Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 4

December 4

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nomination Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox unbiseptium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Unused, article was deleted months ago [1]. As it is not maintained, information could be wrong or outdated. Could have been in this earlier set of deletions: TfD#Infobox elements 121, 124, 126. DePiep (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Double sharp (talk) 15:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and related discussion —PC-XT+ 02:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Chinese periodic tables

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Periodic table (simplified Chinese) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Periodic table (simplified Chinese, legend) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Periodic table (traditional Chinese) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Periodic table (traditional Chinese, legend) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Unused, barely functional and unnecessary. Unused in that they have no transclusions - lots of links due to navigation templates but no actual uses. Barely functional as there are no links, so they're only useful to someone who already knows the Chinese characters, with formatting problems due to everything being tagged as Chinese not just the characters. And unnecessary as this is not the Chinese WP; anyone who wants to read a periodic table in Chinese (or any other language) can use the iw links on e.g. Template:Periodic table. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per prior consensusPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lil Kim sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates too few articles, which are easily navigated. —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:33, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.