Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 303

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Graeme Bartlett in topic User:BJHutton
Archive 300Archive 301Archive 302Archive 303Archive 304Archive 305→Archive 310

FC Luzhany

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

the article was proposed to be deleted due to its lack of supporting references, during the ongoing process of improvement, the point of discussion was turned to some other notability issues that are not mentioned in Wikipedia policies. —Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. If you're referring to WP:NFOOTY (full link: WP:Notability (sports)#Association football) it very much *is* part of Wikipedia policy. And this page is not for contesting an AfD's outcome anyway; it's only for restoring certain types of pages deleted sans debate, of which G4 is not one of them because G4 only applies if there is an existing XfD debate. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Undelete page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_Gazala

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Baby_Gazala · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Baby Gazala is an Indian, highly popular & well known child actor. Starting with Bedardi in the early 90s, she has done over 30 films, which include hit flicks like Imtihaan, Anjaam and One Two Ka Four to name a few. She has been in the industry for more than 20 years. She first started acting when she was as young as four years.

She has also starred in numerous serials like All The Best, Darna Marna and How Is That (DD-1). Besides movies and serials she has also done ads for Reliance, Tide and Brittania.

Baby Gazala has potrayed the beautiful and dumb Krithika, daughter of Shravan and Tanisha in the very popular Balaji TV series 'Kasauti Zindagi Ki'. She was last seen in the hit serial Balveer as Shatir Pari.

Please check the below links for the person on Wikipedia itself:-

The name baby Gazala is present on the following pages

1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamanna_(1997_film)

2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahin_Pyaar_Na_Ho_Jaaye_(2000_film)

3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedardi

4. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anjaam

5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunehgar_(1995_film)

6. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angaaray_(1998_film)

7. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dil_Ke_Jharoke_Main

We don't cite Wikipedia, full stop, or any other wiki for that matter. Whether or not she is name-dropped on other articles is irrelevant to whether or not she gets an article herself; see WP:Notability and in particular WP:NACTOR. You might also wish to read WP:Neutral point of view. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  Declined, because even though it was deleted via WP:PROD, it will not survive in main space if it were restored. Your request to restore the article contains the verbatim text from the article. As such, it contains unambiguous promotional puffery that would not survive a WP:G11 speedy deletion, and it contained zero references to any sources at all, therefore it was correctly deleted in accordance with WP:BLP guidelines. Because you already have the text of the article, you are welcome to start over in draft space (as in Draft:Baby Gazala) and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

A.J. Converse American Author

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, A.J.Converse, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. A.J.Converse (talk) 15:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

I strongly suggest you read WP:Autobiography. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@A.J.Converse: the deleted article contained only one short line of text. You are welcome to start over. Please read Wikipedia:Golden rule and in particular WP:NAUTHOR to get an idea of what is expected for an article to be accepted on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Jag Chima

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Sumitmpathak (talk) 12:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. Note to any admin reading this: The page is salted due to being constantly being created and deleted (generally as either A7 or G11), and there is an existing draft for the subject. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:57, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
The article is also protected from recreation. Work on it in draft space if you must. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Michael Stokes Paulsen

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Article had similar content to a scripted biography the individual uses on both work bio, publisher site, interview scripts, etc. Content was added and edited so as to not plagiarize, but some of the general content was a close paraphrase. This information is part of the individual's "scripted bio" and used across multiple sources as a base for biographical information and education history. If still in violation of Wikipedia regulations, please refund the content so that it can be changed to adhere to an acceptable standard with an explanation of which specific area was deemed unacceptable and subject to speedy deletion. —Ajprunty (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. Copyright violations are never restored, userfied, draftified, or otherwise returned to the wiki in any fashion; you need to write a completely fresh bio from scratch. If you work for the subject, you must also read this and follow the directions provided there as soon as possible. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
A "scripted bio" sounds like something the subject wrote, or at least approved of. We don't want that; we don't care what the subject has to say about themselves. We want verifiable information from impartial reliable third-party sources about the subject. If there are no such sources, then that's pretty much the definition of somebody not notable enough to have an encyclopedia article about them. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:The Lord Amulree in 1949.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

From WP:BOTN: I am not entirely sure if this is the right place to report this incident because it is more related to people not noticing that a bot made a plausible (for a bot, of course) mistake, and not about a bot malfunction. As you can see in my talk page, B-bot nominated for deletion orphaned fair-use file File:The Lord Amulree in 1949.jpg on 4 March. The file became an orphan on 1 March and was eventually deleted on 12 March at 00:00.

I prefer not to say that I am semi-retired because I wish I could be as active as I were in the past, when I edited almost every day, but the truth is I log in very sporadically at this point. I logged in after it had been deleted (ironically, the same day, 18 hours after deletion) and found many (unseen by me, with the files already deleted) of the bot's notices on orphaned fair-use files which were up for deletion. I checked them all and they were all instances of my fair-use file having been replaced by a free file except for this one, the article of which is now without an image. I went to article history and eventually found out that it was all the doing of a sloppy IP edit (diff) which removed the file by pure accident. The person who fixed the mess did not notice that there was a broken file link and just deleted everything, while nobody noticed that the orphaned file did not have an actual replacement. When I found out, I pinged the creator of the bot, B, who never answered, asking for some action to be taken. I am very baffled by this situation and finally decided to take it here. —The Traditionalist (talk) 20:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

@Explicit: Notifying you as you were the deleting admin.--The Traditionalist (talk) 20:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

John P. Janovic

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jfreije, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jfreije (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Awaken A Cappella

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 76.174.186.194, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.174.186.194 (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Sarvagatananda

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Poincare1729, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Poincare1729 (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:NGDATA (Company)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Dgaff44, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dgaff44 (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Hollis Taylor

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jochipp, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jochipp (talk) 02:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

iota (cryptocurrency)

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The article was added for speedy deletion without proper reasoning. The administrators could a) Bann users who have been vandalizing the article. b) Lock a version of the article that is sufficient and meet wikipedia standards and still provides minimum amount of commonly agreed upon information. By deleting the entire article the administrator shows either little understanding of the subject at hand or a hammer approach to an article quality problem. Id like to retrive my versions of this article and would like to further improve on my and other work. I have nothing to do with the iota foundation. Im interested in an impartial quality article to exist on Wikipedia. Please review history of article for further illumination. The cyptocurrency has been written about in major news media:

  1. Forbes [[1]]
  2. Reuter [[2]]

[[3]] 

~Badmash (talk) 12:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Not needed User:Badmash See Draft:IOTA (cryptocurrency) Capitalization matters. Legacypac (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  Not done - per Legacypac there is already an extant version of this draft at Draft:IOTA (cryptocurrency), minus the revisions that were already deleted under AfD.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Twiggle

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ycitro, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ycitro (talk) 11:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Still working on it. Would like to update. —Ycitro (talk) 12:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Michael Ventura (Entrepreneur)

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

We are not sure why this page was deleted to begin with. Would like it reinstated please as Michael is publishing a book in May and more people will be searching for context on who he is! —Sdelisser (talk) 17:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

@Sdelisser: I don't see where there was any such page (nor a Michael Ventura (entrepreneur)). That said, if he's not publishing the book until May, what are the reliable sources that have already written about him? Make sure he's sufficiently notable to have an article yet. —C.Fred (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
And Draft:Michael Ventura (Entrepreneur) was deleted upon the request of Nycjoshblack: he had created the draft, submitted it, and had it declined for lack of notability. That said, because it's a draft, it's eligible for recreation. —C.Fred (talk) 17:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Ah. Michael Ventura (entrepreneur) was not deleted; it was turned into a redirect as the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Ventura (entrepreneur). That decision will not be overturned here, although I could move the history to draft space if you want to work on it. Do you want that done, Sdelisser? —C.Fred (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Morgan Dameron

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —216.165.95.184 (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC) 1=Morgan Dameron 2=This article was deleted as a result of a nomination for being "non-notable." Clearly, the subject is notable and deserving of a page on this site. Morgan Dameron has been discussed in numerous credible places as listed on the page including the New York Times. Moreover, Star Wars: The Force Awakens character Poe Dameron was named after her, and her own independent feature film Different Flowerscan be purchased on iTunes and has been purchased for customer viewing on Lifetime.

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgan Dameron, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:B2Brazil

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Gardinerjd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gardinerjd (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

We have supporting documentation to publish the article —Gardinerjd (talk) 19:33, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 19:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Spring Break Fiji

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Am requesting to have this page be userified or emailed to me so that I can edit the page —103.247.152.126 (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

In that case you will have to have a user. Please log on and let us know under what user you want it userfied. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:IBM z/OS XL C/C++ compilers

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Xascorpio, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Xascorpio (talk) 03:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

IBM z/OS XL C/C++ compilers is a widely used C/C++ compilers on z/OS. A Wikipedia page that introduces it is of value to its users. Please restore my page so that I can refine it to get it publish. Thanks. —Xascorpio (talk) 03:08, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft talk:Xshell

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article Xshell has been restored in mainspace, so the corresponding draft talk page should be undeleted and moved to Talk:Xshell. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:Timeline Windows 10

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Because it's needed in Windows 10 articles. Although it's removed, It's still important in the Windows 10 article. —Windows 10 versions (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page appears to have been deleted under speedy deletion criterion G5, indicating a page that was created by a sockpuppet account created to evade a block or ban, or a user editing on behalf of the blocked/banned user. G5 speedy deletions will not be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ana Hulea

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 138.253.198.119, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 138.253.198.119 (talk) 08:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Alan King (Designer)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I am building this article about Alan King, he a big reference within the fashion industry in new york city, you can check all the articles about him and his bland. —Thejournalist2011 (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

@Thejournalist2011: I'm going to suggest you contact RHaworth, the administrator who protected the page, since apparently this is far from the first attempt to create a page about King. —C.Fred (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Peter's Railway

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, JaxLax, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JaxLax (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done (but not by me). —C.Fred (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Kristyn Harris

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, MerielGJones, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MerielGJones (talk) 08:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Rohini Sindhuri (IAS)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sonicwiki1982, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sonicwiki1982 (talk) 14:30, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Charlie Hargrett

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Talleng2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Talleng2 (talk) 02:46, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. There is nothing to undelete, no content in the deleted history under the draft title or the main space title Charlie Hargrett. The contribution history of Draft:Charlie Hargrett has not been deleted, it's still there at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Charlie_Hargrett&action=history ~Anachronist (talk) 02:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Guardians (2017 Film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) TheOldGarrick (talk) 07:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Guardians (2017 Film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tunde & Adisa Legal Practitioners · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] I wish to improve on my article to suit and conform to wikipedia rules and guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRains94 (talk • contribs) 08:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

SAKSHAM

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Wikipedia page of a genuine government scheme was deleted.[1] —Zardula (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ government scheme, SAKSHAM. "Saksham Scholarship Scheme". pib.nic.in. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAKSHAM, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Being a government scheme is not enough for something to have a Wikipedia article, see WP:N. Hut 8.5 18:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The Brass Monkey

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, SNOWWISS, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13 I had limited access to the internet for the last 4 months and was unable to complete the article prior to it being removed after being in a draft status for 6 months. —SNOWWISS (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Charlie Hargrett

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Talleng2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Talleng2 (talk) 03:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Talleng2 (talk) 03:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

DRAFT:Mickael Pariente

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to continue my work on this article and make a significant improvement to comply with the requirements of Wikipedia —AsyaM (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Joan Abimbola Iyiola

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Josephfbell2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Josephfbell2 (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Hammy Havoc

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Only the nominator and I commented, when pressed for more information, he did not respond despite weeks elapsing. —Amy Mowatt (talk) 01:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Carlisle Homes

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Notable Australian company speedy deleted as advertising - which it was not. It hadn't been tagged beforehand, so no one had had the opportunity to challenge it. If the deleting user wants to argue that the company is non-notable, they should take it to AfD rather than end-running a discussion in which other editors will disagree with them. —The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

For this you should first ask the deleting admin User:Seraphimblade to reconsider to avoid a wheel war. It was in fact prodded by Bishonen who claimed "Created by an undisclosed paid editor", and spam speedy delete requested by GreenMeansGo. See User talk:Kiwirant456. It had about 2 hours to challenge. I think that most of the article is free of promotion, although the awards sections sounds like puffery. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Removing the awards section would seem like a more reasonable solution than deletion then. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
@The Drover's Wife: but the first step is to ask Seraphimblade. I don't think that has happened yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
I have asked Seraphimblade; he has refused. His stated grounds for deletion was that it was written like advertising (which I am very happy to remedy immediately), but he has insisted that I produce further references to his liking before he would consider undeleting it (which is a notability argument, not an advertising one). As such, I would once again request that it be undeleted, because G11 is not an opportunity for people with the right tools to unilaterally delete articles on notability grounds without the hassle of allowing other editors notice and feedback on that idea. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
You can go to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Nobody here will overturn another administrator's decision unilaterally. There would need to be a community consensus. That's what deletion review is for.
Having looked at the deleted article, it not only includes a WP:G11 speedy deletion tag, but also a WP:PROD tag for notability. And if it were restored, it would not survive long, because none of the sources in the article suggest that the topic is notable. If you want the article to exist, I suggest you start from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Cyclone's Flying Circus

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Page was deleted and redirected to Emmett Smith Davis but the contents for Cyclone's Flying Circus were not merged into Emmett Smith Davis. Please undelete the page so that the contents can be merged. —Thayne Harbaugh (talk) 09:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Category talk:Films scored by Sneha Khanwalkar

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please unprotect this page and allow it to be created. Earlier content is NOT required. Earlier situation which caused protection may not be valid now. The category talk needs to be only tagged by WikiProject India. —VasuVR (talk, contribs) 11:30, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done I have created the page. The page was not actually protected or deleted, just the title was blacklisted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Gibson ticket machine

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, MedfordWillow, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MedfordWillow (talk) 11:49, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Rashid Al Habtoor

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page is created for Mr. Rashid Al Habtoor by his media and marketing team. Kindly undelete the page and protect it from further deletion or editing —rashidalhabtoor 12:27, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Due to constant disruption from the paid editor and various anonymous IP addresses, I have EC-protected the article indefinitely. Any substantive changes must be proposed on the talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Yannick Helbling

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Swiss Challenge League is considered a fully professional league —SmackJam (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
@Sir Sputnik: If you still believe the topic isn't notable, please take the article to AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Request to undelete Drvivekbindal

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Details I entered on this page is of same person whose details are there on https://www.mamcsurgery.com/index.php/dr-vivek-bindal-robotic-surgeon

I was not able to post the photo, which caused the confusion.

Kindly undelete the page and guide me to add the photo or Dr Vivek Bindal. —Vikramgkaushik (talk) 17:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done – this page is a copyright violation. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Chidsey Library

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The article is about a building on the National Register of Historic Places. I believe the content from the banned user was never malicious when the article was created. Even if the material is a stub, I'm intending to expand on the article. —– TheGridExe (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, I'm confused now with my request - I see G5 deletions aren't overturned but WP:CSDRFU shows special cases. – TheGridExe (talk) 01:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
No need to be confused. The first port of call is User talk:Nyttend who deleted it. Then if you are referred here, it could be done. If there is refusal, you can of course just start again from scratch. The old article has only four sentences. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the info, Graeme Bartlett. I contacted Nyttend and I will just start fresh with the article. – TheGridExe (talk) 23:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Brendan Kelly (politician)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mahmood Jasim Al-Samydai

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:International Fintech Association

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 07:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. or move it yourself when ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Lumpy Da Comedian

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Chubrockmusic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chubrockmusic (talk) 07:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumpy da comedian (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Lumpy Da Comedian

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Angelicasouth4u, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Angelicasouth4u (talk) 07:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumpy da comedian (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Company B, 6th Florida Infantry Regiment

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I, 2600:8807:8300:C6:CCAF:8F00:B92E:2D10, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2600:8807:8300:C6:CCAF:8F00:B92E:2D10 (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


I, Joshua Beschutzer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joshua Beschutzer (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

MY apology..."life happens", and my attention has been otherwise focused. —Joshua Beschutzer (talk) 11:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

David Winfield Huddleston

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Winstonsmith66 (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC) I created the image and I own the image of myself. Should not have been deleted.

So are you claiming to be David Winfield Huddleston? Is this image a "selfie"? Any way its a tiny thumbnail size 74 × 89. A larger size would be more useful. How did you create the image? Did you crop it from another picture? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Hanns R. Neumann Stiftung

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, HRNStiftung, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HRNStiftung (talk) 11:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I note that your user name closely matches that organisation's name. The user must be for a person So I recommend reading WP:CHU to add something to suggest it is a person and not an org. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Darin Johnson

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This afticle was deleted at an AfD with little turnout. The consensus was that he was not notable because he had not played professionally. However, that has changed and he is now a professional basketball player. I request this article to be undeleted because it meets GNG now. —~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 13:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done @Editorofthewiki: See the message box at the top of this page? We don't overturn AFDs here. You need to discuss restoration with the deleting admin, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). ~Anachronist (talk) 13:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Nicole Antebi

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, 69.119.155.161, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 69.119.155.161 (talk) 14:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

I was doing some research on a pending project of Antebi's and didn't get time to complete the draft. —69.119.155.161 (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 15:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I was leaving it for other users to further its amount of content —JuniorRocketScientist (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Danger Silent

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

We just noticed our band Wikipedia is gone. We didn’t see any reason for this... but it seems it has been down for months. We are still a band with Chris Vaughn’s solo project, we would like the page to be reinstated please. Thank you!

You restored my page, and then deleted it again. I didn’t make this page, but I am Chris Vaughn from Danger Silent... and the information on this Wiki page is correct. Please stop deleting it. Thanks. —2600:8800:800:8D60:7C3E:24CA:37E1:596E (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

...and now proposed for speedy deletion per WP:A7 and WP:G11. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

"Draft:Washington Township, Greene County, Iowa

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Bardoleg, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bardoleg (talk) 06:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Road Asset Management System

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Konsta Sirvio, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Konsta Sirvio (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Silwood Technology

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sunsha1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sunsha1 (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:San_Jose_Inside

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Metronews, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Metronews (talk) 11:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Michael Furman

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ericpeterfurman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ericpeterfurman (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Morocco–Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic relations

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As I recall, it was a perfectly fine and sourced article. —―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done The editor who wrote the page (Abdelkader123456) has been indefinitely blocked for creating many copyright violations. I didn't have to look very hard to find two significant copyright violations in the text of this article and I suspect there are many more. Policy allows for the presumptive removal of contributions by editors with a history of copyright violations. Hut 8.5 18:04, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Daniel Kapler

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have requested the restoration of the article Daniel Kapler, because it was Deleted without a proper check. The article contained reliable sources, was very well described, there were no spelling errors and followed the standards and norms of Wikipedia. Credits for his works can be found in Hebrew. —Jenyamironov (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jenyamironov: I have restored the article to Draft:Daniel Kapler. It was definitely not ready for main space. The rationales for deleting the article given in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Kapler were valid. Please improve the article (I have removed inline external links to other Wikipedias already), keeping in mind WP:MUSICBIO criteria for inclusion as well as the requirement for significant coverage of the person, which isn't evident in the article yet. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

ADVI Health

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Marieclaire.salive, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marieclaire.salive (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

The notifications were sent to the spam folder of my mailbox so i did not see any notifications, I had not realized that it had been so long since I had edited the page. I was working on making the changes when I was distracted and would like to finish creating the page.

User:Abenzev/sandbox

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abenzev (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

User:BJHutton

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page is a identify page like philosophers and Brett Hutton the cricketer. I have provided all content required and cites and links, the information of not of promotion (no links provide more that Gov data and subjects, nor images labelled. there is no more yet better information on my page for an Article than other person in tea talk and or personal individuals living or dead celebratory or not. Such would be discrimination again an individual and cyber-bullying by Wikipedia representatives and or users. I took note of the official complaint and made a appropriate adjustments that I have PDF print of the visual content. I have take a Source copy, PDF of the Talk page and all other evidence to support that I am equally entitle to a article page. I have to add at least 5 philosophy article. I would like it back up within a few hours and without banner. I have take a PDF of this page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BJHutton (talk • contribs) 21:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_303&oldid=1257461481"