Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 16

< September 15	September 17 >

September 16

Template:Wizarding World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 23. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 18:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wizarding_World (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Crowded enz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Crowded enz (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navigational template is mostly links for two different bands, Crowded House and Split Enz, that only share three band members in common and there is no article for Crowded enz. There are already navigational templates for the two bands, Template:Crowded House and Template:Split Enz, and making this template unnecessary and redundant. Aspects (talk) 03:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It is difficult to see what was trying to be achieved here. It's a mess. I'm surprised it has survived so long. --wooden superman 13:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Crowded House/Templates explains it's intended use. It's not a navbox for the bands, as they already have their own. It's a navbox for articles related to the bands, which apparently overlap. Given that rationale, one wouldn't expect an article to exist. I would want this addressed in the reason for deletion before weighing in. --Bsherr (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's not really what navboxes are for. And per WP:NAVBOX an article should exist on the topic of a navbox. Let {{Crowded House}}, {{Split Enz}}, {{Neil Finn}}, etc, do the work and delete this horrible useless jumble. --wooden superman 15:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking as opposed to merging or transcluding into the other two templates. Your points are well-taken as to transcluding it directly into an article, and indeed it isn't right now. --Bsherr (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 13:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 01:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox FIA Formula 2 (2017)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox FIA Formula Two Championship race report. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox FIA Formula 2 (2017) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox FIA Formula Two Championship race report (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox FIA Formula 2 (2017) with Template:Infobox FIA Formula Two Championship race report.
These templates are almost identical. Shouldn't be too difficult to merge them. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree I see no need to have both. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 01:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).