintenance. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Charlie Horton (footballer)
- Charlie Horton (footballer) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- This restoration was requested here by Wikielite360 and since it was a PROD, there's no reason not to - although I did move it to the userspace so he'd have more time to work on it. I'm listing this here just for the sake of records. (Note for Wikielite360 since I'm listing this here: things deleted via PROD can be restored here, but articles deleted via A7 or AfD cannot. Other deletions can be overturned here, but it depends on why/how it was deleted.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Yasha Young
I, Spilt Umber, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spilt Umber (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Spilt Umber: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Blind Shipping
Can I start over with the same page heading? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shipcustomerdirect (talk • contribs) 17:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- There'd be little point. As noted by WikiDan61 when he created the redirect, this is already covered at drop shipping. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
User:Pidgebird/The Black Chronicles: Our History as News
- User:Pidgebird/The Black Chronicles: Our History as News · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Pidgebird (talk) 20:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hoseasons
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Fionaharry (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Abt Associates
Would like to edit the page for re-submission -Patriciaj102 (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Prince doves.jpg
Standard artwork, used for most releases, including American, has no text on the front sleeve and must be undeleted. The current image is of British limited edition. -George Ho (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Ajay Trehan
I am doing a research on Background Check industry in India and found this page about AuthBridge who happen to be one the leading companies in this field because of the innovative technology they use. I edited the page and moved the page because the name was not spelled correctly. I added more information that came out as promotional. I did not intend to promote the company in any way nor am I related to them. I had read some articles about Ajay Trehan and his contribution to innovating this industry. I created a page not to promote him but the innovations he has created. i would like to request this page be restored and I will rewrite this content -Mouris Bashir (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done This was the wrong place to make this request. (See the notice at the top of the page, which says "Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here.".) However, I have restored the article and moved it to Draft:Ajay Trehan to allow a chance for improvement. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done Looking further, I have now found that the article infringed copyright, so I have deleted it again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Chasing the Rain Movie
We have additional information and supporting details to add to the entry and resubmit for approval. -JBennett1054 (talk) 20:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Pacific forest trust
I got discouraged trying to provide sufficient verifiable sources for acceptance and allowed my draft to lapse. I have some new sources and would like to try again -Perrydigm (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Reza Nourbakhsh
Please check Draft: Reza Nourbakhsh -طرفدار محیط زیست (talk) 09:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- @طرفدار محیط زیست: please do not make so many copies of this page, it only causes confusion. I have deleted Template:USER SANDBOX and User:طرفدار محیط زیست/sandbox, and merged the history of Draft:Reza nourbakhsh (small "n") into Draft:Reza Nourbakhsh, which is now in the queue for review. Please edit that page as necessary, but do not make any more copies. JohnCD (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:I Conscious
I, Jahfire, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it by adding more sources. At that point, I plan to resubmit. Thank you very much! Jahfire (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
George Georgallidis
retrieving expired PROD deletion -Prisencolin (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. References must be added Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Team SoloMid
retrieving CSD G13 -Prisencolin (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- I meant to request that the ages edit history be restored to the associates aericle, which is currently in aericle space, if this is possible.--~~
List of Fnatic achievements
retrieving expired PROD -Prisencolin (talk) 22:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Sebastian Fors
retrieving A7 -Prisencolin (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done This will need more work to save it from other kinds of deletion though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
List of courthouses in the United States
The article was deleted at the conclusion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of courthouse buildings in the United States: A, as the version of article seemed inadequate and its place in a larger system was not clear. List of courthouses is now established, and needs to link out to a list of the U.S. courthouses alone. I wish to develop the topic properly. To be clear, I wish for the longstanding article with its full edit history of development, not merely a redirect from one former name to another (it was moved back and forth between "List of courthouses in the United States" and "List of courthouse buildings in the United States:A"). Please move to Draft:List of courthouses in the United States. Thanks in advance. -doncram 00:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. REFUND explicitly is not for undeleting pages that were deleted after discussion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Can you read what's written on the top of this page? It says "This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied ...". Please find other things to do rather than unnecessary clerk admin boards. 103.6.159.87 (talk) 12:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think the I.P. editor is addressing Jéské Couriano, not me. --doncram 21:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I did read the instructions on this page and concluded that this is the right place to request the undeletion. I do not request return of the article to mainspace. Is it confusing that I asked for the article to be put in Draftspace? It would be fine if it were directly userfied to me instead, which I guess would then be to put it at User:Doncram/List of courthouses in the United States. --doncram 21:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Can you read what's written on the top of this page? It says "This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied ...". Please find other things to do rather than unnecessary clerk admin boards. 103.6.159.87 (talk) 12:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I as the deleter am OK with userfying this. Sandstein 07:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done. @Doncram: That page was a redirect, but I found the actual list and have userfied it to User:Doncram/List of courthouse buildings in the United States: A. JohnCD (talk) 08:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! And I am developing it at Draft:List of courthouses in the United States, with some discussion at Draft talk:List of courthouses in the United States. --doncram 23:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
_Madonna.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
File:Northwaydramatics.jpg
Missed the request for copyright info. Can now add this -Mark Nesbitt (talk) 10:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Marknesbitt: Done, image restored, but it will be deleted again in a week if the permissions or copyright information isn't added by then. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Template:Van Canto
Please userfy to User:Jax 0677/Template:Van Canto, as there are NOW five Van Canto albums. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677: Done, userfied to User:Jax 0677/Template:Van Canto. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
workers101
Dear Sir,Madam I am creating the page for my client website [1] all the things which i have mention in wikipedia page is correct and its about site and its ceo. Sir if there is any verification required then i will be able to do that but as request please undelete that page so that i will start working to add content on it -Piyush5767 (talk) 18:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Motorcycle safety/Workpage
This talk page was deleted because Motorcycle safety/Workpage was deleted as a redirect to it. It was then recreated by Brianhe. Both the version deleted 10:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC) by Casliber and the version deleted 04:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC) by Fastily should be restored. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think it's necessary. The recent workpages were just placeholders. I'm waiting for a new editor to respond to my request to use the workpage instead of the talkpage for new content. - Brianhe (talk) 01:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Affan M Quddus
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Affan M Quddus (talk) 14:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Mr. Stradivarius (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
wakatime
this page was deleted when it was used as the link from the Comparison of Time Tracking Software page, it's not spammy or advertising just listing in the comparison table. -Codumon (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
LA Trump
A page was created called LA Trump which provided information about LA Trump which is a non partisan, non profit group of supporters of the 2016 Donald Trump for President Campaign in Southern California. It is an officially recognized group by the Trump Campaign. The deleting administrator stated that it was "advertising" however it was written to be objective and informational, not promotional in anyway. Will you please reconsider the deletion and restore the page. If modifications need to be made we will certainly do so. Thank you -Laykin (talk) 02:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Maile66 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
- @Laykin: Personally, I would have deleted it in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 because the article contained no credible assertion of importance as to why that organization deserves an article in Wikipedia. Either way, it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page.
- As to notability, remember that mere existence doesn't qualify, and the organization doesn't inherit notability from its namesake. See WP:CORP for criteria an organization must meet before it merits an article here. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Windows 2000 Server.png
This was apparently supposed to be the main screenshot for the Windows 2000 article until an administrator deleted it just before it was added to the article. -Mdrnpndr (talk) 16:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Can someone please do this ASAP? This major article has been without a main screenshot for far too long. Mdrnpndr (talk) 22:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Please use it as soon as possible, else it will expire again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Luke Cutforth
Subject has since become a figure of public interest, has varied accolades with verifiable sources. Since deletion has become a BBC Radio 1 radio host and feature film director as well as public figure. Is cited in many other Wikipedia articles such as The Internet Takeover, [[Evan Edinger], [Michael Buckley]], Liam Dryden. I am unaware of the contents of the deleted Wikipedia page but am keen to re-write as I have followed his work for several years and wished to update the personal life section of his Wikipedia, when I found it deleted. Would also be keen to be sent the page's source to aid in my re-write. -Dtiz1 (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Dtiz1: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Cutforth (2nd nomination). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Turned into a draft at Draft:Luke Cutforth. Both this and the talk have a big history to examine too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Severelevels.jpg
Used in a DEFCON template. -Terra ❤ 01:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Apricot Clothing
I, Xeepo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Xeepo (talk) 22:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Ira Tiffen
The page was deleted because it said It didnt say why the person was of any importance, and it was deleted right after I updated it, showing everything that is needed, and should not have been deleted. -Adotchar (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done I have move this to Draft:Ira Tiffen. Importance is still not very clear. Independent references are what we need. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Audio Network
Company page, unsure why it was deleted -87.236.135.41 (talk) 08:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Network, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user King of Hearts (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Goo Technologies
I, Schteppe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Schteppe (talk) 08:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Goo Create
I, Schteppe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Schteppe (talk) 08:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Urban traffic modeling
This page was intended to be published. A forgotten step in the process.
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jvdurieu (talk) 08:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have also declined, as you need to write some content first! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:ApricotClothing
I, Xeepo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Xeepo (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The draft article was deleted due to being incomplete and unedited in several months. I would like to undelete this article and continue to improve it with a view to being successfully sent live at a later date -Xeepo (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- There was no such draft, but if you look above, I have already restored one called Draft:Apricot Clothing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Rengô kantai shirei chôkan Yamamoto Isoroku poster.jpg
- File:Rengô kantai shirei chôkan Yamamoto Isoroku poster.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Two hundred horizontal pixels is a little too small to fit in the infobox. If you can undelete the previous revision, I'll try to have it shrunk to a small but better size. -George Ho (talk) 07:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done See if you like the older one, and then requested deletion of the reduced size. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Malla chandra shekhar
MY PAGE AND ARTICLE IS biography of a living person TRUELY -Sekharsekhar (talk) 16:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. —C.Fred (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Star Ocean First Departure.jpg
I want this undeleted, so I can reuse it at Star Ocean (video game). Then I will put this and the other image at FFD soon, so consensus can decide which one should be in the main infobox. -George Ho (talk) 18:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Yiliang (Peter) "Doublelift" Peng
retrieving speedy deleted page, requesting that page history be merged into Doublelift -Prisencolin (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
I did not realize the page I created was in violation of rules. I don't see the purpose of a "user" page if the user cannot talk about themselves. What are you supposed to but talk about yourself?? I know that no one else is allowed to create a user page but the user so this deletion makes no sense to me.
I would like to at least have a chance to download what I wrote so I can put it elsewhere. I'm sure that my page did not draw any bandwidth on your servers.
I've enjoyed using wiki and donated money to the cause and certainly feel that I will continue donating in the future but I do want a copy of my writing.
Thank you. -ChristianAnarchist (talk) 00:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Look in the history to see what you wrote [2] Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Wafflecus (comics)
I, Jstncrdible, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jstncrdible (talk) 00:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Are you KC Anderson? As File:Wafflecus (comics) first issue cover.jpg seems to suggest that. If so we probably need a proof to make sure no one is ripping off KC Anderson's copyright. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
_first_issue_cover.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Promo Direct
The page deleted because, it has created through company email address and need a COI. I contacted the user who flagged this issue and seek help on how to add COI, but I did not get any reply. I have also added different citation for company's authenticity. Kindly consider my request. -SusanSmi (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done@SusanSmi: actually the article was not deleted because of your email or COI it was deleted after the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promo Direct took place. The consensus was that the company did not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for companies. Articles deleted through discussion cannot be restored here. If you feel this was in error you may try an discuss this with the deleting admin Sarahj2107 (talk · contribs · count · logs) or if that does not work for you you may try deletion review. I will say that both of those options are probably not going to lead to restoration of the article to the main space, if you are intent on working on this article I would suggest you start again at Draft:Promo Direct and you may ask if Sarahj2107 will userfy it. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
AdroitLogic
Article was reedited after the first deletion. Added more 3rd party citations since lacking it was the issue for proposal for deletion at first time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imekez (talk • contribs) 15:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that REFUND admins will not unilaterally restore pages deleted at WP:Articles for deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 15:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I, Etlipman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Etlipman (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This draft hasn't been deleted, Etlipman. It has been nominated for speedy deletion, and there are instructions on how to contest this on the speedy deletion template. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)