Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 April 3

< April 2	April 4 >

April 3

Template:Queensland Firebirds roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Queensland Firebirds roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Melbourne Vixens roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Adelaide Thunderbirds roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:West Coast Fever roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Northern Mystics roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Waikato Bay of Plenty Magic roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Central Pulse roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Canterbury Tactix roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Southern Steel roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

these were all single-use templates, until I merged them with the articles. I had noticed that the Southern Steel one was out-of-sync with the article, so I merged that one, and then just went ahead and merged the rest. I would be happy to undo the merging if there is consensus to keep these separate. Frietjes (talk) 21:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused or redundant to use in article —PC-XT+ 07:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Miami weatherbox/preformatted

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miami weatherbox/preformatted (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With the improvements to {{Weather box}}, this template is neither transcluded nor necessary anymore. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee ^welcome!" 20:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:New York City weatherbox/cached

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New York City weatherbox/cached (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With the improvements to {{Weather box}}, this template is neither transcluded nor necessary anymore. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee ^welcome!" 20:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox drug/Atorvastatin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox drug/Atorvastatin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox drug/Lisinopril (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single use templates, which should be simply merged with the articles and deleted. if we need to keep the history for attribution, then move to a subpage and redirect. Frietjes (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom -- 70.24.250.235 (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per nom —PC-XT+ 08:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox mobile network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox mobile network (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only eight transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox telecommunications network}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with IB telecommunications network.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. --LT910001 (talk) 04:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:A1120 and B1120

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Template:A1120 and B1120 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose deletion Template:A1120 and B1120. This template has very few merits. We don’t need to be creating templates for settlements on every road in every country. There are road articles which include wikified links to settlements. This information isn't quite suited to a navigation template, as the articles included aren't sufficiently numerous. Of the five primary navbox guidelines, this one only fits #2 well and #1 marginally. Chronopher (talk) 16:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronopher: - Please read WP:TFD & how to do set it up correctly, Thanks -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteThere might be a case for this navbox if there was scope for more articles, but unless there are plans a foot for a dozen or so New Towns on these roads it will not expand. the Navbox is not needed to cross-linking so few pages. The settlements can be linked to the road on each article and vice versa.Billhob (talk) 16:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It does not cover a single topic and is just more transport cruft.--Charles (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteAll these towns and villages have already been listed on the A1120 road article making the template unnecessary and just a replica of the navigation wiki links on that page. The settlements on the template for the B1120 road are also linked on that page.Dennisbluie (talk) 21:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note I think there is also a case for the article on the B1120 road to be deleted or merged into the B roads in Zone 8 as there is nothing notable about the road.Dennisbluie (talk) 21:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Dennisbluie point above, The only thing of note to say about the B1120 road is where it goes to.Chronopher (talk) 22:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cannot see the point to this template when all the links to the towns and villages are already listed in Template:Suffolk and in List of civil parishes in Suffolk. The settlements are also listed on the road articles aswell.Demax (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant —PC-XT+ 19:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete B1120 should also be deleted. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 21:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All listed in Template:Suffolk so pretty much useless. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

State X cities and mayors of Y population

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alaska cities and mayors of 30,000 population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Maryland cities and mayors of 50,000 population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There are a few dozen states that have a sufficient number of cities with more than 100,000 in population to make these templates meaningful. As a group they have endured a deletion that was overturned and a second one that closed as no consensus. However, if we start adding all kinds of arbitrarily defined related templates for smaller population thresholds, we are likely to have them all be deleted. Thus, I propose that we get rid of these two templates that will muddle the water for the whole batch.TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support I just saw one of these added to Frederick, Maryland and it really confused me. I don't see these serving a really good purpose, at least not with the current threshold. Though it might be worth noting there really isn't that many cities in Maryland with over 50,000 people let alone 100,000. Zell Faze (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete, let's keep the threshold at 100,000. Frietjes (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – as for the other template; from an Alaskan perspective, this would make sense if it were to also include borough mayors. Then again, that's the sort of thinking outside the box which tends to be highly discouraged on Wikipedia. Regardless, with or without the inclusion of borough mayors, there's a distinct lack of meaningful links between articles. The other problem I see is that this attempts to impose a Wikipedian way of thinking on reality, seeing as how I'm viewing party designations next to the names, yet all municipal offices in Alaska are strictly defined as nonpartisan offices. To boot, it misidentifies Dan Sullivan as a Democrat. I'm not buying a numerical threshold as a valid argument. Variations of that argument go far in explaining the general discouragement in writing about what's notable about local areas, including Alaska. Correspondingly, coverage of Alaska has been heavily skewed towards cut-and-pasted "official disinformation". My favorite: Tuntutuliak Airport, described as being "located one nautical mile (1.85 km) south of the central business district of Tuntutuliak" Um, yeah, right. That sort of clueless garbage is repeated in scores of articles, both about airports and about other subjects. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Frietjes. --LT910001 (talk) 04:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Athletics infoboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox School athletics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (Only 30 transcriptions)

Template:Infobox university athletics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (Only seven transcriptions; undocumented)

Template:Infobox NAIA college athletics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (~~Only two transcriptions~~ orpahaned; undocumented)

Redundant to {{Infobox college athletics}} (Transclusion count: 504) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the "common" template should use a generic name, not "college", as that denotes different things to different people. {{Infobox school athletics}} would be a better title (though it still sports the problematic "athletics" word (these are not just track-and-field templates, it's being used in the North American manner to mean sports) -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 02:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as redundant and lesser.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Washington (state) elections, 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Washington (state) elections, 2012 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{ElectionsWA}}. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 10:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment {{ElectionsWA}} is a horrid name, perhaps it should be {{ElectionsWA-US}} per Western Australia also being WA and having elections. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 04:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge after the destination template has been renamed. --LT910001 (talk) 04:44, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.