Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 May 3

< May 2	May 4 >

May 3

Template:SimpsonsSeason1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:55, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SimpsonsSeason1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. There are no other season navigation bars for other seasons, and the infoboxes on each episode already contain a list of episodes for the season. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - orphaned, purpose served by the infoboxes. Airplaneman ✈ 18:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SOP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SOP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned sidebar template. I'm not sure if it is needed. In any event, it should be put to some use, or deleted. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - orphaned. Airplaneman ✈ 18:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Khonkaen F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Khonkaen F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Khon Kaen Province is the geographical area, i.e. not part of the topic. Honours is a section link to the already linked main article. None of the other articles (apart from the main article) actually exist. Jameboy (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Jameboy (talk) 23:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. – Pee Jay 23:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nothing to add. Airplaneman ✈ 18:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Disney's Princess and the Frog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. I deleted a navbox on this topic per a previous TFD in December, and re-creations of similar content have been speedy deleted. I was notified of this template for possible speedy deletion, but decided to let the discussion go to see if there was any difference in the consensus now. There isn't. RL0919 (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney's Princess and the Frog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template only links four articles together, three of which are already closely interlinked and the fourth not even closely related. BOVINEBOY 2008 :) 23:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the love of God, leave my template alone, get a life!!!!!!User:Hillaryangellecarter —Preceding undated comment added 23:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Delete - this template has been deleted several times in the past. It has only 3 articles, the rest is red links and "Related media", so this falls under Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox. --LoЯd ۞pεth 02:39, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom (and creator's response). Navbox not needed. Airplaneman ✈ 18:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Templates can only be justified by their usefulness, not on religious grounds... --Jameboy (talk) 21:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rugby league infoboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rugby league manager infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Rugby league player infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Rugby league player infobox2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

First two unused, the third has just a few instances. All Unedited since 2008. Redundant to {{Infobox rugby league biography}}. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support this nomination, though on the one third one the articles still using it should be edited before it is deleted. Not sure of the usual procedure but will you be notifying the relevant wikiproject (WT:RL)? LunarLander // talk // 22:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Jeff79 (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Support nom - redundant, hardly used. Airplaneman ✈ 18:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Igbo Royalty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Igbo Royalty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Reundant to {{Infobox monarch}}, with which I have just replaced the only five instances.. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant, unused. Airplaneman ✈ 18:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rfd2/helper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rfd2/helper (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was pretty useful when the parser function #time didn't exist yet, but now no longer needed and replaced in {{Rfd2}}. Note: Currently a redirect, but was used as a template, thus listing here instead of RfD. The Evil IP address (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - superseded, now unused. Airplaneman ✈ 17:58, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dead Doom Groove(INaCAGE)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dead Doom Groove(INaCAGE) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recreation of previously speedied article (A7) in Template space. - Mobius Clock 20:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox youtuber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox youtuber (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; undocumented; no obvious purpose. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We should consider a CSD for never-used templates. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 13:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not easy to track never-used templates (whatlinkshere doesn't say if a page was transcluded in the past); templates like this are usually no-brainer deletion candidates, but those are usually dealt with in a PROD-like manner anyway (they go to TfD and get deleted a week afterwards due to the closing admin realising that deep discussion isn't needed). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 15:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unused. {{Infobox internet celebrity}} is a better fit for YouTubers who are notable enough to have articles. Airplaneman ✈ 17:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Département Charente

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Département Charente (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Département Haute-Garonne (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned templates copied from Fr Wikipedia, and were mostly being used in the infobox. Can be replaced with simple wikilink. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - wikilink will do the job equally well if not better. Airplaneman ✈ 17:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Penthouse Pets of 1969

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Penthouse Pets of 1969 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox template including only redlinks, therefore useless. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - orphaned, doesn't navigate to anything. Airplaneman ✈ 17:40, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Weeping Angel stories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Weeping Angel stories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two stories. Quite a few other Doctor Who villains have two stories. no need for this template 188.221.79.22 (talk) 20:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Until/if more stories are made; no need to have an infobox for so few. - Mobius Clock 20:11, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unneeded navbox. Purpose better served using a "see also" section. Airplaneman ✈ 17:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TEA district rating

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TEA district rating (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Though well-intentioned, this template by its nature requires that any of the hundreds of articles that would use it must be updated annually as their status changes. Since the template is changed each year with the current year, any article using it that is not immediately updated with the information for that new year may be stating false information (e.g. a district may have been Exemplary in 2009-2010 but when the template gets changed to say 2010-2011 the article may become automatically inaccurate if its status changed in the new year). IMHO, it is ill-advised to create templates that can make an article automatically become untrue (i.e. stale info is ok if it is qualified with when the info was valid. But having an article state that info is current as of 2010 when it was really only true in 2007 is a serious problem). Mcorazao (talk) 20:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to Template:2009–2010 TEA district rating or similar. Looks like a useful navbox, but I agree that annually updating hundreds of articles is not easy. I suggest creating a new template each year to facilitate this; renaming this template will allow the templates to be kept on all current pages, with new templates such as Template:2010–2011 TEA district rating being added to articles as necessary. Airplaneman ✈ 17:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The rating is literally different every year. Why should we create a new template each year? How far will this go? WhisperToMe (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If we cannot keep it current, I don't see the point in having this template, nor do I agree with having a stable template for each school year. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although this is formatted as a navbox, it is actually just a single piece of information, and thus would be better placed either as a sentence in the text or as an item in an infobox. This would also allow a reference note to properly qualify the information so that it would not be false even if it became dated. To avoid loss of information, I would suggest that a sentence about the rating be added when the template is removed. --RL0919 (talk) 13:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Airlines of... templates with one or no links

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airlines_of_Andorra (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - no links

Template:Airlines_of_Kosovo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - one link, only used on that same page

Template:Airlines_of_Monaco (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - one link

Template:Airlines_of_San_Marino (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - no links

As detailed above, these templates either have no links whatsoever or only one, and all but {{Airlines of Kosovo}} is unused (the Kosovo template is only used on the page it links to). As the content of these templates is highly unlikely to change, there is no need to keep them around. One link does not need a navbox. - Mobius Clock 10:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - orphaned and unneeded navboxes that don't facilitate navigation, with one or no links to other articles. Airplaneman ✈ 17:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:For football player see Ryan Mathews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:For football player see Ryan Mathews (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is created by an editor who clearly doesn't know what he/she is doing. —Chris!_c/t 05:59, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article in template space, not edited since 2009, would probably be suitable for deletion as an article if in mainspace. - Mobius Clock 09:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.