Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 290
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 285 | ← | Archive 288 | Archive 289 | Archive 290 | Archive 291 | Archive 292 | → | Archive 295 |
Domenic Johansson
I'm requesting an undelete of [Domenic Johansson] for the following reasons:
• The original deletion reason doesn't make sense. The page was deleted for G8 - that's “dependency on a non-existant page”. However, there is no way how this reason could apply to a normal article page.
• I believe the deletion was in error.
• User:INeverCry who deleted the article in 2013 has been banned from all Wikimedia projects for sockpuppetry.
• I consider the subject of the article relevant; I can't tell if the content of the article meets WP quality standards but it can be improved once it's restored.
—Dynam1te3 (talk) 13:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, I just learned that the page in question is just a redirect and that the article I'm looking for has been restored to user namespace. Link: User:StAnselm/Domenic_Johansson_custody_case - I'd like to withdraw my request. -- Dynam1te3 (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- How the heck do I withdraw my undelete request??? -- Dynam1te3 (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think you just did, you can remove this section if you like.
Not done for the record. Hut 8.5 18:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think you just did, you can remove this section if you like.
- How the heck do I withdraw my undelete request??? -- Dynam1te3 (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Cash-flow return on investment
From a quick search for sources it seems that cash flow return on investment (CFROI) is a common term in accounting terminology that easily meets GNG. The PROD argument that the term should not be in an encyclopedia because it is only found "in a [sic] economics book" is flawed. Please restore to User:Sam Sailor/Drafts/Cash-flow return on investment. (In case of follow up questions, please ping.) —Sam Sailor 15:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Could do with references though. Hut 8.5 19:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Guide to Iceland
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Bird flying high (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. —Kusma (t·c) 15:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
User:Eazaran/Giliapps
I, Eazaran, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eazaran (talk) 20:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Context Logic Inc.
I do not know who requested the G7 deletion; however, it would be nice if the article was moved to the draft namespace so I can update and expand it, as they are one of the highest valued startup companies. —Daylen (talk) 02:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- The writer, Tbb 911 requested deletion. They appear to be active so you can ask the reason for G7. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- There wasn't actually very much text there (one paragraph), it wouldn't get you much further than starting from scratch. Hut 8.5 21:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Kopparapu Sodara Kavulu
I was not given a notice of delete of my edits to this Content. All my edits were deleted without a notice for improvement. I would like to treat the content again as required for wikipolicies. —CSHN Murthy (talk) 01:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- @CSHN Murthy: Not done, nothing to do. The article is not deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Actually the requestors contributions were undone and revision deleted with this comment: "Remove nauseated, cloying gooey content before". Another editor thought it was advertising. Instead of deletion the edits were removed. You can discuss this with user talk:Dlohcierekim if you wish. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Do not undelete:--See my reply below.He is trying to game the system.Winged Blades Godric 05:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- I restored one pre clean up version for ref's retrieval. The rest of the content was not retrievable as being hopelessly POV. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- @CSHN Murthy: the article is now at Draft:Kopparapu Sodara Kavulu. Please work on it there, and submit it for review when you believe it meets Wikipedia standards for neutrality and notability. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
China's Four Most Handsome Men (6)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —126.159.226.105 (talk) 14:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China's Four Most Handsome Men, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The request will be denied on this page no matter how many times you make it. —Kusma (t·c) 15:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- As you have been told repeatedly, WP:Deletion review is the proper venue to challenge an AfD deletion. I have not seen any earnest attempts to litigate the issue there yet, just a bunch of meatpuppetry from r/aznidentity. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:BuzzConf
I, Mattcen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattcen (talk) 23:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/H. Reeves-Smith
I, Davidbrookesland, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Davidbrookesland (talk) 08:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
My original article from 2012 i have lost. Another page of the same title has been since created by someone else. I want to see my original for comparison only. With thanks,
--Davidbrookesland (talk) 08:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I also "declined" it due to H. Reeves-Smith. You can also improve that page too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Donga Science
i was just too busy.This magazine is quite popular magzine in Korea about science. It talks about science issues,... It is longest science magazine thats ever in Korea. Its' site is http://dongascience.donga.com/ and you can learn about this little bit in ko.wikipedia or namu wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk) 10:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC) Draft:Donga Science — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Otha D. Smith Jr.
Carrieannsmith (talk) 14:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Carrieannsmith: My, that's an old draft. I restored it and moved it to Draft:Otha D. Smith Jr..
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
2^11
This redirect was deleted by a bot because its target had been deleted. The target now exists again, so please undelete the redirect, and then edit it to avoid a double redirect. —208.95.51.38 (talk) 15:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done, restored and revised. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
China's Four Most Handsome Men (7)
It was deleted under grounds that it was based on unfounded info, however a quick search on Google would show that there is indeed a consensus on these 4 handsome men of ancient China. The Chinese encyclopedia Baike (http://www.baike.com/wiki/%E5%8F%A4%E4%BB%A3%E5%9B%9B%E5%A4%A7%E7%BE%8E%E7%94%B7) clearly lists these 4 men. Why is the page for men deleted and not the women? Both articles were properly sourced with historical information backing it up. It seems like the decision to delete this page was hasty and quite frankly unwarranted —Fusion20 (talk) 07:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done as has been said six times previously this page was deleted through a deletion discussion and is not eligible for restoration through this page, you have to use deletion review instead, regardless of what Reddit told you. Incidentally Baike.com is not a reliable source and that will not be taken into consideration. Hut 8.5 07:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Hut 8.5: See my report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fusion20. I wondered why no one has done this yet (at least I couldn't find one). ~Anachronist (talk) 20:49, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Because they're more likely than not meatpuppets, not sockpuppets, drawn here by this /r/aznidentity thread. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Paulo Bruxellas/Miles Ranch
I, Paulo Bruxellas, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paulo Bruxellas (talk) 21:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done – this page is a copyright violation. Text is from [1]. Hut 8.5 22:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Thelakkat Kalathilthodiyil Kesavan Nayar
page showed promise as a draft. —Egaoblai (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that this has been restored twice before, but as those appear to be at the request of someone else I'm prepared to restore it again. Hut 8.5 22:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Traci Kochendorfer
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —66.213.105.3 (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC) This page is a bio page of a celebrity actress known person and was put on in past by original wiki editors and was later vandalised by several no name other country editors who attacked her personally under JoeDecker and another it was filed in complaint by legal to the foundation and they were supposed to delete fire the editor who vandalized the article for she is connected to several known films, magazines, music and other wikipedia articles. and were compensated and also donated to this wikipedia donation. in part this still hasn't been done most recently another full page article on a known awarded magazine who also had her name on it was vandalized. this is our official cease and desist order on defaming and degrading this known person life and achievements for she is known worldwide for her achievements not to include served under armed forces sponsorships. And this must stop. asap.
- (Non-administrator comment) See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traci Kochendorfer. Same IP made another undeletion request in July--all of the IP's edits in 2017 were attempts to add this subject to Wikipedia in various places, excepting a couple of instances of outright vandalism. --Finngall talk 02:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done As this was deleted through a deletion discussion requests to overturn the deletion will have to go to deletion review. The requester has unsurprisingly been blocked for issuing legal threats. Hut 8.5 22:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
User:Fergus Cloughley/sandbox
I, Fergus Cloughley, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fergus Cloughley (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Routee
I, Dkatsioulas, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dkatsioulas (talk) 16:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 16:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:The Kyan and Koko Series
185.69.145.109 (talk) 10:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- It looks like the intent of the IP was a draft about the Kyan and Koko series. I've repaired the request and am investigating. —C.Fred (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 16:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Dirk Hamilton
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —47.156.26.203 (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC) Dirk Hamilton is a relevant singer/songwriter with 18 individual albums in his recording catalog distributed worldwide. His music is available to purchase on all internet outlets, including ITunes and Amazon. His music is available for listening on all radio stations, live and streaming. He is still recording and performing live worldwide. His Wikipedia article is still available in Italy. If you are allowing other artist to remain please undelete the Dirk Hamilton Article.
Thank you
- (Non-administrator comment) Mainspace article had previously been moved to Draft:Dirk Hamilton, which still exists. --Finngall talk 07:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done There is a draft of the article at Draft:Dirk Hamilton. Please work on making that page comply with Wikipedia policies. Once it does, then the article can be moved back to mainspace. —C.Fred (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Grant Macdonald (Silversmiths) Limited
We have been working to get this in-line with Wikipedia policies and are keen to ensure it reads as requested. Grant Macdonald silversmiths are of historical importance (they are mentioned in other Wikipedia articles such as Dresden's Our Lady Church for their work on the dome reconstruction), and have the Royal Warrant for services to HRH Prince of Wales. They produce items for the historically important livery companies of London. We do not want this to be an 'ad' but a factual article to express their history which is part of the tradition of gold and silversmithing in London and globally. Any help to ensure we can do this really would be appreciated. —Toomuchfranking (talk) 10:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Toomuchfranking: I have moved the article back to Draft:Grant Macdonald (Silversmiths) Limited. Please don't move it to main space yourself. Because you apparently have a WP:Conflict of interest, the correct procedure is not for you to decide unilaterally that your article should be published in main space, but rather to submit it for review. Draft space is the only place where a COI editor can make substantive changes — and moving a draft to main space constitutes a substantive change. You may click on the button at the top of the draft to do that.
- Furthermore, there is no way to "ensure it reads as requested" because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Articles are protected only if they experience disruptive editing or content disputes. If you want complete editorial control over the content, you need to publish it somewhere else, not on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Since the article has been moved to draft space, the correct procedure is to submit the draft for review through the AFC process. —C.Fred (talk) 16:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft: Workers' Councils
possibly notable —Atlantic306 (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
China's Four Most Handsome Men (8)
I think this page was fine as it was, please undelete this page! There was no profanity, and the content is quite useful and interesting when it comes to Chinese History. There is already a Four Beauties page on China's four most beautiful women, so there should also be a page for men. The China's Four Most Handsome Men page was deleted as a mistake or in spite. —149.162.28.131 (talk) 19:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done As has been said seven times already to people coming from Reddit, this page was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion and requests for restoration should be taken to deletion review and not this page. And no, this page was not deleted by mistake or in spite, or out of some sort of sexism, it was deleted because people didn't think this was a particularly notable combination of people (in contrast to the Four Beauties page). Hut 8.5 19:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Jordan Lawson
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —76.169.103.210 (talk) 12:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC) The page for actor and musician Jordan Lawson should be undeleted and put back on Wikipedia. This person’s performances, publicity, status, etc is significant for Wikipedia and it was a page on the site for a long time until someone requested it to be deleted. Probably an outside user from Wikipedia. The Jordan Lawson page should be re added to the site and the person/performer is a well known artist and continuing to grow in popularity. Thank you
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Lawson, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Edgar181 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 12:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
MC Steppa
This is a current and historically important MC from the UK Rave/ Hardcore and D&B scene. There are more articles that can be listed on this page to improve the original copy "Save page" button below —86.148.71.65 (talk) 09:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Steppa, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:The origin and history behind the dialogue in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (1971 film)
- Draft:The origin and history behind the dialogue in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (1971 film) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, WonkaNerd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WonkaNerd (talk) 05:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:The Heretics (film)
I, Juanitavid, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Juanitavid (talk) 20:16, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Joan Does Dynasty (film)
I, Juanitavid, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Juanitavid (talk) 20:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that you will ahve to start writing from scratch, as material copioed from web sites is not acceptable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Adam Woodage
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jascleeter122 (talk) 09:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 11:08, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
keith jolie
This is the page for an active recording (music) artist (me) and I exist and had met the criteria listed for external sources, since I can't find any trace of the page now I don't know why the page was deleted —Kjolie (talk) 02:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Jolie, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Orange Mike | Talk 03:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Ching Miao
I'm changing my mind. Notable actor. —Timmyshin (talk) 05:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Igor Sill
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —184.105.173.194 (talk) 18:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Putative article text deleted. Most recent iteration of the article under this title was deleted by PROD in 2008. As far as I can tell without the tools, there doesn't appear to have been any subsequent attempt at creating a draft. --Finngall talk 19:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Callum Mouncey
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Callum Mouncey · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Jacknstock, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jack N. Stock (talk) 03:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Botmetric
Kindly restore the page so that I can edit the content as per Wikipedia guidelines. —Rkunal (talk) 07:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:09, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
China's Four Most Handsome Men (9)
It got deleted without any reason. —Nufu88 (talk) 19:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done As with the eight previous requests this needs to be taken to deletion review, and it wasn't deleted for no reason. Hut 8.5 19:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Hut8.5: Is it alright if we just revert off any further requests for undeletion of this page in particular? I'm getting the feeling that we'd be wasting time explaining things to drive-by accounts who are unlikely to edit Wikipedia other than to help spam this request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think they're probably going to die off, but if they continue that sounds like a good idea. Hut 8.5 11:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know how many of these accounts are meatpuppets, but I'd like to point out this particular article was created by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xdeluna. Timmyshin (talk) 05:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Each and every request has been done by a meatpuppet from Reddit, as r/aznidentity took exception to the article's deletion. I don't think they know who Xdeluna is. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Jéské Couriano: @Hut 8.5: This is actually the 10th request, not the 9th, because I had reverted one of them a few days ago. I'm all in favor of reverting these on sight from now on. These are drive-bys sent here by a Reddit thread, they won't read the response, they won't respond, so let's not waste our time with them. I opened a SPI on this (see request 7 above) and it was closed as not actionable. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think they're probably going to die off, but if they continue that sounds like a good idea. Hut 8.5 11:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Hut8.5: Is it alright if we just revert off any further requests for undeletion of this page in particular? I'm getting the feeling that we'd be wasting time explaining things to drive-by accounts who are unlikely to edit Wikipedia other than to help spam this request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season
I, Dim. Nor. 86, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dim. Nor. 86 (talk) 14:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Sevn Thomas
I, 76.79.198.90, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.79.198.90 (talk) 08:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Cope knight bonesharps.png
File was deleted as orphaned NFC in 2013, but its orphaning was due to a broken edit, and it should have still been in use. The deleting admin Mark Arsten doesn't appear to be very active, so I'm asking here. —Paul_012 (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Gustav Rehberger.jpg
Nonfree image of bio subject. Deleted when a supposedly free alternative was uploaded to Commons. The alternative image, however, has since been deleted from Commons as nonfree. —The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC) The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Lu Shan (actress)
Page has been improved well —CO16 (talk) 18:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- This page has never been deleted. Hut 8.5 21:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- We sill need references that have substantial content about the actress, as the film pages do not have much. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Quectel Wireless Solutions
I, Ashleyliu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashleyliu (talk) 01:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Sugar (Nancy Sinatra album)
The article was deleted per WP:CSD#A1. I would like to improve the article. —153.164.179.125 (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- The content was 'Nancy Sinatra did her best as a Jazz singer, in her own way, in the c.d. "Sugar"' by Sicodelia65, so not so useful. so how about you start again with Draft:Sugar (Nancy Sinatra album) . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Miss Intercontinental 2017
The page which is about a beauty pageant is not less significant than Miss Globe and so it is enough to stand alone as an article in Wikipedia. —Arsh 18 (talk) 06:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- The page is not yet deleted, but you can remove the prod template at the top if you do not want it deleted. Use the edit source tab to take out the proposed deletion notice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Zong Zijie
Improved article —CO16 (talk) 09:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Well you could talk to the deleting admin, user talk:Czar about this. However the references have gone worse, and notability was not proven any more than at the time of the afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amos Lim (2nd nomination). So resoting as an aricle is unlikely. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Yeri (singer)
Singer is well known and article has been improved better. —CO16 (talk) 17:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Page live/Draftified The redirect has what appears to be the full article's history. What few deletions are on the article are history merges for preservation of edits. I don't think there's much of anything to do here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:The Southwell Company
I, Beveritttx, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SouthwellCo 17:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Was in large part a copyvio of [2] and I suspect the remainder might be copyvio as well. Hut 8.5 22:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Alex Tsitsopoulos
This Australian actor has a number of acting credits to his name so deserves to have to have the article on wikipedia restored —J Bar (talk) 21:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done I don't think this deletion was valid in the first place as it wasn't requested by the article creator. Hut 8.5 22:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Sheldon Charrett
I, BudJillett, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BudJillett (talk) 00:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Cinda McCain
I, 66.31.26.32, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.31.26.32 (talk) 00:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Joelle Novey
I, EAWH, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. EAWH (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Billy Farrell (music producer)
I, Globalmediamakers, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Globalmediamakers (talk) 20:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
ePUAP
Content was in PD. See talk for details. —RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 15:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- You should ask the deleter user talk: Anthony Bradbury. The copied page was https://epuap.gov.pl/wps/portal/english. Just because Template:PD-PolishGov exists, does not convince me, but if the Polish government claims this on their web site, perhaps you can prove that it applies to the content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- It's done now. But just to note, did you read the content of this template? Almost all work by Polish govt are always in PD, even if otherwise stated. Polish govt doesn't have to place anything on their website and I don't need to prove anything. --RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 15:05, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Samesi.jpeg
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Kunal Maurya 17:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done
- @Kunal Maurya: I see that you have found Wikimedia Commons and have uploaded File:Market in Samesi.jpg there, as well as inserted it into the article at Samesi. Wikipedia requires copyright licensing information. Since this file was deleted for lack of license information it cannot be restored without you adding it. I suggest that you continue using the upload process at Commons:Special:UploadWizard because that is the easiest way to make the correct notes on your uploads. Reply here if you have something more to say about this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Nakhavaly Brothers
The wording will be edited and differed from INDABA description in order to respect the copyright of INDABA page —Kolefon (talk) 11:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done
- @Kolefon: This text was deleted because it is copyrighted. Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted text even if you plan to edit and change it. Please write something new outside of Wikipedia, then feel free to paste your text into a new article. You may wish to start at Draft:Nakhavaly Brothers so that you can edit it and get feedback before publishing it into the encyclopedia. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:34, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Book tour
This was previously prod'ed. I want to see the deleted content and page history. Could you please userfy this to User:bluerasberry/Book tour? Thanks. — Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Bluerasberry/Book tour. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I looked it over and there is nothing to salvage. I CSD'd it and then made book tour a live article starting fresh. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Deidre Costello (actress)
I simply couldn't believe she had even been considered for deletion. 89 separate credits on IMDB; a key member of the cast of I didn't know you cared. No wonder Wikipedia is not always given the credit it deserves. A shocking omission!Bashereyre (talk) 15:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Bashereyre: Where is the deletion discussion? I see nothing at Deidre Costello. What makes you think someone deleted this? If this article has never been written then of course you can start it. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Bluerasberry: Because it was misspelt.
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. IMDb is not an acceptable source, and we don't accept notability-by-osmosis as an argument. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Surely when considering the deletion of an article it would be appropriate to see if editors who regularly and consistently edit articles about related subjects (in this case acting, british television, situation comedies) rate this as a suitable article for WP. What seems to have happened here is that no-one in the deletion debates has those skills. WP is not perfect, but in this case the The Wisdom of Crowds\wisdom of crowds has not worked. Bashereyre (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Did you read the deletion debate at all? All that matters is whether Wikipedia's core inclusion criteria (WP:Notability and/or WP:NACTOR in this case) are met. The AfD ran for almost a month and was relisted three times. If nobody came out to try and defend it, it's on them for not paying attention. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Surely when considering the deletion of an article it would be appropriate to see if editors who regularly and consistently edit articles about related subjects (in this case acting, british television, situation comedies) rate this as a suitable article for WP. What seems to have happened here is that no-one in the deletion debates has those skills. WP is not perfect, but in this case the The Wisdom of Crowds\wisdom of crowds has not worked. Bashereyre (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deirdre Costello (actress), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 14:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Zoe Strimpel
This page was deleted because in May 2015, the subject did not meet the requirement of notability for authors. Since then, Zoe Strimpel has been writing as full time columnist for the Telegraph in the UK. This makes her notable notable by Wikipedia's standards. —Rgonsalv (talk) 01:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I'm not at all sure that writing as a columnist makes someone notable, BTW - make sure the subject passes the general notability guideline. Hut 8.5 14:55, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Benevolence in islam
Any page which has been deleted as a result of a proposed deletion can be undeleted upon request —Andrew D. (talk) 00:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done @Andrew Davidson: I've restored this but as it isn't remotely suitable for mainspace at this time I've moved it to draftspace (Draft:Benevolence in Islam) so it can be worked on as necessary. Hut 8.5 15:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Bishwo Gautam
I was editing this page during the first week of December and I did lots of changes unknowingly. This could be the reason for deletion. I am the great follower of Bishwo Gautam. Bishwo Gautam is one of the great fashion designer of Nepal and he needs this page back with same contents. —Fashionhub (talk) 21:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. He doesn't "need" this page back. We are not a billboard for people to improve their web presence. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Elf Titled
Contest PROD. The PROD rationale is no longer valid - the band article has been restored and includes several album review references, substantiating the album's stand-alone notability. —Chubbles (talk) 20:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The Advantage (album)
Contest PROD. The PROD rationale is no longer valid - the band article has been restored and includes several album review references, substantiating the album's stand-alone notability. —Chubbles (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Dharma Vish
Dharma Vish is a well known Music Composer in Bollywood and in South India and he clearly qualifies for a page. —183.82.19.242 (talk) 10:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Kuruvi poster.jpg
Restore legitimate image that was properly uploaded by me, complying with WP:FUR. —Kailash29792 (talk) 02:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792: the image was deleted because it wasn't being used in any articles. On 16 December somebody removed it from the article where it was being used (Kuruvi) and replaced it with another one. Fair use images have to be used in at least one article so your image was deleted. We can restore it if it is going to be put back in the article. Hut 8.5 17:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Delia Dolor
(no text provided) Jots07 (talk) 15:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 17:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —GugnePorcu (talk) 16:05, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
PLEASE DELETE THIS PHOTO, IT IS MINE AND I DO NOT WANT IT USED BY ANYBODY
- Done I've deleted it. For future reference if you are the sole contributor to a page and you would like it deleted then you can request that by adding {{db-author}} to it. Hut 8.5 18:00, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Mesh (band)
I'm in the middle of a long spool of red tape trying to re-establish the notability of this band, whose title is currently salted. Requesting userfication of prior content to salvage anything worthwhile, so I can source and eventually restore it. —Chubbles (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Chubbles/Mesh (band). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Babangida Sayyadi Ruma
The previous action was done by someone who get access to my system, i therefore request to publish the page again "Publish changes" button below —Zainab Bagudo (talk) 23:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done revisions restored, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babangida_Sayyadi_Ruma&action=history for your version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Babangida Ruma
the page was deleted to do lack of proper reference kindly restore it back i wanna work on it again "Publish changes" button below —Zainab Bagudo (talk) 23:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not done since it was a copyright infringement, and promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Dennis Martin
(no text provided) SupraFootwear (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)