Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 20

< June 19	June 21 >

June 20

Template:Simpsons cast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Simpsons cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded. TBran dl ey 14:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ unless someone can explain why this is unneeded. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No longer have any opinion. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- by convention we don't create cast templates, or it would create way too many navboxes at the bottom of each article. --TBran dl ey 03:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for same reason. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TBrandley. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 23:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:David Bromley (artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:David Bromley (artist) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Is this artist noteworthy enough? He has his own website and a few hits on google, but nothing that would make him stand out in my mind. Possible referr to AfD board? keystoneridin! (talk) 14:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Bromley is a prominent Australian artist who is very widely known in Australia as a leading contemporary artist- noted on occasions as one of Australia's 50 most collectible artists, and he has been a finalist in the Archibald Prize- Australia's most famous art prize- several times. His name appears in several other Wikipedia articles.

His name may be less well known outside of Australia, or outside the arts. That does not take away from his notability as an artist. --Ajhshamley (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PhantasmaChronica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PhantasmaChronica (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I did a search and found that this is one song which lasts for roughly 52 minutes, but broken into multiple sections. Unsure if notable. Discussion needed to further AfD. keystoneridin! (talk) 08:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cat year nav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cat year nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Substantial duplication of {{Year by category}}. More-or-less, year by category is the template for more used now-a-days. Suggest conversion by hand/bot and then deletion. Izno (talk) 03:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 23:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.