Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 24

< November 23	November 25 >

November 24

Template:Surgeries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to a list article Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Surgeries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template not useful for navigation - it is a list of completely different operations. I propose either deletion or moving to a list. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

make it into a list article, way to big to be useful as a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Victoria's Secret Fashion Show model navboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1995-1999VSFashion Show (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2000-2009VSFashion Show (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2010-2019VSFashion Show (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:PERFNAV. An appearance in a fashion show is nothing more than a performance. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is like the Super Bowl of Modelling.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is seen as the top prize in modelling CDevilqueen (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2016 (GMT)
Comment Neither of these "keeps" address the issue. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete, better to use a category and standard in-article linking. Frietjes (talk) 17:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful navigation tool. Moreover, as previous posters stated, this is one of the highest career achievements in modeling. That means this is not just a performance, but a career award/honor within a professional field, for which there are similar templates, such as Template:Nobel Prize in Physics, which is obviously in a very different field, but even in the same field, it is comparable to Template:2000–09 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit. —Lowellian (reply) 00:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:H-1 aux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:H-1 aux (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN and the past precedents at WP:USRD/P. We just don't do navboxes like this for so few links, let alone just two. Imzadi 1979 → 19:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep, per WP:USRD/STDS#External links and WP:USRD/STDS#Auxiliary routes That and every interstate with an aux has a template like this. That and Template:I-77 aux has a staggering four links. Cards84664 (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- False, not everyone has such a box, and you've misread the guidance in those sections. External links does not mention navboxes at all, and Auxiliary routes says that "editors may place the 3dI template..." (emphasis added) or "place it at the bottom of the article below all content", but it does not say we require such a navbox. As for this box, this should actually be CSD-ed based on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 12#Various auxiliary Interstate templates, a discussion that lead to the deletion of a previous navbox for this same topic under a different name, along with four others based on the precedent set at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 4#Template:I-83 aux and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 October 29#Template:I-45 aux and continued at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 11#Template:I-16 aux and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 13#Template:I-66 aux. In all ten cases, navboxes with small numbers of links were deleted, however based on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 19#Interstate navboxes with three links, it appears that the minimum was set at three links, while this only has two. Imzadi 1979 → 21:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I did some research, now it has four. Cards84664 (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - No, it still has just two; you've simply added redirect to obscure the fact that this box still only navigates to just two articles. Imzadi 1979 → 23:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have clinched this highway and it is an important part of my childhood. With that said, you simply can't have a navbox with links to only two articles. I personally wouldn't mind a navbox of all four Hawaii Interstates, but I don't think there's precedent for that. -happy5214 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Apparently there's precedent to not have those. Either way, I wasn't proposing the creation of one. -happy 5214 23:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fred Gallo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fred Gallo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation. No article for navbox subject. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete, mostly redlinks. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lucian Bratu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lucian Bratu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No active links. Provides no navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mihai Constantinescu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mihai Constantinescu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete, mostly redlinks. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dinu Cocea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dinu Cocea (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete, mostly redlinks. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Andrei Blaier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andrei Blaier (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation Rob Sinden (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete, but merge the list with Andrei Blaier before deleting. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chief Ministers of West Bengal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chief Ministers of West Bengal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Transcluded only once and redundant with Template:West Bengal Chief Ministers present. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, redundant (or merge with the article and delete). Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Media and entertainment companies of the Philippines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Media and entertainment companies of the Philippines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I'm the creator of this template and now I have realized that it should be broken down into separate templates because it has become bloated. Hollyckuhno (talk) 05:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, too large. Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PrSpam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 3 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PrSpam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Joplin Blasters roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joplin Blasters roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team folded, no current roster. oknazevad (talk) 02:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, defunct. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).