Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 14

October 14

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Primefac (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2000 Summer Olympics schedule templates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. Subst and delete. Then delete Category:2000 Summer Olympics schedule templates, which would then be empty. DH85868993 (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone is creating an infobox for one person rather than using the generic ones that already would do the job. Sitush (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 22. Primefac (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, there is more detail about the matches in Delhi Daredevils in 2018 and this template has no information. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates. Subst and delete. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:10, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Subst at Cycling at the 2018 Asian Games and delete. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:07, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template and currently unused. Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:58, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Super Sentai templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While there's many Sentai templates that serve a navigational purpose to the Super Sentai/Power Rangers, that's just not the case with these in particular. Ohranger's in particular is of little use since it only contains links to two separate character articles plus a link to the American adaptation, while the latter four are loaded with both redirects and links to the same articles. The superfluous links gives the illusion that these templates are more useful than they actually are. I say delete or redirect.—Mythdon (talkcontribs) 07:23, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:06, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, outdated and unneeded. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 05:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:07, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by Module:Language/data/ISO 639 name to code. Not used. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 05:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Thank you for the explanation User:Erutuon — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by Module:Language/data/iana languages ,Module:Language/data/ISO 639-2 and Module:Language/data/ISO 639-3. Not used. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 05:34, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).