Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 February 20

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 19 February 21 >

February 20

edit

Template:Star Trek: Enterprise novels

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I merged all of the related content to List of Star Trek: Enterprise novels, leaving this template devoid of its purpose in navigation between articles. Izno (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Urban Book Circle

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not often at Tfd, but I believe WP:EXISTING applies here, in the sense that the main article Urban Book Circle has just been deleted as non-notable at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Book Circle. Category:Urban Book Circle appears to be on its way to deletion as non-defining, as well, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_February_5#Category:Urban_Book_Circle. All were created by the same editor, in what seems to me to be an attempt to use Wikipedia as a platform to help promote a non-notable (at this time) business venture owned by one Djuradj Vujcic, whose bio article, also created by the same editor, is now also at Afd.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Morgan State Bears bowl game navbox

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. It only links to two articles, including the main one. One link is a redirect. We don't need a template to link two articles. It's not transcluded in either article. [1] —PC-XT+ 08:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Smart cities

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete both. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 05:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pages like Bhopal already have a number of navboxes. Adding navboxes for particular characteristics the city has is unnecessary (this is a bit like WP:DNWAUC but with template). DexDor (talk) 07:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 2nd template added. DexDor (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urghh that's even worse. DexDor (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noticed that the Template:Smart cities has been put up of deletion.

Recently I had created the Template:Cities in India to be or developed as Smart Cities without noticing that a similar Template:Smart cities was already existing (although it was incomplete at that time). My template is complete in full sense and I have already inserted it in almost 40% of the pages mentioned in the template, on the other hand Template:Smart cities in not inserted on any city pages mentioned in it.

You gave example of Bhopal, asserting that it has got too many templates, but I want to tell you that nor all the million plus urban agglomerations in India are included in the Smart Cities Mission (eg. Bengaluru/Bangalore) neither all the cities to be developed as smart cities are million plus agglomerations (eg. Pasighat). Thus, I think it is okay that both the templates are present on that page.

Why the Template:Smart cities should be deleted instead of Template:Cities in India to be or developed as Smart Cities:

  • The template in not present on the pages of the cities to be developed as smart cities.
  • After completing the list of qualified cities it once again list them in phase-wise manner which means all the hundred cities will be listed again in three rows (phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3), which is pointless!
  • Most of the cities have no internal wiki link or have disambiguation links.
  • Details are wrong. The title of the template mentions "Proposed smart cities in India - Phase 1 (98 cities)" but only 20 cities have been qualified for phase 1 [2] not all. The last two rows tries to list them the first phase in haphazard manner!

Wiki.Gunjan (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SDSU College of Professional Studies Fine Arts

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXISTING -- Navigates in two articles (San Diego State University College of Professional Studies & Fine Arts & Sycuan Institute on Tribal Gaming). Hard to navigate. The Sycuan link has been merged into Template:San Diego State University and has been removed from articles... making this template orphaned. 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 05:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SDSU College of Arts & Letters

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXISTING -- Navigates in five articles (three of which were merged). Hard to navigate. The links have been been merged into Template:San Diego State University and has been removed from articles... making this template orphaned. 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 05:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_February_20&oldid=708028591"