Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 300

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Hut 8.5 in topic Draft:Heathrow Southern Railway
Archive 295←Archive 298Archive 299Archive 300Archive 301Archive 302→Archive 305

The Rinaldi Group

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I request to restore/undelete the article The Rinaldi Group. How can an article be deleted on the basis of only a single vote? Deleting the article without proper AFD discussion is very inappropriate. I was about to vote for keeping the article, but before that, the article was deleted. I believe the subject is notable and fulfills the Wikipedia's notability requirement. Also, the reason for nominating the article for deletion was just an opinion, and Wikipedia sees the facts, not an opinion. —Nausad Ahmed 20:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. The second AfD discussion was not a single !vote, and we don't use votes, we use arguments. Finally, if the concerns about the sources were just opinion, then the arguments would not have been to delete. We do have minimum standards for sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Ivan B

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Article was deleted because it did not have a credible claim of significance when the artist has videos with views of upwards of 10 million and this was listed in the article after an edit, and other songs with hundreds of thousands of views. The artist is thus, significant and important, and YouTube is a credible source. —Vargo2 (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Viet_Khang

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is a bio of real person, an artist, a musician, a song writer "Publish changes" button below —Knowledge Seeker (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Việt Khang, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 21:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Teal Swan

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I, 86.163.144.190, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.163.144.190 (talk) 20:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC) I tried contacting Peridon who was the admin that deleted it but according to his talk page he is inactive. Teal Swan is a notable author who has written The Completion Process : https://www.amazon.com/Completion-Process-Practice-Yourself-Together/dp/1401951449/ and Shadows Before Dawn: https://www.amazon.com/Completion-Process-Practice-Yourself-Together/dp/1401951449/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1522375161&sr=8-1&keywords=teal+swan both of which have substantial reviews on Amazon.com She is ranked 27th on Watkins magazine’s list of the 100 Most Spiritually Influential Living People in 2018: https://www.watkinsmagazine.com/watkins-spiritual-100-list-2018 (published both online and in print)

Her notability includes several critics: https://www.ozy.com/provocateurs/spiritual-guru-or-dangerous-cult-leader/81686 https://medium.com/@jtdabbagian/reviewing-the-completion-process-by-teal-swan-why-this-idea-is-a-bad-thing-d483592e03c https://evonews.com/business/leadership/2017/jul/03/an-insider-look-into-teal-swan-spiritual-healer-or-charismatic-cult-leader/ https://web.archive.org/web/20151107074624/http://www.jessicamystic.com/exposing-teal-scott-teal-swan-a-dangerous-spiritual-speaker.html

Although she is a polemic figure, she seems to be notable, and her youtube channel has over 400,000 subscribers: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSpiritualCatalyst

Thanks for your help and consideration ~~Seeker~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.144.190 (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Also, none of what you wrote above has any bearing on notability, unless some of the reviews you list are from notable critics. Subscribers to a YouTube channel are irrelevant to notability here. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Anachronist! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.144.190 (talk) 01:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Lawrence Anthony "Law" Fajardo

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cezartigno (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Creating Draft:Lawrence Anthony "Law" Fajardo

User:Harshrathod50/Da Funk

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I created this page yesterday and deleted it today because someone removed a non-free image from it and this userbox lost its purpose. Now I got a free-image for it and therefore want it back, thankyou. —Harsh Rathod Poke me! 07:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Thankyou! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 18:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Fusion360

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I edited this page from scratch yesterday and it has been removed and redirected to Autodesk please revert —Howe1 (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Howe1 this page hasn't been deleted, just redirected. See the page history, where your last revision is the second from the top. Lithopsian is the one who redirected the page, noting that they were doing so because it appeared that the content of the page was copied from a third party website, which isn't allowed. If you've written the article text yourself, then you may restore the page by undoing Lithopsian's edit. However, if you did copy and paste all or part of your text from a third party, you are still free to rewrite the page. You'll just need to make sure to start from scratch, writing in your own words. Cheers! Prodego talk 00:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
That was me. As noted, the article had been almost directly copied from the product website and there was essentially no saveable text. In the worst cases, copyright text will be completely removed, but in this case your original article is still present in the history. Typically product websites are copyright-protected, but even in cases where it is public domain or you are the copyright holder, it cannot be used in Wikipedia. You must write the article in your own words. Even closely paraphrasing from another source may be an issue, you can read WP:PLAGIARISM for (much!) more detail. If you do intend to rewrite the article, consider the notability criteria and promotional content guidelines. In particular, make sure you provide secondary or tertiary sources to establish notability and provide verification of claims. Lithopsian (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Saint Catherine Church of Loix

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Vloizeau, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vloizeau (talk) 17:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Vere Wynne-Jones

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. I am confused by the logs for this article. It looks like it was PRODed 3 months after a unanimous keep vote at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vere Wynne-Jones. Can anyone check if there is a good version to restore? Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 09:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC) —Biwom (talk) 09:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done @Biwom: I have restored the edit history of the article, policy does say that as this was kept at AfD it should only be deleted as the result of a future AfD and not through PROD or A7. There are a couple of revisions belonging to the first creation which was deleted as a copyvio, I haven't restored those. Hut 8.5 14:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

CREATION TUBE

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ahmed Zubayer (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Miss Krystle

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Feer53l9, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Feer53l9 (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

The Talk Show

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This page was deleted in 2005 (by a now inactive and retired admin). I have no idea what the state of the article was at that point, but there is a new article at The Talk Show (podcast) that may be related and I'd like to see the old edit history in case there are some old relevant links I can hunt down through archive.org to make sense of the early history of the podcast. I will concede that this very well could be a complete coincidence and have no information relevant to the new article, but I still would like to try. It would be great if the history of this article could be moved into my user space for a short period of time so I can see if there is any relevance to the new article. Thanks! — - PaulT+/C 12:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

  • I don't think there's any content there you can salvage as they appear to be talking about completely different topics. The podcast in the deleted article was started in December 2005 and involves "Mike" chatting about anything he likes and promoting Morgan Dollar Records, the company which makes the podcast. The article noted that the podcast "consists of blocks of programming interrupted by commercials", which it makes out to be unusual or distinctive instead of being the way almost all radio shows work. The only link cited was [1]. Hut 8.5 14:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:RootsTrust

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 84.189.207.1 (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Trent Williams

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —LCCC16 (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Trent Williams according to Sporting News is a was voted twice to their first team all pro and I believe it should be represented on his Wikipedia page because sporting news is has a legitimate vote on the all pro teams and they are also recognized by the pro football hall of fame and a certain user keeps deleting my edit on this.

Draft:Ecclesbourne_Primary_School

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jolyonroberts (talk) 01:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

I HAVE A RIGHT!

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The admin who deleted the article cited the reason given in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I HAVE A RIGHT!, which was an April Fool's Day nomination. In theory, the topic meets GNG criteria and can at least be improved and rewritten to eliminate the promotional tone. It exists on the Ukrainian Wikipedia until the title: uk:Я МАЮ ПРАВО! —««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

I have moved the content on that page to "I have a right!". Please feel free to tidy it up as needed. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 21:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
And I have deleted it. It was changed to a redirect to another page with identical content, which in turn was deleted in accordance with WP:G11, so I deleted the redirect.
Promotional material has no place in main article space. If you must work on it, do it in draft space. Also @Some Gadget Geek: be aware that what exists in the Ukraine or any other language Wikipedia is completely irrelevant here. Each Wikipedia has its own rules, and the English Wikipedia tends to have higher editorial standards for content. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Hongyuan Zha

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

User:Ziyatexie was discovered to be a paid editor. Given the fact that this user was violating Wikipedia policies, there is reason to believe the move to create the AfD of Hongyuan Zha was motivated by the personal vendetta, rather than a valid reason for deletion and an honest desire to improve Wikipedia. Reasons why it should be undeleted.

Here is a quote from Wikipedia's Valid Reasons to delete page: "An article about a notable topic that is written like an advertisement, with a promotional tone and style, but which does qualify for an article (under WP:N, the Notability policy) should not be deleted, but should be marked {ad}, notifying others to change the writing style to give it a neutral tone." Hongyuan Zha entry is not perfect but it is a notable topic about a prominent figure in search queries and query execution that is likely of interest to many readers. The existence of the Hongyuan Zha entry surely improves the Wikipedia project. —190.37.60.85 (talk) 06:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hongyuan Zha, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Yunshui (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 13:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Berkshire Flyer

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Esporn (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Please undelete "Berkshire Flyer". I will be adding content shortly. Thank you, Eddie Sporn

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Naved Aslam's page was deleted in 2015. He has since done many TV shows and gained fame. An easily accessible source for his biography and cinematic history should be available to the public. Therefore i request that his page be undeleted so it may be updated with his many works and his work be available to view by the public. —Film Fraternity (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naved Aslam, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user KTC (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 13:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
    • There is nothing stopping you from writing a new article about this person as long as you address the issues which led to the deletion of the previous one. Hut 8.5 13:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Davonte': The Beginning

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In order for the artist of this EP gets published, this page would have to get published because, it’s says on the artist’s article, that there can’t be just mentions, but there are resources linked. So I guess they mean this would have to be published first. —Kenokiyang (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

@KenokiYang:   Not done. The article was deleted in accordance with WP:A9. That means, we cannot have articles about musical works of an artist, if we don't have a Wikipedia article about that artist. If the artist fails to meet WP:MUSICBIO criteria for inclusion, we cannot have a Wikipedia article about the artist. And as a consequence, we also cannot have articles about musical works from non-notable artists. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Christine Jenkins

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, JohnTW22, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JohnTW22 (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

June Beverly Bonesteel

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, FlyladyAZ, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FlyladyAZ (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Wyoming

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Vermont

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 16:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ships Have Sailed

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Originally, this page wasn't accepted due to 'lack of notability'...in order to prove notability, we had to wait for certain things to be published, many outside of our control, hence we had to wait quite some time before revisiting the draft. At this time, we would like to revisit the draft, and provide the references that now exist as requested originally by the reviewer. —Nctrnlmpls (talk) 16:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

@Nctrnlmpls: Who, exactly, is this "we" and "our" you refer to? Is this account operated by more than one person? Have you complied with WP:PAID? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Hey, sorry yes, I worked on the submission initially with a friend who admittedly was more familiar with Wikipedia than I am personally...certainly no one is being paid to work on this submission. Apologies for the confusion.

Sita

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2405:204:4407:4C6C:B999:6BF8:8F24:6543 (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The page is not deleted, and isn't proposed to be deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
My guess is that he's trying to get his edits reinstated, since they were just reverted. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Except, this request was submitted before the IP address made any edits to that article. If he's editing while logged out, then he reverted himself. And I reverted all those edits from both as being unconstructive. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Veronica Cool

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Sdmyer98 (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

@Sdmyer98:   Not done and will not be done. The article was unambiguously promotional. There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring such an article. I see you put a paid editing disclosure on your user page and then removed it. Sorry, but this is mandatory, so I have restored it. You have a legal obligation to make that disclosure; you agreed to do so as a condition of creating your account, see Wikimedia:Terms of Use. As a paid editor, you have a conflict of interest. And as an editor with a conflict of interest, you should not create articles in main space on topics with which you are associated.
Feel free to re-create the article in draft space (e.g. Draft:Veronica Cool), and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. That is the only venue we offer for editors with a conflict of interest to get an article published. If the article is approved, the reviewer will move it to main space, after which you must refrain from making any substantive changes, but rather propose them on the article's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Spackermouse/Joseph Moran

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Spackermouse, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spackermouse (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Spackermouse (talk) 23:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Arree Chung

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) BirdieRosewell (talk) 07:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

GetSimpl

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Shamvilraza (talk) 07:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Requesting an un-delete the page. Reason being, it's a new payment method all together unlike Credit Card, Debit Card. It's a virtual ledger product which allows users to write to merchants ledger entry. Think of it as instantly approved virtual credit card.

I don't see a reason for this page to be flagged and deleted.

@Shamvilraza: Nothing you wrote above is a valid reason to override the decision to delete.
  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Ritchie333 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also, if you have an association with the subject of the article, you should create it in draft space and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If you are being compensated in any way for editing this article, you must disclose this as a condition of having an account here. See WP:PAID for details. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:ExpertCR

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(no text provided) 31.45.169.28 (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Also, the article should be written in English, otherwise it can never be accepted here. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Nick Royaards

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Benmorling, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Benmorling (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Parcel Direct Ireland

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This page showed details of the changing face of logistics in the Irish economy and the evolution of integrated ecommerce logistics for small businesses and partnerships and use of technology. Without companies like these then companies like the incumbent An Post have all the validation and relegate other companies to secondary providers and nullify there effect on the changing face of the Irish economy. Wikipedia has numerous examples of companies like these on all their pages. If one such page is to be deleted, then ALL such pages should be deleted. If new disrupters are not to be recognized, then change will not happen. This company just launched a network of parcel shops ParcelDirect Local, which will further change the face of post and courier in Ireland. this has to be recognized on WikiPedia —Jjbarni (talk) 15:43, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

That argument generally does not fly here. Every article must stand or fall on its own merits and failings. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Well, regardless of that poor rationale, it was also deleted via WP:PROD so it's eligible for restoration by request here. So...
  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
@Jéské Couriano: I went through and cleaned up promotional prose and useless citations. If you feel the article should be deleted, take it to AFD. Personally I think it's borderline, with moderate coverage in reliable sources. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Woh Kaun Thi? (2019 film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Previously I didn't have time to work on it but now I wanna resume it again. The film is gonna start principle photography soon. —Harsh Rathod Poke me! 14:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

@Harshrathod50:   Done, draft is restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:43, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Thankyou! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 02:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Chris Nichols

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I originally posted this request at the deleting admin's talk page, but noticed he is no longer an administrator as of January, so cannot help me. I believe the original deletion was probably appropriate, so DRV wouldn't be the right venue, either. Back in 2013, Chris Nichols was deleted at AfD. Assuming this 2013 article was about the columnist/author, I have several reliable third-party sources about him including a feature in Pasadena Weekly [4] and write ups/reviews of his book [5], [6], which won a 2008 Independent Publishers award [7]. I'd like to try and rescue this, would someone mind userfying it for me so I can work on it? —The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Sounds like a different person, one instantiation was about a Virginian shooter, and the other was a student at Marquette University. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Yes, that does sound like a totally different person. This can be closed. Thank you! The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 22:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  Not done - Withdrawn by requester. (non-admin closure) MarginalCost (talk) 02:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Brendanz Dystopia

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Antherius

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please undelete Draft:Antherius so we can add additional content as requested. Treynal (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

@Treynal: Who is "we"? --Finngall talk 15:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Kastus Technology

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to request the temporary restoration of this article's history. The need for the rewriting of the overly promotional material is obvious, however I would argue the notability of the topic as Kastus has been independently verified in a Nature article by it's scientific peers. This article is available in the sources section. —Caileam Raleigh (talk) 10:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. That being said, an admin might be willing to email you the contents of the lastest revision before deletion if you have a verified email attached to your Wikipedia account. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:ERP Security

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jielena, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jielena (talk) 14:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Automated negotiation

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, AutomatedNegotiation, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AutomatedNegotiation (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaan_Ali

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Mirzalisv (talk) 19:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC) This is real information I add official time of India media website references I don't know my page is delete

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Well, it's deleted now as WP:A7 and cannot be restored by request. You'd have to talk to the deleting administrator. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

List of magicians in fantasy

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page has been a source of learning about famous and different different mages and magic users and also a big source of inspiration for fantasy writers, I request that the page be restored, and if that’s not possible at least have the text of page in some way, the page was closed because it didn’t include ALL magicians as seen in deletion debate page, but there are hundreds of thousands of works of fantasy literature, mythology and legend tht include magicians and no wikipedia page can include it all —5.210.40.58 (talk) 21:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of magicians in fantasy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

2017 Women's European Amateur Boxing Championships

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It seems that some articles were deleted in error as part of a sock case. User:GeneralizationsAreBad was the clean-up admin and I've requested a review, but I just noticed that they have been inactive for over a month now (hence no response to my initial queries). The articles were deleted in error as the sock did a copy-paste move (hence making others' work appear to be his own). I believe the following articles have also been affected: World University Squash Championships, World University Orienteering Championships, IPC Nordic Skiing World Championships, IPC Alpine Skiing World Championships, IPC Biathlon and Cross-Country Skiing World Championships. Need an admin to review the history and restore articles where the true article creator was not the sock. (NB: I have only become involved in this as sock edited via IP to advise my own work was deleted in this process). —SFB 00:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

I have restored 2017 Women's European Amateur Boxing Championships , IPC Biathlon and Cross-Country Skiing World Championships, World University Squash Championships, World University Orienteering Championships, IPC Biathlon and Cross-Country Skiing World Championships. (and talk pages) The other pages were redirects that you are free to create. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: Great stuff. Thanks for the help SFB 19:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Dorri Olds

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ray Jameson, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ray Jameson (talk) 13:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

America Green Solar

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —KateMarriott1214 (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

America Green Solar is backed by credible public sources and is the only provider of solar heating in the United States. The information provided is factual, not promotional.

@KateMarriott1214: It was also not in any way ready for publication in main space, so I moved it to Draft:America Green Solar for further improvement. If you are being compensated in any way for your involvement in this article, see WP:PAID. If you have any association with this company, see WP:COI. You must disclose any association or compensation. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Testors Inc

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I found more sources in the news that I am going to add —Thegooduser Let's Chat 23:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Ba Htoo

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The page was nominated for speedy deletion CSD G5 by Matthew hk and deleted by There'sNoTime, but I've copyedited (major) a few minutes before being deleted. The article is notable and the only concern is created by sock. Thank you. --Phyo WP (message) 20:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

@Phyo WP: I think you can restart a fresh version of the article. While the "source code" and citation of the old version, which was created by sock with block evasion, you can probably obtained from somewhere else. Matthew_hk tc 12:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Heathrow Southern Railway

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I, Rappy48, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rappy48 (talk) 14:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

There's currently an article at Heathrow Southern Railway. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

I plan on using the content i had on the deleted draft to add to the existing page since i dont have a local copy saved on my PC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rappy48 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_300&oldid=1145943899"