Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 25
November 25
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Ajinomoto (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Navbox or products for a company, which only has one bluelink that is not the company itself (or a redirect to it). DMacks (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, not useful. Frietjes (talk) 23:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navbox for only redlinked articles. ~ Rob13Talk 08:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, currently does no more than duplicate World_Games_1989#Titles. Frietjes (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused, redlinked articles only. ~ Rob13Talk 08:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until some articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article in the sidebar. ~ Rob13Talk 08:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Only one article for this navigational template ~ Rob13Talk 08:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, we can use standard linking until more articles are created. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 3 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navbox for entirely redlinked articles. ~ Rob13Talk 08:08, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navbox for entirely red-linked articles. ~ Rob13Talk 08:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Navboxes for entirely red-linked articles. Unused as well. ~ Rob13Talk 08:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Useless topic-specific version of "this section needs expansion" template. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 04:31, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 3 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Template:ME-fact (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).