Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 9

< December 8	December 10 >

December 9

Template:NP-NPC coalition/meta/color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:30, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NP-NPC coalition/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is unused. Also bundled with this nom is Template:NP-NPC coalition/meta/shortname. –H T D 20:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment you need to tag {{NP-NPC coalition/meta/shortname}} 76.65.128.198 (talk) 10:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kapisanan sa Paglilingkod sa Bagong Pilipinas/meta/color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kapisanan sa Paglilingkod sa Bagong Pilipinas/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is unused. –H T D 20:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Alliance For Barangay Concerns/Lakas Kampi CMD/meta/color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alliance For Barangay Concerns/Lakas Kampi CMD/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is unused. –H T D 20:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Malayalam historical dramas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Malayalam historical dramas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template doesn't make any sense at all. Who decides which all movies fall under a particular genre? The user seems to have created a template by simply listing all the movies of a particular genre which he/she has seen. There are a lot more movies that can come under this template and its impossible to list all of them. DdraconiandevilL (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South Ossetian political parties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Ossetian political parties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox about parties in this part of world with "There are no data about political parties in South Ossetia" Bulwersator (talk) 15:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this was intended to replace a timeline that existed in image-form. It's probably unneeded. Nimur (talk) 15:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South Lebanon conflict (1982–2000) graphical timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Lebanon conflict (1982–2000) graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unfinished, unused Bulwersator (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South Dragons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:39, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Dragons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SourceJS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SourceJS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment reading the source code for this template, it looks like it is used to encapsulate JavaScript cide passages. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It doesn't seem to work. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it could be made to work, but the template wouldn't be necessary anyway. --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Soundsample

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Soundsample (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sosa area

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sosa area (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 15:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this seems to be part of a series, {{Sosa area/space}} , {{Sosa area/line}} , {{Sosa area/o}} -- 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sound-w-icon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete. No used; Requested by author - Nabla (talk) 01:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sound-w-icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 15:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G7 I had created this as the mediaplayer template wasn't good enough for a certain purpose, but I found a better workaround eventually. No need for this now. I have tagged it as CSD G7 (removing the tfd template), as it isn't being used anywhere else. ManishEarth^{Talk • Stalk} 01:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Translate quote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Translate quote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Encourages WP:OR translations, unused. Bulwersator (talk) 14:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete duplicates the functionality of {{Not English-inline}} . 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chembox subst explosive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep in the light of information provided. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chembox subst explosive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused Bulwersator (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is a substitution template, it will always appear unused. Where does it say it was deprecated? It is linked to from other template documentation. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Categories: Wikipedia substituted templates Deprecated chembox templates Chembox templates" Bulwersator (talk) 08:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hmm... but it is still documented as the template to use from {{chembox}}... which is weird if it supposed to be deprecated. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 08:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's not actually in that category as far as I can tell. Look at the template source. That appears to be coming in via one of the other templates, though I don't see which one yet. I think IP editor is right that it's actively in use... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 09:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have notified the relevant wikiprojects. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 07:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The deprecation category comes from the /doc subpage. It was added when the /doc subpage was created. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the deletion template is still in place, if this is a speedy keep, the deletion template should be removed. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fb2 Templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb2 2 (B) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb2 3 (B) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb2 4 (B) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb2 5 (B) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb2 6 (B) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 14:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment 4,5,6 are completely useless, printing "4", "5", "6" and that's all, simple boilerplate for a single character. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:54, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Flagicon/SA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Flagicon/SA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a flag icon; unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't make sense. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nebraska Cornhuskers football award navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete

Template:Nebraska Cornhuskers football award navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Huge, superfluous navbox that leans toward fancruft. It is the only one of its kind (awards by college football team) and not a good precedent we want sitting around. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Argh. Navboxes are not trophy rooms. For relatively minor awards and positions the succession box system is a much better fit than megaboxes like this. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Chris, many of these awards are not minor. Most of these awards are major national awards. That's not the problem. What is problematic about this particular navbox is that it lists the recipients of multiple different awards, but only those recipients who attended a particular university, thereby creating duplicate/parallel navbox for the same awards and a subgroup of the same recipients. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- As the creator of this navbox, who now knows better, if I also vote for deletion perhaps we can bypass the debate and just delete it? Fjbfour (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - CSD, author request - tagged Bulwersator (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my comments above and the comments of the navbox creator. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Islands in the German Bight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete

Template:Islands in the German Bight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navigation template is redundant and currently unused. All articles in there are already grouped in {{Frisian Islands}}. An all those islands are as well located in the German Bight while {{Islands in the German Bight}} is only focused on a small subgroup near Heligoland. Bermicourt, the creator of {{Islands in the German Bight}}, agrees with this deletion nomination. De728631 (talk) 15:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as speedy, G7 Bulwersator (talk) 15:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.