Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 21

November 21

edit

Record label templates revisited

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep KPOP labes and delete the rest.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A long standing consensus and precedent says to exclude record label rosters and catalogues from related navboxes. See also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates and ongoing Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 20#Template:Monstercat. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 17:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. Both songs mentioned are covers anyway! --woodensuperman 16:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Had a lot of entries which failed WP:FILMNAV, also a list of theatre shows he has been in - also not suitable for a navbox. Now these have been trimmed there is nothing left to navigate. --woodensuperman 15:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and almost entirely links to the PT wikipedia. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-English template WOSlinker (talk) 10:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template with inaccuracies. Repetition of similar templates such as Template:People of Cao Wei and Template:People of the end of Han dynasty. LDS contact me 06:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).