Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 October 7
October 7
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Useless template. The reality is that, unlike (say) an album cover, there is no "standard" use of a non-free film screenshot. Every screenshot will require a separate rationale. The "purpose of use" which this template uses is useless, and would be challenged in any thorough review. J Milburn (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- As creator of the template: No objection. I created this following a request to amend protected templates by the experienced editor Sfan00 IMG at Template talk:Non-free video cover, but perhaps I took it on myself to create unnecessary media-specific NFU rationale templates. This one is currently transcluded on 35 pages, so those will need to be edited if the template is deleted rather than redirected. Moreover, the widely-used Template:Non-free film screenshot links to it, but presumably that link can easily be changed to Template:Non-free use rationale. – Fayenatic London 15:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Doesn't futher enhance navigation since only 2 distinct articles exist. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. They might become notable enough at some point to have this, but it's just two links (both to the same page) right now, there's no need. It might be worth userfying if someone wants to do that, but definitely not mainspace-worthy. Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 19:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as premature/useless for navigation —PC-XT+ 08:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Unused NSH002 (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.