Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 311
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 305 | ← | Archive 309 | Archive 310 | Archive 311 | Archive 312 | Archive 313 | → | Archive 315 |
File:Forward and backward Euler method.svg
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Joseph.slater (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
I made the graphic and simply didn't add the copyright information. Happy to add it. I haven't been logged in for a very long time so wasn't aware of the problem.
Done @Joseph.slater: I've restored it and reset the clock, you have a week to add the copyright information before it's deleted again. Hut 8.5 19:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Babylon Whores
userfy —Jax 0677 (talk) 21:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC) --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Not done See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babylon Whores. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:05, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree - @Orangemike:, I am not asking for the page to be moved to article space, I am asking for it to be moved to my user space. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then you'll need to ask the deleting admin, @Ad Orientem: --Orange Mike | Talk 14:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done @ Jax 0677 userfied per your request. Please do not move this back into the mainspace w/o improving the article in a manner that addresses the issues raised at AfD. The page can be found at User:Jax 0677/Babylon Whores. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ad Orientem, given that the AfD outcome was "delete", I think that what has happened now is improper. Have a look at this... --Randykitty (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Randykitty I agree. @Jax 0677 you need to revert your move/redirect. That is clearly inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the AfD close. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- To clarify, if you want to create a redirect, that's fine. But it cannot include the page history as it flatly contradicts the outcome of the AfD. That door is closed. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677 Never mind. I reverted it myself. Don't that again please. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- To clarify, if you want to create a redirect, that's fine. But it cannot include the page history as it flatly contradicts the outcome of the AfD. That door is closed. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Randykitty I agree. @Jax 0677 you need to revert your move/redirect. That is clearly inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the AfD close. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ad Orientem, given that the AfD outcome was "delete", I think that what has happened now is improper. Have a look at this... --Randykitty (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then you'll need to ask the deleting admin, @Ad Orientem: --Orange Mike | Talk 14:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
I have just proposed deletion of the redirect target. —Kusma (t·c) 16:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- At AfD now after Jax 0677 removed the prod. —Kusma (t·c) 19:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ad Orientem:, @Randykitty:, I apologize for this. However, people create pages for deleted articles all of the time (i.e. Upon a Burning Body and Born of Osiris). If I believe that this is a valid search term with valuable page history, and the validity of the search term and value of the page history was not discussed at AFD, what is my recourse? RFC, DELREV? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
I have no objection to the creation of a redirect. But consensus at the AfD was to delete the article, so reintroducing it in this way, with it's page history was not correct. I see two realistic courses of action. First just create a redirect as suggested above. And secondly improve the deleted page in a manner that addresses the issues that resulted in it's deletion at AfD. At that point I think you could move it back into the mainspace. Whether or not that is realistically possible, I can't say. DRV is pretty much limited to determining if the closing admin read the consensus correctly. I suppose I could revert the close and re-open the AfD. But right now I need to eat and will be offline for at least an hour. I will think about this and get back to you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ad Orientem:, if you are willing, please revert the closure to discuss the possibility of redirecting with history. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Jax 0677 Where are you planning to redirect this to? The target you were looking at is a pretty plausible candidate for deletion in its own right. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ad Orientem:, AFD (of the musician) before RFD (of the band). --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Jax 0677 Huh? -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- None of these articles look even remotely encyclopedic. Barring remarkable improvement I think Antti Litmanen is unlikely to survive AfD. Also Mana Mana is almost completely unsourced and looks vulnerable to a deletion nom. I am going to decline re-opening the AfD as there doesn't appear to be a good target. Sorry. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ad Orientem:, if this is the case, then the Babylon Whores redirect with history should be taken to WP:RFD, as it is a redirect performed in good faith, as it redirected to a musician with an article. But now, this can be discussed in the AFD about the musician. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677 As I noted above, you are free to create a redirect. However, just so as to avoid any confusion, I restored and userfied the article with the understanding that it would not be moved back into the mainspace other than as an improved/corrected stand alone article. Reintroducing the page history, other than as just outlined, is not compatible with the AfD close. What happened earlier was done in good faith and perhaps a result of poor communication, but I am not going to be happy if this is repeated. When an AfD says delete, userfying the article is a courtesy that is almost always left to the discretion of the closing admin. I hope that I will not be given reason to reconsider that courtesy. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ad Orientem:, if this is the case, then the Babylon Whores redirect with history should be taken to WP:RFD, as it is a redirect performed in good faith, as it redirected to a musician with an article. But now, this can be discussed in the AFD about the musician. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- None of these articles look even remotely encyclopedic. Barring remarkable improvement I think Antti Litmanen is unlikely to survive AfD. Also Mana Mana is almost completely unsourced and looks vulnerable to a deletion nom. I am going to decline re-opening the AfD as there doesn't appear to be a good target. Sorry. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Jax 0677 Huh? -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ad Orientem:, AFD (of the musician) before RFD (of the band). --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Jax 0677 Where are you planning to redirect this to? The target you were looking at is a pretty plausible candidate for deletion in its own right. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Christopher Scott (choreographer)
Christopher Scott is a leader in the field of choreography. As he was just nominated for his third Emmy Award, I was planning to add some references to his article but found it to be deleted. I know that students have used this article to write papers about this choreographer, and I believe many others have also referenced this Wikipedia article. It seems that someone thought that Christopher Scott is not important enough for a Wikipedia Page. That seemed to be the concern, but I can no longer access the talk page anymore. I am requesting that the Christopher Scott (choreographer) article be undeleted so that I can add the new articles. While dancers and choreographers rarely get as much press as other creatives, I think there is plenty of valid press referencing the work of Christopher Scott to prove that he is a notable choreographer and someone that Wikipedia users may want to research. —2606:6000:6783:4C00:F995:298F:69AB:BBC2 (talk) 21:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
2606:6000:6783:4C00:F995:298F:69AB:BBC2 (talk) 21:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Scott (choreographer), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TonyBallioni (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović
I, Crnizmaj, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Crnizmaj (talk) 21:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done No need to use the "hangon" template. If there is a g13 tag, you can remove it yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Paul44 18:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin_Case_(businessman)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion".
Contest this speedy deletion button not found.
Calvin Case is a prominent St. Louis businessman. This is well documented in the biography posted on the Findagrave location cited. I would copy it to Wikipedia except for copyright.
- @Zero914: this page hasn't been deleted - the speedy deletion request was declined by an admin, so it isn't going to be speedily deleted for that reason. Hut 8.5 18:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
2017 Southern Europe heat wave
I will merge salvageable content to 2017 wildfire season —☆ Bri (talk) 12:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done @Bri: I've restored this to Draft:2017 Southern Europe heat wave. Hut 8.5 19:00, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Hut 8.5 I'm on a wikibreak but will do the merge within a few days. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:13, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
James Broughton (singer)
Person i have some significant coverage I think this article need to be review —37.111.130.255 (talk) 19:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Broughton (musician), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Mz7 (talk) 22:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Ariel_Armony
I, Lschwartz2416, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lschwartz2416 (talk) 11:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Mz7 (talk) 01:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:List of taxa described from West Virginia
- Draft:List of taxa described from West Virginia · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:List of taxa described from Nevada
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Harry Smith (Radio Presenter)
I, Hazzy6000, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hazzy6000 (talk) 06:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Long-short (romanization)
notable —Prisencolin (talk) 20:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Hut 8.5 20:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Dakota_Flight_Center_LLC
Active company —108.211.17.164 (talk) 17:51, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done. The page was totally devoid of any prose content too. Please improve it, or the next time it is deleted for lack of attention, it won't be restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
FxPro
My husband, who is crazy about Formula One, asked me why there is no article about the company FxPro, which became the sponsor of the McLaren team this year. In 2014-2016 I worked for FxPro, and he thought I should be aware of it. I was doing HR, but challenge accepted. Nothing useful was found in discussions. At least a couple of times the article was deleted, but I don’t know what was there in the text.
I looked at some other articles in the category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Foreign_exchange_companies, and tried to do something similar to the sample (look at my draft). But I will appreciate it if someone can do better or cut out any unnecessary parts (I don’t have any connections with the company now except memories, so there are no worries). Others have more experience for sure. In other words, I ask you to consider the application, as if an author not concerned made it.
In terms of relevance, I think the company is significant for Wikipedia because of age, size and sports sponsorship (this is the most interesting, perhaps this is their greatest benefit for society rather than financial decisions). —Rukkostan (talk) 16:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Rukkostan: Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FxPro, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ad Orientem (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
- It's been deleted multiple times, most recently for being too promotional. Because you have a conflict of interest, if you want to create the article yourself, be aware that the only venue we offer for editors like you to publish an article is Wikipedia:Articles for creation. II suggest you start an article in draft space (e.g. Draft:FxPro) and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. The deleting administrator may be willing to restore the deleted article to draft space for you to work on. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- I took a second look at the discussion and I stand by my close. Consensus looks pretty clear to me. If you want to take another stab at the article you will need to start with a WP:DRAFT and then when you think it is ready submit it to WP:AFC as suggested above. Please read WP:COI first. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
First of all, the file is referenced as a source for many or all of the animation files listed in the wiki site of Archimedean solids; Second it's a useful source file for generating/rendering large polyhedra using POV-Ray; Third, the claim that it's not a useful or usable file is clearly wrong —DavidTaubmann 20:21, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Davidtaubmann: Done, restored. I added a note to the description explaining the use of this file, to avoid future deletion (it's been deleted multiple times). Please look it over and edit as you see fit. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Romanian Passport (old, non-biometric).jpeg
This file is my own work, and I didn't notice the comment on my profile until now —Flaviut (talk) 07:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Shammi Shinh
I would like to see the information on this CEO of PRODIGUER brands and creator of the worlds most expensive champagne. —80.246.139.222 (talk) 12:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Centre for Teacher Accreditation
I am trying to understand the reasons for deletion of my page. In the meantime, can my page article be emailed to me please?Remuna Rai (talk) 11:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC) —Remuna Rai (talk) 11:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- It was deleted after this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Teacher Accreditation, no one suggested keeping the page. You can see a copy here: http://deletionpedia.org/en/Centre_for_Teacher_Accreditation Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Swords Of Essex
I, Cut2thepoint, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cut2thepoint (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Mz7 (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Robert Lewins
I, ClareGS, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ClareGS (talk) 14:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @ClareGS: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Mz7 (talk) 17:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Balu nagendra
Balu Nagendra is an Indian actor who appears primarily in Kannada films. Best known for his performance in Huliraaya movie. Balu's popular on-screen roles have come in films like Anna Bond (2012), Kaddipudi (2013) and Lights Camera Action (2014). Other notable acting credits include Inthi Ninna Preethiya (2008), Junglee (2009), Tuglak (2012) and Huliraaya (2017).
- Neither are useful sources - the first is an interview (which doesn't help for notability) and the other is too sparse to be a usable source. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'd say start over, in draft space, and submit for review via WP:AFC. The deleted article is only 3 sentences long, and even the previous version deleted in accordance with WP:A7 had more detail. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
File:OJ Simpson Newsweek TIME.png
I would like to have the PNG version undeleted, so I can use it again at O. J. Simpson murder case. —George Ho (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @George Ho: Done, restored and deletion tag re-dated. You have a week to add it to an article and remove the deletion tag. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
- Draft:International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Mbounthavong, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mbounthavong (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Mz7 (talk) 09:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Time Simply Passes
I, Tyflowers, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tyflowers (talk) 19:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Pat McHenry
I, Brucebolton01, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brucebolton01 (talk) 00:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:59, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:SEESHA
I, Monisha.leah, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Monisha.leah (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Legacy Marketing
Fair and square fact based article. —Docholiday79 (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. If it's a G11 deletion then the page isn't "fair and square"; Wikipedia requires a dispassionate tone. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)- What is it with you marketing people, that you are unable to hear what crap you are spewing? An "article" that regurgitates press releases, and contains garbage like "Legacy Marketing’s mantra is “experience is everything” and their culture is focused on the passion behind the work" is completely unsalvageable, and must be replaced with actual normal human English. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- They're paid to not care about Wikipedia's policies, in fact to completely disregard them and never think they exist. Marketroids and Wikipedia do not mix. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- I should note that after this REFUND request, they wrote another article in the same spot - which also got A7'd. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- They're paid to not care about Wikipedia's policies, in fact to completely disregard them and never think they exist. Marketroids and Wikipedia do not mix. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Nevada Romo
A member of a notable musical ensemble should not have their page history deleted without cause —Jax 0677 (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Not done A7 deletions don't qualify for restoration here, you'll need to speak to the deleting admin or use WP:DRV. The deleted article gave no indication whatsoever that the subject is notable, and the subject was a single person rather than a band. Hut 8.5 17:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
2018-2019 Hashtag United Season
I think the page should be un-deleted because it is the only way for fans to get information without waiting a week so the video will be uploaded. The Team website is a SHOP not a website. I understand the club plays in level nine of english football but they are very popular —IsraeliIdan (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018–2019 Hashtag United season, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Enigmaman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Integrated_Computer_Solutions
The page was a professional written and objective history of a software company from the 1980s to today. It demonstrated the evolution of integrated software from CD based software to today's touchscreens. It is also an interesting history of the development of QT from Nokia and C++. —Slozier55 (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. —C.Fred (talk) 19:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Karen Willough
I, Bradmarcus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bradmarcus (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Artist got overwhelmed doing the page herself, but then lost all the files, so it would really help that she doesn't have to restart from scratch. —Bradmarcus (talk) 18:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Question: @Bradmarcus: How do you know the artist was working on the page initially? —C.Fred (talk) 18:50, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
She's an old friend and asked me to help her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradmarcus (talk • contribs) 19:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
- @Bradmarcus: Because of your friendship, you have a conflict of interest with Willough. Make sure you follow the COI guidelines in your edits and bring in independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 19:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Absolutely!! Thank you so much!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradmarcus (talk • contribs) 19:41, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Kim Ou-joon
I, Sawol, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sawol (talk) 13:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Windowpane (band)
I, BigBuckChuck, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BigBuckChuck (talk) 05:45, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:45, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
2012 European Universities Games
Deleted because "Expired PROD, concern was: Non-notable sports event. Violates WP:Sports event. Also the only reference is the official website." - But it's actually a notable event. (Wikidata). I would like to work with the article and add sources. Every year, the Games get more popular and gain more attention. —Pelmeen10 (talk) 07:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
List of awards and nominations received by Hina Khan
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Hinasona (talk) 04:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Hina khan has won many awards and I think the list must be on her page. It was there but then removed, I don't know why. But please restore it.
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at List of awards and nominations received by Hina Khan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
haastrup
I, 'DesoHaa, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 'DesoHaa (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- @'DesoHaa: Haastrup is a disambiguation page and exists. It looks like you've worked on several drafts about people with the name Haastrup. Which of these drafts did you want undeleted? —C.Fred (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello C. Fred thanks for your prompt response. Please undelete 'DesoHaa (talk) 20:48, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Sir Ambassador Prince James Adedokun Abiodun Haastrup — Preceding unsigned comment added by 'DesoHaa (talk • contribs) 20:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- That's Draft:Sir Ambassador Prince Adédokun Abiọdun James Haastrup (KJW). The title seems a bit, errr, iffy. See MOS:HONORIFIC. Kleuske (talk) 20:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Kleuske: The name of the article can be fixed if the article is brought up to a condition where it's ready for mainspace. The name doesn't prevent restoring the draft. —C.Fred (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- The remark was intended as advice to DesoHaa, not as an opinion on whether or not to restore. Apologies if that's the impression you got. Kleuske (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Kleuske: The name of the article can be fixed if the article is brought up to a condition where it's ready for mainspace. The name doesn't prevent restoring the draft. —C.Fred (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Kleuske for putting me right. So please, undelete James Adedokun Abiodun Haastrup'DesoHaa (talk) 21:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. - @'DesoHaa: Please follow the instructions in the messages where submission was rejected. Make sure that this individual has gotten significant coverage in reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Universal_Basic_Services
I, 2.27.59.216, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2.27.59.216 (talk) 17:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Still editing, apologies for delay in getting back to this but will complete within 30 days this time —Aapercy (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Energy hub
I, 154.72.167.226, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 154.72.167.226 (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Tiertime
I, Metriotous, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Metriotous (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 17:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Nagamanyam D Dasari
I, Vinodsagar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vinodsagar (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Tasha Inniss
G13 (to see the deleted content). —Taku (talk) 12:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Ok. The subject is clearly not notable. Could you undo the undeletion now? Or should I still send it to a MfD? —- Taku (talk) 20:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- @TakuyaMurata: I have deleted the draft again, since nobody edited it in the interim. I've logged it as G13, so it would be subject for automatic restoration if somebody else requested it. —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. —- Taku (talk) 21:13, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Children's Theatre of Winnetka
to merge into another article —165.20.114.246 (talk) 02:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Which one, and why? None of the versions have much content at all and the most recent one is literally a very bad joke. I can't see why you'd want to merge it anywhere. Hut 8.5 06:35, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- sorry, i did not relies, i am not a word-smith, i was just looking for content to add to a another wiki as a paragraph.
165.20.114.245 (talk) 13:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I thought you meant another Wikipedia article. If you register for an account I can email you the contents. Hut 8.5 17:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- He may still very well mean just that. A lot of people use "wiki" to refer to Wikipedia articles. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:15, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Again sorry about that, I live here, and in doing a search found that there had been one (an article) deleted, it would work perfect on the Community_House_(Winnetka,_Illinois), stub page as a paragraph since there is partly nothing there and would expand it, CTW is an internal origination with the same tax id, address, phone no. ect.165.20.114.246 (talk) 22:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Lucifer (2018 film)
Refund for G13. Already in mainspace. Let me see if there is anything useful in it. —--Let There Be Sunshine 08:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
The_Odyssey_(apartment_complex)
Admin user Explicit from South Korea deleted the page I created over 10 years ago. I contacted him via Twitter but got no reply. I asked him if he had a backup copy via the talk page but he deleted my talk comment! I would just like a the article to be restored as a draft so that I can edit it to a high enough standard for inclusion in Wikipedia. "Publish changes" button below —Vb4vb4vb4 (talk) 10:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. see Draft:The Odyssey (apartment complex) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Chu Chi Zui
Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chu Chi Zui, the article was deleted as a hoax, please restore it and archive it to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Chu Chi Zui given that this is one of the longest hoaxes discovered so far. —- CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
User:MX
Requested the deletion of this page for privacy reasons during block. Now that I'm back to work, I'd like to have the user page back as editors are generally encouraged to have one. Thank you. —MX (✉ • ✎) 13:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done, restored. Welcome back. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Grace Bonney
It appears the article was deleted previously because it was vandalized. The delete log says it was once deleted because it only said: 'Grace is dumb.' However, since then she has written several books and started a magazine. There are multiple examples of secondary, independent sources discussing her, her books and her other work. I would like to get the article undeleted so I could recreate it properly. Examples of significant coverage [1][2][3][4] —Lonehexagon (talk) 06:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Given that the title is protected per a consensus on WP:Administrators' noticeboard (diff of discussion) and the fact the last deleted revisions are from 2007 I would actually suggest going through the drafting process so that you'll have time to make sure the article's up to par. I don't doubt you'll be able to given the article was last deleted over a decade ago. (The rest of the entries in the deletion log are actually toggling creation-protection for the page.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Lonehexagon: if you're interested in writing an article about the subject then I'd be happy to remove the create protection on the title for you. However the deleted versions aren't going to help you very much with this. Only one of the three deleted versions is not vandalism and that one was pretty short, quite spammy and completely unreferenced. And of course it was only about her blog. I think you'd be better off starting from scratch, if you can come up with something which is vaguely neutrally written and cites some decent-looking sources then it would be vastly better. Hut 8.5 10:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Hut 8.5: Hello, I actually made an article to submit before I realized that it couldn't be recreated. If the article is allowed recreation, this is what I would use. User:Lonehexagon/sandbox5 I hope that's enough to submit as a draft. Lonehexagon (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I've unprotected the title so you can move your draft to mainspace when ready. Hut 8.5 16:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
User:JocularJellyfish/sandbox/Courts
I, JocularJellyfish, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 16:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done I have no idea why this was deleted: it was last edited a week ago and as it isn't an AfC submission it doesn't qualify for G13 anyway. Hut 8.5 16:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Cyril Ogwu
User is notable and has both primary and secondary sources —Libertydavid (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Not done, it would not survive in main space, was created to circumvent the AFC process, and Draft:Cyril Ogwu already exists. Work on that one instead. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
warwick economics summit
The Warwick Economics Summit is Europe's largest student-run summit, the article included a full history of the summit, its visitors (including six nobel prize winners) and more. I'm confused by the deletion.—Jamesbye98 (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick Economics Summit (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
- @Jamesbye98: Since this has gone through AfD twice and been deleted both times, that's a good sign that this student-run summit doesn't meet the Wikipedia guidelines and shouldn't have an article. —C.Fred (talk) 23:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Ted (Theodore) Downing
I, Vpski, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VPski (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @VPski: Are you actually going to submit it this time? It was undeleted about a year ago, and after two days of changes, you didn't do anything further with it. —C.Fred (talk) 23:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
File:New Dimensions II.jpg
Book cover, deleted after article it illustrated was inappropriately redirected —The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
File:New Dimensions 3.jpg
Book cover, deleted after article it illustrated was inappropriately redirected —The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
File:New Dimensions IV.jpg
Book cover, deleted after article it illustrated was inappropriately redirected —The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Michael Skolnik
Living person, famous political activist, tweeted that his page was deleted and asked how to get it back; seems like vandalism. — Fordcat (talk) 03:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
- @Fordcat: Please follow up with RHaworth about the article and why he chose to delete it.
- @RHaworth: I'm not convinced this should have been CSD G11, but I'm not convinced enough to override your deletion without discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 03:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:25, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Russian Embassy in Berlin attack plot
Violation of WP:PROD, page not tagged for at least seven days; AfD discussion is necessary —Greywin (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Question: @Greywin: I have reviewed the deleted history of this page, and it is my opinion that the PROD deletion was valid. The page was tagged at 20:28, 7 July 2018 and deleted at 04:53, 15 July 2018 (UTC) – the time in between was about 7 days and 8 hours. Under the WP:PROD policy, I can undelete this if you contest the deletion for any reason, but since the reason you provided seems to be purely procedural, I wanted to ask whether you would still like to see this article undeleted with this information in mind. Mz7 (talk) 17:36, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok thank you, maybe I missed the tagging due to vacation. But I think first of all, Alternatives to deletion need to be considered. Above that, before deletion an AfD discussion is needed in this case. I remember the article as properly sourced, and a planned attack on an embassy is clearly a notable subject. So please undelete. --Greywin (talk) 23:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:TSUKI_Project
I, ʬʬ, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ʬʬ (talk) 21:58, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Not done. Start over. The only thing in that deleted draft is a request for article creation, and that isn't the place to do it. Either write a draft article, or add a request to Wikipedia:Requested articles. But don't create a draft that's nothing more than a request for someone else to do the work. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:37, 22 July 2018 (UTC)